Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Electric Vehicle Rebate 2019
Table of Contents
Introduction 3
Overview 4
Statement of need 6
Rules affected, authorities, supporting documents 9
Fee Analysis 12
Statement of fiscal and economic impact 13
Federal relationship 18
Land use 20
Stakeholder and public involvement 24
Public notice and hearings 26
Draft Rules - With Edits Highlighted 30
Draft Rules – With Edits Incorporated 31
Supporting documents 32
Accessibility Information
|
You may review copies of all documents referenced in this announcement at:
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
700 NE Multnomah St., Ste. 600
Portland, OR, 97232
To schedule a review of all websites and documents referenced in this announcement, call Rachel Sakata, DEQ – Headquarters, 503-229-5659 (800-452-4011, ext. 5622 toll-free in Oregon).
Please notify DEQ of any special physical or language accommodations or if you need information in large print, Braille or another format. To make these arrangements, contact DEQ, Portland, at 503-229-5696 or call toll-free in Oregon at 1-800-452-4011, ext. 5696; fax to 503-229-6762; or email to deqinfo@deq.state.or.us . Hearing impaired persons may call 711.
Introduction
|
DEQ invites public input on proposed permanent rule amendments to chapter 340 of the Oregon Administrative Rules.
Background
In May 2018, The Environmental Quality Commission (EQC) adopted rules to implement a zero-emission vehicle rebate program in Oregon. The program, contains two elements – one element provides rebates for the purchase or lease of eligible new zero-emission vehicles (referred to as standard rebates) if all program requirements are met. The second element, called the Charge Ahead rebate, provides rebates for the purchase or lease of new or used zero-emission vehicles if the purchaser is from a low or moderate-income household.
DEQ proposal
DEQ is proposing to amend the zero-emission vehicle rebate program by changing the definitions in OAR 340-270-0030 for rebate-eligible light duty zero emission vehicles and plug in hybrid electric vehicles to include vehicles with at least three wheels. Currently light duty zero emission vehicles and plug in hybrid electric vehicles are defined as vehicles with at least four wheels. The proposed change would broaden the range of eligible vehicles to include those with three wheels.
Request for Other Options
|
During the public comment period, DEQ asks for public comment on whether there are other options for achieving the rules’ substantive goals while reducing the rules’ negative economic impact, if any, on business.
Overview
|
Brief summary of fiscal impact
Short summary
DEQ recommends the EQC approve the proposed rule amendment to include three wheeled light duty zero emission vehicles and plug in hybrid electric vehicles in the Zero-Emission and Electric Vehicle Rebate program (EV Rebate Program).
In May 2018, The Environmental Quality Commission (EQC) adopted rules to implement a zero-emission vehicle rebate program in Oregon. The program, contains two elements – one element provides rebates for the purchase or lease of eligible new zero-emission vehicles (referred to as standard rebates) if all program requirements are met. The second element, called the Charge Ahead rebate, provides rebates for the purchase or lease of new or used zero-emission vehicles if the purchaser is from a low or moderate-income household.
DEQ is proposing to amend the zero-emission vehicle rebate program by changing the definitions in OAR 340-270-0030 for rebate-eligible light duty zero emission vehicles and plug in hybrid electric vehicles to include vehicles with at least three wheels. Currently light duty zero emission vehicles and plug in hybrid electric vehicles are defined as vehicles with at least four wheels. The proposed change would broaden the range of eligible vehicles to include those with three wheels.
Brief history
On August 18, 2017, Oregon Governor Kate Brown signed House Bill 2017 which, in addition to making many other transportation investments, created a program to provide rebates to Oregonians who meet all program requirements and purchase certain types of zero-emission vehicles, including eligible plug-in hybrid zero-emission vehicles, and other eligible zero-emissions vehicles. This program was designed by the Oregon Legislature to encourage higher adoption of zero-emission vehicles to reduce air pollution and progress the state towards its greenhouse gas reduction goals.
In May 2018, The Environmental Quality Commission (EQC) adopted rules to implement a zero-emission vehicle rebate program in Oregon. These rules as adopted defined rebate-eligible light duty zero emission vehicles and plug in hybrid electric vehicles as vehicles with at least four wheels. This language inadvertently prevents participants from applying for rebates for three wheeled zero-emission vehicles. DEQ is proposing to change the definition of rebate-eligible light duty zero emission vehicles and plug in hybrid electric vehicles as those with at least three wheels to make the EV Rebate Program more inclusive of all eligible vehicle types, expand options for businesses and consumers, and ensure equitable application of the EV Rebate Program to all eligible vehicles. This change is also consistent with House Bill 2017, which does not specify the number of wheels in the definitions of light duty zero emission vehicles and plug in hybrid electric vehicles.
Regulated parties
DEQ is preparing to implement the program established by the May 2018 rules. There are no other regulated parties, because the proposed rules do not impose any requirements on parties who do not wish to participate in the program. Other parties who choose to participate in the program may include:
• Automobile dealers that sell or lease new and or used zero-emission vehicles. Such dealers may be affected by the rules if they choose to apply the rebate to the purchase at the point of sale, by allowing purchasers to assign their rebates to the dealers or by otherwise assisting purchasers in obtaining rebates. Further, dealers could be affected by increased zero-emission vehicle sales.
• Automobile manufacturers, such as those that manufacture zero-emission vehicles eligible for rebates. Manufacturers may be affected by the rules if they allowed purchasers to assign their rebates or otherwise assist purchasers in obtaining rebates. Further, dealers could be affected by increased zero-emission vehicle sales.
• Zero-emission vehicle purchasers such as Oregon residents who purchase or lease zero-emission vehicles that qualify for rebates under the program.
Request for other options
During the public comment period, DEQ requests public comment on whether to consider other options for including three wheeled vehicles in the Zero-Emission and Electric Vehicle Rebate program.
Procedural Summary
|
More information
Information about this rulemaking is on this rulemaking’s web page: Electric Vehicle Rebate 2019
Public Hearings
DEQ plans to hold one public hearing. Anyone can attend a hearing in person, or by webinar or teleconference.
Information about the public hearing:
• Date
• Start time
• Street address
• Room
• City
• Teleconference phone number: 888-278-0296
• Participant code: (0296 number) = 8040259
• Webinar link:
◦ (0296 number) = 888-278-0296 webinar link
• Instructions on how to join webinar or teleconference: Webinar/teleconference instructions
How to comment on this rulemaking proposal
DEQ is asking for public comment on the proposed rules. Anyone can submit comments and questions about this rulemaking. A person can submit comments through an online web page, by regular mail or at the public hearing.
Comment deadline
DEQ will only consider comments on the proposed rules that DEQ receives by 4 p.m., on December 8, 2018.
Submit comment online
Electric Vehicle Rebate 2019 Comment Page (Note that this link will not be live until the day DEQ publishes notice to the public):
Note for public university students:
ORS 192.345(29) allows Oregon public university and OHSU students to protect their university email addresses from disclosure under Oregon’s public records law. If you are an Oregon public university or OHSU student you may omit your email address when you complete the online form to submit a comment.
By mail
Oregon DEQ
Attn: Rachel Sakata
700 NE Multnomah St., Room 600
Portland, OR 97232-4100
At hearing
DATE/MONTH
You can also participate in the hearing through a teleconference or webinar.
Teleconference call-in number: 888-278-0296
Participant ID: 8040259
Webinar link (webinar has no audio, you must listen on the teleconference): 888-278-0296 webinar link
How to join the teleconference or webinar: Teleconference and Webinar instructions
Sign up for rulemaking notices
Get email or text updates about this rulemaking by signing up through this link:
Electric Vehicle Rebate 2019 Rulemaking Email List;
or on the rulemaking web site: Electric Vehicle Rebate 2019 rulemaking web page.
Get email or text updates about other, future DEQ rulemaking by signing up through this link: DEQ Email Notice List.
What will happen next?
DEQ will include a written response to comments in a staff report DEQ will submit to the Environmental Quality Commission. DEQ may modify the rule proposal based on the comments.
Present proposal to the EQC
Proposed rules only become effective if the Environmental Quality Commission adopts them. DEQ plans to present the proposed rules to the commission for a decision at its January 2019 meeting.
Statement of need ORS 183.335(b)(C) |
What need would the proposed rule address?
The proposed rule would address the need for a definition of rebate-eligible light duty zero emission vehicles and plug in hybrid electric vehicles that include three wheeled vehicles.
How would the proposed rule address the need?
The proposed rule would change the definition of rebate-eligible light duty zero emission vehicles and plug in hybrid electric vehicles from those with “at least four wheels” to those with “at least three wheels”. This will make the EV Rebate Program more inclusive of all eligible vehicle types, expand options for businesses and consumers, and ensure equitable application of the EV Rebate Program to all eligible vehicles. This change is also consistent with House Bill 2017, which does not specify the number of wheels in the definitions of light duty zero emission vehicles and plug in hybrid electric vehicles.
How will DEQ know the rule addressed the need?
DEQ will know the need has been addressed when applicants are able to apply for a rebate for three wheeled vehicles.
Rules affected, authorities, supporting documents
|
Lead division
Air Quality Division
Program or activity
Air Quality Planning
Chapter 340 action
Rules Amended – OAR 340 | ||||
OAR | 340 | 270 | 0030 | (6)(c), (12) (i) |
Statutory Authority - ORS | ||||
468.020 | 468.065 | 2017 Or. Law Ch. 750 Sec. 148-157 | ||
Statutes Implemented - ORS | ||||
2017 Or. Law Ch. 750 Sec. 148-157 | ||||
Legislation
House Bill 2017 (2017)
Documents relied on for rulemaking
Document title | Document location |
House Bill 2017 (2017) | https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2017R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/HB2017/Enrolled |
California Code of Regulations, 1962.1 and 1962.2 | https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/zevprog/zevregs/1962.1_Clean.pdf
https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/zevprog/zevregs/1962.2_Clean.pdf |
40 CFR 600.116-12, Special Procedures Related to Electric Vehicles and Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles | https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/CFR-2012-title40-vol31/CFR-2012-title40-vol31-sec600-116-12 |
Fee Analysis
|
This rulemaking does not involve fees.
Statement of fiscal and economic impact
|
Fiscal and Economic Impact
TEXT
Statement of Cost of Compliance
State agencies
Separately describe the impact on:
Local governments
Public
Large businesses - businesses with more than 50 employees
Small businesses – businesses with 50 or fewer employees
a. Estimated number of small businesses and types of businesses and industries with small businesses subject to proposed rule.
EXAMPLE: Assuming all manufacturers in the lowest fee tier are small businesses, these proposed rules could affect 109 small businesses.
EXAMPLE: Using recent employment data, DEQ compared the 64 businesses registered with the Clean Fuels Program to current employment data to determine how many people the business employs. Thirty-eight are small businesses. Of those 38, two are Oregon producers of fuels, nine are small importers of finished fuels and 24 are large importers.
b. Projected reporting, recordkeeping and other administrative activities, including costs of professional services, required for small businesses to comply with the proposed rule.
c. Projected equipment, supplies, labor and increased administration required for small businesses to comply with the proposed rule.
d. Describe how DEQ involved small businesses in developing this proposed rule.
Documents relied on for fiscal and economic impact
Document title | Document location |
|
|
TEXT | Employment Department 875 Union Street NE Salem OR 97311 TEXT |
Advisory committee fiscal review
The requirement to discuss an advisory committee in this section is separate from and in addition to discussing the advisory committee in the Stakeholder Involvement section. The question to be addressed here is whether an advisory committee reviewed the fiscal impact statement.
DEQ appointed an advisory committee.
As ORS 183.33 requires, DEQ asked for the committee’s recommendations on:
• Whether the proposed rules would have a fiscal impact,
• The extent of the impact, and
• Whether the proposed rules would have a significant adverse impact on small businesses; if so, then how DEQ can comply with ORS 183.540 reduce that impact.
The committee reviewed the draft fiscal and economic impact statement and
Choose one:
-documented its recommendations in the (e
- its findings are stated in the approved minutes dated DATE.
The committee The committee determined the proposed rules would/would not have a significant adverse impact on small businesses in Oregon.
Only if the fiscal impact statement or the advisory committee determined there would be a significant adverse impact on small business, include the following:
As ORS 183.333 and 183.540 require, the committee considered how DEQ could reduce the rules’ fiscal impact on small business by:
• Establishing differing compliance or reporting requirements or time tables for small business;
• Clarifying, consolidating or simplifying the compliance and reporting requirements under the rule for small business;
• Utilizing objective criteria for standards;
• Exempting small businesses from any or all requirements of the rule; or
• Otherwise establishing less intrusive or less costly alternatives applicable to small business.
DEQ did not appoint an advisory committee. State why DEQ did not convene an advisory committee.
If DEQ did not appoint an advisory committee and DEQ found there would be a significant adverse fiscal impact on small businesses, include the following:
DEQ determined the rules would have a significant adverse impact on small businesses. As ORS 183.540 requires, DEQ considered how to reduce that impact by:
• Establishing differing compliance or reporting requirements or time tables for small business;
• Clarifying, consolidating or simplifying the compliance and reporting requirements under the rule for small business;
• Utilizing objective criteria for standards;
• Exempting small businesses from any or all requirements of the rule; or
• Otherwise establishing less intrusive or less costly alternatives applicable to small business.
Explain the outcome of DEQ’s review of these questions.
Housing cost
As ORS 183.534 requires, DEQ evaluated whether the proposed rules would have an effect on the development cost of a 6,000-square-foot parcel and construction of a 1,200-square-foot detached, single-family dwelling on that parcel. DEQ determined the proposed rules
Choose one, delete the other:
would have no effect on the development costs because explain why.
or
would/could affect the development costs by explain why and how much, if possible, the rules raise these costs.
Federal relationship |
Relationship to federal requirements
183.332 Policy statement; conformity of state rules with equivalent federal laws and rules. It is the policy of this state that agencies shall seek to retain and promote the unique identity of Oregon by considering local conditions when an agency adopts policies and rules. However, since there are many federal laws and regulations that apply to activities that are also regulated by the state, it is also the policy of this state that agencies attempt to adopt rules that correspond with equivalent federal laws and rules unless:
(1) There is specific statutory direction to the agency that authorizes the adoption of the rule;
(2) A federal waiver has been granted that authorizes the adoption of the rule;
(3) Local or special conditions exist in this state that warrant a different rule;
(4) The state rule has the effect of clarifying the federal rules, standards, procedures or requirements;
(5) The state rule achieves the goals of the federal and state law with the least impact on public and private resources; or
(6) There is no corresponding federal regulation. [1997 c.602 §2]
ORS 183.332, 468A.327 and OAR 340-011-0029 require DEQ to attempt to adopt rules that correspond with existing equivalent federal laws and rules unless there are reasons not to do so.
The proposed rules would adopt federal requirements.
The proposed rules are not different from or in addition to federal requirements
The proposed rules add requirements additional to those in federal requirements.
Explain the public health, environmental, scientific, economic, technological, administrative (statutory categories) or other reasons DEQ is imposing requirements that differ from or are in addition to, related federal requirements.
Explain the public health, environmental, scientific, economic, technological, administrative (statutory categories) or other reasons DEQ is imposing requirements that are in addition to related federal requirements.
What alternatives did DEQ consider if any?
If the proposed rules differ from or impose additional requirements above the federal requirements, include this section; otherwise delete it:
Land use ORS 197.180; OAR 340-018-0070; 660-030-0005, 660-030-0075 Land Use |
There is a link to DEQ’s State Agency Coordination program on the Rule Resources section of the rulemaking SharePoint page and a copy of that document is stored in the Rulemaking Resources folder, under “land use.”
If DEQ determines a new or amended rule does affect land use DEQ must provide notice of the rule to the Department of Land Conservation and Development and anyone on the land use mailing list. DEQ accomplishes this by emailing a copy of this notice to DLCD contact person that includes:
(a) Evidence that the rule or program is a land use program; or
(b) Evidence that the rule or program affects land use and is covered under the Department's certified State Agency Coordination Program; or
(c) Evidence that the rule or program is a land use program including an explanation of how goal compliance and plan compatibility will be assured.
The State of Oregon has adopted statewide land use planning goals that are authorized under ORS 197.180 and listed in OAR 660-015-0000-0010. There are 19 such goals. The other aspect of statewide coordination in planning is that local entities must adopt comprehensive land use and development plans, called “acknowledged comprehensive plans.” State agencies must coordinate their efforts with the statewide goals and local comprehensive plans.
ORS 197.180 and OAR 340-018-0070 require DEQ to determine whether a new or amended rule affects land use as described in ORS 197.180. If so, DEQ must make certain determinations.
DEQ adopted a State Agency Coordination (SAC) plan that describes which of DEQ’s rules and programs affect land use or constitute a land-use program, and how DEQ will comply with state land-use goals and ensure compatibility with local comprehensive plans. Rules that affect land use are termed a “land use program” under the controlling statutes.
A rule or program affects land use if:
• The statewide land use planning goals specifically refer to the rule or program, or
• The rule or program is reasonably expected to have significant effects on:
◦ Resources, objectives or areas identified in the statewide planning goals, or
◦ Present or future land uses identified in acknowledged comprehensive plans
If a proposed new or amended rule does not specifically fall within the above requirements, it could still be considered to affect land use. If there is any question on this, consult DOJ.
If a proposed new or amended rule does affect land use, DEQ must explain how it will comply with state wide goals and ensure compatibility with local comprehensive plans. One way DEQ can meet this requirement is by showing the procedures in DEQ’s SAC adequately address the land-use aspect of the proposed rules. If the SAC does not address the proposed rules, DEQ must explain how it will otherwise meet this requirement.
Through the SAC and OAR 340-018-0030, DEQ determined its programs directly relate to the following the statewide goals:
• Goal 5 – Open Spaces
• Goal 6 – Air, Water and Land Resources Quality
• Goal 11 – Public Facilities and Services
• Goal 16 – Estuarine Resources
• Goal 19 – Ocean Resources
DEQ also determined three statewide goals specifically reference DEQ programs:
• Nonpoint source discharge water quality program – Goal 16
• Water quality and sewage disposal systems – Goal 16
• Water quality permits and oil spill regulations – Goal 19
DEQ adopted findings, through OAR 340-018-0030, that the following programs do have a significant effect on land use:
Department of Environmental Quality State Agency Coordination Program OAR 340-018-0030 |
Programs Determined to Have Significant Effect on Land Use |
(1) Air Quality Division |
(a) Approval of Noise Impact Boundaries for Motor Racing Facilities; |
(b) Approval of Airport Noise Abatement Program and Noise Impact Boundaries; |
(c) Approval of Notice of Construction; |
(d) Issuance of Air Contaminant Discharge Permit; |
(e) Issuance of Indirect Source Construction Permit; |
(f) Approval of Parking and Traffic Circulation Plan. |
(g) Employee Commute Options. |
(2) Environmental Cleanup Division |
(a) Issuance of Environmental Hazard Notice |
(3) Hazardous and Solid Waste Division |
(a) Issuance of Solid Waste Disposal Permit; |
(b) Issuance of Waste Tire Storage Permit; and |
(c) Issuance of Hazardous Waste and PCB Storage, Treatment and Disposal Permit |
(4) Water Quality Division |
(a) Approval of Wastewater System and Facility Plans; |
(b) Approval of State Revolving Loan Application; |
(c) Issuance of Onsite Construction-Installation Permits, Alteration Permits, and Authorization Notices; |
(d) Issuance of NPDES and WPCF Permits; |
(e) Development of Water Quality Wetland Protection Criteria; |
(f) Requirement of an Implementation Plan to Meet Restrictions for Waste Load Allocations on Water Quality Limited Waterways (TMDLS); |
(g) Certification of Water Quality Standards for Federal Permits, Licenses; |
(h) Development of Action Plan for Declared Ground Water Management Area; |
(i) Development of Nonpoint Source Management Plan; |
(j) Development of Estuary Plans; |
(k) Development of Oil Spill Regulations |
Land-use considerations
In adopting new or amended rules, ORS 197.180 and OAR 340-018-0070 require DEQ to determine whether the proposed rules significantly affect land use. If so, DEQ must explain how the proposed rules comply with state wide land-use planning goals and local acknowledged comprehensive plans.
Under OAR 660-030-0005 and OAR 340 Division 18, DEQ considers that rules affect land use if:
• The statewide land use planning goals specifically refer to the rule or program, or
• The rule or program is reasonably expected to have significant effects on:
◦ Resources, objectives or areas identified in the statewide planning goals, or
◦ Present or future land uses identified in acknowledged comprehensive plans
DEQ determined whether the proposed rules involve programs or actions that affect land use by reviewing its Statewide Agency Coordination plan. The plan describes the programs that DEQ determined significantly affect land use. DEQ considers that its programs specifically relate to the following statewide goals:
Goal | Title |
5 | Open Spaces, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Natural Resources |
6 | Air, Water and Land Resources Quality |
9 | Ocean Resources |
11 | Public Facilities and Services |
16 | Estuarial Resources |
Statewide goals also specifically reference the following DEQ programs:
• Nonpoint source discharge water quality program – Goal 16
• Water quality and sewage disposal systems – Goal 16
• Water quality permits and oil spill regulations – Goal 19
Determination
DEQ determined that these proposed rules do not affect land use under OAR 340-018-0030 or DEQ’s State Agency Coordination Program.
DEQ determined that the following proposed rules (or all of the proposed rules) affect programs or activities that the DEQ State Agency Coordination Program considers a land-use program.
OAR 340-XXX-XXXX
OAR 340-XXX-XXXX
DEQ’s statewide goal compliance and local plan compatibility procedures adequately cover the proposed rules. TEXT
DEQ’s statewide goal compliance and local plan compatibility procedures do not cover the proposed rules.
DEQ will ensure these rules comply with statewide goals and are compatible with local plans by TEXT.
EQC Prior Involvement
|
DEQ did not present additional information specific to this proposed rule revision.
DEQ shared information about this rulemaking with the EQC
Choose one and delete the other options:
at a facilitated hearing on
through an informational item on the DATE EQC agenda
Advisory Committee ORS 183.333; 183.333(3) |
Background
DEQ did not convene an advisory committee because TEXT.
DEQ convened the COMMITTEE NAME advisory committee. The committee included representatives from (gmet times. The committee’s web page is located at: LINK TO COMMITTEE WEB PAGE.
The committee members were:
Rulemaking Name Advisory Committee | |
Name | Representing |
Meeting notifications
To notify people about the advisory committee’s activities, DEQ:
• Sent GovDelivery bulletins, a free e-mail subscription service, to the following lists:
• Rulemaking
•
•
• On DATES DEQ sent a one-time notice to subscribers to describe how to sign up for advisory committee meeting notices, and
• People who signed up for the advisory committee bulletin.
• Added advisory committee announcements to DEQ’s calendar of public meetings at DEQ Calendar.
• On DATES DEQ provided notice of meetings and links to committee information through postings on Facebook and Twitter.
Committee discussions
In addition to the recommendations described under the Statement of Fiscal and Economic Impact section above, the committee
Public Engagement
|
Public notice
DEQ provided notice of the proposed rulemaking and rulemaking hearing on Nov. 1, 2018 by:
• On Oct. 31, 2018 filing notice with the Oregon Secretary of State for publication in the November 2018 Oregon Bulletin;
• Notifying the EPA by mail;
• Posting the Notice, Invitation to Comment and Draft Rules on the web page for this rulemaking, located at: Electric Vehicle Rebate 2019;
• Emailing NUMBER OF PARTIES interested parties on the following DEQ lists through GovDelivery:
• Rulemaking
• TOPIC
• TOPIC
• stakeholders on the
• Emailing the following key legislators required under ORS 183.335:
•
•
•
• Emailing advisory committee members,
• Postings on Twitter and Facebook
• Posting on the DEQ event calendar: DEQ Calendar
Public Comment
|
How to comment on this rulemaking proposal
DEQ is asking for public comment on the proposed rules. Anyone can submit comments and questions about this rulemaking. A person can submit comments through an online web page, by regular mail or at the public hearing.
Comment deadline
DEQ will only consider comments on the proposed rules that DEQ receives by 4 p.m., on DATE/MONTH.
Submit comment online
LINK TO RULEMAKING COMMENT PAGE (Note that this link will not be live until the day DEQ publishes notice to the public):
http://www.oregon.gov/deq/Regulations/rulemaking/Pages/cRULEMAKINGNAME.aspx
Note for public university students:
ORS 192.345(29) allows Oregon public university and OHSU students to protect their university email addresses from disclosure under Oregon’s public records law. If you are an Oregon public university or OHSU student you may omit your email address when you complete the online form to submit a comment.
By mail
Oregon DEQ
Attn: RULE WRITER
700 NE Multnomah St., Room 600
Portland, OR 97232-4100
At hearing
DATE/MONTH
You can also participate in the hearing through a teleconference or webinar.
Teleconference call-in number:
Participant ID:
Webinar link (webinar has no audio, you must listen on the teleconference):
How to join the teleconference or webinar: Teleconference and Webinar instructions
Public Hearing ORS 183.335(1); 468.020(2) Public Hearings |
Public hearings
DEQ plans to hold NUMBER public hearing(s). Anyone can attend a hearing in person, or by webinar or teleconference.
Information about the public hearing:
• Date
• Start time
• Street address
• Room
• City
• Teleconference phone number: 888-363-4734 OR 888-278-0296
• Participant code: (4734 number) = 1910322 OR (0296 number) = 8040259
• Webinar link:
◦ (4734 number) = 888-363-4734 webinar link
◦ OR
◦ (0296 number) = 888-278-0296 webinar link
• Instructions on how to join webinar or teleconference: Webinar/teleconference instructions
DEQ will consider all written comments received at the hearings listed below before completing the draft rules. DEQ will summarize all comments and respond to comments in the Environmental Quality Commission staff report.
Any person can submit comments on the proposed rules as described in the Introduction section of this document.
Draft Rules - With Edits Highlighted LEAVE BLANK – AGENCY RULES COORDINATOR WILL ADD
|
Draft Rules – With Edits Incorporated LEAVE BLANK – AGENCY RULES COORDINATOR WILL ADD
|
Supporting documents
|