From: Kim Parducci

Sent: Tue Oct 18 16:31:14 2022

To: Sam Miller

Cc: R Quigley

Subject: Re: ITE Code

Importance: Normal

Hi Sam,

I think it makes sense to use one land use if everything falls within the description. You could use a land use like 821 - Shopping Plaza (40-150ksf) for something like this. I haven't had a chance to put much time into it to determine if that indeed would be the best one but it's definitely one I would look at if trying to come up with one that represents a mix of commercial uses on a site.

Kim

On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 3:09 PM Sam Miller <smiller@cityofmolalla.com> wrote:

Hi Ryan & Kim,

Looking for same advice on a new Mutli-Commercial (Grocery/Retail) development coming into Molalla (see attached site plan). The way City handle ITE codes and the TIA for Cascade Center Development was to have each individual development submit their own. Which made sense as the property was subdivided into lots. The proposed applicant is not looking to subdivide the property but keep as a whole. My question is, would it make sense to have the development under one ITE code that would fit the land use and account for one TIA, rather than treat each development as a separate land use. Which would require an updated TIA for each land use. What is the best practice on dealing with larger developments that have Multiple land use within one development that are not subdivided? Any advice would be appreciated.

Ryan, let me know if a task order would be more appropriate when asking for information like this.

Regards,

Sam Miller | Sr. Engineer Tech.

City of Molalla

315 Kennel Ave. | PO Box 248 | Molalla, OR 97038

T : 503-759-0217 | E: smiller@cityofmolalla.com

--

KIMBERLY PARDUCCI, PE PTOE

SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING

Medford, Oregon 97504 | (541) 941-4148 Cell

Kim.parducci@gmail.com | Oregon DBE/WBE/ESB Certified: No. 5726