A B C D E F G
1 First Name Last Name Email Address Organization State Comment Additional Document
2 Mark Sytsma sytsmam@pdx.edu Portland State University OR Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DEQ rulemaking on ballast water management. I worked with DEQ in development of the ballast water management program and assisted in its implementation in the early years of the program, prior to DEQ acquiring adequate staffing. I served on the advisory committee for development of the current language, and I have chaired the STAIS since its inception.

I support the proposed exchange plus treatment recommendation, however, I believe that the 18 ppt threshold for this treatment is arbitrary and fails to adequately protect Oregon’s water resources from invasive species. I recommend the more protective approach used by EPA for the Great Lakes other states, arguably with less biologically and culturally important freshwater resources, that requires exchange plus treatment for ALL ballast water prior to discharge. Such a requirement would be more protective for Oregon than the current rule. In addition, the 18 ppt threshold complicates shipboard ballast water management by requiring the ship operator to measure salinity prior to making a decision on how to manage ballast; requiring exchange plus treatment for ALL ballast water is a much simpler and more protective approach.
 
3 Doug Heiken dh@oregonwild.org Oregon Wild OREGON Please accept the following comments on behalf of 15,000 members and supporters of Oregon Wild's mission to protect and restore Oregon's wildlands, wildlife, and waters.

The stated purpose of the rules is "to prevent the discharge of ballast water that represents a high-risk for the transport and release of aquatic invasive species." We feel this purpose is too narrow. Oregon's aquatic ecosystems are too valuable and too vulnerable for these rules to address just "high risk" situations.

We urge DEQ to be more risk averse and strive to control all substantial risks. It makes sense to require exchange plus treatment for ALL ballast water. It is a much simpler and more protective approach. This approach has worked in other jurisdictions.
 
4 Nicole Dobroski nicole.dobroski@slc.ca.gov California State Lands Commission California   https://data.oregon.gov/views/x3sn-jrd7/files/79b2f542-b36f-4399-85b8-fc8fa34dce4f?filename=OregonComments_25May2016.pdf&content_type=application%2Fpdf
5 Allen Pleus allen.pleus@dfw.wa.gov WDFW Washington WDFW supports this rulemaking and recommends a few technical edits to ensure future regulatory consistency between our states. One of two files attached. https://data.oregon.gov/views/x3sn-jrd7/files/db13ee6d-a59d-453f-8516-8cc6ad519c53?filename=vanden+Hooff+6.17.16+Comments+on+Ballast+Water+Rulemaking.pdf&content_type=application%2Fpdf
6 Allen Pleus allen.pleus@dfw.wa.gov WDFW Washington WDFW supports this rulemaking and recommends a few technical edits to ensure future regulatory consistency between our states. Two of two files attached. https://data.oregon.gov/views/x3sn-jrd7/files/98b10511-4a39-4f6b-a469-097bd0f22afa?filename=OARS+340_143+WDFW+tech+comments+062016.pdf&content_type=application%2Fpdf
7 Debrah Marriott DMarriott@estuarypartnership.org Lower Columbia Estuary Partnership Oregon    
8 meyer goldstein goldstein.meyer@deq.state.or.us deq oregon This is a test to see if a document can be attached. https://data.oregon.gov/views/x3sn-jrd7/files/b25c3119-226e-4c8b-9af8-a6cec4416389?filename=N%3A%5Ci%5CDEQ%27s+rulemaking+process.docx&content_type=application%2Fvnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
9 Amanda Hanson       Comment attachment submitted on behalf of Amanda Hanson and Lower Columbia Estuary Partnership by Meyer Goldstein, DEQ https://data.oregon.gov/views/x3sn-jrd7/files/03cb6600-5e83-4fbc-b401-5e13aff4c1a4?filename=C%3A%5CUsers%5Cmgoldst%5CDesktop%5CComments+on+Ballast+Water+Rulemaking+7+2016.pdf&content_type=application%2Fpdf
10 Kate Mickelson kate@crsoa.net CR Steamship Operators Assn Oregon   https://data.oregon.gov/views/x3sn-jrd7/files/517bd296-c093-48e5-8563-a76989d253a2?filename=Ballast+Water+Comment+Letter_052416.pdf&content_type=application%2Fpdf
11 Kate Mickelson kate@crsoa.net CR Steamship Operators Assn Oregon   https://data.oregon.gov/views/x3sn-jrd7/files/4bb5a88d-bfb4-4a26-935f-f1b5c42d57cc?filename=Ballast+Water+Comment+Letter_070816.pdf&content_type=application%2Fpdf
12 Kim Cox kim.cox@portlandoregon.gov Portland Bureau of Environmental Services Oregon Please see the attached letter. https://data.oregon.gov/views/x3sn-jrd7/files/2bc41f6d-8dc5-4387-bdd8-8ec0810a4a66?filename=BES+Comment+Letter+to+DEQ_Proposed+Ballast+Water+Rule_7-7-16_Final.docx.pdf&content_type=application%2Fpdf
13 Dorothy Shoemaker dorothyshoemaker@centurylink.net OR   https://data.oregon.gov/views/x3sn-jrd7/files/81363e2c-94a0-402e-ad04-c52397d10dde?filename=Ballast+Water.doc&content_type=application%2Fmsword
14 Mark Sytsma marksytsma@me.com Portland State University OREGON   https://data.oregon.gov/views/x3sn-jrd7/files/1486f89c-a454-4b01-b8a1-b559aeb04e57?filename=OR+BW+rulemaking+comment_Sytsma.pdf&content_type=application%2Fpdf
15 Cybele Knowles cknowles@biologicaldiversity.org Center for Biological Diversity Oregon Attached please find 898 comments from activists with the Center for Biological Diversity on the proposed rules to revise Oregon's Ballast Water Discharge Management Program. Thank you for your attention.

Best,
Cybele Knowles
Communications Associate
Center for Biological Diversity
cknowles@biologicaldiversity.org
(520) 623-5252 x 324
www.biologicaldiversity.org
https://data.oregon.gov/views/x3sn-jrd7/files/13d8f5fa-dc06-46fe-acac-e473c09cfbb7?filename=BallastWater_CBD_898comments.pdf&content_type=application%2Fpdf
16 Nina Bell nbell@advocates-nwea.org Northwest Environmental Advocates Oregon See attached letter. https://data.oregon.gov/views/x3sn-jrd7/files/7e608f4e-9e46-4897-a66d-fdecb6decb8c?filename=NWEA+comments+on+Oregon+ballast+rules+2016.pdf&content_type=application%2Fpdf
17 Nicole Dobroski nicole.dobroski@slc.ca.gov California State Lands Commission California Please see attached comment letter. https://data.oregon.gov/views/x3sn-jrd7/files/b71136b7-0e37-4e18-8ed1-de9c4bd2783d?filename=CSLC_Comments_10242016final.pdf&content_type=application%2Fpdf
18 Craig Rowland Craig_Rowland@fws.gov US Fish and Wildlife Service Oregon The USFWS supports the proposed rule amendment requiring seawater ballast exchanges plus federally required treatment for voyages that present a high risk of introducing aquatic invasive species to Oregon's waters. See attached letter of support. https://data.oregon.gov/views/x3sn-jrd7/files/b4919642-2d3e-4419-8d74-1f1815d86a71?filename=USFWS+Letter+DEQ+Ballast+Water+Management.pdf&content_type=application%2Fpdf
19 Kate Mickelson kate@crsoa.net CRSOA OR Please see attached file. https://data.oregon.gov/views/x3sn-jrd7/files/869082ea-6524-40c6-a6a5-49cb74351bd2?filename=Ballast+Water+Comment+Letter_102416.pdf&content_type=application%2Fpdf

Ballast_Water_2016_Rulemaking