From: Susan Hansen

Sent: Wed Jul 19 08:35:26 2017

To: DECONCINI Nina

Subject: RE: Response to Molalla yet?b Importance: Normal

 

The stalling and excuses and failure to proceed with enforcement is totally beyond belief. Susan

 

 

-----Original Message-----

From: nina.deconcini@state.or.us

Sent: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:16:01 +0000

To: foxglovefarm@inbox.com

Subject: RE: Response to Molalla yet?

 

We are in discussions about setting up a time to meet about the MAO. With everyone’s schedules, it is taking some time. I don’t know exactly when it will occur, but we are working on it. There has been no communication in written form shared since the July 5th meeting.

From: Susan Hansen [mailto:foxglovefarm@inbox.com]

Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 8:10 AM

To: DECONCINI Nina <nina.deconcini@state.or.us>

Subject: RE: Response to Molalla yet?

So when you say "discussions" how is that accomplished - via email? On the phone? Again, the notes I read said prompt response, what kind of response are you planning and has ANY COMMUNICATION IN WRITTEN FORM happened since the July 5 meeting? Susan

-----Original Message-----

From: nina.deconcini@state.or.us

Sent: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:48:32 +0000

To: foxglovefarm@inbox.com

Subject: RE: Response to Molalla yet?

Susan,

We are still in the process of the MAO discussions with the City. We have not sent any response.

Nina

From: Susan Hansen [mailto:foxglovefarm@inbox.com]

Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 6:39 PM

To: DECONCINI Nina <nina.deconcini@state.or.us>

Subject: Response to Molalla yet?

Dear Nina,

 

Did DEQ write any response yet to Molalla after the July 5 meeting and/or about Molalla's MAO proposal? One of the notes I obtained said DEQ need to make a prompt response after that July 5 meeting.

 

Susan Hansen

Bear Creek Recovery