A | B | C | D | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2 | low | high | ||
3 | 0.35 | 1.2 | ft3/min, flowrate for EPA Method 5(?) | |
4 | 28.3168 | 28.3168 | liters per ft3 | |
5 | 9.91088 | 33.98016 | liters per minute | this appears to match approx flowrates for EPA Method 5 according to Table 5.1 in: |
6 | 0.0075 | 0.0075 | grains per dscf | https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjYltzHvKrNAhVQ92MKHbkqDSoQFgghMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww3.epa.gov%2Fttnemc01%2Fpromgate%2Fm-05.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGTaCXQFoTGJZHbD5QP60TN9zTvVw |
7 | 0.002625 | 0.009 | grains per minute | |
8 | 0.1575 | 0.54 | grains per hour | |
9 | 64.7989 | 64.7989 | mg per grain | |
10 | 10.20582675 | 34.991406 | mg per hour | |
12 | According to George's document, 3 mg of sample is detectable. | |||
13 | At the flowrates above, it looks like a 1 hr test would gather more than 3mg of sample if emissions are at the proposed limit. So, a 1 hr test would be able to show whether a facility is meeting the limit or not. |
A | B | C | |
---|---|---|---|
3 | 0.0075 | gr/dscf | proposed baghouse outlet limit |
4 | 64.7989 | mg/grain | |
5 | 0.48599175 | mg/dscf | |
6 | 35.3147 | ft3/m3 | |
7 | 17.16265285 | mg/m3 | |
8 | 1.00E+06 | ng/mg | |
9 | 1.72E+07 | ng/m3 | outlet concentration |
11 | 0.08 | ng/m3 | ambient limit for hex chrome, the most stringent in the rule |
13 | 2.15E+08 | dilution factor needed to make air safe if outlet conc is at proposed limit |