From: Gerald Fisher

Sent: Mon Jun 10 15:47:05 2019

To: Dan Zinder

Cc: Alice Cannon

Subject: RE: Question: Aquatic Center Partition

Importance: Normal

Hi Dan,

No plan required. When the sell the properties, that do not belong to the pool district, to a non-school district individual then the public overlay comes off (they will have to remove as part of their application) and then we will see what they want to develop. The underlying zone is residential. Thanks.

Regards,

Gerald Fisher, P.E. | Public Works Director

City of Molalla

117 N Molalla Ave. | PO Box 248 |Molalla, OR 97038

Office: 503.829.6855 | Direct: 503.759.0218

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.

From: Dan Zinder <dzinder@cityofmolalla.com>

Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 1:18 PM

To: Gerald Fisher <gfisher@cityofmolalla.com>; Alice Cannon <acannon@cityofmolalla.com>

Subject: Question: Aquatic Center Partition

Gerald,

The School District has not submitted a plan for future development, which the code wouldn’t require for PSP as there is no minimum lot size. Planning is not particularly interested in this but would the inclusion of such a plan desirable for public works?

Generally, this gets at a question of whether for the purposes of our findings we should accept in full the assertion by MRSD that there are no current plans for redeveloping the property.

Z