| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Subject | Body | From: (Name) | From: (Address) | From: (Type) | To: (Name) | To: (Address) | To: (Type) | CC: (Name) | CC: (Address) | CC: (Type) | BCC: (Name) | BCC: (Address) | BCC: (Type) | Billing Information | Categories | Importance | Mileage | Sensitivity | Attachment |
| 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | JONI S EMAIL COMMENTS | |||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | In Support of Bullseye Glass |
Hello, I am writing in support of Bullseye Glass in the hopes you will reconsider your further restrictions on their glass production. I work in the government and I recognize knee-jerk responses to public pressure. It is rarely proportionate to the risk and severely limits our agency's productivity and effectiveness. This situation sounds the same as I have seen many times. As I understand it, there is no scientific evidence proving that the furnaces produce toxic chromium. But the public fears are driving DEQ to react unreasonably. I am also a glass artist and had hopes of starting my own business this year. Though this situation could change my plans. The regulations already imposed are threatening the strength of their business and creating a strain on a vibrant artistic community. And there is not proof that their production is dangerous. I am all for public safety. But I am also behind a business’ right to do business until there is evidence that the business is doing harm. Please do not impose any further regulations on Bullseye glass without scientific evidence. Thank you, Barbara Wells |
964Barbara Wells | barbwired_6@hotmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 5 | Bullseye Glass Company Portland Oregon |
To whom it may concern, Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Best Regards, Tanya Veit AAE Glass AAEGLASS.COM <http://www.aaeglass.com/> BLOG <http://fusedglassdecals.blogspot.com/> 1228 LAFAYETTE ST. CAPE CORAL, FL 33904 239-471-7724 |
AAE Glass | info@aaeglass.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 6 | Bullseye & Uroborus |
I DO stand with Bullseye Glass in it's efforts to continue operations
as a responsible citizen of the social and business community
of Portland, Oregon. It has a long history of responsible operation.
I am a glass artist who goes there regularly. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. Because Dr. LaCourse has said that Bullseye's furnaces do NOT produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. We sincerely appreciate any support and clear thinking you can provide right now. Sincerely, Alice Haga |
Alice Haga | alicehaga11@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 7 |
Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I
stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations
as a responsible citizen of the social and business community
of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. We sincerely appreciate any support you can provide right now. |
Andrew Gallagher | andygeggsnbakey@aol.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | |||||||||||
| 8 | Concerning Bullseye Glass |
Dear Ms Hammond, I am a Portland artist, and have worked in the Bullseye Resource Center for the past 6 years making glass art. I have followed the story regarding Bullseye, and their responses to the public concern. Bullseye has a long history of responsible operation. I have read recent information from Dr LaCourse of Alfred University, who teaches courses in glass engineering. His findings report that for proper creation of green glass, it is necessary to keep chromium III from chemically changing into the toxic chromium VI. Since Bullseye's goal is to create green glass, this transformation would ruin their glass, and change the color. Bullseye is working to comply with new requirements by installing 99% efficient bag houses on furnaces that melt the chromium. They understand the importance of stronger standards for the industry and for community health and safety. I stand with Bullseye in their efforts to comply with new environmental safety requirements and operate as a responsible business in Portland, Oregon. Thank you, Angelita Surmon 503-238-1390 1705 SE 41st Ave Portland, OR 97214 angelitasurmon@comcast.net www.angelitasurmon.com |
angelitasurmon@comcast.net | angelitasurmon@comcast.net | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 9 | Please save our art glass industry |
Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I
stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations
as a responsible citizen of the social and business community
of Portland, Oregon. Please let our art glass companies study the heavy metal problem and implement appropriate measures in a timely manner. Please do not pass temporary restrictions on Chromium III usage that are not based on science. Doing so will impact glass artists throughout the world who depend on Portland-made glass for their livelihoods, and their families who depend on them. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. Please not to allow DEQ to impose poorly written and misdirected temporary rules, which don’t appear to be based on science and fact. Thank you, Audree DeAngeles Artist, Seattle 206-295-1678 |
Audree DeAngeles | adeangeles@hotmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | adeangeles@hotmail.com | adeangeles@hotmail.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 10 | environmental regulations |
Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I
stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations
as a responsible citizen of the social and business community
of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Neither DEQ or EPA have required any other US producer, of green glass, to entirely and arbitrarily stop their production without notice and perform the kind of extensive testing and modeling that DEQ is asking for. A typical green bottle manufacturer uses 1,000 times more Cr(III) per year than Bullseye Glass. A bottle producer, with emission controls, would melt more Cr(III) each day than Bullseye uses in a year. I am very saddened by this whole affair which appears to be scaremongering by the portland news paper, resulting in political pandering with no bearing on facts. You are going to put not only Bullseye glass out of business for no good reason but also the many glass artists who rely on them cross the whole WORLD. Please, look at the science. |
Becky Haywood Glass | beckyhaywoodglass@gmail.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||||||||
| 11 | Bullseye Glass Company |
Hi, I am a UK glass artist and trained Bullseye Glass instructor working here in the UK. I understand you are meeting later today with a view to determining future action with regard to possible pollution in the Portland area caused by various glass manufacturing companies. Please can I ask you to also consider the wider impact of any decision you make. My business and many of my glass artist colleagues livelihood are centred on the import of American glass to the UK. Without this incredible product we would all be out of business. There is NO other alternative as no other manufacturers exist in the world that make a product like this. As far as I can see from all the evidence that has been reported there is no concrete reason for restricting the use of certain essential ingredients in the production of the glass. So I respectfully request that you consider the wider impact of any actions you take at your meeting today. Many thanks for your time in reading this. Becky Wills Yellow Dog Workshops Bristol, UK. |
Becky Wills | becky@yellowdogglass.co.uk | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | SAXTON LYNNE | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8 | EX | High | Normal | |||||||
| 12 | DEQ regulations against Bullseye Glass Co. |
Dear Legislators and whom else it may concern, I want to voice my concern about the witch hunt that seems to be going on against 2 glass factories in Portland, OR. I have read many articles that don’t seem to be well-supported by actual science that has created a huge problem where they might not even be a small one. One recent letter to the Oregonian editor sums it up nicely: http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2016/03/use_reason_science_to_report_o.html#incart_river_mobileshort_home I have read a few articles by other science people stating that the statistics being spewed forth are misleading at best. Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I know few other businesses, much less manufacturing businesses, who are as environmentally conscious and concerned as they are. Full disclosure, yes, I know some people who work there. So maybe I am biased. But I am of science mind, and I want the actual data facts to be evaluated in a scientific manner. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political vagaries or scare tactics. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. Please, before ruling, get some more actual scientists to chime in on what is going on and how dangerous it is (or is not). I urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. And I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Sincerely, Beth Goodnight ___________________________________________________ 5908 Texas Dr, Vancouver, WA 98661 360/719-9278 -- Cell gnite721@gmail.com <mailto:gnite721@gmail.com> http://goodnightdesign.com This e-mail may contain privileged information for the sole reference of the intended recipient. Please do not forward or reproduce this e-mail or the information contained herein without my written permission. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please notify me. Thank you. Beth ___________________________________________________ 5908 Texas Dr, Vancouver, WA 98661 360/719-9278 -- Cell gnite721@gmail.com <mailto:gnite721@gmail.com> http://goodnightdesign.com This e-mail may contain privileged information for the sole reference of the intended recipient. Please do not forward or reproduce this e-mail or the information contained herein without my written permission. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please notify me. Thank you. |
Beth Goodnight | gnite721@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;SAXTON LYNNE;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | SMTP;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 13 | Bullseye Glass |
Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I
stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations
as a responsible citizen of the social and business community
of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Dawn Lucero resident of Oregon -- Bird Jewelry by Dawn www.birdjewelry.com <http://www.birdjewelry.com> phone (541) 879-1691 |
Birdjewelry by Dawn | birdjewelrybydawn@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 14 | March 15, 2016, DEQ rule change meeting |
Dear Regulators and Elected Representatives, I am writing to you in regard to the just announced DEQ special meeting to be held on March 15, 2016 for the purpose of considering rule changes directed at Oregon Colored Art Glass Manufacturers. I have read the DEQ proposal for new temporary rules to be considered for adoption at this meeting as outlined here: http://www.oregon.gov/deq/EQC/Documents/2016/031516eqcAgenda.pdf I live in the Portland area and consider myself to be an environmentalist. As such, I applaud the intent of the DEQ to protect our air quality and the health and safety of those living in the neighborhoods near Oregon’s glass manufacturing facilities. However, I feel that these proposed new rule changes are misguided and will not help achieve that goal. I am also a glass artist and am concerned for the well-being of Oregon’s colored art glass manufacturing industry, those employed in that industry and those dependent on the products of that industry. In the recent furor over air contamination possibly coming from local glass manufacturing facilities, I think that these latter two constituencies have been largely overlooked. Due to what I consider to be largely irresponsible, sensationalistic news reporting on this matter, the public demand for immediate action has been extreme. I feel that these proposed new rules are an unwarranted over reaction that will not improve the situation. Two recent soil test studies, have already shown that the severity of the problem isn’t nearly as great as what was originally feared and both of the Portland glass manufacturers cited as possible sources of pollution, Bullseye and Uroboros, have already taken actions to eliminate the use of, and therefore the potential for, releases of the identified hazardous materials. These actions, taken voluntarily and at significant sacrifice to these businesses demonstrate the good will and concern that both have for the air quality in our community. The new rules proposed by the DEQ would force these businesses to make even more significant reductions in their production. The specific change that the new rules would enforce would be the elimination of the use of Chromium III because of the potential for this material to be transformed during production to a hazardous form; Chromium VI. Note, that the proposed DEQ rules also mistakenly make multiple references to another material, Chromium IV, which is indicative of the haste and lack of review with which these proposed rules were drafted. Although the potential conversion of Cr III to Cr VI does exist, glass manufacturers have the ability, and in-fact, the necessity, to prevent such conversion from occurring during the manufacturing process. If they did not, their process would not yield the green glass color they were aiming to produce and their production would be wasted. The scientific reasons behind this are explained by Dr. LaCourse of Alfred University here: <http://www.bullseyeglass.com/about-us/dr-lacourse-chromium-statement.html> http://www.bullseyeglass.com/about-us/dr-lacourse-chromium-statement.html. In short, it would serve no purpose to restrict the use of Cr III by these glass manufacturers, but it would cause significant harm to both of these companies above and beyond that already resulting from their voluntary actions. The DEQ rule proposal identifies the public and the colored glass manufacturers as parties that would be affected by these proposed temporary rules. Their estimation of how the glass companies would be affected completely overlooks the impact of forcing them to further curtail their production, the layoffs that would follow, and the very real potential for the businesses to be forced to shut down entirely. Oregon should be proud of and should help promote its home grown art glass industry. To my knowledge, there are only three companies in the world that make significant quantities of the type of art glass that can be readily used by fused glass artists, and we are fortunate to have two of them located here in Portland. Beyond the effect on the local economy, these unnecessary and scientifically unsupported new rules would also negatively impact the thousands of glass artists worldwide that depend on the products of these companies for their livelihood, potentially destroying the entire fused art glass industry. I hope that you will lend your voice to help DEQ understand that we need a balanced, reasoned and scientifically supported solution to this air contamination problem and not an ineffective, knee-jerk reaction as represented by these proposed rules. Sincerely, Bob Heath ????›?????????????????????????????????????›?????????????????????????????????‰‰? |
Bob Heath | bob@arttouch.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 15 | Stop Unjustified DEQ Cr(III) Glass Regulations |
Hello, I am writing to implore you to stop the premature regulation of CR(III); current regulation is too broad and will affect the livelihood of a large local business: Bullseye Glass. "The primary issue is our use of trivalent chromium Cr(III). Both DEQ and EPA have acknowledged there is no clear evidence of acute or chronic health risks based on Bullseye’s use of Cr(III), which is a harmless and naturally occurring compound. The limitations proposed are based on politics and anchored in speculation that some of these compounds might possibly change into a more toxic form of Chromium in our furnaces. Scientific evidence clearly indicates our furnaces cannot turn Chromium III into Chromium VI. If they did, our glass would be ruined. For more information on this, see this explanation by Dr. LaCourse of Alfred University: http://www.bullseyeglass.com/about-us/dr-lacourse-chromium-statement.html" Most of Bullseye Glass' products use CR(III); to put a reactionary and not scientifically supported ban in place could have disastrous effects on a successful, local business. Please do not support this ban. Best, Brendan |
Brendan Hsu | brendan.c.hsu@gmail.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||||||||
| 16 | Special meeting of the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission |
I am a longtime Bullseye customer and am writing in their support.
In all my dealings with them I have felt the utmost high consideration
for their neighbors and their very “Green” approach to all
aspects of their business. Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Laura Brownfield Glass Play |
Brownfield Laura | lbrownfield2@cox.net | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;novick@portlandoregon.gov;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;REP Nosse;nick@portlandoregon.gov;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;novick@portlandoregon.gov;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;nick@portlandoregon.gov;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov | EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;EX;SMTP;EX;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 17 | opposed to the new rules |
Dear Joni Hammond, Please, do not support the Air Quality 2016 Temporary Rules. These onerous rules put an unnecessary and unsustainable burden on local manufacturers. The rules do not address the real air quality problems facing Portland. Instead they target small businesses that do not produce large tax revenues. Bullseye and Uroboros are known around the world as businesses that make quality glass, ethically and locally. These rules are focused only on these small local business and not large producers of chemicals which there is such sudden concern over, such as any number of other glass manufacturers (consider alcohol bottling?). Lest we forget the incredibly high levels of car and truck exhaust inhaled daily, but this is not a concern for the DEQ-but art glass-that's where we draw the line now? These onerous new rules come less than a week after the DEQ found NO evidence that heavy metal emissions were causing harm. The DEQ found NO evidence of harmful levels of arsenic, chromium or cadmium in schools. It appears these rules are being introduced merely to calm public opinion. These companies have made beautiful glass in Portland for forty years. I'm afraid that if these rules will drive them out of business. Certainly their employees locally will be harmed and the ripple of these changes will be felt by the art glass community around the world. I don't understand. I thought Oregon supported the arts. I thought Portland supported local businesses and workers. I have never been more disappointed to call Portland home. Please oppose these new rules. Thank you, Callie |
Callie Meiners | photocallie@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 18 | Please allow Bullseye and Uroboros time to finish installing the baghouses |
Dear Ms. Hammond: My name is Candace Pratt. I worked in the food industry (NORPAC in Stayton, OR) and other ag industry firms for more than 20 years and most recently as a glass artist for over a decade here in Portland. I have a masters degree in food chemistry. I ask you to please allow Bullseye and Uroboros the time to install the baghouses that will capture the emissions from cadmium and chromium without forcing them to stop production of the those products containing chromium. (As you know they’ve already stopped production of red, orange and yellow glass). This is very vibrant industry in Portland, and the tests to date do not show sufficient concern as to further restrict their production. The necessary equipment is being installed to scrub the emissions; that is sufficient in my opinion. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Candace Pratt Candace Pratt Icings, LLC 296 SW Moonridge Pl. Portland, OR 97225 cell 503-780-9046 studio 503-296-6758 candace@icingsglass.com http://www.icingsglass.com |
Candace Pratt | candace@icingsglass.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 19 | Request to not ask Bullseye Glass to halt production of Chromium glass and to find a solution moving forward. |
Dear Joni Hammond Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation, making glass locally in the U.S., rather than outsourcing more work to places such as China. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon and for their efforts in producing a product that is “Made in U.S.A.” Bullseye has been upstanding in its efforts to meet requirements for “clean production” and had been following DEQ guidelines. Recently, the DEQ had identified potentially high levels of cadmium and arsenic in the air and Bullseye has stopped production of these glass lines. However, the results produced by DEQ do not necessarily indicate that Bullseye has produced this, but they have complied by stopping production until new baghouse collection systems can be installed. As I understand, they may be asked to stop all production of Chromium-based glass. Scientific evidence clearly supports that the heat used in glass generation does not change Chromium (III) into Chromium (VI) and this has not previously been an issue. I am a biochemist at UCLA and believe that the public have over-reacted and this has driven the current developments. To ask Bullseye to halt production using Chromium (III) is simply an overreaction to public and political issues. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. I urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Bullseye Glass is an example of the type of local company we want to keep in America. They have been pro-active in dealing with environmental issues. From what I have read, DEQ may not have been communicating with them in a timely and effective manner and the response that is developing is one to now ask Bullseye to stop glass production, potentially putting them out of business. I urge you to consider the scientific evidence and then work with Bullseye Glass to allow them to maintain their local, made-in –USA business. Carla Koehler Carla Koehler Professor Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA Box 951569 (for post) 607 Charles E. Young Drive E. (for courier) Los Angeles, CA 90095-1569 email: koehler@chem.ucla.edu homepage: <http://koehler.chem.ucla.edu> http://koehler.chem.ucla.edu TEL: +1 310 794 4834 FAX: +1 310 206 4038 |
Carla Koehler | koehlerc@chem.ucla.edu | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 20 | Bullseye Glass |
Dear Joni, I am an artist who works with Bullseye glass and I live in inner SE Portland. In 20 years as a customer I have never known Bullseye to be anything but the most ethical and upstanding business. They employ 140 of the most creative hardworking people and their product makes possible the employment of untold others here in Portland and globally. The artistic community is what makes Portland the amazing city that it is. PLEASE consider the science before you take action that could destroy an entire art form and greatly damage all of the people it supports, including myself. Do not let the politics of fear be the decider here, I beg of you. Sincerely, Carmen Vetter Sent from my iPhone |
Carmen Vetter | carmenvetter@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 21 | Bullseye Glass Company |
Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation.
Bullseye understands the public interest and supports stronger
environmental standards for our industry. To that effect, the
company has already began the process of installing 99% efficient
baghouses on furnaces that melt Chromium. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Scientific evidence shows BUllseye's use of the compound is not harmful. Nevertheless, DEQ wants to restrict Bullseye from using Cr(III) for an extended period of time. They are essentially basing these rules off an assumption of guilt without any supporting evidence. Neither DEQ or EPA have required any other US producer, of green glass, to entirely and arbitrarily stop their production without notice and perform the kind of extensive testing and modeling that DEQ is asking for. A typical green bottle manufacturer uses 1,000 times more Cr(III) per year than Bullseye Glass. A bottle producer, with emission controls, would melt more Cr(III) each day than Bullseye uses in a year. These newly proposed regulations are based on politics and fear, not science. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Sincerely, Carol Carson |
Carol Carson | carsonglass@me.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 22 | DEQ Meeting and Bullseye Glass |
A Plea from a concerned citizen: Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Sincerely, Carol Feiertag |
Carol Feiertag | carolfeiertag@me.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 23 | Re: DEQ Meetig |
Dear Mr. Hammond: Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Sincerely, Carol Feiertag |
Carol Feiertag | carolfeiertag@icloud.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 24 | In support of Bullseye |
Ms. Hammond, I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as an exceptionally responsible and long standing citizen of the social and business community of Portland. Scientific evidence clearly indicates that Bullseye’s furnaces cannot turn Chromium III into Chromium VI. I urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, rather than rushing to placate an excitable community by imposing poorly written and misdirected controls. Catharine Newell Portland Artist Catharine Newell Studio catharine.newell@comcast.net <mailto:catharine.newell@comcast.net> 503.236.2175 |
Catharine Newell | catharine.newell@comcast.net | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 25 |
Dear Mr Hammond Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Kind regards Cathryn Shilling www.cathrynshilling.co.uk <http://www.cathrynshilling.co.uk/> +44 7940 708 275 News & Exhibitions: Collective Genius Masterpieces from the Devereux & Huskie Glassworks 3rd May - 11th June, Vessel Gallery, London Recollections Celebrating 40 Years of London Glassblowing 20th May - 11th June 2016, The Gallery at London Glassblowing, London Glass 2016 An Exhibition of Ten Selected Artists in Glass 21st May - 12th July, Pyramid Gallery, York Designer Crafts at the Mall 11th - 21st August, Mall Galleries, London |
Cathryn Shilling | glass@cathrynshilling.co.uk | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | |||||||||||
| 26 | Fwd: Bullseye glass |
> > Dear Mrs.Hammond > > Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. > > Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. > > Warm regards, > > Chantale Langlois > Fusedenergy.com > Chantale@fusedenergy.com > > |
Chantale Langlois | chantale@fusedenergy.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 27 | Uroboros and Bullseye Glass |
Good Morning, I'm not certain exactly what part you play in this
situation, however, I know the part I play in it. I've been a glass blower for 15 years. I live in Hood River and blow in The Dalles. All of our raw materials comes from either Bullseye or Uroboros Glass Companies. I am a retired science teacher from Portland Public Schools and taught in the areas that were affected by this scare tactic. I realize there is real concern and it should have been addressed years ago. However, doing it in such a "witch hunt" fashion has truly tainted my estimation of our DEQ and our salivating media. As a science teacher I tried to instill the idea that before you could spout out statements and use them as facts, they had to be tested and tested and tested. So far based solely on what I've been reading through the media (mostly the Oregonian), the initial scare was "Oh so tested!" However, after numerous days, further tests of the soil have in fact left much to be in-conclusive. Mixing light or even heavy industry with housing is never a good idea. The cement plants....my oh my....they are very polluting....large and destructive, casting companies are equally polluting as can be stated for many companies both large and small. Before I get lost in ramblings of my own, let me say that the latest issue seems to be around Chromium III and its POSSIBLY being turned into Chromium IV. May I refer you to more scientific information before you actually jump on a mis-directed band-wagon? Dr. LaCourse of Alfred University: <http://www.bullseyeglass.com/about-us/dr-lacourse-chromium-statement.html> http://www.bullseyeglass.com/about-us/dr-lacourse-chromium-statement.html -- All this has to do with the type of mixture that is used in heating the glass. When a flame is neutral, glass is happy...when there is a reducing flame( more propane/natural gas than oxygen) it will bring out the metals to the surface of the glass which will RUIN green glass fast. Obviously when I purchase green glass from Bullseye, Uroboros, it is green and that alone states that the heat source was in a neutral environment AND SAFE. Otherwise I wouldn't be purchasing glass that is that beautiful green colour. Any government knows instinctively or experimentally that if you stir up enough FEAR you can control the population. Here is an absolutely perfect example of it. Keep the fear going and you will direct the people. Please get off that track. Insist on the protection from ALL COMPANIES USING THESE PRODUCTS and then enforce the protections. Otherwise, quit singling out smaller companies to cast the blame upon. Might I also point out the companies that are being singled out have voluntarily stopped using chemicals that produce the reds, oranges, yellows and are installing better filters. These companies are in good faith and responsible partners to our environment. Don't drive them out of business because of mis-guided information that isn't completely true. When you think of the economic impact of having world recognized and respected glass dealers in PORTLAND, OREGON, you really need to know which cliff you are hanging onto. Thousands of people flock into Portland for conferences and many of these conferences are put on by the leaders in the industry...mainly Bullseye and Uroboros. Hundreds of thousands of pounds of glass are shipped WORLD-WIDE from Portland....Heads on Beds benefits from these conferences. I can go on ad nauseum but will limit my time with you to simply request that you seriously look at the science behind the Chromium III / IV issue before you knee-jerk react because of a populace that is being led by FEAR. Charlene Fort/Morning Sun Studio, Hood River, OR. |
Charlene Fort | charfort@gmail.com | SMTP | Charlene Fort OGG | charfort@gmail.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 28 |
Dear Gentlemen; Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. It will be in poor judgement to impose regulations not based on a facts, but on a feeling as a "likely source of metals air emissions". It would be irresponsible to not have additional testing and a definitive conclusion to the issue at hand. Please do not pass regulations and judgement until additional study can find a conclusion based on facts. Cherie Kennedy Infinite Glass Art Sent from my iPad Sent from my iPad |
Cherie Kennedy | teacak@sbcglobal.net | SMTP | SAXTON LYNNE;HAMMOND Joni;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||||||
| 29 | Bullseye |
Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I
stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations
as a responsible citizen of the social and business community
of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. And personally I have never heard of any company being shut down without a chance to comply with any NEW regulations government decides to implement. Cheryl McGaffey 6218 N. Oberlin St Portland, OR 97203 |
Cheryl McGaffey | dls@designlitestudio.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 30 | DEQ meeting in Portland |
Greetings Director Hammond, I am a third generation Oregonian and longtime resident of Portland (over 30 years). I am sincerely interested in the wellbeing of everyone who calls this great city home. I have followed the sequence of events and information on Portland’s air quality as reported in The Oregonian. I was particularly disturbed about the length of time that the DEQ took to finally report the findings of the moss tests. This was really a betrayal of trust, as a citizen, we expect governmental departments to do the job they are paid to do. However, regulatory decisions should be based on scientific protocol and evidence, not emotional judgments or political ‘hot button’ issues. I have taken classes at Bullseye Glass over several years and attended Chroma-Culture, the by-yearly educational conference that was held here in Portland in 2013. This event drew important presenters, artists, and educators in glass from around the world. Glass production is a science, and I know Bullseye will do everything that is required to be a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland. Again, regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist and professor of glass, Dr. LaCourse has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. Here is the link to his statement: http://www.bullseyeglass.com/about-us/dr-lacourse-chromium-statement.html I urge the DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not rush to impose poorly written and misdirected rules. As the old saying goes ‘don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater’! Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of this important matter. Sincerely, Cheryl Mellnik 503-248-0577 |
Cheryl Mellnik | cmellnik@comcast.net | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 31 | Re: Proposed Temporary Rule on Colored Art Glass Manufacturing |
To Acting Director Hammond and Members of the Environmental Quality
Commission - Please find attached to this email a set of comments on the proposed temporary rule that would apply to colored art glass manufacturing facilities. These comments are submitted on behalf of Crag Law Center, Northwest Environmental Defense Center, Neighbors for Clean Air, OPAL Environmental Justice Oregon, Eastside Portland Air Coalition, Coalition for Communities of Color, Oregon Environmental Council, Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility, Verde, Beyond Toxics, and the Portland African American Leadership Forum. We have also attached a proposed alternative set of temporary rules that we ask be considered by the EQC. We will also submit these materials via DEQ’s web portal. Thank you for your consideration. Chris Winter Co-Executive Director Crag Law Center 917 Sw Oak St. Suite 417 Portland, OR 97205 (503) 525-2725 Fax (503) 296-5454 chris@crag.org <mailto:chris@crag.org> Protecting and sustaining the natural legacy of the Pacific Northwest On Mar 15, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Chris Winter <chris@crag.org <mailto:chris@crag.org> > wrote: To the Members of the Environmental Quality Commission: Please find attached to this email testimony that I plan to present at the meeting of the Commission this afternoon. These comments are submitted on behalf of Crag Law Center, Northwest Environmental Defense Center, Neighbors for Clean Air, and OPAL Environmental Justice. We are asking that the Commission defer consideration of the proposed temporary rules until the public is provided with a very modest 14-day comment period on the rule package. Thank you for your consideration. Chris Winter Co-Executive Director Crag Law Center 917 Sw Oak St. Suite 417 Portland, OR 97205 (503) 525-2725 Fax (503) 296-5454 chris@crag.org <mailto:chris@crag.org> Protecting and sustaining the natural legacy of the Pacific Northwest <3-15-16 - EQC Testimony.pdf> |
Chris Winter | chris@crag.org | SMTP | JOHNSON Colleen;EDEN Melinda;OKEEFFE Jane;ARMSTRONG Ed;RIDER Morgan;HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JOHNSON Colleen176;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=EDEN Melindae77;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OKEEFFE Janee72;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ARMSTRONG Edce9;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RIDER Morgan94f;/O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX | mark riskedahl;Mary Peveto;Huy Ong;GOLDFARB Gabriela * GOV;Eastside Portland Air Coalition;Jennifer D Jones;Maggie Tallmadge;Andrea Durbin;Kelly Campbell;alan@verdenw.org;desireerajee@gmail.com;Mary (Wyden) Gautreaux;REP Kotek;REP SmithWarner;REP Frederick;SEN Shields;SEN Rosenbaum;REP Helm;REP Taylor;REP Nosse;REP KenyGuyer;SEN Dembrow;REP Greenlick;Zach Klonoski;mult.chair@multco.us;Phil_Chang@merkley.senate.gov;Tony DeFalco | riskedahl@gmail.com;mary@whatsinourair.org;huy@opalpdx.org;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GOLDFARB Gabriela * GOV943;eastsideportlandair@gmail.com;thejonesfour@mac.com;maggie@coalitioncommunitiescolor.org;andread@oeconline.org;kelly@oregonpsr.org;alan@verdenw.org;desireerajee@gmail.com;Mary_Gautreaux@wyden.senate.gov;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Koteka13;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Smith Warner921;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Frederick053;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sen Shieldsc27;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sen Rosenbaumb04;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Helme05;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Taylor69c;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep KenyGuyer799;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sen Dembrowab8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Greenlick014;Zach.Klonoski@portlandoregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;Phil_Chang@merkley.senate.gov;waxwing7@gmail.com | SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 32 | Re: Proposed Temporary Rule on Colored Art Glass Manufacturing |
To Acting Director Hammond and Members of the Environmental Quality
Commission - Please find attached to this email a set of comments on the proposed temporary rule that would apply to colored art glass manufacturing facilities. These comments are submitted on behalf of Crag Law Center, Northwest Environmental Defense Center, Neighbors for Clean Air, OPAL Environmental Justice Oregon, Eastside Portland Air Coalition, Coalition for Communities of Color, Oregon Environmental Council, Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility, Verde, Beyond Toxics, and the Portland African American Leadership Forum. We have also attached a proposed alternative set of temporary rules that we ask be considered by the EQC. We will also submit these materials via DEQ’s web portal. Thank you for your consideration. Chris Winter Co-Executive Director Crag Law Center 917 Sw Oak St. Suite 417 Portland, OR 97205 (503) 525-2725 Fax (503) 296-5454 chris@crag.org <mailto:chris@crag.org> Protecting and sustaining the natural legacy of the Pacific Northwest On Mar 15, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Chris Winter <chris@crag.org <mailto:chris@crag.org> > wrote: To the Members of the Environmental Quality Commission: Please find attached to this email testimony that I plan to present at the meeting of the Commission this afternoon. These comments are submitted on behalf of Crag Law Center, Northwest Environmental Defense Center, Neighbors for Clean Air, and OPAL Environmental Justice. We are asking that the Commission defer consideration of the proposed temporary rules until the public is provided with a very modest 14-day comment period on the rule package. Thank you for your consideration. Chris Winter Co-Executive Director Crag Law Center 917 Sw Oak St. Suite 417 Portland, OR 97205 (503) 525-2725 Fax (503) 296-5454 chris@crag.org <mailto:chris@crag.org> Protecting and sustaining the natural legacy of the Pacific Northwest <3-15-16 - EQC Testimony.pdf> |
Chris Winter | chris@crag.org | SMTP | JOHNSON Colleen;EDEN Melinda;OKEEFFE Jane;ARMSTRONG Ed;RIDER Morgan;HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JOHNSON Colleen176;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=EDEN Melindae77;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OKEEFFE Janee72;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ARMSTRONG Edce9;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RIDER Morgan94f;/O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX | mark riskedahl;Mary Peveto;Huy Ong;GOLDFARB Gabriela * GOV;Eastside Portland Air Coalition;Jennifer D Jones;Maggie Tallmadge;Andrea Durbin;Kelly Campbell;alan@verdenw.org;desireerajee@gmail.com;Mary (Wyden) Gautreaux;REP Kotek;REP SmithWarner;REP Frederick;SEN Shields;SEN Rosenbaum;REP Helm;REP Taylor;REP Nosse;REP KenyGuyer;SEN Dembrow;REP Greenlick;Zach Klonoski;mult.chair@multco.us;Phil_Chang@merkley.senate.gov;Tony DeFalco | riskedahl@gmail.com;mary@whatsinourair.org;huy@opalpdx.org;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GOLDFARB Gabriela * GOV943;eastsideportlandair@gmail.com;thejonesfour@mac.com;maggie@coalitioncommunitiescolor.org;andread@oeconline.org;kelly@oregonpsr.org;alan@verdenw.org;desireerajee@gmail.com;Mary_Gautreaux@wyden.senate.gov;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Koteka13;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Smith Warner921;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Frederick053;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sen Shieldsc27;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sen Rosenbaumb04;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Helme05;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Taylor69c;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep KenyGuyer799;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sen Dembrowab8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Greenlick014;Zach.Klonoski@portlandoregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;Phil_Chang@merkley.senate.gov;waxwing7@gmail.com | SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 33 | Re: Proposed Temporary Rule on Colored Art Glass Manufacturing |
There was an error in the earlier message regarding one of the
attachments. Please refer to the two documents that are attached
to this email. Thank you and apologies for the confusion. Chris Winter Co-Executive Director Crag Law Center 503-525-2725 chris@crag.org <mailto:chris@crag.org> On Mar 30, 2016, at 9:09 AM, Chris Winter <chris@crag.org <mailto:chris@crag.org> > wrote: To Acting Director Hammond and Members of the Environmental Quality Commission - Please find attached to this email a set of comments on the proposed temporary rule that would apply to colored art glass manufacturing facilities. These comments are submitted on behalf of Crag Law Center, Northwest Environmental Defense Center, Neighbors for Clean Air, OPAL Environmental Justice Oregon, Eastside Portland Air Coalition, Coalition for Communities of Color, Oregon Environmental Council, Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility, Verde, Beyond Toxics, and the Portland African American Leadership Forum. We have also attached a proposed alternative set of temporary rules that we ask be considered by the EQC. We will also submit these materials via DEQ’s web portal. Thank you for your consideration. Chris Winter Co-Executive Director Crag Law Center 917 Sw Oak St. Suite 417 Portland, OR 97205 (503) 525-2725 Fax (503) 296-5454 chris@crag.org <mailto:chris@crag.org> Protecting and sustaining the natural legacy of the Pacific Northwest <3-30-16 - Final Group Comments on Temporary Rule.pdf> <3-30-16 - Proposed Temporary Glass Mfr Rules.pdf> On Mar 15, 2016, at 10:46 AM, Chris Winter <chris@crag.org <mailto:chris@crag.org> > wrote: To the Members of the Environmental Quality Commission: Please find attached to this email testimony that I plan to present at the meeting of the Commission this afternoon. These comments are submitted on behalf of Crag Law Center, Northwest Environmental Defense Center, Neighbors for Clean Air, and OPAL Environmental Justice. We are asking that the Commission defer consideration of the proposed temporary rules until the public is provided with a very modest 14-day comment period on the rule package. Thank you for your consideration. Chris Winter Co-Executive Director Crag Law Center 917 Sw Oak St. Suite 417 Portland, OR 97205 (503) 525-2725 Fax (503) 296-5454 chris@crag.org <mailto:chris@crag.org> Protecting and sustaining the natural legacy of the Pacific Northwest <3-15-16 - EQC Testimony.pdf> |
Chris Winter | chris@crag.org | SMTP | JOHNSON Colleen;EDEN Melinda;OKEEFFE Jane;ARMSTRONG Ed;RIDER Morgan;HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JOHNSON Colleen176;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=EDEN Melindae77;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OKEEFFE Janee72;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ARMSTRONG Edce9;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RIDER Morgan94f;/O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX | mark riskedahl;Mary Peveto;Huy Ong;GOLDFARB Gabriela * GOV;Eastside Portland Air Coalition;Jennifer D Jones;Maggie Tallmadge;Andrea Durbin;Kelly Campbell;alan@verdenw.org;desireerajee@gmail.com;Mary (Wyden) Gautreaux;REP Kotek;REP SmithWarner;REP Frederick;SEN Shields;SEN Rosenbaum;REP Helm;REP Taylor;REP Nosse;REP KenyGuyer;SEN Dembrow;REP Greenlick;Zach Klonoski;mult.chair@multco.us;Phil_Chang@merkley.senate.gov;Tony DeFalco | riskedahl@gmail.com;mary@whatsinourair.org;huy@opalpdx.org;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GOLDFARB Gabriela * GOV943;eastsideportlandair@gmail.com;thejonesfour@mac.com;maggie@coalitioncommunitiescolor.org;andread@oeconline.org;kelly@oregonpsr.org;alan@verdenw.org;desireerajee@gmail.com;Mary_Gautreaux@wyden.senate.gov;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Koteka13;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Smith Warner921;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Frederick053;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sen Shieldsc27;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sen Rosenbaumb04;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Helme05;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Taylor69c;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep KenyGuyer799;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sen Dembrowab8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Greenlick014;Zach.Klonoski@portlandoregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;Phil_Chang@merkley.senate.gov;waxwing7@gmail.com | SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 34 | Fwd: Important letter from Bullseye and local Glass Artists |
Help please Today! Please stop, or at least delay the action being taken in Portland Oregon against the Glass companies. I am sorry this is a poorly constructed cry for help .. there is no time left. The science does not support the enactment being imposed without proper review, or provide an opportunity for members of the community to address the issue. These glass companies work very hard to keep the community safe. They have met previous requirements and will continue to improve their efforts, now that new data has come to their attention. The original article was alarmist, and inaccurate. The follow up DEQ article was poorly distributed, or ignored. These new 'temporary' restrictions are inappropriate. Please request a review of the science, before issuing these restrictions. We need a common sense review, not an alarmist reaction. Yes we want to protect our residents, but placing blame on the wrong businesses will not correct the problem, and will put some well-intentioned businesses out of business … not to mention, the glass artists. Thank you Cindy please review this informative e-mail: -----Original Message----- Sent: Tue, Mar 15, 2016 7:15 am Subject: FW: Important letter from Bullseye -----Original Message----- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bullseye Glass Co. needs your help. Tomorrow, DEQ is proposing a set of sweeping “temporary” regulations that will severely curtail our production, without clear supporting evidence or an understanding of how we make our glass. See the agenda and proposed temporary rules here: http://www.oregon.gov/deq/EQC/Documents/2016/031516eqcAgenda.pdf The primary issue is our use of trivalent chromium Cr(III). Both DEQ and EPA have acknowledged there is no clear evidence of acute or chronic health risks based on Bullseye’s use of Cr(III), which is a harmless and naturally occurring compound. The limitations proposed are based on politics and anchored in speculation that some of these compounds might possibly change into a more toxic form of Chromium in our furnaces. Scientific evidence clearly indicates our furnaces cannot turn Chromium III into Chromium VI. If they did, our glass would be ruined. For more information on this, see this explanation by Dr. LaCourse of Alfred University: http://www.bullseyeglass.com/about-us/dr-lacourse-chromium-statement.html Bullseye understands the public interest and supports stronger environmental standards for our industry. To that effect, the company has already began the process of installing 99% efficient baghouses on furnaces that melt Chromium. We’ve agreed to test these filtration devices once they’re installed and in operation. As many of you know, Chromium III is essential to us producing the glass you rely on. Scientific evidence shows our use of the compound is not harmful. Nevertheless, DEQ wants to restrict Bullseye from using Cr(III) for an extended period of time. They are essentially basing these rules off an assumption of guilt without any supporting evidence. Neither DEQ or EPA have required any other US producer, of green glass, to entirely and arbitrarily stop their production without notice and perform the kind of extensive testing and modeling that DEQ is asking for. A typical green bottle manufacturer uses 1,000 times more Cr(III) per year than Bullseye Glass. A bottle producer, with emission controls, would melt more Cr(III) each day than Bullseye uses in a year. These newly proposed regulations are based on politics and fear, not science. They come right after DEQ’s executive director was forced to resign and its lead air monitor left the agency. These regulations could be forced upon us in the next 24 hours via a temporary rule making procedure by DEQ. If we are not allowed to use Cr (III), we can no longer make green glass. On top of our voluntary suspension of cadmium glass production until our baghouse is in place, this new limitation would eliminate 50% of our product line. It would result in employee layoffs, huge economic impacts to Bullseye and our worldwide customers, and could even drive us out of business. (To contact us on this subject, please send email to our Environmental Information email at questions@bullseyeglass.com <mailto:questions@bullseyeglass.com> .) Warm regards, Dan Schwoerer and Lani McGregor And the people of Bullseye Glass Co. ????›???????????????????????›??????????????????????????‰??‰????????????????????????????›????????????????????????????????????????????›???????????????????›??????????????????????›??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????›?????????????????????????????????‰‰? |
Cindy | lunarisen@aol.com | SMTP | REP Nosse;HAMMOND Joni;REP VegaPederson;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;lunarisen@aol.com | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;lunarisen@aol.com | EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 35 |
Dear Sirs/Madams, I am a glass artist working in the UK. I am aware that you have a meeting today regarding the potential problems arising from glass manufacture in the Portland area. I would like to ask you to consider carefully the impact of your decisions today throughout the world, and to make sure that it is based wholly on the scientific evidence presented. I, like most artists I know am very concerned about environmental issues and would not be happy using Bullseye Glass, if I thought that they were polluting the environment. However, I believe that all the scientific evidence shows that the glass production is safe. Furthermore, I believe people at Bullseye Glass are equally concerned about the environment and are eager to put in further measures to ensure the safety of their output. Bullseye Glass has a long history of responsible operation and I fully support them. I am looking forward to visiting Portland later in the year and attending a course at Bullseye Glass. I feel they are an asset to the area. Claire Moore (Bluebell Glass UK) |
Claire Moore | clairemoore77@hotmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;gabriela.goldfarb@oregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;gabriela.goldfarb@oregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||||||
| 36 | Bulleye Glass |
Dear Ms. Hammond, I'm asking that you NOT impose “temporary” regulations on Bullseye without there being some real evidence that it is needed. Bullseye Glass has been a responsible part of our community for many years. If we start this kind of reaction with the glass industry, where does it stop? Bullseye is trying to continue their operations (keeping local people employed!) while improving air quality controls. Please do not allow this reaction prior to ALL of the needed data. Thank you, Vicki Green |
Coella Glass | vgreen1us@yahoo.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 37 | "temporary" regulations for Bullseye Glass |
To Those Who Are Considering enforcing sweeping “temporary”
regulations that will severely curtail Bullseye glass production,: I understand your desire to protect those who live in the area of the Bullseye plant, but quick judgment of the situation without regard for the facts is putting an entire industry at risk. The impact on many could be irreversible. Many of the people who use the products from Bullseye have a huge investment in their businesses- this is not just a craft project! If a company has been in compliance with regulations and is taking steps to keep in compliance they should not be shut down unless there are irrefutable facts that immediate and undeniable harm will ensue. I understand that media hype has made the neighbors of Bullseye uncomfortable. But it is your responsibility to look at all sides of this situation and base decisions on facts and not emotions. Those of us who depend on Bullseye glass for our livelihood are depending on you to represent all sides of this situation. We all want a clean environment; but if shutting down the production for a period of time greatly impacts our industry and may literally have zero impact on the overall environment for that brief period of time when new safeguards are being installed this must be considered. I believe it is your responsibility to have clear supporting evidence of harm and an understanding of how the glass is made before you legislate crippling regulations for an entire industry built on the products of Bullseye. Thank-you for your fair representation, Connie Munford |
Connie Munford | craemunford@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | portland@bullseyeglass.com | portland@bullseyeglass.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 38 | I support Bullseye Glass - a company of Portlanders |
Dear Joni, I support Bullseye Glass’ efforts to continue operating as a responsible citizen of Portland’s social and business community. Bullseye Glass has a history of responsible operation, has remained in compliance with DEQ permits, and is committed to installing 99% efficient baghouses on furnaces that melt Chromium. Chromium III is essential to Bullseye’s product line, and the use of this compound is not harmful, as supported by scientific evidence which indicates the furnace environment cannot change Chromium III into the harmful Chromium VI. Why implement additional limitations on Bullseye’s use of Chromium III when there is no evidence to suggest its use is harmful? I urge DEQ to make regulatory decisions based on science, not conjecture. Thousands of families around the world depend on the art glass products Bullseye makes right here in Portland, Oregon, USA – my family included. As a native Oregonian, I am saddened and frustrated to see local industry, a small business, persecuted in the name of politics. I have lived in East Portland for more than 14 years, and worked for Bullseye for 12 years. This fantastic family owned business has time and again supported healthy growing families; and it will continue to do so if you allow Bullseye to have the opportunity to remain in business. Please do the right thing, and base your decisions on facts that will allow local industry develop and thrive. Thank you, Corinna Horsell |
Corinna Horsell | corinnahorsell@hotmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 39 | Dale Feik EQC Public comment for Mar 15, 2016 |
To: Environmental Quality Commissioners Via: Stephanie Caldera,
Administrative Assistant to EQC, 503-229-5301 Jane O’Keeffe, Chair Ed Armstrong, Vice Chair Morgan Rider Colleen Johnson Melinda Eden Joni Hammond, Interim Director, DEQ Cc: Victoria Lowe, Forest Grove City Councilor From: Dale Feik Date: March 15, 2016 Re: Things to consider while deciding Temporary rules for Glass coloring Factories & more input on hiring new DEQ Director Mary O’Brian and Lisa Arkin wrote an Opinion Letter to the Editor that was published in the Oregonian March 2, 2016. Please read and consider the necessity of asking the lobbyist for DEQ, Palmer Mason, to lobby our State Legislators to repeal a law that was passed to prevent cities to adopt the kind of toxic chemical reporting that is required in Eugene. I have attached the Opinion letter and copied and pasted it below. I have also attached the Willamette Week article written around 1995 that highly criticizes DEQ’s authorizing ‘Bubble Permits” to Intel. Those Bubble permits are still authorized. Mary O’Brien is quoted in that extensive article. More input of hiring procedures of new, acting, interim, permanent DEQ Director. Victoria Lowe, Forest Grove City Councilor who made public comment March 14, 2016, forgot to mention during her comment time that another option would be for you to request that an experienced EPA Administrator be asked to serve as an Interim Director until you get the details worked out and get hired a permanent directory. Something to consider. -------------------------- <http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2016/03/post_160.html> http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2016/03/post_160.html By Mary O'Brien and Lisa Arkin It's important to know when you're being poisoned by industrial toxic discharges, whether to air, water or land. Some would even say you have a right to know. But how much you can know depends on good laws. Gaps and loopholes in federal and state regulations have allowed stained-glass manufacturing companies to pollute Portland residential neighborhoods with heavy metals without anyone knowing that extremely hazardous air pollutants were going into the air. State officials stressed how "caught off-guard" they were when a U.S. Forest Service air monitoring study revealed very high levels of cadmium and arsenic in the air of several inner-city Portland neighborhoods. Thousands of people had been unknowingly exposed for decades. In 1996, the citizens of Eugene amended their city constitution to make it everyone's right to know about even small amounts of toxic chemicals that local manufacturers are using and emitting. The businesses, of course, were already keeping careful track of their dollars coming in and going out. We were sure they could do the same for toxics. And now they do. Each year, Eugene businesses using more than 50 pounds (5 pounds for extremely hazardous substances) of hazardous chemicals file a report with the fire marshal. The report covers chemicals federally listed in the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Accuracy is accomplished by requiring businesses to report the amount of chemicals brought onsite each year and where each toxic has gone — for instance into the air, water, stored on-site, trucked away as waste or incorporated into a product. Sensible and reliable, this reporting program is called the Community Toxics Right-to-Know law. The fire marshal's detailed report is filed online for public access, 24/7. In 1999, under pressure from the Associated Oregon Industries, the Oregon Legislature voted to adopt onerous and complicated provisions making it virtually impossible for other communities to implement a community toxics right-to-know program. Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber would have had the votes to uphold a veto; he didn't do so, ignoring the need to protect public health. Fast forward to Portland in 2016. The Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) indicates they knew that cadmium and arsenic were elevated in Portland's air prior to the Forest Service monitoring, but they didn't know where the emissions were coming from. That's because businesses do not currently have to report toxic discharges less than 10 tons per year. Under Eugene's system, chemical reporting is by the pound, not by the ton. However, these smaller sources of toxics add up. Simply put, Portland's plumes of cadmium, arsenic and chromium went up in the air and fell right through an information and regulatory gap. The situation with glass manufacturers could just be the tip of the iceberg. If Bullseye Glass and Uroboros Glass were located in Eugene, the DEQ (and the public) would have immediately known all the sources locally emitting cadmium and arsenic. Everyone would have been able to track historical emissions trends, as well as determine whether other nearby polluters were adding to the problem. Knowing might mean the difference between a resident being exposed for a short time, or in the case of Portland neighborhoods, a very long time. While the wheels of toxics regulatory reform turn extremely slowly if at all at the state and federal level, communities throughout Oregon could enact right-to-know laws within the next two years if Oregon's Legislature would take its foot off the communities' necks — and their lungs and children. All it has to do is allow Community Toxics Right-to-Know, based on Eugene's tried-and-true model. Reporting toxics in, toxics out. Posting the information on a website. It's that simple, and it's a heck of an incentive to stop using toxics unnecessarily, because everyone is watching. Mary O'Brien, Ph.D., is Utah Forests Program Director with the Grand Canyon Trust and original author of the "Eugene Toxics Right-to-Know" charter language. Lisa Arkin is executive director of Beyond Toxics, a statewide environmental health and justice organization, and an appointed member of the Eugene Toxics Board. ---------------------------- At a previous EQC meeting I said that Hillsboro Air & Water (HAW) a project of Portland Clean Air (PCA) http://portlandcleanair.org/ spent 24 days over four days, digitally copying all of the simple, standard, Air Contaminate Discharge, and Title V Air Permits for all industries in Multnomah and Washington Counties that DEQ Air Staff pulled for Seth Woolley and me at the Lloyd Center DEQ file office. Seth has posted those on our web site. Dave Monro said that he would like to have us share those digitally copied permits with him and the department of air quality. So I am doing that now even though Dave has resigned. I am copying this to Nina Deconcini who was, I believe, Dave’s supervisor. At previous EQC meetings I encouraged you to get all written air and water permits on digital files for DEQ staff and the public. PCA/HAW is sharing this information with the public and you. Please make it a very high priority for the new Director of DEQ to get an electronic data/permit system operating efficiently for DEQ staff and the public. Seth also posted Portland Pollution Maps -- http://portlandcleanair.org/ <http://portlandcleanair.org/files/Multnomah%20Air%20Pollution%20-%20What%20You%20Can%20Do%20-%20PCA.pdf> Portland Air Pollution - What You Can Do (DEQ data by Portland Clean Air) <http://portlandcleanair.org/files/Multnomah%202014%20EPA%20TRI%20-%20PCA.pdf> Portland 2014 EPA Toxic Release Inventory (EPA data by Portland Clean Air) <http://portlandcleanair.org/files/Multnomah%20Air%20Pollution%20-%20Cancer%20Risk%20Maps%20-%20PCA.pdf> Portland Air Pollution Cancer Risk Maps (DEQ, EPA data by Portland Clean Air) <http://projects.oregonlive.com/arsenic/> Multnomah Lead, Arsenic, & Nickel Moss map (Forest Service data by Oregonian) I also attached a HAW Fact sheet and our first HAW Newsletter for your information. Sincerely, Dale Feik, Spokesperson for Hillsboro Air and Water (HAW) Cc: Seth Woolley, PCA, Board Director and Media Contact Greg Bourget, PCA, Executive Director, Researcher, and Volunteer Coordinator ??????Ã??????????????????????????????????????????›???????????????????????????????????›?????????›?‚???Ã??????Ã??????????????›?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????›????????? |
Dale Feik | dfeik33@comcast.net | SMTP | CALDERA Stephanie | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=sclark | EX | HAMMOND Joni;Victoria Lowe | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;v.lowe2@frontier.com | EX;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 40 | Stephanie Caldera Public comment for EQC members March 30, 2016 |
To: Environmental Quality Commissioners Via: Stephanie Caldera,
Administrative Assistant to EQC, 503-229-5301 Jane O’Keeffe, Chair Ed Armstrong, Vice Chair Morgan Rider Colleen Johnson Melinda Eden Joni Hammond, Interim Director, DEQ From: Dale Feik Date: March 30, 2016 After reading the proposed Temporary Rules that apply to the colored-glass manufacturing companies in Portland, I believe that they are necessary to protect the immediate and long-term health of the people who live close to those plants. Even the people who do not live close by will be affected because those toxic emissions, after being diluted by mixing with the air, still linger on. Every toxic emission matters! The goal of the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act is to eliminate toxic emissions, not just reduce them. That is why in the Clean Water Act, the EPA and State Environmental Quality Regulatory Agencies have to approve industries’ National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. Many lobbyists and attorneys representing industries (Association for Oregon Industries – Air Quality Committee co-chaired by Thomas Wood and Mark Morford) have convinced DEQ and you to make decisions that do not seriously prejudice them so that the industries can make huge profits without being held to the strictest environmental emission controls possible. With the hiring of a new Director of DEQ I hope that the DEQ staff will make recommendations to you that are stricter than current Federal rules – rules that DEQ has the authority to make. Specifically, I believe that the Temporary Rules need to be enhanced by: Changing the wording so that they apply to not just Portland but to at least the Portland Metro area – better yet, to all glass manufacturers and glass makers statewide. I requested from the State Fire Marshal in Salem all of the extremely Hazardous Chemicals that Intel had stored onsite in the years 2010 through 2015 in Washington County. Intel manufacturing plants in Hillsboro and Aloha are classified by the State Fire Marshal as Extremely Hazardous Facilities. The very long lists of Flammable, Corrosive, Acute Health Hazard, Combustible, Poisonous Substances, and Chemicals are overwhelming even to Fire Fighter Emergency Response teams. The State Fire Marshal’s office administers the 1986 Federal Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know law which has never been implemented well at the Local Emergency Planning Committee County level. Many of those Intel Extremely Hazardous Substances are heavy metals which are also used by the glass manufacturing industry – lead, copper, zinc cadmium, arsenic, chromium and others, and because of propriety laws, are unnamed. The Southwest Organizing Project in New Mexico wrote the book titled Intel Inside, A Case Study of Environmental and Social Injustice. Most of that injustice had to do with politicians/lobbyists blocking effective environmental laws that would have protected the large Latino population who live by Intel’s facilities who emit tons, not just pounds, of toxic emissions. Any Temporary Rule in Oregon needs to be sufficient to protect the environmental health of our most vulnerable residents, not just the ones living by the glass manufacturing plants. As you know, I objected to the Temporary Rule that you adopted for six months without public comment so that Intel in Washington County and On-Manufacturing semi-conductor facility in Multnomah County would not have to follow the then current DEQ rule to control greenhouse gases. Toxic air emissions (heavy metals, fluorine related substances) create many health related diseases but greenhouse gas emissions caused by the burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) in the long run will make our planet inhabitable by animal life as we know it. When you decide the details of the Temporary Rule, please consider the statement of the 21 Youth Plaintiffs ages 8 through19 who sued the Federal Government and the Fossil Fuel Industry. I have attached the statements made by those 21 youth – those statements are beside each youth’s picture. http://ourchildrenstrust.org/federalplaintiffs In summary, colored glass has many interesting features depending on your point of view and qualities of materials used. Many people now wish that public health took precedence over artistic beauty. What good is beauty if you get sick or die from that beauty? Please adopt very strict Temporary Rules and make them Permanent. This time I would be in favor of you doing that. |
Dale Feik | dfeik33@comcast.net | SMTP | CALDERA Stephanie | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=sclark | EX | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 41 | Bullseye Glass |
To: John Hammond, I have been a long standing customer and friend of Bullseye Glass. My experience with them in the last 15 years is that they are a caring community minded organization and wouldn't dream of harming Portland, it's air quality or it's citizens. If they have additional responsibilities in air quality cleanup give them a clear path - but don't allow them to be villified and found guilty before a reasonable examination of the facts. Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. I sincerely hope that you and your team will look beyond the political villification of Bullseye and carefully examine and then work with them to fix whatever may need to be fixed. Enough of this trial by media! Sincerely, Dave Bartles |
Dave Bartles | dwbart1@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 42 | Bullseye Glass resend |
To: Joni Hammond, First, I apologize, I hit send - before I realized I had sent my previous message meant for you addressed as "John" - sorry! Anyway, I have been a long standing customer and friend of Bullseye Glass. My experience with them in the last 15 years is that they are a caring community minded organization and wouldn't dream of harming Portland, it's air quality or it's citizens. If they have additional responsibilities in air quality cleanup give them a clear path - but don't allow them to be villified and found guilty in the media before a reasonable examination of the facts. Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. I sincerely hope that you and your team will look beyond the political villification of Bullseye and carefully examine and then work with them to fix whatever may need to be fixed. Enough of this trial by media! Sincerely, Dave Bartles |
Dave Bartles | dwbart1@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 43 | Bullseye Glass |
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, I am writing to you in regard to the proposed stop being put on the use by Bullseye Glass Co. of trivalent Chromium in their production of glass at their factory in Portland. I am a retired Englishman, who worked for many years in University Radiation Protection here in the UK. I was a representative of a professional society on a National Committee which met regularly with the UK Environment Agency, have been involved in the writing of many Environmental Impact Statements and feel that I have the professional skills to make a significant input in this matter. I am married to a Danish-born Glass Artist working here in the North East of England. There are two major issues of fact which need to be upheld here: Under the conditions used in the manufacture of Bullseye glass, there is no way in which hexavalent chromium can be made and released to the environment. This is a scientific fact. It is a principle of American law that everyone is innocent until proven guilty. In proposing the shut down of a major part of Bullseye Glass Company’s production, this principle is being set aside without any cause whatsoever. This is to place the State of Oregon in a very dangerous position in law. Bullseye glass is a vital medium for a very large part of the world-wide studio glass movement. Those, like my wife, who do not actually use the glass produced by Bullseye Glass Co., are dependant on vendors world-wide for their other requisites, these suppliers depending on their sales of Bullseye glass for their continuing existence. Can the State of Oregon risk the massive cost of an indefensible law suit by small companies around the world, in a class action, due to the scientifically invalid prevention of this company continuing its legal manufacture of this glass, by the state legislature? I have listened to representatives of Bullseye Glass company a number of times and am well aware of their commitment to the environment. I have already offered my knowledge to them if it can be of any use. Otherwise I have no contact with the company and am writing to you all for no other reason than to attempt to prevent the unnecessary damage proposed to the world-wide Studio Glass community many of whom are my very good friends and one of whom is my wife of more than 30 years. Yours faithfully David J Walland |
David Walland | davidwalland@googlemail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;Rep.JessicaVegaPedersen@state.or.us;Gabriella.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;Rep.JessicaVegaPedersen@state.or.us;Gabriella.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 44 | Bullseye Glass |
DEQ is proposing a set of sweeping regulations that will severely
curtail Bullseye glass production, without clear supporting evidence
or an understanding of how they make glass. Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose poorly written and misdirected rules. Regards, Deive Butvila |
dbutvila@gmail.com | dbutvila@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 45 | Creation of a Public/Private Partnership in the Matter of Management of Heavy Metals in Portland--An Alternative to Proposed Temporary Rules |
An open letter to: Joni Hammond (Interim Director) Department
of Environmental Quality (DEQ): I have read with interest the current issues raised by the finding of heavy metals in the air in the southeast part of Portland. And, a proposal to establish temporary standards to limit the use of Chromium III (CRIII) used in the production of green glass for artistic used is scheduled for tomorrow. My wife is a glass artist who uses products produced by Bullseye Glass Co. And, I understand the following: 1) The owners of Bullseye Glass have been responsive to these concerns, have discontinued production of glass that may be associated with these products and are working to implement a permanent solution for all identified heavy metals used in the production of their glass products. 2) There are certain public health concerns that both the local and state authorities have identified, have sought to find a remedy for these findings and have acted responsibly in carrying out their duties; 3) That current federal standards do not cover this situation in smaller glass facilities; 4) There are differences of opinion about the possibility of production of CR VI when using CRIII ; and, 5) That a hearing is scheduled tomorrow to approve temporary standards in this regard. I am writing to respectfully ask that the DEQ explore alternatives to implementation of these standards. There is, it seems to me, a need to find a balanced remedy that protects both the public health and also protects the interests of these businesses who provide a resource for the art glass community. I would ask that all interested parties form an ongoing working group to determine how best to manage this public health concern. Overly protective regulations that threaten the viability of small glass manufacturers are not the answer, particularly when, as I understand it, they have agreed to fully cooperate with the proposed safeguards, have provided scientific information regarding the possibility of CR VI formation during the process; and have agreed that measures will be put in place to assure their compliance and to protect the public safety and environment. Such a broad based group of stakeholders should be charged with reporting back to the City, State and Federal government their findings; examine available science regarding the use of CRIII in production of glass; provide transparency for the community at large for their findings and recommendations; and, see that a mechanism is put in place to assure creation of an effective monitoring system that reports any changes in levels of toxicity until a more permanent remedy is found. Such a public-private partnership is consistent with Oregon's values and its concerns for the health and well being of all our members of the community. There are no bad guys or good guys here. Only people of good will who want to find a solution. Requiring standards to insure what might be a potential violation in the future is not consistent with these values and concerns. There is room for both preventive environmental controls in the absence of federal standards and for glass manufacturers to live and be responsible members of our business community. We should expect no less. I would ask that you consider an alternative to these temporary rules. Respectfully, Dale Garell, MD 4028 SW Dosch Park Lane Portland, Oregon 97239 cc: Oregon Health Authority (OHA) Lynne Saxton phone: 503-947-2340 Email: <mailto:lynne.saxton@state.or.us> lynne.saxton@state.or.us <mailto:lynne.saxton@state.or.us> State Representatives Governor Kate Brown phone: (503) 378-4582 email: <https://www.oregon.gov/gov/pages/contact.aspx> https://www.oregon.gov/gov/pages/contact.aspx Representative Rob Nosse phone: (971) 217-8037 email: <mailto:Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us> Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us <mailto:Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us> Representative Jessica Vega Pederson phone: (503) 986-1447 email: <mailto:Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us> Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us <mailto:Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us> U.S. Representative Earl Blumenauer phone: (503) 231-2300 email: <https://forms.house.gov/blumenauer/webforms/issue_subscribe.html> https://forms.house.gov/blumenauer/webforms/issue_subscribe.html ? Oregon’s Natural Resource Office Gabriela Goldfarb phone: (503) 378-5232 email: <mailto:Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov> Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov <mailto:Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov> U.S. Senators Jeff Merkley phone: (503) 326-3386 email: <http://www.merkley.senate.gov/contact> http://www.merkley.senate.gov/contact Ron Wyden phone: (503) 326-7525 email: <https://www.wyden.senate.gov/contact> https://www.wyden.senate.gov/contact County Representatives Deborah Kafoury phone: (503) 988-3308 email: <mailto:mult.chair@multco.us> mult.chair@multco.us <mailto:mult.chair@multco.us> Portland Representatives Mayor Charlie Hales phone: (503) 823-4120 email: <mailto:mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov> mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov> ?Dan Saltzman phone: (503) 823-4151 email: <mailto:dan@portlandoregon.gov> dan@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:dan@portlandoregon.gov> Nick Fish phone: (503) 823-3589 email: <mailto:nick@portlandoregon.gov> nick@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:nick@portlandoregon.gov> Amanda Fritz phone: 503-823-3008 email: <mailto:Amanda@portlandoregon.gov> Amanda@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:Amanda@portlandoregon.gov> Steve Novick phone: (503) 823-4682 email: <mailto:novick@portlandoregon.gov> novick@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:novick@portlandoregon.gov> ????Â???Z????????????????????????????????‰‰? |
dcgarell@aol.com | dcgarell@aol.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | irislitt@stanford.edu;lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com | irislitt@stanford.edu;lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com | SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 46 | Creation of a Public/Private Partnership in the Matter of Management of Heavy Metals in Portland--An Alternative to Proposed Temporary Rules |
An open letter to: Joni Hammond (Interim Director) Department
of Environmental Quality (DEQ): I have read with interest the current issues raised by the finding of heavy metals in the air in the southeast part of Portland. And, a proposal to establish temporary standards to limit the use of Chromium III (CRIII) used in the production of green glass for artistic used is scheduled for tomorrow. My wife is a glass artist who uses products produced by Bullseye Glass Co. And, I understand the following: 1) The owners of Bullseye Glass have been responsive to these concerns, have discontinued production of glass that may be associated with these products and are working to implement a permanent solution for all identified heavy metals used in the production of their glass products. 2) There are certain public health concerns that both the local and state authorities have identified, have sought to find a remedy for these findings and have acted responsibly in carrying out their duties; 3) That current federal standards do not cover this situation in smaller glass facilities; 4) There are differences of opinion about the possibility of production of CR VI when using CRIII ; and, 5) That a hearing is scheduled tomorrow to approve temporary standards in this regard. I am writing to respectfully ask that the DEQ explore alternatives to implementation of these standards. There is, it seems to me, a need to find a balanced remedy that protects both the public health and also protects the interests of these businesses who provide a resource for the art glass community. I would ask that all interested parties form an ongoing working group to determine how best to manage this public health concern. Overly protective regulations that threaten the viability of small glass manufacturers are not the answer, particularly when, as I understand it, they have agreed to fully cooperate with the proposed safeguards, have provided scientific information regarding the possibility of CR VI formation during the process; and have agreed that measures will be put in place to assure their compliance and to protect the public safety and environment. Such a broad based group of stakeholders should be charged with reporting back to the City, State and Federal government their findings; examine available science regarding the use of CRIII in production of glass; provide transparency for the community at large for their findings and recommendations; and, see that a mechanism is put in place to assure creation of an effective monitoring system that reports any changes in levels of toxicity until a more permanent remedy is found. Such a public-private partnership is consistent with Oregon's values and its concerns for the health and well being of all our members of the community. There are no bad guys or good guys here. Only people of good will who want to find a solution. Requiring standards to insure what might be a potential violation in the future is not consistent with these values and concerns. There is room for both preventive environmental controls in the absence of federal standards and for glass manufacturers to live and be responsible members of our business community. We should expect no less. I would ask that you consider an alternative to these temporary rules. Respectfully, Dale Garell, MD 4028 SW Dosch Park Lane Portland, Oregon 97239 cc: Oregon Health Authority (OHA) Lynne Saxton phone: 503-947-2340 Email: <mailto:lynne.saxton@state.or.us> lynne.saxton@state.or.us <mailto:lynne.saxton@state.or.us> State Representatives Governor Kate Brown phone: (503) 378-4582 email: <https://www.oregon.gov/gov/pages/contact.aspx> https://www.oregon.gov/gov/pages/contact.aspx Representative Rob Nosse phone: (971) 217-8037 email: <mailto:Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us> Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us <mailto:Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us> Representative Jessica Vega Pederson phone: (503) 986-1447 email: <mailto:Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us> Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us <mailto:Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us> U.S. Representative Earl Blumenauer phone: (503) 231-2300 email: <https://forms.house.gov/blumenauer/webforms/issue_subscribe.html> https://forms.house.gov/blumenauer/webforms/issue_subscribe.html ? Oregon’s Natural Resource Office Gabriela Goldfarb phone: (503) 378-5232 email: <mailto:Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov> Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov <mailto:Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov> U.S. Senators Jeff Merkley phone: (503) 326-3386 email: <http://www.merkley.senate.gov/contact> http://www.merkley.senate.gov/contact Ron Wyden phone: (503) 326-7525 email: <https://www.wyden.senate.gov/contact> https://www.wyden.senate.gov/contact County Representatives Deborah Kafoury phone: (503) 988-3308 email: <mailto:mult.chair@multco.us> mult.chair@multco.us <mailto:mult.chair@multco.us> Portland Representatives Mayor Charlie Hales phone: (503) 823-4120 email: <mailto:mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov> mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov> ?Dan Saltzman phone: (503) 823-4151 email: <mailto:dan@portlandoregon.gov> dan@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:dan@portlandoregon.gov> Nick Fish phone: (503) 823-3589 email: <mailto:nick@portlandoregon.gov> nick@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:nick@portlandoregon.gov> Amanda Fritz phone: 503-823-3008 email: <mailto:Amanda@portlandoregon.gov> Amanda@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:Amanda@portlandoregon.gov> Steve Novick phone: (503) 823-4682 email: <mailto:novick@portlandoregon.gov> novick@portlandoregon.go <mailto:novick@portlandoregon.gov> ???????Â????????????????????????‰‰? |
dcgarell@aol.com | dcgarell@aol.com | SMTP | mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov | mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com;irislitt@stanford.edu | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com;irislitt@stanford.edu | EX;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 47 | Fwd: Creation of a Public/Private Partnership in the Matter of Management of Heavy Metals in Portland--An Alternative to Proposed Temporary Rules |
-----Original Message----- From: dcgarell <dcgarell@aol.com> To: hammond.joni <hammond.joni@deq.state.or.us> Cc: irislitt <irislitt@stanford.edu>; lanimcgregor <lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com> Sent: Tue, Mar 15, 2016 12:20 am Subject: Creation of a |
dcgarell@aol.com | dcgarell@aol.com | SMTP | mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov | mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com;irislitt@stanford.edu | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com;irislitt@stanford.edu | EX;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 48 | Fwd: Creation of a Public/Private Partnership in the Matter of Management of Heavy Metals in Portland--An Alternative to Proposed Temporary Rules |
-----Original Message----- From: dcgarell <dcgarell@aol.com> To: hammond.joni <hammond.joni@deq.state.or.us> Cc: irislitt <irislitt@stanford.edu>; lanimcgregor <lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com> Sent: Tue, Mar 15, 2016 12:20 am Subject: Creation of a Public/Private Partnership in the Matter of Management of Heavy Metals in Portland--An Alternative to Proposed Temporary Rules An open letter to: Joni Hammond (Interim Director) Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ): I have read with interest the current issues raised by the finding of heavy metals in the air in the southeast part of Portland. And, a proposal to establish temporary standards to limit the use of Chromium III (CRIII) used in the production of green glass for artistic used is scheduled for tomorrow. My wife is a glass artist who uses products produced by Bullseye Glass Co. And, I understand the following: 1) The owners of Bullseye Glass have been responsive to these concerns, have discontinued production of glass that may be associated with these products and are working to implement a permanent solution for all identified heavy metals used in the production of their glass products. 2) There are certain public health concerns that both the local and state authorities have identified, have sought to find a remedy for these findings and have acted responsibly in carrying out their duties; 3) That current federal standards do not cover this situation in smaller glass facilities; 4) There are differences of opinion about the possibility of production of CR VI when using CRIII ; and, 5) That a hearing is scheduled tomorrow to approve temporary standards in this regard. I am writing to respectfully ask that the DEQ explore alternatives to implementation of these standards. There is, it seems to me, a need to find a balanced remedy that protects both the public health and also protects the interests of these businesses who provide a resource for the art glass community. I would ask that all interested parties form an ongoing working group to determine how best to manage this public health concern. Overly protective regulations that threaten the viability of small glass manufacturers are not the answer, particularly when, as I understand it, they have agreed to fully cooperate with the proposed safeguards, have provided scientific information regarding the possibility of CR VI formation during the process; and have agreed that measures will be put in place to assure their compliance and to protect the public safety and environment. Such a broad based group of stakeholders should be charged with reporting back to the City, State and Federal government their findings; examine available science regarding the use of CRIII in production of glass; provide transparency for the community at large for their findings and recommendations; and, see that a mechanism is put in place to assure creation of an effective monitoring system that reports any changes in levels of toxicity until a more permanent remedy is found. Such a public-private partnership is consistent with Oregon's values and its concerns for the health and well being of all our members of the community. There are no bad guys or good guys here. Only people of good will who want to find a solution. Requiring standards to insure what might be a potential violation in the future is not consistent with these values and concerns. There is room for both preventive environmental controls in the absence of federal standards and for glass manufacturers to live and be responsible members of our business community. We should expect no less. I would ask that you consider an alternative to these temporary rules. Respectfully, Dale Garell, MD 4028 SW Dosch Park Lane Portland, Oregon 97239 cc: Oregon Health Authority (OHA) Lynne Saxton phone: 503-947-2340 Email: <mailto:lynne.saxton@state.or.us> lynne.saxton@state.or.us <mailto:lynne.saxton@state.or.us> State Representatives Governor Kate Brown phone: (503) 378-4582 email: <https://www.oregon.gov/gov/pages/contact.aspx> https://www.oregon.gov/gov/pages/contact.aspx Representative Rob Nosse phone: (971) 217-8037 email: <mailto:Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us> Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us <mailto:Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us> Representative Jessica Vega Pederson phone: (503) 986-1447 email: <mailto:Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us> Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us <mailto:Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us> U.S. Representative Earl Blumenauer phone: (503) 231-2300 email: <https://forms.house.gov/blumenauer/webforms/issue_subscribe.html> https://forms.house.gov/blumenauer/webforms/issue_subscribe.html ? Oregon’s Natural Resource Office Gabriela Goldfarb phone: (503) 378-5232 email: <mailto:Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov> Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov <mailto:Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov> U.S. Senators Jeff Merkley phone: (503) 326-3386 email: <http://www.merkley.senate.gov/contact> http://www.merkley.senate.gov/contact Ron Wyden phone: (503) 326-7525 email: <https://www.wyden.senate.gov/contact> https://www.wyden.senate.gov/contact County Representatives Deborah Kafoury phone: (503) 988-3308 email: <mailto:mult.chair@multco.us> mult.chair@multco.us <mailto:mult.chair@multco.us> Portland Representatives Mayor Charlie Hales phone: (503) 823-4120 email: <mailto:mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov> mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov ?Dan Saltzman phone: (503) 823-4151 email: <mailto:dan@portlandoregon.gov> dan@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:dan@portlandoregon.gov> Nick Fish phone: (503) 823-3589 email: <mailto:nick@portlandoregon.gov> nick@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:nick@portlandoregon.gov> Amanda Fritz phone: 503-823-3008 email: <mailto:Amanda@portlandoregon.gov> Amanda@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:Amanda@portlandoregon.gov> Steve Novick phone: (503) 823-4682 email: <mailto:novick@portlandoregon.gov> novick@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:novick@portlandoregon.gov> ?????????????????????????????? |
dcgarell@aol.com | dcgarell@aol.com | SMTP | mult.chair@multco.us | mult.chair@multco.us | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com;irislitt@stanford.edu | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com;irislitt@stanford.edu | EX;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 49 | Fwd: Creation of a Public/Private Partnership in the Matter of Management of Heavy Metals in Portland--An Alternative to Proposed Temporary Rules |
-----Original Message----- From: dcgarell <dcgarell@aol.com <mailto:dcgarell@aol.com> > To: hammond.joni <hammond.joni@deq.state.or.us <mailto:hammond.joni@deq.state.or.us> > Cc: irislitt <irislitt@stanford.edu <mailto:irislitt@stanford.edu> >; lanimcgregor <lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com <mailto:lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com> > Sent: Tue, Mar 15, 2016 12:20 am Subject: Creation of a Public/Private Partnership in the Matter of Management of Heavy Metals in Portland--An Alternative to Proposed Temporary Rules An open letter to: Joni Hammond (Interim Director) Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ): I have read with interest the current issues raised by the finding of heavy metals in the air in the southeast part of Portland. And, a proposal to establish temporary standards to limit the use of Chromium III (CRIII) used in the production of green glass for artistic used is scheduled for tomorrow. My wife is a glass artist who uses products produced by Bullseye Glass Co. And, I understand the following: 1) The owners of Bullseye Glass have been responsive to these concerns, have discontinued production of glass that may be associated with these products and are working to implement a permanent solution for all identified heavy metals used in the production of their glass products. 2) There are certain public health concerns that both the local and state authorities have identified, have sought to find a remedy for these findings and have acted responsibly in carrying out their duties; 3) That current federal standards do not cover this situation in smaller glass facilities; 4) There are differences of opinion about the possibility of production of CR VI when using CRIII ; and, 5) That a hearing is scheduled tomorrow to approve temporary standards in this regard. I am writing to respectfully ask that the DEQ explore alternatives to implementation of these standards. There is, it seems to me, a need to find a balanced remedy that protects both the public health and also protects the interests of these businesses who provide a resource for the art glass community. I would ask that all interested parties form an ongoing working group to determine how best to manage this public health concern. Overly protective regulations that threaten the viability of small glass manufacturers are not the answer, particularly when, as I understand it, they have agreed to fully cooperate with the proposed safeguards, have provided scientific information regarding the possibility of CR VI formation during the process; and have agreed that measures will be put in place to assure their compliance and to protect the public safety and environment. Such a broad based group of stakeholders should be charged with reporting back to the City, State and Federal government their findings; examine available science regarding the use of CRIII in production of glass; provide transparency for the community at large for their findings and recommendations; and, see that a mechanism is put in place to assure creation of an effective monitoring system that reports any changes in levels of toxicity until a more permanent remedy is found. Such a public-private partnership is consistent with Oregon's values and its concerns for the health and well being of all our members of the community. There are no bad guys or good guys here. Only people of good will who want to find a solution. Requiring standards to insure what might be a potential violation in the future is not consistent with these values and concerns. There is room for both preventive environmental controls in the absence of federal standards and for glass manufacturers to live and be responsible members of our business community. We should expect no less. I would ask that you consider an alternative to these temporary rules. Respectfully, Dale Garell, MD 4028 SW Dosch Park Lane Portland, Oregon 97239 cc: Oregon Health Authority (OHA) Lynne Saxton phone: 503-947-2340 Email: <mailto:lynne.saxton@state.or.us> lynne.saxton@state.or.us <mailto:lynne.saxton@state.or.us> State Representatives Governor Kate Brown phone: (503) 378-4582 email: <https://www.oregon.gov/gov/pages/contact.aspx> https://www.oregon.gov/gov/pages/contact.aspx Representative Rob Nosse phone: (971) 217-8037 email: <mailto:Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us> Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us <mailto:Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us> Representative Jessica Vega Pederson phone: (503) 986-1447 email: <mailto:Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us> Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us <mailto:Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us> U.S. Representative Earl Blumenauer phone: (503) 231-2300 email: <https://forms.house.gov/blumenauer/webforms/issue_subscribe.html> https://forms.house.gov/blumenauer/webforms/issue_subscribe.html ? Oregon’s Natural Resource Office Gabriela Goldfarb phone: (503) 378-5232 email: <mailto:Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov> Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov <mailto:Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov> U.S. Senators Jeff Merkley phone: (503) 326-3386 email: <http://www.merkley.senate.gov/contact> http://www.merkley.senate.gov/contact Ron Wyden phone: (503) 326-7525 email: <https://www.wyden.senate.gov/contact> https://www.wyden.senate.gov/contact County Representatives Deborah Kafoury phone: (503) 988-3308 email: <mailto:mult.chair@multco.us> mult.chair@multco.us <mailto:mult.chair@multco.us> Portland Representatives Mayor Charlie Hales phone: (503) 823-4120 email: <mailto:mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov> mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov> ?Dan Saltzman phone: (503) 823-4151 email: <mailto:dan@portlandoregon.gov> dan@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:dan@portlandoregon.gov> Nick Fish phone: (503) 823-3589 email: <mailto:nick@portlandoregon.gov> nick@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:nick@portlandoregon.gov> Amanda Fritz phone: 503-823-3008 email: <mailto:Amanda@portlandoregon.gov> Amanda@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:Amanda@portlandoregon.gov> Steve Novick phone: (503) 823-4682 email: <mailto:novick@portlandoregon.gov> novick@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:novick@portlandoregon.gov> |
dcgarell@aol.com | dcgarell@aol.com | SMTP | Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov | Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com;irislitt@stanford.edu | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com;irislitt@stanford.edu | EX;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 50 | Fwd: Creation of a Public/Private Partnership in the Matter of Management of Heavy Metals in Portland--An Alternative to Proposed Temporary Rules |
Might you forward this e-mail to Representative Earl Blmenauer.
(l https://forms.house.gov/blumenauer/webforms/issue_subscribe.html)?
I am unable to send from my computer this evening and I want to be sure he is copied..Thanks, Dale Garell -----Original Message----- From: dcgarell <dcgarell@aol.com> To: hammond.joni <hammond.joni@deq.state.or.us> Cc: irislitt <irislitt@stanford.edu>; lanimcgregor <lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com> Sent: Tue, Mar 15, 2016 12:20 am Subject: Creation of a Public/Private Partnership in the Matter of Management of Heavy Metals in Portland--An Alternative to Proposed Temporary Rules An open letter to: Joni Hammond (Interim Director) Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ): I have read with interest the current issues raised by the finding of heavy metals in the air in the southeast part of Portland. And, a proposal to establish temporary standards to limit the use of Chromium III (CRIII) used in the production of green glass for artistic used is scheduled for tomorrow. My wife is a glass artist who uses products produced by Bullseye Glass Co. And, I understand the following: 1) The owners of Bullseye Glass have been responsive to these concerns, have discontinued production of glass that may be associated with these products and are working to implement a permanent solution for all identified heavy metals used in the production of their glass products. 2) There are certain public health concerns that both the local and state authorities have identified, have sought to find a remedy for these findings and have acted responsibly in carrying out their duties; 3) That current federal standards do not cover this situation in smaller glass facilities; 4) There are differences of opinion about the possibility of production of CR VI when using CRIII ; and, 5) That a hearing is scheduled tomorrow to approve temporary standards in this regard. I am writing to respectfully ask that the DEQ explore alternatives to implementation of these standards. There is, it seems to me, a need to find a balanced remedy that protects both the public health and also protects the interests of these businesses who provide a resource for the art glass community. I would ask that all interested parties form an ongoing working group to determine how best to manage this public health concern. Overly protective regulations that threaten the viability of small glass manufacturers are not the answer, particularly when, as I understand it, they have agreed to fully cooperate with the proposed safeguards, have provided scientific information regarding the possibility of CR VI formation during the process; and have agreed that measures will be put in place to assure their compliance and to protect the public safety and environment. Such a broad based group of stakeholders should be charged with reporting back to the City, State and Federal government their findings; examine available science regarding the use of CRIII in production of glass; provide transparency for the community at large for their findings and recommendations; and, see that a mechanism is put in place to assure creation of an effective monitoring system that reports any changes in levels of toxicity until a more permanent remedy is found. Such a public-private partnership is consistent with Oregon's values and its concerns for the health and well being of all our members of the community. There are no bad guys or good guys here. Only people of good will who want to find a solution. Requiring standards to insure what might be a potential violation in the future is not consistent with these values and concerns. There is room for both preventive environmental controls in the absence of federal standards and for glass manufacturers to live and be responsible members of our business community. We should expect no less. I would ask that you consider an alternative to these temporary rules. Respectfully, Dale Garell, MD 4028 SW Dosch Park Lane Portland, Oregon 97239 cc: Oregon Health Authority (OHA) Lynne Saxton phone: 503-947-2340 Email: <mailto:lynne.saxton@state.or.us> lynne.saxton@state.or.us <mailto:lynne.saxton@state.or.us> State Representatives Governor Kate Brown phone: (503) 378-4582 email: <https://www.oregon.gov/gov/pages/contact.aspx> https://www.oregon.gov/gov/pages/contact.aspx Representative Rob Nosse phone: (971) 217-8037 email: <mailto:Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us> Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us <mailto:Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us> Representative Jessica Vega Pederson phone: (503) 986-1447 email: <mailto:Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us> Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us <mailto:Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us> U.S. Representative Earl Blumenauer phone: (503) 231-2300 email: <https://forms.house.gov/blumenauer/webforms/issue_subscribe.html> https://forms.house.gov/blumenauer/webforms/issue_subscribe.html ? Oregon’s Natural Resource Office Gabriela Goldfarb phone: (503) 378-5232 email: <mailto:Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov> Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov <mailto:Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov> U.S. Senators Jeff Merkley phone: (503) 326-3386 email: <http://www.merkley.senate.gov/contact> http://www.merkley.senate.gov/contact Ron Wyden phone: (503) 326-7525 email: <https://www.wyden.senate.gov/contact> https://www.wyden.senate.gov/contact County Representatives Deborah Kafoury phone: (503) 988-3308 email: <mailto:mult.chair@multco.us> mult.chair@multco.us <mailto:mult.chair@multco.us> Portland Representatives Mayor Charlie Hales phone: (503) 823-4120 email: <mailto:mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov> mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov> ?Dan Saltzman phone: (503) 823-4151 email: <mailto:dan@portlandoregon.gov> dan@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:dan@portlandoregon.gov> Nick Fish phone: (503) 823-3589 email: <mailto:nick@portlandoregon.gov> nick@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:nick@portlandoregon.gov> Amanda Fritz phone: 503-823-3008 email: <mailto:Amanda@portlandoregon.gov> Amanda@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:Amanda@portlandoregon.gov> Steve Novick phone: (503) 823-4682 email: <mailto:novick@portlandoregon.gov> novick@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:novick@portlandoregon.gov> ??????.????????????1??????????????????????n?????? ?/??????????????????????????????????????????????e???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? |
dcgarell@aol.com | dcgarell@aol.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 51 | Fwd: Creation of a Public/Private Partnership in the Matter of Management of Heavy Metals in Portland--An Alternative to Proposed Temporary Rules |
-----Original Message----- From: dcgarell <dcgarell@aol.com> To: hammond.joni <hammond.joni@deq.state.or.us> Cc: irislitt <irislitt@stanford.edu>; lanimcgregor <lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com> Sent: Tue, Mar 15, 2016 12:20 am Subject: Creation of a Public/Private Partnership in the Matter of Management of Heavy Metals in Portland--An Alternative to Proposed Temporary Rules An open letter to: Joni Hammond (Interim Director) Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ): I have read with interest the current issues raised by the finding of heavy metals in the air in the southeast part of Portland. And, a proposal to establish temporary standards to limit the use of Chromium III (CRIII) used in the production of green glass for artistic used is scheduled for tomorrow. My wife is a glass artist who uses products produced by Bullseye Glass Co. And, I understand the following: 1) The owners of Bullseye Glass have been responsive to these concerns, have discontinued production of glass that may be associated with these products and are working to implement a permanent solution for all identified heavy metals used in the production of their glass products. 2) There are certain public health concerns that both the local and state authorities have identified, have sought to find a remedy for these findings and have acted responsibly in carrying out their duties; 3) That current federal standards do not cover this situation in smaller glass facilities; 4) There are differences of opinion about the possibility of production of CR VI when using CRIII ; and, 5) That a hearing is scheduled tomorrow to approve temporary standards in this regard. I am writing to respectfully ask that the DEQ explore alternatives to implementation of these standards. There is, it seems to me, a need to find a balanced remedy that protects both the public health and also protects the interests of these businesses who provide a resource for the art glass community. I would ask that all interested parties form an ongoing working group to determine how best to manage this public health concern. Overly protective regulations that threaten the viability of small glass manufacturers are not the answer, particularly when, as I understand it, they have agreed to fully cooperate with the proposed safeguards, have provided scientific information regarding the possibility of CR VI formation during the process; and have agreed that measures will be put in place to assure their compliance and to protect the public safety and environment. Such a broad based group of stakeholders should be charged with reporting back to the City, State and Federal government their findings; examine available science regarding the use of CRIII in production of glass; provide transparency for the community at large for their findings and recommendations; and, see that a mechanism is put in place to assure creation of an effective monitoring system that reports any changes in levels of toxicity until a more permanent remedy is found. Such a public-private partnership is consistent with Oregon's values and its concerns for the health and well being of all our members of the community. There are no bad guys or good guys here. Only people of good will who want to find a solution. Requiring standards to insure what might be a potential violation in the future is not consistent with these values and concerns. There is room for both preventive environmental controls in the absence of federal standards and for glass manufacturers to live and be responsible members of our business community. We should expect no less. I would ask that you consider an alternative to these temporary rules. Respectfully, Dale Garell, MD 4028 SW Dosch Park Lane Portland, Oregon 97239 cc: Oregon Health Authority (OHA) Lynne Saxton phone: 503-947-2340 Email: <mailto:lynne.saxton@state.or.us> lynne.saxton@state.or.us <mailto:lynne.saxton@state.or.us> State Representatives Governor Kate Brown phone: (503) 378-4582 email: <https://www.oregon.gov/gov/pages/contact.aspx> https://www.oregon.gov/gov/pages/contact.aspx Representative Rob Nosse phone: (971) 217-8037 email: <mailto:Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us> Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us <mailto:Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us> Representative Jessica Vega Pederson phone: (503) 986-1447 email: <mailto:Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us> Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us <mailto:Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us> U.S. Representative Earl Blumenauer phone: (503) 231-2300 email: <https://forms.house.gov/blumenauer/webforms/issue_subscribe.html> https://forms.house.gov/blumenauer/webforms/issue_subscribe.html ? Oregon’s Natural Resource Office Gabriela Goldfarb phone: (503) 378-5232 email: <mailto:Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov> Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov <mailto:Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov> U.S. Senators Jeff Merkley phone: (503) 326-3386 email: <http://www.merkley.senate.gov/contact> http://www.merkley.senate.gov/contact Ron Wyden phone: (503) 326-7525 email: <https://www.wyden.senate.gov/contact> https://www.wyden.senate.gov/contact County Representatives Deborah Kafoury phone: (503) 988-3308 email: <mailto:mult.chair@multco.us> mult.chair@multco.us <mailto:mult.chair@multco.us> Portland Representatives Mayor Charlie Hales phone: (503) 823-4120 email: <mailto:mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov> mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov> ?Dan Saltzman phone: (503) 823-4151 email: <mailto:dan@portlandoregon.gov> dan@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:dan@portlandoregon.gov> Nick Fish phone: (503) 823-3589 email: <mailto:nick@portlandoregon.gov> nick@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:nick@portlandoregon.gov> Amanda Fritz phone: 503-823-3008 email: <mailto:Amanda@portlandoregon.gov> Amanda@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:Amanda@portlandoregon.gov> Steve Novick phone: (503) 823-4682 email: <mailto:novick@portlandoregon.gov> novick@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:novick@portlandoregon.gov> |
dcgarell@aol.com | dcgarell@aol.com | SMTP | REP VegaPederson | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119 | EX | HAMMOND Joni;lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com;irislitt@stanford.edu | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com;irislitt@stanford.edu | EX;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52 | Fwd: Creation of a Public/Private Partnership in the Matter of Management of Heavy Metals in Portland--An Alternative to Proposed Temporary Rules |
-----Original Message----- From: dcgarell <dcgarell@aol.com> To: hammond.joni <hammond.joni@deq.state.or.us> Cc: irislitt <irislitt@stanford.edu>; lanimcgregor <lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com> Sent: Tue, Mar 15, 2016 12:20 am Subject: Creation of a Public/Private Partnership in the Matter of Management of Heavy Metals in Portland--An Alternative to Proposed Temporary Rules An open letter to: Joni Hammond (Interim Director) Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ): I have read with interest the current issues raised by the finding of heavy metals in the air in the southeast part of Portland. And, a proposal to establish temporary standards to limit the use of Chromium III (CRIII) used in the production of green glass for artistic used is scheduled for tomorrow. My wife is a glass artist who uses products produced by Bullseye Glass Co. And, I understand the following: 1) The owners of Bullseye Glass have been responsive to these concerns, have discontinued production of glass that may be associated with these products and are working to implement a permanent solution for all identified heavy metals used in the production of their glass products. 2) There are certain public health concerns that both the local and state authorities have identified, have sought to find a remedy for these findings and have acted responsibly in carrying out their duties; 3) That current federal standards do not cover this situation in smaller glass facilities; 4) There are differences of opinion about the possibility of production of CR VI when using CRIII ; and, 5) That a hearing is scheduled tomorrow to approve temporary standards in this regard. I am writing to respectfully ask that the DEQ explore alternatives to implementation of these standards. There is, it seems to me, a need to find a balanced remedy that protects both the public health and also protects the interests of these businesses who provide a resource for the art glass community. I would ask that all interested parties form an ongoing working group to determine how best to manage this public health concern. Overly protective regulations that threaten the viability of small glass manufacturers are not the answer, particularly when, as I understand it, they have agreed to fully cooperate with the proposed safeguards, have provided scientific information regarding the possibility of CR VI formation during the process; and have agreed that measures will be put in place to assure their compliance and to protect the public safety and environment. Such a broad based group of stakeholders should be charged with reporting back to the City, State and Federal government their findings; examine available science regarding the use of CRIII in production of glass; provide transparency for the community at large for their findings and recommendations; and, see that a mechanism is put in place to assure creation of an effective monitoring system that reports any changes in levels of toxicity until a more permanent remedy is found. Such a public-private partnership is consistent with Oregon's values and its concerns for the health and well being of all our members of the community. There are no bad guys or good guys here. Only people of good will who want to find a solution. Requiring standards to insure what might be a potential violation in the future is not consistent with these values and concerns. There is room for both preventive environmental controls in the absence of federal standards and for glass manufacturers to live and be responsible members of our business community. We should expect no less. I would ask that you consider an alternative to these temporary rules. Respectfully, Dale Garell, MD 4028 SW Dosch Park Lane Portland, Oregon 97239 cc: Oregon Health Authority (OHA) Lynne Saxton phone: 503-947-2340 Email: <mailto:lynne.saxton@state.or.us> lynne.saxton@state.or.us <mailto:lynne.saxton@state.or.us> State Representatives Governor Kate Brown phone: (503) 378-4582 email: <https://www.oregon.gov/gov/pages/contact.aspx> https://www.oregon.gov/gov/pages/contact.aspx Representative Rob Nosse phone: (971) 217-8037 email: <mailto:Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us> Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us <mailto:Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us> Representative Jessica Vega Pederson phone: (503) 986-1447 email: <mailto:Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us> Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us <mailto:Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us> U.S. Representative Earl Blumenauer phone: (503) 231-2300 email: <https://forms.house.gov/blumenauer/webforms/issue_subscribe.html> https://forms.house.gov/blumenauer/webforms/issue_subscribe.html ? Oregon’s Natural Resource Office Gabriela Goldfarb phone: (503) 378-5232 email: <mailto:Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov> Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov <mailto:Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov> U.S. Senators Jeff Merkley phone: (503) 326-3386 email: <http://www.merkley.senate.gov/contact> http://www.merkley.senate.gov/contact Ron Wyden phone: (503) 326-7525 email: <https://www.wyden.senate.gov/contact> https://www.wyden.senate.gov/contact County Representatives Deborah Kafoury phone: (503) 988-3308 email: <mailto:mult.chair@multco.us> mult.chair@multco.us <mailto:mult.chair@multco.us> Portland Representatives Mayor Charlie Hales phone: (503) 823-4120 email: <mailto:mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov> mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov> ?Dan Saltzman phone: (503) 823-4151 email: <mailto:dan@portlandoregon.gov> dan@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:dan@portlandoregon.gov> Nick Fish phone: (503) 823-3589 email: <mailto:nick@portlandoregon.gov> nick@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:nick@portlandoregon.gov> Amanda Fritz phone: 503-823-3008 email: <mailto:Amanda@portlandoregon.gov> Amanda@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:Amanda@portlandoregon.gov> Steve Novick phone: (503) 823-4682 email: <mailto:novick@portlandoregon.gov> novick@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:novick@portlandoregon.gov> |
dcgarell@aol.com | dcgarell@aol.com | SMTP | REP Nosse | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97 | EX | HAMMOND Joni;lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com;irislitt@stanford.edu | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com;irislitt@stanford.edu | EX;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 53 | Fwd: Creation of a Public/Private Partnership in the Matter of Management of Heavy Metals in Portland--An Alternative to Proposed Temporary Rules |
-----Original Message----- From: dcgarell <dcgarell@aol.com> To: hammond.joni <hammond.joni@deq.state.or.us> Cc: irislitt <irislitt@stanford.edu>; lanimcgregor <lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com> Sent: Tue, Mar 15, 2016 12:20 am Subject: Creation of a |
dcgarell@aol.com | dcgarell@aol.com | SMTP | SAXTON LYNNE | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8 | EX | HAMMOND Joni;lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com;irislitt@stanford.edu | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com;irislitt@stanford.edu | EX;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 54 | Fwd: Creation of a Public/Private Partnership in the Matter of Management of Heavy Metals in Portland--An Alternative to Proposed Temporary Rules |
-----Original Message----- From: dcgarell <dcgarell@aol.com> To: hammond.joni <hammond.joni@deq.state.or.us> Cc: irislitt <irislitt@stanford.edu>; lanimcgregor <lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com> Sent: Tue, Mar 15, 2016 12:20 am Subject: Creation of a Public/Private Partnership in the Matter of Management of Heavy Metals in Portland--An Alternative to Proposed Temporary Rules An open letter to: Joni Hammond (Interim Director) Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ): I have read with interest the current issues raised by the finding of heavy metals in the air in the southeast part of Portland. And, a proposal to establish temporary standards to limit the use of Chromium III (CRIII) used in the production of green glass for artistic used is scheduled for tomorrow. My wife is a glass artist who uses products produced by Bullseye Glass Co. And, I understand the following: 1) The owners of Bullseye Glass have been responsive to these concerns, have discontinued production of glass that may be associated with these products and are working to implement a permanent solution for all identified heavy metals used in the production of their glass products. 2) There are certain public health concerns that both the local and state authorities have identified, have sought to find a remedy for these findings and have acted responsibly in carrying out their duties; 3) That current federal standards do not cover this situation in smaller glass facilities; 4) There are differences of opinion about the possibility of production of CR VI when using CRIII ; and, 5) That a hearing is scheduled tomorrow to approve temporary standards in this regard. I am writing to respectfully ask that the DEQ explore alternatives to implementation of these standards. There is, it seems to me, a need to find a balanced remedy that protects both the public health and also protects the interests of these businesses who provide a resource for the art glass community. I would ask that all interested parties form an ongoing working group to determine how best to manage this public health concern. Overly protective regulations that threaten the viability of small glass manufacturers are not the answer, particularly when, as I understand it, they have agreed to fully cooperate with the proposed safeguards, have provided scientific information regarding the possibility of CR VI formation during the process; and have agreed that measures will be put in place to assure their compliance and to protect the public safety and environment. Such a broad based group of stakeholders should be charged with reporting back to the City, State and Federal government their findings; examine available science regarding the use of CRIII in production of glass; provide transparency for the community at large for their findings and recommendations; and, see that a mechanism is put in place to assure creation of an effective monitoring system that reports any changes in levels of toxicity until a more permanent remedy is found. Such a public-private partnership is consistent with Oregon's values and its concerns for the health and well being of all our members of the community. There are no bad guys or good guys here. Only people of good will who want to find a solution. Requiring standards to insure what might be a potential violation in the future is not consistent with these values and concerns. There is room for both preventive environmental controls in the absence of federal standards and for glass manufacturers to live and be responsible members of our business community. We should expect no less. I would ask that you consider an alternative to these temporary rules. Respectfully, Dale Garell, MD 4028 SW Dosch Park Lane Portland, Oregon 97239 cc: Oregon Health Authority (OHA) Lynne Saxton phone: 503-947-2340 Email: <mailto:lynne.saxton@state.or.us> lynne.saxton@state.or.us <mailto:lynne.saxton@state.or.us> State Representatives Governor Kate Brown phone: (503) 378-4582 email: <https://www.oregon.gov/gov/pages/contact.aspx> https://www.oregon.gov/gov/pages/contact.aspx Representative Rob Nosse phone: (971) 217-8037 email: <mailto:Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us> Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us <mailto:Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us> Representative Jessica Vega Pederson phone: (503) 986-1447 email: <mailto:Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us> Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us <mailto:Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us> U.S. Representative Earl Blumenauer phone: (503) 231-2300 email: <https://forms.house.gov/blumenauer/webforms/issue_subscribe.html> https://forms.house.gov/blumenauer/webforms/issue_subscribe.html ? Oregon’s Natural Resource Office Gabriela Goldfarb phone: (503) 378-5232 email: <mailto:Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov> Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov <mailto:Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov> U.S. Senators Jeff Merkley phone: (503) 326-3386 email: <http://www.merkley.senate.gov/contact> http://www.merkley.senate.gov/contact Ron Wyden phone: (503) 326-7525 email: <https://www.wyden.senate.gov/contact> https://www.wyden.senate.gov/contact County Representatives Deborah Kafoury phone: (503) 988-3308 email: <mailto:mult.chair@multco.us> mult.chair@multco.us <mailto:mult.chair@multco.us> Portland Representatives Mayor Charlie Hales phone: (503) 823-4120 email: <mailto:mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov> mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov> ?Dan Saltzman phone: (503) 823-4151 emaimayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov Nick Fish phone: (503) 823-3589 email: Amanda Fritz phone: 503-823-3008 email: <mailto:Amanda@portlandoregon.gov> Amanda@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:Amanda@portlandoregon.gov> Steve Novick phone: (503) 823-4682 email: <mailto:novick@portlandoregon.gov> novick@portlandoregon.gov <mailto:novick@portlandoregon.gov> |
dcgarell@aol.com | dcgarell@aol.com | SMTP | mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.govAmanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov | mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.govAmanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov | SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com;irislitt@stanford.edu | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;lanimcgregor@bullseyeglass.com;irislitt@stanford.edu | EX;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 55 | DEQ potential actions on Bullseye Glass Co. |
RE: DEQ potential actions on Bullseye Glass Co. Portland, OR Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. http://www.bullseyeglass.com/about-us/dr-lacourse-chromium-statement.html Neither DEQ or EPA have required any other US producer, of green glass, to entirely and arbitrarily stop their production without notice and perform the kind of extensive testing and modeling that DEQ is asking for. A typical green bottle manufacturer uses 1,000 times more Cr(III) per year than Bullseye Glass. A bottle producer, with emission controls, would melt more Cr(III) each day than Bullseye uses in a year. I urge the DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Sincerely Deanna Peters 37023 Soap Creek Rd Corvallis, OR 97330 dpeters@peak.org <mailto:dpeters@peak.org> 541-745-5047 |
Deanna Peters | dpeters@peak.org | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 56 | Opposed to The DEQ's Sweeping Temporary Regulations - Hearing Today |
I am writing in opposition to the sweeping temporary regulations
that the DEQ is proposing today. Not only are most of the proposed
changes scientifically invalid but they also serve to hurt a
Portland business that has been a strong corporate citizen and
a huge community support. The DEQ mishandled the entire release of misinformation and now seeks to impose business killing sanctions on a business who NEVER BROKE ANY RULES. Not only is this a deplorable overreach of power, it is unconscionable. Further more, this affects small business owners across the United States and around the world who seek to make a living creating glass art. FACTS: Bullseye Glass never violated their emissions permit. They have voluntarily agreed to suspend use of certain chemicals while cooperating with the bungled DEQ investigation. They have further decided to install baghouse filters to prevent additional concerns. If these misguided regulations are allowed to pass today, glass employees will lose their jobs, small glass businesses across the U.S. will be hurt or put out of business and glass artists worldwide will be injured. Please oppose these regulations. Thank you for your time. Debbi Elmer Timberidge Glassworks, LLC Texas |
Debbi | debbi.elmer@sbcglobal.net | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Devon Willis | DevonWillis@bullseyeglass.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 57 | I stand with Bullseye Glass, please don't make me lose my job |
Hello, My name is Devon Willis. I started working at Bullseye Glass Co. almost 6 years ago mainly because I was impressed by their focus on scientific exploration and active education. They were a business that obviously cared about making the world a better place and who were constantly evolving and improving themselves. Right now as a Bullseye employee I’m terrified but NOT about my health and safety. I’m terrified that the job I love and depend on, and the jobs that many of my friends and thousands of my customers around the country depend on is threatened. I’m frightened because I’m seeing decisions being made by organizations I once trusted based on speculation, conjecture and flat out lies that will affect me personally as well as set a frightening precedence. Right now in the news, many people are discussing the current presidential primary campaign and the use of misinformation and rhetoric to excite the voting base. Many people are laughing at some candidates’ blatant disregard for the truth, but there is also real fear that this is going to provide a foothold in our government to turn fear-mongering into law. I’m seeing the same thing happening right here right now in Portland, Oregon where media hype and a group of uninformed and frightened individuals is allowed to influence the decisions my government SHOULD be making based on scientific studies and facts. Progress needs to be made using information from credible sources using empirical evidence not as a reaction towards a public witch hunt that is in actuality delaying progress. I stand with Bullseye as they continue to do the right thing and I hope the DEQ and the EQC will too. Thank you for your consideration, Devon |
Devon Willis | willis.devon@gmail.com | SMTP | Devon Willis | willis.devon@gmail.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 58 | URGENT: Regarding Bullseye Glass |
Hello, I am writing today in support of the Bullseye Glass Company. Bullseye Glass has shown extreme concern for safety and environmental compliance, maintaining proper controls as directed by the agencies who have governed them. I urge you to adhere to scientific data and common sense, and not allow yourselves to be influenced by fearful people who do not have all of the facts and are attempting to create misguided policy based on hearsay and fear. Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Bullseye immediately responded to the need for a thorough review of their practices and they have been extremely compliant with all expectations for reduction and/or discontinuation of certain ingredients. Please give them the opportunity to keep 100% of their employees working while more studies are done and the facts are discovered. Until then, the regulations you are considering imposing would be nearly fatal and completely unfair. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. ?Please do NOT pass the proposed temporary regulation imposing restrictions on Bullseye Glass. Thank you for your consideration of this urgent and important matter. Sincerely, Diana? Diana Chernofsky ?13629 NW 43rd Avenue Vancouver, WA 98685 ? Text/Tel. 1.360.608.8650 |
Diana Chernofsky | dianachernofsky@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 59 | Bullseye Glass |
As an Oregon small business owner, I am sending this email because
of concerns regarding my main glass supplier - Bullseye Glass
Company in Portland. Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. We sincerely appreciate any support you can provide right now. Diana Evans Designer Glass & Creations Klamath Falls, OR |
Diana S | blastingglass@hotmail.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||||||||
| 60 | Please Don't Cave In To Politics! |
Dear Ms. Hammond, I'm a local fused glass artist and regular customer of Bullseye Glass. They employ wonderful, caring, helpful people, who are happy in their work--which is an indication of the same qualities in the owners of the company. Bullseye Glass has a long history of responsible operation, and they are already hard at work making changes to reduce any possible environmental impact from their cadmium glass production. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. Furthermore, if that type of toxic chromium were to be produced in their furnaces, the glass would be ruined! We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Most sincerely, Diane Moeglein Vancouver, WA |
DMoeglein | dlesli62@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 61 | Feedback on proposed rules for glass manufacturing in Portland |
I was not able to make the meeting that was held but wanted to
make my voice heard. I am a fused glass artist and also an environmentalist
so I am deeply concerned about the concentrations of heavy metals
around the glass making factories and do believe that it seems
some DEQ rules do need to be strengthened not just for the glass
factory but for other manufacturers in the dense Portland neighborhoods. What I would like to address is a specific rule the DEQ is proposing in its temporary list related to Chromium III. There is a concern it could convert to Chromium VI which is the serious pollution concern. What I understand from the experts, such as Dr. LaCourse a leading glass scientist from Alfred University, is that the way the glass furnace operates in the making of glass would not allow this to happen as it would destroy the product. I think the decisions involved need to be based on science. Otherwise out of fear and misinformation you are needlessly destroying businesses,and jobs. Thank you for hearing my concern, Dolores Kueffler Fused glass artist |
dolores Kueffler | kuedee@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 62 | OREGON GLASS MANUFACTURE |
HI, I AM WRITING TODAY REGARDING UROBOROS AND BULLSEYE GLASS. I AM A LOCAL CRAFTER WHO HAS TAKEN CLASSES AND SOLD SOME OF MY GLASS DESIGNS. I AM PARTICULARLY CONCERND THAT THE CORRECT SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION SEEMS TO BE OVERRIDDEN BY PUBLIC CONCERN AND A LOT OF MEDIA HYPE. IF THE DEQ HAS DEEMED THAT THEY HAVE BEEN IN COMPLIANCE ALL OF THESE YEARS THEN FURTHER EXAMINATION OF DEQ POLICIES AND EFFICIENCY SHOULD BE EXAMINED. I TEND TO BE A BIT ON THE TRUSTING SIDE OF OUR REGULATORY COMMISSIONS AND AS SUCH DO BELIEVE THAT THESE COMPANIES HAVE BEEN IN COMPLIANCE AND DOING WHAT IS NECESSARY TO TAKE APPROPRIATE PRECAUSTIONS NO MENTION HAS BEEN MADE ABOUT THE ACTUAL FACTS THAT THE ACTUAL SPECIFIC SUPPLIES AND PROCEDURES DO NOT CAUSE HE POLLUTANTS AS SUGGESTED. THAT THE CHEMICALS DO NOT PHYSICALLY BREAKDOWN AS SUGGESTED, THE CURRENT ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT IN THIS COUNTRY IS ALARMING AND WE ARE CONSTANTLY HEARING THAT SMALL BUSINESS IS THE BACKBONE OF OUR ECONOMY SINCE IT HAS BEEN DECIDED SOMEWHERE UP THE FOODCHAIN THAT AMERICAN JOBS THAT COULD SUPPORT FAMILIES ARE BEING OUTSOURCED TO THE PHILIPINES AND OTHER COUNTRIES. WE MUST TAKE ACTION NOW BEFORE WE FALL TO THE STATE OF EUROPE WITH BANKRUPT COUNTRIES. WITH 93 MILLION OUT OF WORK AND MANY MORE TAKING PART TIME POSITIONS AT VERY LOW PAY AND SOME 1/7 WORKING FAMILIES PARTICULARLY IN OREGON ON FOODSTAMPS HOW CAN IT BE OKAY TO PUT ANOTHER PROBABLY 1500 FAMILIES OUT OF WORK, INTO FOODSTAMPS, OUT OF THEIR HOMES BECAUSE THEY CAN’T MAKE PAYMENTS AND HEVENS KNOWS WHATEVER OTHER HARDSHIPS WILL BEFALL THESE FOLKS. WE NEED TO HAVE SOME SORT OF INDUSTRY EMPLOYING PEOPLE LOCALLY. WE JUST CAN’T CONTINUE SPIRALLING DOWNWARD WITH MORE AND MORE PEOPLE OUT OF WORK. I DOUBT THAT THE BIG PICTURE HAS BEEN CONSIDERED. NOT ONLY THE DIRECT EMPLOYEES WILL BE OUT OF WORK BUT ALSO THOSE COMPANIES MANUFACTURING THE SUPPLIES USED IN MANUFACTURING THE GLASS COMPONENTS, THE COMPANIES MANUFACTURING THE MOLDS FOR USE IN FUSING, THE MANUFACTURERS OF THE KILNS, THE ART GALLERIES SELLING GLASS ART, THE STORES CARRYING SUPPLIES, THE MANUFACTURERS OF ART GLASS SINKS AND LIGHT FIXTURES, THE ARTISTS MAKING AT LEAST PART OF THEIR INCOME TO PROVIDE FOR THEIR FAMILIES, THE BUSINESSES THAT ALL THESE FAMILIES PATRONIZE WHO WILL LOOSE INCOME FROM YET MORE MIDDLE CLASS FAMILIES BEING THROWN INTO A POVERTY SITUATION!!! WE CAN’T AFFORD TO LOOSE THESE INCOMES. THESE TWO COMPANIES AND THE OTHER IN THE EVERETT AREA PROVIDE GLASS MATERIALS ALL OVER THE WORLD, SO THEN THEIR LOSS WILL ALSO FORCE OTHER BUSINESSS TO SHUT DOWN IN OTHER PARTS OF NORTH AMERICA AND OTHER COUNTRIES. IF THERE ARE NEEDED MEASURES TO BE TAKEN TO PROVIDE AIR CLEANING EQUIPMENT THESE STEPS SHOULD BE ASSISTED BY THE AGENCIES WHO HAVE LONG ADVISED THAT THE INDUSTRIES ARE WORKING SAFELY. WE PUT LOTTERY DOLLARS INTO LLAMA FARMING ETC. THEY NEED TO BE PUT TO USE TO SAVE TONS OF JOBS IN THIS INDUSTRY AS WELL. THE FUNDS EXIST FOR THESE PURPOSES. I TRULY HOPE THAT YOUR FAMILIES ARE NOT PUT UNDER SUCH UNFAIR SCRUTINY AND THAT THEY ARE ALL ABLE TO CONTINUE IN THEIR EMPLOYMENT, BENEFITS ND LIFESTYLES, IF THESE COMPANIES ARE FORCED TO CLOSE THEIR DOOR MANY FAMILIES WILL NOT BE SO LUCKY. I BESEACH YOU TO LOOK AT THE BIGGER PICTURE AND STEP IN TO HELP AND TO HAVE SCIENTISTS WORK ON THIS SITUATION RATHER THAN A RASH UNFOUNDED DECISION BE MADE THAT WILL AFFECT US ALL AS MORE AND MORE PEOPPLE ARE UNEMPLOED!! THE ECONOMY KILLED MY SMALL BUSINESS OF OVER 30 YEARS WITH THE INCREASED COST OF SUPPLIES DUE TO THE ENERGY SITUATION, PLEASE DON’T PUT MORE HONEST HARDWORKING DECENT COMPANIES OUT OFBUSINESS UNDER SUCH UNFAIR SITUATIONS. BEGGING FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION AND TIME IN VERIFYING THE TRUE SCIENTIFIC INFORATION !! ROCHELLE BAKER 503-245-7297 |
dustpaw@comcast.net | dustpaw@comcast.net | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 63 | Temporary Rules Comments |
To Acting Director Hammond and Members of the Environmental Quality
Commission - Please find attached to this email a set of comments on the proposed temporary rule that would apply to colored art glass manufacturing facilities. These comments are submitted on behalf of Eastside Portland Air Coalition and the Hi Nooners Hayden Island Air Group. Eastside Portland Air Coalition has also submitted comments partnering with Crag Law Center among others, which Chris Winter has already sent you. We feel it's important that you know we are building and joining existing coalitions across the state in response to air toxics issues and look forward to many other partnerships to continue to build momentum toward state wide reform for air toxic regulations. We will also submit these materials via DEQ’s web portal. Thank you for your consideration. Eastside Portland Air Coalition www.eastsideportlandair.org <http://www.eastsideportlandair.org> |
Eastside Portland Air Coalition | eastsideportlandair@gmail.com | SMTP | JOHNSON Colleen;EDEN Melinda;OKEEFFE Jane;ARMSTRONG Ed;RIDER Morgan;HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JOHNSON Colleen176;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=EDEN Melindae77;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OKEEFFE Janee72;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ARMSTRONG Edce9;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RIDER Morgan94f;/O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX | Huy Ong;GOLDFARB Gabriela * GOV;Eastside Portland Air Coalition;Maggie Tallmadge;Andrea Durbin;Kelly Campbell;“alan@verdenw.org”;“desireerajee@gmail.com”;Mary (Wyden) Gautreaux;REP Kotek;REP SmithWarner;REP Frederick;SEN Shields;SEN Rosenbaum;REP Helm;REP Taylor;REP Nosse;REP KenyGuyer;SEN Dembrow;REP Greenlick;Zach Klonoski;“mult.chair@multco.us”;“Phil_Chang@merkley.senate.gov”;Tony DeFalco;Mlputman;Jessica Applegate-Brown;Amanda Jarman;Jennifer D Jones | huy@opalpdx.org;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GOLDFARB Gabriela * GOV943;eastsideportlandair@gmail.com;maggie@coalitioncommunitiescolor.org;andread@oeconline.org;kelly@oregonpsr.org;alan@verdenw.org;desireerajee@gmail.com;Mary_Gautreaux@wyden.senate.gov;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Koteka13;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Smith Warner921;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Frederick053;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sen Shieldsc27;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sen Rosenbaumb04;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Helme05;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Taylor69c;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep KenyGuyer799;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sen Dembrowab8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Greenlick014;Zach.Klonoski@portlandoregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;Phil_Chang@merkley.senate.gov;waxwing7@gmail.com;mlputman@gmail.com;applegatebrown@msn.com;amanda@fundraisingnerd.com;thejonesfour@mac.com | SMTP;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 64 | Proposed Chromium III regulations |
Joni Hammond of the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
(DEQ) Dear Ms. Hammond, I would urge you to consider the science and expert opinion of Dr. LaCourse who has stated that Bullseye's furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. There appears to be a level of hysteria surrounding the call for these new regulations without time for proper testing. Restricting Bullseye's ability to use CR (III) will cause them to reduce their production significantly, cause layoffs and hardships for the employees. I have visited their facility and found their concern for safety to be excellent. My daughter moved from Pittsburgh, PA to Portland several years ago because she wanted to live in the city, enjoy the people, ambiance and advantages that Portland offers. I have enjoyed my visits there as well and would be very disappointed in the DEQ administration if Bullseye were to be forced to shut down without a proper hearing and opportunity to present their side. Thank you, Edward Christianson The Villages, FL. We sincerely appreciate any support you can provide right now. |
Ed Christianson | echristi@att.net | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 65 | Bullseye Glass - Inadequate notice and incorrect metals specified |
Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I
stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations
as a responsible citizen of the social and business community
of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. I would hate to see a company unfairly penalized, especially one that is contributing so much to the community and the glass art industry. Oregon should be proud of its place in the art community and not let politics and sensationalistic journalism push it to penalize a company such as Bullseye. I also urge you to research Chromium III. I think there's a typo in the hastily prepared temporary rules. |
Elise Mcveigh | elise.mcveigh@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 66 | re the proposed restrictions on Bullseye Glass factory |
Dear Sirs and Madams, Scientific testing has shown that the ground around the Bullseye Glass factory is not contaminated and neither are the children in the area. Both DEQ and EPA have acknowledged there is no clear evidence of acute or chronic health risks based on Bullseye’s use of Cr(III), which is a harmless and naturally occurring compound. Scientific evidence clearly indicates their furnaces cannot turn Chromium III into Chromium VI. If they did, their glass would be ruined. Scientific evidence shows their use of the compound is not harmful. Even so, Bullseye Glass is voluntarily installing baghouses on those furnaces. Nevertheless, DEQ wants to restrict Bullseye from using Cr(III) for an extended period of time. They are essentially basing these rules off an assumption of guilt without any supporting evidence. I fail to see how shutting them down will benefit anyone. The employees at the factory will lose their jobs, glass artists all around the world will be affected and will also lose income, myself included. Neither DEQ or EPA have required any other US producer, of green glass, to entirely and arbitrarily stop their production without notice and perform the kind of extensive testing and modeling that DEQ is asking for. A typical green bottle manufacturer uses 1,000 times more Cr(III) per year than Bullseye Glass. A bottle producer, with emission controls, would melt more Cr(III) each day than Bullseye uses in a year. If you support these restrictions then you must by rights impose them on all green glass makers which I think we can agree is not something that anyone wants done. Please base your decisions and support on scientific evidence instead of fear without proof. Bullseye Glass is a responsible company and they are already doing or have agreed to take measures that the largest users of ChromiumIII do not and are not asked to do. Sincerely, Ellen Abbott Custom Etched Glass www.emstudioglass.com <http://www.emstudioglass.com> 713-864-4773 |
Ellen Abbott | ellen@emstudioglass.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 67 | Bullseye Glass |
To whom it concerns, I am a glass artist. I don't use Bullseye products, but what affects the community affects us all as I'm sure you can understand. I appreciate the effort you are making to keep the Portland neighborhood safe, but you really need to look at and consider the science behind the use of the naturally occurring Chromium(III) in glass making. Please know that preventing the use of Chromium(III) in addition to the other recent restrictions would cut Bullseye's production by 50%, which will undoubtedly result in layoffs locally, a HUGE impact nationally and internationally to glass artists who would not be able to buy a number of Bullseye colors, and could result in Bullseye closing their doors forever. Please, Bullseye has been beyond reasonable in cooperating with the DEQ and EPA to determine the cause & solution to this environmental issue. Please be reasonable and cooperate with them. Bullseye has already had to suspend production of reds, oranges, yellows, some greens and some browns. With the fear based legislation about to be enacted, Bullseye would be forced to suspend production of ALL greens. Can you imagine YOUR world without red, orange, yellow and green? Please be reasonable, listen to science, not fear. An Illinois Glass Artist and Bullseye supporter, Emily Speight |
Emily Speight | ecsp8@yahoo.com | SMTP | novick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;REP VegaPederson;REP Nosse;SAXTON LYNNE;HAMMOND Joni | novick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;EX;EX;EX;EX | questions@bullseyeglass.com | questions@bullseyeglass.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 68 | Bullseye Glass |
Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. I urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. I am a glass artist and these changes would affect my ability to purchase glass for my business. Thank you for your consideration Gina Granato 4521 NE 30th Portland OR 97211 |
Gina Granato | granatog@yahoo.com | SMTP | Gina Granato | granatog@yahoo.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 69 | Bullseye Glass Company |
Dear Ms. Hammond, I am writing to you with regards to the proposed measures that may be imposed on glass production at Bullseye glass, Portland. My understanding is that these proposed measures have arisen from the concern that Cr(III), a harmless and naturally occurring compound, will be converted into its more harmful form Cr(VI) during the production of Bullseye glass and that this will lead to harmful levels of exposure to humans. However, Bullseye has been using Cr(III) responsibly and the processes they use in glass making do not produce toxic chromium (Cr(VI)). So environmental exposure to chromium from the production of Bullseye glass will be exposure to Cr(III) not Cr(VI). Regarding hazard, both the DEQ and EPA have acknowledged there is no clear evidence of acute or chronic health risks based on Bullseye’s use of Cr(III). Humans are regularly exposed to Cr(III) from natural sources as well as industrial production. Bullseye has a commitment to monitor emissions of Cr(III) and keep them within the allowed levels, therefore it can be expected that the risk of harmful effects in humans will be low. It is important to note that other glass manufacturers in the USA are known to use much higher amounts of Cr(III) than Bullseye on a yearly basis and this has been deemed safe, so there are precedents of previous exposure to Cr(III) at higher levels with low risk. This means that the lower levels of Cr(III) emitted by Bullseye production will also result in low risk . Taking into account this information, I would like to urge the DEQ to rely on the available scientific evidence and to use standard risk assessment approaches (taking into account hazard potential and exposure) before imposing these strict rules. There is no doubt that the protection of humans living in the vicinity of glass factories is essential, but public pressure and political motivation should not drive the imposition of disproportionate regulations. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Laura Dawson |
glassfanatic@gmail.com | glassfanatic@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 70 | Bullseye Glass |
Hi Bullseye glass has been in business for a very long time.
Yes, someone may have dropped the ball on testing ( not Bullseye!)
and I understand completely that the neighbors are concerned
about emissions....I don't blame them.....but you also SHOULD
NOT after all this time....put Bullseye out of business while
you figure it out! If the statement below is true......then
you do not need to be shutting them down as long as efforts are
being made to update ways to control known emissions problems......don't
go overboard with what "might" be......when it makes no sense
compared to what you ask of other businesses. Please work WITH
them to solve the problem! Neither DEQ or EPA have required any other US producer, of green glass, to entirely and arbitrarily stop their production without notice and perform the kind of extensive testing and modeling that DEQ is asking for. A typical green bottle manufacturer uses 1,000 times more Cr(III) per year than Bullseye Glass. A bottle producer, with emission controls, would melt more Cr(III) each day than Bullseye uses in a year. Sincerely, Greta Schneider Glass artist and over 40 year Portland area resident. |
Greta Schneider | coppercreekdesigns@yahoo.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 71 | Support for Bullseye glass |
To whom it may concern Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions MUST be based on science, NOT political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do NOT produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. We sincerely appreciate any support you can provide right now. best regards Haley Haddow London, UK |
Haley Haddow | haleyeb@hotmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;gabriela.goldfarb@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 72 | Extend public comment period for proposed air quality permits |
Dear Deputy Director Joni Hammonds: We are writing in regards to the application for air quality permits sought by Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline, L.P. for the LNG compressor station in Malin, Oregon. The compressor station would be one of the top fifteen greatest sources of greenhouse gas pollution in the state and a potential source of hazardous air pollutants such as toluene and formaldehyde. It would be located less than two miles from the residential center of Malin. The compressor station would be located in a particularly rural part of the state. Many rural residents have limited access to the internet to be able to access project materials and submit comments online. Thirty days is not enough to ensure that the local community has been properly informed of the full air quality impacts of the proposed compressor station or adequate time to comments. In addition, 57.8% of the community is Latino, and public meeting announcements have not been adequately provided to the community in Spanish. Due to the large nature of the compressor station and significant amounts of green house gas pollution, criteria air pollutants, and air toxics the compressor station would emit, we urge you to GRANT FOUR REQUESTS FROM SOUTHERN OREGON COMMUNITIES: 1. POSTPONE THE PERMITTING PROCESS UNTIL AFTER the DEQ’s recently announced STATEWIDE RULE MAKING ON TOXIC AIR POLLUTANTS IS FINISHED. If DEQ anticipates that the rulemaking process will take more than 12 months please: 2. POSTPONE THE MARCH 17 HEARING FOR A MINIMUM OF 60 DAYS TO ENSURE THE PUBLIC CAN FULLY BE INFORMED AND PARTICIPATE. 3. PROVIDE ALL MATERIALS IN SPANISH AND PROVIDE SPANISH TRANSLATION AT ALL PUBLIC EVENTS. 4. EXTEND THE COMMENT PERIOD TO 90 DAYS AFTER ANY PUBLIC HEARING. Given recent air quality concerns in the Portland area after revelations about weak air quality permitting rules and the recent turnover of DEQ leadership, many southern Oregonians are greatly concerned about air quality in their local communities. The scope and complexity of this project is massive, and the people of Oregon need more time to provide DEQ with substantive comments. Thank you for considering this request. Sincerely, Hannah Sohl Director, Rogue Climate Lisa Arkin Director, Beyond Toxics Rhett Lawrence Conservation Director, Oregon Chapter of Sierra Club Deb McGee and Patty Hine Coordinators, 350 Eugene |
Hannah Sohl | hannah@rogueclimate.org | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;info@katebrownfororegon.com;Ruchi.SADHIR@oregon.gov;SWOFFORD Nancy;CAMARATA Mary;WHITMAN Richard M * GOV | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;info@katebrownfororegon.com;Ruchi.SADHIR@oregon.gov;/O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=NSWOFFO;/O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=MCAMARA;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=WHITMAN Richard M * GOVe88 | EX;SMTP;SMTP;EX;EX;EX | Lisa Arkin;Joel Iboa;Rhett Lawrence;Deb McGee and Patty Hine | larkin@beyondtoxics.org;jiboa@beyondtoxics.org;rhett.lawrence@sierraclub.org;zap_oregon@msn.com | SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 73 | In support of Bullseye Glass |
Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I
stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations
as a responsible citizen of the social and business community
of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. I urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Bullseye employs many people in Portland, and provides glass that allows many artists to make a living all over the world. It is important not to jump to conclusions regarding the safety of Bullseye's furnaces. Thank you for your time. --jodi Longobardo |
Happyfish1 | happyfish1@aol.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 74 | Regarding Bullseye Glass |
I wanted to speak with you regarding the Community of Bullseye. Thousands of glass artists from around the world rely on their expertise and product. I am one of them. I visited Portland and Bullseye twice for week long classes I took to develop glass casting skills. I discovered the uniqueness of Portland and my wife and I moved here to be closer to the artistic community of Portland and the bedrock which is Bullseye. They are a hub of art and commerce that serves so many so well. I and Bullseye recognize the obligation we all have to protecting Mother Earth. I am certain that they will responsibly follow new rules and do their part. I ask you to recognize the importance of Bullseye and protect them and us who rely on them. This is critical to my art, my life, my living in this area. I know Dan and Lani personally and can attest to their integrity and responsible actions, and I know they will be even better citizens than before. The rules changing are an opportunity for them to do even more. They will. Please help them and us. Sincerely, Haunt Rama |
Haunt Rama | haunt@canby.com | SMTP | SAXTON LYNNE | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8 | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 75 | Bullseye Glass - trivalent chromium Cr(III) |
Bullseye Glass has a long history of responsible operation. I
stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations
as a responsible citizen of the social and business community
of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. I have been a Bullseye customer for the past 7 years. I am personally friends with some of the employees and each time I have visited the facility, it is always the same: caring, wonderful, people who are responsible, active members of their Portland home communities. I live in Seattle, but I am just as concerned about what is happening with Bullseye Glass and Uroboros Glass. Please look at ALL the facts before enacting ANY kind of legislation. Thank you, -- Helen Cowart 206-651-4023 |
Helen Cowart | helenc@elemental.name | SMTP | SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;/O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 76 | Bullseye Glass |
Dear Sir or Madam, I am the owner of an art glass company, located in Rhode Island, that creates architectural glass installations for government, corporate, healthcare, and public environments. More than 50% of my production relies on Bullseye Glass. I have known Bullseye to be environmentally conscious with a long history of responsible operation. Poorly conceived regulatory decisions which will result in Bullseye curtailing its production will not only have dire consequences for Bullseye Glass itself, but also for scores of companies like mine across the country resulting in canceled projects, lost revenue, and layoffs. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. The full statement can be found at the link below. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. http://www.bullseyeglass.com/about-us/dr-lacourse-chromium-statement.html Sincerely, Paul Housberg GLASS PROJECT INC 875 N Main Road, Jamestown RI 02835 Tel. 401 560 0880 <tel:401%20560%200880> Fax. 401 560 0881 <tel:401%20560%200881> www.glassproject.com |
housberg@gmail.com | housberg@gmail.com | SMTP | Housberg@glassproject.com | Housberg@glassproject.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 77 | Regarding Bullseye Glass - DEQ |
Dear Sir or Ma’am, First let me say that without Bullseye glass my small business will end. Without a reliable supply of sheet glass that is used in my art based business I will not be able to continue. The ripple effects of the decision made today will not only impact my ability to make a living, but an extreme amount of artists worldwide. The art glass industry is unique and we have very few options for our supplies. At this moment only three companies provide glass to our art community, one of which is Bullseye (and in my opinion is by far superior). Bullseye is making efforts to ensure their impact on the environment does not cause harm. If the statistics I have read are true I feel it is quite an injustice to institute “temporary” regulations that will inhibit their production. Imagine the chaos if the American population starts calling for all bottle production to cease within the US. That is what this decision will lead to. Every manufacturer of green glass bottles will need to be shut down. I cannot even begin to estimate or imagine how many American jobs would be lost. Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Sincerely, Jacki Pfeffer |
Jacqueline Pfeffer | jacki.pfeffer@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 78 | Bullseye Glass |
Dear Sir/Madam I understand you are meeting today, and may bring in temporary legislation that will quite likely put Bullseye Glass, based in Portland, out of business. I am writing to ask you to consider the wider impact of such a move. Not only would it cause many people to be laid off in Portland, businesses from around the world will be significantly impacted and have to also close as there are only two fused glass producers - both of whom are based in Portland. This will bring great financial loss to many. Our very livelihoods depend on the fused glass manufacturers - and doesn't just include glass artists, but glass shops, kiln makers, and a huge array of people connected to fused glass making. There is NO other alternative as no other manufacturers exist in the world that make a product like this. As far as I can see from all the evidence that has been reported there is no concrete reason for restricting the use of certain essential ingredients in the production of the glass. Bullseye have already voluntarily taken steps to limit the use of some chemicals. A leading scientist, Dr LaCourse, has assured us that Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. It also seems disproportionately aimed at fused glass - as green bottle producers melt more Cr(III) each day than Bullseye uses in a year. I realise when it comes to health it may be easy to have a knee-jerk reaction to feel like you're doing something, but please consider the facts. There is no proof Bullseye are causing harm to health, and they're willing to take steps to further limit any possibility for exposure. To bring in this temporary measure will be harsh and disproportionate to the issue at hand. So I respectfully request that you consider the wider impact of any actions you take at your meeting today. Many thanks for your time in reading this. Yours faithfully Jade Hamnett |
Jade Hamnett | jade.hamnett@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 79 | Bullseye Glass Co. Portland. |
Email to: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) - Joni Hammond (Interim Director) Oregon Health Authority (OHA) - Lynne Saxton State Representatives Governor Kate Brown Representative Rob Nosse Representative Jessica Vega Pederson U.S. Representative Earl Blumenauer Oregon’s Natural Resource Office - Gabriela Goldfarb County Representatives Deborah Kafoury - email: mult.chair@multco.us Portland Representatives Mayor Charlie Hales Dan Saltzman Nick Fish Amanda Fritz Steve Novick Bullseye Glass Dear All Re: Bullseye Glass Thank you for taking the time to read this email. I am an artist in the UK who is concerned about the temporary regulations proposed by the DEQ which will have a significant impact on the Bullseye Glass Company in Portland, Oregon. Their glass is of great importance to the art community, and I have been using it to create my work for many years. Stopping production of so many colours, even on a temporary basis, will have a huge impact on both the company and the international artistic community. Please do not implement the new temporary regulations unless there is robust scientific evidence to demonstrate that this is necessary. Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. I understand that a leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse of Alfred University, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium and has published evidence to support this. I urge the DEQ to rely on science and fact when considering whether to restrict production at the Bullseye factory. Given that the current levels in soil samples are generally below “background” levels, as per the quote from your website below, and that the results from the air quality survey are due soon but (as far as I know) have not yet been published, it would be reasonable to delay putting any restrictions in place at least until this new air quality data has been received, reviewed and analysed. http://www.oregon.gov/DEQ/pages/index.aspx “The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality’s analyses showed that samples of soil from around Bullseye Glass Co. in Southeast Portland were generally below naturally occurring or “background” levels of heavy metals, including arsenic, cadmium and chromium 6. Further analysis by toxicologists in The Oregon Health Authority (OHA) Public Health Division found that the levels of metals were too low to be harmful to people, including children at a nearby day care, Children’s Creative Learning Center (CCLC).” Thank you very much for reading my email, and for taking my concerns into consideration when this matter is discussed. Any support you can offer would be most appreciated. (To contact Bullseye on this subject, please send email to their Environmental Information email at questions@bullseyeglass.com.) Best wishes Jane Cameron - Artist Jane Cameron BMus(TCM), AMusA(Cello), ATCL(MusEd) Member of the Guild of Silk Painters Member of Glass Beadmakers UK Member of Surrey Artists Open Studios Member of Woking Arts Hub Member of the Professional Crafters Guild Member of the Incorporated Society of Musicians <http://www.surreycelloteacher.co.uk/> www.surreycelloteacher.co.uk www.janecameron.co.uk <http://www.janecameron.co.uk> 07958 580 598 |
Jane Cameron - Artist | janecameronartist@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | questions@bullseyeglass.com | questions@bullseyeglass.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 80 | No temporary rule today |
Dear Joni Hammond, Bullseye Glass Company deserves, and welcomes, a thoughtful, science-based path forward that leads to real improvements - not a rushed rule that does nothing to solve legitimate problems. Please do not enact the proposed temporary rule that is being considered later today. It has the possibility of causing irreparable damage to an honest, law-abiding, creative company. I care about a future Portland, with clean air, a healthy economy and healthy, vibrant neighborhoods. So do hundreds of employees and local customers of Bullseye Glass. The story of Bullseye is intertwined with the story of what makes Portland the wonderful place it is today. We want to find the right way forward. Help Portland continue along this path & don’t needlessly harm this good company. Thank you for your leadership, Janet Janet Bartholomew BULLSEYE GLASS RESOURCE CENTER 3610 SE 21st Ave I Portland, OR I 97202 503-227-2797 www.bullseyeglass.com Questions about kilnforming? Check out our new <http://www.bullseyeglass.com/?a_aid=Janet> online education videos or visit the <http://www.bullseyeglass.com/forum/> Bullseye Forum. |
Janet Bartholomew | JanetBartholomew@bullseyeglass.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 81 | In support of Bullseye Glass |
Dear Joni Hammond, I am a long time customer of Bullseye Glass. Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Sincerely, Janie Trainor, glass artist |
Janie Trainor | ricodelux@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 82 | In support of art glass manufacturers |
Dear Regulators and Elected Representatives, I am writing to you in regard to the just announced DEQ special meeting to be held on March 15, 2016 for the purpose of considering rule changes directed at Oregon Colored Art Glass Manufacturers. I have read the DEQ proposal for new temporary rules to be considered for adoption at this meeting as outlined here: http://www.oregon.gov/deq/EQC/Documents/2016/031516eqcAgenda.pdf While I applaud the intent of the DEQ to protect our air quality and the health and safety of those living in the neighborhoods near Oregon’s glass manufacturing facilities, I feel that these proposed new rule changes are misguided and will not help achieve that goal. I am a glass artist and am concerned for the well-being of Oregon’s colored art glass manufacturing industry, those employed in that industry and those dependent on the products of that industry. In the recent furor over air contamination possibly coming from local glass manufacturing facilities, I think that these latter two constituencies have been largely overlooked. Due to what I consider to be largely irresponsible, sensationalistic news reporting on this matter, the public demand for immediate action has been extreme. I feel that these proposed new rules are an unwarranted over reaction that will not improve the situation. Two recent soil test studies, have already shown that the severity of the problem isn’t nearly as great as what was originally feared and both of the Portland glass manufacturers cited as possible sources of pollution, Bullseye and Uroboros, have already taken actions to eliminate the use of, and therefore the potential for, releases of the identified hazardous materials. These actions, taken voluntarily and at significant sacrifice to these businesses demonstrate the good will and concern that both have for the air quality in our community. The new rules proposed by the DEQ would force these businesses to make even more significant reductions in their production. The specific change that the new rules would enforce would be the elimination of the use of Chromium III because of the potential for this material to be transformed during production to a hazardous form; Chromium VI. Note, that the proposed DEQ rules also mistakenly make multiple references to another material, Chromium IV, which is indicative of the haste and lack of review with which these proposed rules were drafted. Although the potential conversion of Cr III to Cr VI does exist, glass manufacturers have the ability, and in-fact, the necessity, to prevent such conversion from occurring during the manufacturing process. If they did not, their process would not yield the green glass color they were aiming to produce and their production would be wasted. The scientific reasons behind this are explained by Dr. LaCourse of Alfred University here: http://www.bullseyeglass.com/about-us/dr-lacourse-chromium-statement.html. In short, it would serve no purpose to restrict the use of Cr III by these glass manufacturers, but it would cause significant harm to both of these companies above and beyond that already resulting from their voluntary actions. The DEQ rule proposal identifies the public and the colored glass manufacturers as parties that would be affected by these proposed temporary rules. Their estimation of how the glass companies would be affected completely overlooks the impact of forcing them to further curtail their production, the layoffs that would follow, and the very real potential for the businesses to be forced to shut down entirely. Oregon should be proud of and should help promote its home grown art glass industry. To my knowledge, there are only three companies in the world that make significant quantities of the type of art glass that can be readily used by fused glass artists, and we are fortunate to have two of them located here in Portland. Beyond the effect on the local economy, these unnecessary and scientifically unsupported new rules would also negatively impact the thousands of glass artists worldwide that depend on the products of these companies for their livelihood, potentially destroying the entire fused art glass industry. I hope that you will lend your voice to help DEQ understand that we need a balanced, reasoned and scientifically supported solution to this air contamination problem and not an ineffective, knee-jerk reaction as represented by these proposed rules. Sincerely, Jennifer Cheng Sent from my iPad ???????›??????????????‰??‰????????????????????????????›????????????????????????????????????????????›???????????????????›??????????????????????›??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????›?????????????????????????????????‰‰? |
Jennifer Cheng | jenccheng39@yahoo.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;nick@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;REP VegaPederson;dan@portlandoregon.gov;amanda@portlandoregon.gov;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;gabriela.goldfarb@oregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;nick@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;dan@portlandoregon.gov;amanda@portlandoregon.gov;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;gabriela.goldfarb@oregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 83 | Bullseye Glass |
Ms. Hammond, I wanted to write a short note in support of Bullseye Glass. I understand the public outcry for high air quality standards but cannot understand attacking and possibly ruining a small local company that has supported our community for many years by imposing “harsh temporary” regulations without any real evidence. I think we need to move cautiously forward and not just have a knee jerk reaction for the loudest group. Bullseye is trying to be a responsible part of our community and I think we should commend and support their efforts so we can retain good companies like these here in Portland. Thank you, Jennifer Ferrante |
Jennifer Ferrante | ferrante@easystreet.net | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 84 | Bullseye Glass |
Hello As a glass hobbyist in Portland, OR, I am saddened to hear that we are about to shut down a significant amount of Bullseye Glass's production without any scientific data around that production. Bullseye has already voluntarily shut down some of its product lines but to shut down more, which does not even produce chromium, would be detrimental to the business, to Portland, to the people they employ and to our community. It would be a shame to do this in a political rush without evidence or scientific basis. Please do not impose these new rules without further evaluation and study. Thanks, Jennifer Sherman 3415 SE Stark St Portland, OR 97214 ******************************** Jennifer Sherman 415-810-0982 |
Jennifer Sherman | jdsherman1@yahoo.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 85 | DEQ and Bullseye Glass |
Hello, Trivalent Chromium is common and is a nutrient that our bodies use. Hexavalent Chromium is toxic to our bodies. Hexavalent Chromium levels found by Bullseye Glass were below federal screening levels. It is true that some, low levels, where found. Perhaps it actually came from Portland Cement used in concrete. In my research I found this PDF file from the Portland Cement Association, Hexavalent Chromium in Cement Manufacturing: Literature Review, PCA R&D Serial No. 2983. http://web.mit.edu/cron/project/concrete-sustainability-hub/Literature%20Review/Building%20Energy/Concerte%20Industry%20Reports/PCA%20CD%20Cement%20Research%20Library%202008/reports/SN2983.pdf In that report, they say that Hexavalent chromium is found in cement in generally trace amounts. But it is still found in cement. Perhaps some demolishing of sidewalks or buildings nearby the Bullseye plant cause the elevated levels of chromium. I use Bullseye glass in my art and have been following the turn of events with Bullseye, the community and the DEQ. I believe in scientific facts and understanding of the truth. To cause a business and an industry to shut down on inconclusive test results is appalling. Public outcry over the discovery of minute toxins in the air has been blown way out of proportion. It is important to keep toxins out of the atmosphere, but even gas power autos and lawnmowers produce toxins. Even electric cars produce ozone, a known toxin at ground level. The media has played a role in the Bullseye issue as well. The media will play on people’s fears and ignorance. They say that toxins where found, but not at what levels. And the levels are below DEQ screening levels. People will hear “toxins found” and then get out their torches and pitch forks. I too am concerned about the air quality and toxins found in it. However, Bullseye has voluntarily stopped using the heavy metals and stopped contributing to the air pollution of the city. They will also install a “baghouse” filtration system to go above and beyond their requirements. They are responsive to the community that they belong to and want to better protect their neighbors from air pollutants. Thank You, Jim Jablonski |
Jim Jablonski | jim@jcadpcb.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | questions@bullseyeglass.com | questions@bullseyeglass.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 86 | Bullseye Glass and it's use of Chromium |
Dear Deputy Director Hamilton, Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. I am certian that you appreciate, having a B.S from U of O, that, regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Jim Scheller Hillsboro, Oregon |
jim@jimscheller.com | scheljim@comcast.net | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 87 | BULLSEYE GLASS |
Dear Ms. Hammond, Having followed this issue from it's onset via the media, it is evident that this issue requires attention based on initial environmental sample data. And it is satisfying to see that progress is being made by Bullseye Glass Co, who has legally manufactured glass from their onset, and further environmental investigation. But, this situation seems to have another aspect to it with regards to the media and to decisions being made on the handling of this issue... I've been doing business with the Bullseye Glass Co. for almost thirty years and can say without hesitation that they are a company without equal in this industry. Above board and professional at all times. They are without doubt the life blood of my industry. After learning this morning of the proposed temporary "regulations" that the DEQ wants to apply to Bullseye Glass Co. I find myself once again dissatisfied with the handling of this situation given the current evidence. I cannot overstate on the far reaching negative effects of the implementation of these regulations. Even with the current voluntary manufacturing suspensions it has NOT been business as usual for my industry. So, before making any decision, without the full understanding, of the glass making process and the negative economic impact that this would have on this industry world wide, would be, once again, dissatisfying. James Steven Dunham -- James Steven Dunham Purchasing Manager Coatings by Sandberg, Inc. www.cbs-dichroic.com <http://www.cbs-dichroic.com> 714.538.0888 |
jimdunham66@gmail.com | jimdunham66@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 88 | Bullseye |
As a glass artist I’m writing in support of Bullseye glass Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Thanks Ms J L Ryan London, UK |
Jo Ryan | jo.ryan@virginmedia.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | SAXTON LYNNE;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov | EX;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 89 | I support Bullseye Glass |
Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I
stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations
as a responsible citizen of the social and business community
of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Sincerely, Julie Re Sent from my iPhone |
Joe and Julie | joejuliere@yahoo.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 90 | re: Support Bullseye in this discriminatory DEQ action |
Hello, I am writing to you today in support of Bullseye Glass, a corporation I have had the pleasure of doing business with for the last 30 years, in its efforts to continue to provide art glass and to be a good citizen in the communities its business impacts. It is highly discriminatory to impose unreasonable regulations against Bullseye (long known in the glass community to be a leading force in environmental concerns!). And any restrictive regulations must be fairly and equally applied, both to ALL businesses who fail to pass environmental testing and only AFTER scientific evidence of any toxicity has been established. To single Bullseye out, to apply restrictions only against this company, and without any testing to validate such actions, is legally and morally just WRONG. Please consider the evidence Dr. LaCourse has provided concluding that the Bullseye furnaces not NOT produce toxic chromium. Please urge the DEQ to make a decision only after responsible examination of all evidence and not to be influenced by current political railroading. Thank you sincerely for your positive actions in this regard, Sincerely, Jolinda Marshall 2291 Morningside Trail Ramona, CA 92065 (619) 246-3532 Jolinda.morluv@gmail.com <mailto:Jolinda.morluv@gmail.com> |
Jolinda Marshall | Jolinda.Public@gmail.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||||||||
| 91 | Bullseye Glass Support |
As a glass artist in the area I rely on Bullseye glass for about
95% of my glass art. Bullseye Glass provides a quality product
and is consiencious about the community. The article by Prof.
LaCourse http://www.bullseyeglass.com/about-us/dr-lacourse-chromium-statement.html explains the conditions required to make green glass making it impossible to have high emissions of cr-6 seems to answer alot of questions and hopefully fears. I stand in support of Bulleye Glass and thier continued attempt to safly do business in the Portland area. Judy Keen JK Glass Works Sent from Samsung tablet |
judy | judy@judykeen.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 92 | Proposed DEQ rules affecting Bullseye and Uroboros |
Joni Hammond Interim Director Oregon Department of Environmental Quality When there was evidence of heavy metals in the area around Bullseye, I was confident that they would seek and apply the necessary steps to maintain clean air. This, Bullseye is doing. I also became concerned that there were no local guidelines for the heavy metals. There is neither evidence nor science that warrants this 180 day waiting period for CR III. This is a wake up call to make DEQ a professional, science based organization that acts, not reacts. Please use common sense and a cooperative spirit to clean up the air for our city and state. Background: my late husband worked with Bullseye Glass in the 1970’s. In 2011 I became a glass artist using as my primary studio, the facility at Bullseye Resource Center. I have been impressed with the way Bullseye mentors new artists and enforces stringent safety practices for employees and those using the facilities. Judy Buffo 2309 SW First Avenue #1744 Portland, Oregon 97201 http://judybuffoglass.com/ <http://judybuffoglass.com/home.html> |
Judy Buffo | buffoj@yahoo.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 93 | Bullseye Glass Company |
Ms. Hammond, Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Thank you for your attention. Judy Johnson Judy Johnson 4475 Middle Cheshire Rd. Canandaigua, NY 14424 (585) 752-4385 opensalt@rochester.rr.com |
Judy Johnson | opensalt@rochester.rr.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 94 | Issue: Bullseye Glass Production |
Dear Ms. Hammond and Mr. Hales: I am writing as a glass artist, long-time Bullseye customer, and Ph.D. in biology. As an Arizona resident, I have no direct involvement with environmental issues in Portland or the State of Oregon, although I have been an admirer of the leadership position your city and State have taken in protecting public health and public lands. I request that you continue this leadership role in the issue of Bullseye Glass Company. I have toured the Bullseye Portland factory, learned about their production, taken classes in their classrooms, talked with their staff, and purchased and use their products--which, by the way, are of high quality, made with care and craftsmanship. Thus, I can say firsthand that I believe that the company's management and staff take pride in their products and processes. They have devoted themselves to serving their customers well while also being a good partner in the community. I never got the sense that this small company was ever out to cheat, dissemble, cut corners, or deliberately engage in any activities that would bring harm to its employees, its customers, or its neighbors. I also understand that this issue reached a crisis point, not because Bullseye Glass "covered up" any alleged pollution practices, but rather because the regulatory process simply did not require reporting from companies of this size and production level. I have run an environmental organization and have worked on environmental issues in the past, and I am betting that this issue will trigger a revamping of how data are collected and compliance forms are filed. But until then, again, I ask you to be real leaders, not just get carried along on a tide of fear and outrage that might not have a strong basis in science, and nevertheless, will take a long time to sort out. This company has more than a hundred loyal employees who do not deserve to lose their jobs. And this company also has thousands of customers around the U.S. and abroad--among them, many hundreds of professional artists--whose livelihoods will be adversely affected by a halt to production of important colors of glass. I would urge you to give this company the benefit of the doubt. It is important to weigh all sides of this issue, and it's important to get all the facts. But it's also important to avoid creating a situation that would bring a good company to its knees--along with all those who depend on its products--unnecessarily. I would suggest that you figure out a way to allow the company to continue production while immediately launching whatever studies are considered necessary for a long-term resolution to this problem. If you work with Bullseye management to determine a reasonable timeline for compliance, along with setting deadlines for interim objectives, work could immediately begin on responding to this issue with wisdom, concern, and deliberation. One question would be: How significant is the impact on air quality for pollutants emitted from this source over a three- or six-month period? If the health impacts are not acute over this time span, it would give the company the chance to take immediate measures to control pollutant output, just as further investigation of actual long-term output and its effects, could be undertaken. And one last suggestion: If public sentiment is harsh enough to force the closure of this plant, perhaps the city or state could help find another temporary location outside populated areas for production to continue while the issues are being sorted out. I know that vibrant cities are mosaics-- not just of residential and entertainment areas, but also of businesses, parks and open space, and industries. A balanced mosaic of uses keeps cities vital. Let Bullseye have the chance to show it will continue to be a good a responsible part of that mosaic. Sincerely, Judith Kiriazis -- Judith Kiriazis, Ph.D. Heart of Stone Studio www.heartofstonestudio.com <http://www.heartofstonestudio.com> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=oa-2115-e> Scanned for viruses. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=oa-2115-e> |
Judy Kiriazis | judy@heartofstonestudio.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;Mayor Charlie Hales | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov | EX;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 95 | Bullseye hearing |
To the policy makers regarding Bullseye Glass: As a long time user of Bullseye products who has shopped their outlet, I have closely followed the Oregonian’s coverage of Bullseye Glass, and from the start, have been perplexed as to how a company as dedicated to safety and service as Bullseye could possibly befoul its own neighborhood. Answer: they have not, do not, and could not. Having read the scientific information provided by the letter Bullseye sent to its customers, I am completely outraged that Bullseye is being singled out for extraordinary restrictions. I am not a scientist, but my husband is both literally a rocket scientist and a nuclear scientist concerned with environmental health, and he says that Bullseye’s scientific statements are spot on. As a tree-hugging environmentalist, I would never advocate sacrificing even a hangnail to rescuing Bullseye, but they are innocent - guilty of nothing whatsoever with respect to the public health. This has got to be a political maneuver (why, for heaven’s sake? sells papers? ) - and I am strictly a glass fusing hobby-est with no financial interest in Bullseye’s continued production. I am committed to what is right, and singling out Bullseye this way is utterly wrong. I support Bullseye. Judy Ringle |
Judy Ringle | judy.ringle@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;REP Nosse | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97 | EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;EX | Rathja Marsha | Marsha.Rathja@comcast.net | SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 96 | Bullseye Glass |
To Joni Hammond: Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. The effects of this unjust ruling can have a widespread negative impact not only on the people of Portland but on all of us on every other state and other countries around the world. There are a lot of us 'little guys' who rely on this long upstanding company who make a quality product. Thank-you. With Respect, June Sanning Winsome ArtWorks Lima, Ohio |
June Crawford/Sanning | june.k.crawford@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 97 | Please Save Bullseye Glass! |
Dear Ms. Hammond, I am writing to ask your help in saving a gem of Portland, a gem for all of Oregon. Bullseye Glass is a northwest icon of artistry and excellence creating fused glass that is used around the world. Bullseye is not just a local company, it created an entirely new industry. Bullseye created the art form of fused glass. Bullseye glass is used all over the world. You'll find their glass in museums and local art shows. I first learned about Bullseye Glass when I lived in Houston Texas and my husband started his hobby of stained glass. When I moved to Portland Oregon in 2000, one of my first priorities was to take a fused glass class from Bullseye. I'm only an amateur artist, but Bullseye gave me a new wonderful medium to work with. Fused glass is now my favorite art form. Since then, I've met hundreds of artists from across the city who make their living by being glass artists. Their studios are in their basements or garages, but you'll find them at the many art shows that flourish around the Portland area. Because of Bullseye, the Glass Guild is thriving in the northwest. I've also gotten to know the people who work at Bullseye. I've seen how they care about their customers, their product, their community and the environment. I know they are the type of company that will go the extra mile to do the right thing. According to the media, Bullseye has broken no laws and is meeting all federal and local environmental emissions standards, yet they are suddenly being targeted by regulators seeking to make a political splash. The regulators at OEQC are imperiling the very existence of Bullseye. I believe the OEQC is unfairly attacking Bullseye Glass. Bullseye has voluntarily suspended use of cadmium in its glass making till new equipment can be installed, even though their cadmium emissions are below the legal limits. Now the OEQC wants to suspend their use of chromium, which would stop production of half their glass! As with cadmium, their emissions are within the legal limits! Everyone wants to protect the environment, but this is draconian and unfair! Please help us save Bullseye from overzealous regulators! If Bullseye is forced to unfairly shutdown production, then good employees will lose their jobs. And thousands of artists across the Northwest will lose their livelihood and their beloved art. These regulators are not just killing a company, they are trying to kill an entire industry. They are trying to kill an art form. The Northwest is famous for its art! Please help us save Bullseye Glass! We need your help. Please save an art form and a world class industry. Thank you, Karen Azinger Amateur glass artist Author of The Silk & Steel epic fantasy saga a registered voter of Portland Oregon k_azinger@hotmail.com |
Karen Azinger | k_azinger@hotmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 98 | Bullseye Glass, Portland, Oregon |
|
Karen Ehart | keglass@qwestoffice.net | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 99 | Bullseye Glass, DEQ meeting. |
Dear Joni, I am writing in support of Bullseye Glass. Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation and as I understand it Bullseye Glass are taking voluntary steps regarding Cadmium and Arsenic control. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regarding chromium, a leading scientist, Dr LaCourse, has assured us that Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. I respectfully suggest that regulatory decisions must be based on science, not fear and politics. I urge the DEQ to use science and fact when coming to their decisions later today. Yours sincerely, Karen Lilley. |
Karen Lilley | karen.lilley@virgin.net | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 100 | Bullseye Glass meeting |
Good morning. I am a UK glass artist working in the UK. I understand you are meeting later today with a view to determining future action with regard to possible pollution in the Portland area caused by various glass manufacturing companies. Can I please ask you to also consider the wider impact of any decision you make. My business and many other glass artists livelihood are centred on the import of American glass to the UK. Without this incredible product we would all simply be out of business. There is NO other alternative as no other manufacturers exist in the world that make a product like this. As far as I can see from all the evidence that has been reported there is no concrete reason for restricting the use of certain essential ingredients in the production of the glass. So I respectfully request that you consider the wider impact of any actions you take at your meeting today. Many thanks in advance. Karen Worrall Kj Designs-Glass Derbyshire, UK. |
Karen Worrall | kj-designs@hotmail.co.uk | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;questions@bullseyeglass.com | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;questions@bullseyeglass.com | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 101 | Bullseye Glass |
Dear Ms. Hammond, Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. We stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Sincerely, Karrie Brain-Marsh Jeff Marsh 3344 NE Beakey St. Portland, OR 97212 |
Karrie | karrie@chariotsonfile.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102 | Air quality issue |
|
Kate Saunders | katefsaunders@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 103 | In support of Bullseye Glass |
Dear Regulators and Elected Representatives, I am writing to you concerning the announced DEQ special meeting to be held on March 15, 2016 for the purpose of considering rule changes directed at Oregon Colored Art Glass Manufacturers. I have read the DEQ proposal for new temporary rules to be considered for adoption at this meeting. I consider myself to be an environmentalist. As such, I applaud the intent of the DEQ to protect our air quality and the health and safety of those living in the neighborhoods near Oregon’s glass manufacturing facilities. However, I feel that these proposed new rule changes are misguided and will not help achieve that goal. I am also a glass artist and am concerned for the well-being of Oregon’s colored art glass manufacturing industry, those employed in that industry and those dependent on the products of that industry. Due to what I consider to be largely irresponsible, sensationalistic news reporting on this matter, the public demand for immediate action has been extreme. I feel that these proposed new rules are an unwarranted over reaction that will not improve the situation. Two recent soil test studies, have already shown that the severity of the problem isn’t nearly as great as what was originally feared and both of the Portland glass manufacturers cited as possible sources of pollution, Bullseye and Uroboros, have already taken actions to eliminate the use of, and therefore the potential for, releases of the identified hazardous materials. These actions, taken voluntarily and at significant sacrifice to these businesses demonstrate the good will and concern that both have for the air quality in our community. The new rules proposed by the DEQ would force these businesses to make even more significant reductions in their production. The specific change that the new rules would enforce would be the elimination of the use of Chromium III because of the potential for this material to be transformed during production to a hazardous form; Chromium VI. Note, that the proposed DEQ rules also mistakenly make multiple references to another material, Chromium IV, which is indicative of the haste and lack of review with which these proposed rules were drafted. Although the potential conversion of Cr III to Cr VI does exist, glass manufacturers have the ability, and in-fact, the necessity, to prevent such conversion from occurring during the manufacturing process. If they did not, their process would not yield the green glass color they were aiming to produce and their production would be wasted. The scientific reasons behind this are explained by Dr. LaCourse. In short, it would serve no purpose to restrict the use of Cr III by these glass manufacturers, but it would cause significant harm to both of these companies above and beyond that already resulting from their voluntary actions. The DEQ rule proposal identifies the public and the colored glass manufacturers as parties that would be affected by these proposed temporary rules. Their estimation of how the glass companies would be affected completely overlooks the impact of forcing them to further curtail their production, the layoffs that would follow, and the very real potential for the businesses to be forced to shut down entirely. Oregon should be proud of and should help promote its home grown art glass industry. To my knowledge, there are only three companies in the world that make significant quantities of the type of art glass that can be readily used by fused glass artists, and we are fortunate to have two of them located here in Portland. Beyond the effect on the local economy, these unnecessary and scientifically unsupported new rules would also negatively impact the thousands of glass artists worldwide that depend on the products of these companies for their livelihood, potentially destroying the entire fused art glass industry. I hope that you will lend your voice to help DEQ understand that we need a balanced, reasoned and scientifically supported solution to this air contamination problem and not an ineffective, knee-jerk reaction as represented by these proposed rules. Respectfully, Kathy Berger Sent from Seja's iPad ????Á?????????????????????????????????›?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????›?????????????????????????????????‰‰? |
Kathy Berger | seja44@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | SAXTON LYNNE | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8 | EX | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 104 | Bullseye Glass Factory |
As a glass artist in the Metro area, I wish to say that Bullseye
glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with
Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible
citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Thank you for your consideration, Kathy Kollenburn 445 SE Linden Gresham, OR 97080 |
Kathy Kollenburn | kkollenburn@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 105 |
Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I
stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations
as a responsible citizen of the social and business community
of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. If we are not allowed to use Cr (III), we can no longer make green glass. On top of our voluntary suspension of cadmium glass production until our baghouse is in place, this new limitation would eliminate 50% of our product line. It would result in employee layoffs, huge economic impacts to Bullseye and our worldwide customers, and could even drive us out of business. thank you for your concern. Kelli Graves GlassWench Studio |
kelli graves | glasswenchstudio@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||||||
| 106 | Special Meeting March 15th |
?Bullseye Glass has a long history of responsible operation.
I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations
as a responsible citizen of the social and business community
of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules.? Basing these rules off an assumption of guilt, without any supporting evidence, appears reactionary and fear-based. Hold these types of regulatory decisions until all the scientific facts are in place. The science has not supported the data guiding these practices being proposed. Bullseye's fast-tracking new filtering systems without request from any regulatory agency in the interest of the public outcry - let them put that in place prior to additional sanctions you feel you must impose due to such outcry. This additional reaction could very well drive a long standing, well established business right out of Oregon. Don't drive a long standing business out of Oregon because of political and environmental lobbyist pressure. Of course this is just my personal opinion, a citizen of Oregon, and a glass artist. Kelly Yeats Glass Artist kmyeats@gmail.com <mailto:kmyeats@gmail.com> |
Kelly Yeats | kmyeats@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;gabriela.goldfarb@oregon.gov;multchair@multco.us | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;gabriela.goldfarb@oregon.gov;multchair@multco.us | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 107 |
Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I
stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations
as a responsible citizen of the social and business community
of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules |
kenwri11@aol.com | kenwri11@aol.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | |||||||||||
| 108 | Temporary regulations on Bullseye Glass |
Bullseye glass is an integral part of the glass community of Portland, state of Oregon, and the Pacific Northwest. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Please do not impose regulations that are poorly written and not based on scientific fact. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. I urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not cave into political pressure to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Sincerely, Kevin J Kanyo |
KEVIN KANYO | gk1922@comcast.net | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 109 | Bullseye Glass |
Dear madam, sir, Bullseye Glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Artists, glass schools, glassstudio's & glass shops all over the world will be affected. Jobs will be affected. Our whole community will be affected. Not only in Portland, but allover the world. Sincerely, Krista Israel The Netherlands www.krista-israel.com studio - business area NOACK Soesterweg 564 unit X 3812BP Amersfoort The Netherlands |
Krista Israel | krista_israel@live.nl | SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||||||||
| 110 | Pending regulations Bullseye Glass |
As an artist who depends on Bullseye Glass to make a living and pay my bills, I urge you to consider all of the scientific facts and don't let peoples fears and insecurities drive your decisions regarding Bullseye and their continued production of their products. I like you do not want a single person exposed to toxic materials. I also do not want Bullseye Glass driven out of business because of unfound fears. Please consider not only the impact your decisions have on the neighbors of Bullseye but also the impact your decisions have on the employees of Bullseye Glass and the impact your decisions will have of the thousands of other people who make a living using these Bullseye Products. I trust you and the State of Oregon to make sound decisions. Please consider all the facts. You hold a lot of peoples lives in the balance and I hope that everyone involved will use the facts not peoples fears when making their decisions regarding the future of everyone involved including Bullseye Glass. Thank you. Larry Larson Caribou Glass Studio |
Larry Larson | caribouglassstudio@yahoo.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 111 | Bullseye |
I am a glass Artist that lives in Texas. While I know the air
quality does not affect me, the stop of production of glass that
you are proposing will cause a hardship all over the United States
and other countries. Many artist only use Bullseye as their
vendor. This would be a tremendous damage to the glass community
and our businesses. I do support the filtering that they already
preparing to do. However, to delete production any longer with
the result that may cause them to close could cause other smaller
business to close or raise their prices to the point that glass
as we know it now in the community would stop. I ask that you consider the damage to the glass industry that shutting them down or ceasing production of 50% of their glass will cause. There must be some way that they can satisfy both your needs and ours as artist. I am sure this has already caused glass to go up again and this will affect all the glass companies. Raising the price of all glass will affect the whole economy such as raising the price of gasoline does. It's a ripple affect. Thank you for your time. Linda Dolby JL Glass Designs McKinney, TX Linda@jlglass.biz Sent from my iPad |
Linda Dolby | linda@jlglass.biz | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 112 | Bullseye Glass Special meeting of the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission |
Gentlemen and Ladies: I have been a user of Bullseye Glass for 25 plus years. I have worked in there facility for hundred of hours. Neither DEQ or EPA have required any other US producer, of green glass, to entirely and arbitrarily stop their production without notice and perform the kind of extensive testing and modeling that DEQ is asking for. A typical green bottle manufacturer uses 1,000 times more Cr(III) per year than Bullseye Glass. A bottle producer, with emission controls, would melt more Cr(III) each day than Bullseye uses in a year. I understand the publics concern but I beg you to look at the science and the possibility of loss of income to employees not only in the Portland area but around the world. The effects are not just to the glass manufacture but to the artist, builders and end consumers like yourself. Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Please allow the law to do what we have voted for our officials to do and not react to media hype. Sincerely, Lisa Rasmussen -- Lisa Rasmussen PO Box 65853 Vancouver, WA 98665-8200 cell 360-281-2886 fax 360-450-3239 |
Lisa Rasmussen | lrasmussengal@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;rcfloor@bullseyeglass.com | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;rcfloor@bullseyeglass.com | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 113 | Bullseye Glass |
Hi Joni, I'm pleased you guys are trying to keep us safe and protect us from pollution and dangerous chemicals. As an oregonian I love my home state and want to keep it as pristine as possible. I know you are having a hearing on banning chromium use at Bullseye tomorrow. I'm concerned that your intentions while honorable, are misdirected. Bullseye has always struck me as a good, environmentally conscious neighbor. I have gone in and spoken with the employees and am impressed with their focus on safety and stewardship. I believe the type of chromium they use is not dangerous and banning it without understanding the lack of health risks seems to be more for show then a scientifically based decision. Please do more research before you take action that would potentially put people out of work. Lisa Ripps Portland Oregon Sent from my iPhone |
Lisa Ripps | lisaripps@hotmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 114 | Bullseye glass factory Portland |
I am writing in regard to the proposed restrictions on Bullseye.
My concern is that any restrictions placed are the direct result
of public outcry rather than the scientific facts. I have been
a devoted follower of this unique glass company for other 10
years and would hate to see them effectively closed down out
of fear. Please weigh the scientific facts when you make your
decision. Yours truly, Lisa Sayer Sent from my iPad |
Lisa Sayer | lisa.sayer10@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 115 | Re Bullseye Glass |
As a glass artist living and working in the UK I rely heavily
on being able to use Bullseye Glass that is imported from the
US. I understand that your department is about to impose restrictions on Bullseye Glass to curtail their production of some colours of glass. I also understand that there is little scientific evidence to suggest that their production emissions are harmful and that Bullseye Glass are taking steps to lower their current emissions even further. I urge your department to reconsider it's decision as this will have severe far reaching consequences on glass artists not just in the US or the UK but in many other countries across the globe. With best wishes Lizzie Masters The Glass Dragonfly Www.the glass dragonfly.co.uk Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android <https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android> |
lizziemasters@sky.com | lizziemasters@sky.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 116 | DEQ proposed emission changes for Bullseye |
Dear John, The DEQ rule changes directed at Oregon Colored Art Glass Manufacturers. ( <http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.oregon.gov%2Fdeq%2FEQC%2FDocuments%2F2016%2F031516eqcAgenda.pdf&h=1AQFepmfK> http://www.oregon.gov/.../Documents/2016/031516eqcAgenda.pdf ) are an overreaction not based upon science that will hurt thousands of people in our industry. I consider myself an environmentalist and feel that the public's health is paramount yet I ask that you consider the actual science of the limits they are proposing and how over reacting right now will hurt many, many people's livelihoods. Let's change the DEQ laws responsibly without a rush to judgement that is neither science based nor fair. Thank you for your consideration, Lawrence Morrell www.LawrenceMorrell.com LMorrell@comcast.net |
LMorrell | lmorrell@comcast.net | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 117 | DEQ “temporary” regulations |
to whom it belongs Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. We sincerely appreciate any support you can provide right now. |
lourdes zenobi | mlzenobi@yahoo.com | SMTP | Lourdes Zenobi | mlzenobi@yahoo.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 118 | Reflection on Air Quality Issues |
Hello, I am writing to express my thoughts as a member of the public and resident of the Brooklyn neighborhood, less than 10 blocks from Bullseye Glass. I was unable to attend the public meeting last week due to the less than adequate prior notice given, and a busy work schedule. Note that since I have been most involved in the happenings around Bullseye, I mention them here specifically, but my commentary applies to all manufacturers that emit toxics into our airshed. Please bear with me as I tell you about my family. We relocated to Portland in May 2015, from Tokyo, Japan. My husband and young son are Japanese, and I am from the Pacific Northwest. On March 11, 2011, my husband and my life changed forever when a magnitude 9.1 earthquake struck the East Coast of Japan's main island, causing 3 nuclear reactors to, in effect, malfunction. A toxic plume of radiation swept across the country, although thankfully, most went out to the sea. Regardless of the actual health risk of that radiation, we were unable to continue to live in Japan, where we were sure we would spend the rest of our lives, comfortably because of several things that took place after that event, eroding our faith in regulatory agencies to regulate and protect the public, rather than industry. Words cannot express the profound impact that erosion of faith had on our, and many of our friends' lives, but we were deeply concerned about our food, the health of our future children, our environment, and the diligence of our politicians and regulatory authorities. We are dismayed to see several of those things happening here in Portland, after the news of toxic air broke last month. First, item of concern is the lack of regulatory authority the DEQ has demonstrated. The proposed rules require strict and severe financial penalties, otherwise a company is likely to choose to pay $1,000 here and there rather than invest in the infrastructure required to effectively eliminate toxic emissions. Second, industry standard, EPA-compliant filtration devices are required. If we can remove 99% of toxics and make that manufacturer have effectively no negative impact on the airshed, why wouldn't we? This is a prime opportunity for Oregon to live up to its green reputation, attract jobs/workers, and become a true leader in clean industry. Third, the precautionary principle must be applied. When we don't know the true impact to human health, we must act to protect the public over profits. Protecting the public will reap savings for the state down the road in lowered health care costs alone. One must not look only at cancer. These toxics are known to cause a multitude of adverse health impacts apart from cancer. The OHA is wrong in their stance on this, although that is a separate issue. Reporting from the Oregonian indicates that air quality has significantly improved in SE Portland after the glassmakers' voluntary agreement to stop using toxics. While diesel fuels and other industries also contribute to poor air quality, the data points to Bullseye as the major contributor to our air issues in close-in SE. Bullseye, while pretending to want to work with neighbors, has spent funds that could be used on filtration on a PR firm, which has consistently given out differing information to different audiences. I believe the initial notice of intent to construct mentioned one filter (of 19 furnaces and 6 stacks) that was 90% efficient, which is what was communicated to EPAC (East Portland Air Coalition). In a letter to rally support from customers, suppliers, and distributors, for the company, the filter would suddenly remove 99% of toxics, period. (What about the other furnaces/stacks?) Bullseye has failed to clarify this point, leaving the neighborhood feeling confused, betrayed, and dismayed. We cannot trust that Bullseye will do the right thing unless YOU act to enforce permanent rules that require the most up-to-date, industry standard filtration on ALL furnaces. Who is to say that, when a large order is placed, Bullseye would be sure to use the furnace with the filter to complete that order, instead of firing up multiple furnaces and allowing toxics back into our air? Penalties must be in place to ensure compliance. It is up to you to ensure that the residents of SE Portland are safe in our homes, at our parks, in our neighborhoods. The precautionary principle must be applied, for all known carcinogens, not just cadmium, arsenic, chromium and nickel. I do not believe that Bullseye will go out of business. I do believe, however, that this is a great opportunity for the company, as well as Portland and the state of Oregon, to be truly green, to attract new residents with clean air, and to lead the way in developing clean industry that is appropriate for mixed-zoning with residential neighborhoods. Having jobs in our neighborhoods is also important, but not to the detriment of health, which goes beyond looking at cancer. Please apply the precautionary principle. Please apply it to all industries, but to glass manufacturers first if you must. We know, and the data states that this current threat to human health can be eliminated. Again, the DEQ works for the public, not for industry. Please, protect our families, our way of life, and restore our faith in the state. Do what's right, not what protects profits. It is not in the DEQ's mission statement to protect profits. Indeed, "DEQ's mission is to be a leader in restoring, maintaining and enhancing the quality of Oregon's air, land and water." Do that, please. Thank you very much, Lynette Hasegawa Brooklyn resident |
lynette hasegawa | lynette.hasegawa@gmail.com | SMTP | JOHNSON Colleen;EDEN Melinda;OKEEFFE Jane;ARMSTRONG Ed;RIDER Morgan;REP Kotek;SEN Rosenbaum;REP SmithWarner;REP Frederick;mult.chair@multco.us;REP Taylor;REP Nosse;REP KenyGuyer;REP Helm;REP Greenlick;SEN Shields;SEN Dembrow;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;HAMMOND Joni;DECONCINI Nina;mclerran.dennis@epa.gov;hastings.janis@epa.gov;Barber.Anthony@epamail.epa.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JOHNSON Colleen176;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=EDEN Melindae77;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OKEEFFE Janee72;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ARMSTRONG Edce9;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RIDER Morgan94f;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Koteka13;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sen Rosenbaumb04;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Smith Warner921;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Frederick053;mult.chair@multco.us;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Taylor69c;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep KenyGuyer799;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Helme05;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Greenlick014;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sen Shieldsc27;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sen Dembrowab8;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;/O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=NDECONC;mclerran.dennis@epa.gov;hastings.janis@epa.gov;Barber.Anthony@epamail.epa.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 119 | The Glass Issue |
As someone who has been doing glass for a number of years at a
studio in St John's , I would urge you to take a realistic view
of this situation and weigh it fairly. It is has been apparent
that neither glass company knowingly or intentionally spewed
toxins into the air. Had they known what was required or needed,
they would have complied. It's mass hysteria in that neighborhood
of mothers with nothing better to do but make trouble for others
and not try and work with the businesses like they should have
. Work with the glass businesses , see that there is regulation for what they are doing so the rest of us can still enjoy making glass for others . If they need a better filtering system, let them know but at the same time let those hysterical mothers know that again, neither business is doing anything intentionally. A Huntting Gresham Or Sent from my iPad |
mandysmom1946@yahoo.com | mandysmom1946@yahoo.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 120 | Multnomah County Chair Letter to Department of Environmental Quality |
March 15, 2016 Joni Hammond Department of Environmental Quality 811 SW Sixth Avenue Portland, Oregon Dear Director Hammond, I was concerned when I received copies from your office of the letters dated March 8 to Bullseye Glass Co. and Uroboros Glass Studios, Inc from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). The agency’s decision to allow the resumed use of chromium at Bullseye and Uroboros, as outlined in the March 8, 2016 letter to those companies transpired without public input and is premature. The resumed use of chromium, even under the conditions outlined in the letter, could put families and individuals living near those facilities at increased risk. The DEQ is essentially proposing an experiment to determine if chromium 3 is converted during the manufacturing process into the more toxic chromium 6 and emitted into the air. This type of experimentation is not appropriate in close proximity to schools, neighborhoods, and childcare facilities, and without consent from the people directly impacted. I am calling on DEQ to take the following actions: · Mandate best available emissions control technology: Suspend heavy metal use at Bullseye and Uroboros until effective emission control technology has been installed and verified as effective. · Allow public comment on temporary rules: The public has a right to weigh in on temporary rules related to emissions of heavy metals from the glass manufacturing sector in Portland. The abbreviated timeline for temporary rulemaking does not allow for adequate public input, nor will closed door rulemaking build trust with the public. I join with other voices in asking for a 14 day public comment period. · Establish a clear timeline. I am renewing my call for the state to provide a timeline and specific regulatory strategies that will be employed to comprehensively address air toxics. We have all heard the understandable confusion, fear and anger from residents who live near these facilities. If the DEQ cannot verify safe levels of toxic heavy metal emissions that will not exceed ambient health-based benchmarks, then the agency should not be rushing to enable these emissions to recur. Nearby residents have a right to expect that the health of their children is being protected by the DEQ, not negotiated away behind closed doors. Sincerely, Deborah Kafoury Multnomah County Chair Cc: Governor Kate Brown Multnomah County Oregon 501 SE Hawthorne, Suite 600 Portland, Oregon 97214 503-988-3308 <https://multco.us/chair-kafoury> https://multco.us/chair-kafoury |
marco.circosta@multco.us | marco.circosta@multco.us | SMTP | Multnomah County Chair | mult.chair@multco.us | SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 121 | Special Meeting of the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission March 15 2016 |
Dear Regulators and Elected Representatives, I am contacting you to voice my concerns over the proposed changes to the manufacture of glass in the Portland area of Oregon. I am a fused glass artist in England and so I have an interest in the outcome of the meeting. I do not have any great scientific understanding of the production of glass but I have followed the development of the situation from the first publication of the news story concerning the possibility of air pollution which might be caused by the manufacture of glass. I fear for the people who rely totally on these companies for their own business. I have read through the DEQ proposals as outlined in this agenda http://www.oregon.gov/deq/EQC/Documents/2016/031516eqcAgenda.pdf and notice the use of the words 'possibly', 'likely', 'more likely than not', 'potentially', which suggest to me that there has been no scientific proof that the manufacturing process actually does produce dangerously high levels of the materials described. Much of this seems to be pure speculation. In fact, it seems that the whole problem seems to have been blown up out of proportion. From my distant perspective it seems that the press has sown a seed for public concern by suggesting that there is a problem and then it has been taken up by others with some political purpose to add fuel to their own intentions. I understand the concern over pollution but the wording on the agenda is very vague concerning the actual level of pollution and its effect on the locality. These companies have been producing glass for many years; have any of their employees been found to have suffered from these polllutants? From what I know of one of the manufacturers they are a well liked and conscientious company who take seriously their duty to protect the environment as well as providing a good quality product. They have already reduced their output of certain colours of glass which has caused no little problem to many who use their products. People in the UK are concerned that they may be forced to go out of business as they rely on these glass manufacturers to provide them with the materials necessary for their livelihood. I notice at the end of the agenda there is a section entitled 'Who are the affected parties?' I would like to add to that list the numerous people worldwide who rely on those glass producers for their livelihood. These companies produce materials that are used by glass artists all over the world, both in business and as a recreational activity. Any restriction on the production of their glass will have a far-reaching and, in many cases, a devastating effect. Bearing all this in mind I hope that any decisions made at this meeting are based on sound, scientific evidence, and that those who make the decisions do so from a considered and unbiased standpoint, Kind Regards, Margaret Hall |
Margaret Hall | margrhall@hotmail.com | SMTP | SAXTON LYNNE;HAMMOND Joni;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 122 | Bullseye Glass |
Hello, I am writing to you all today in support of Bullseye Glass. I have used Bullseye Glass in our classrooms for many years as did the teachers before me and I feel compelled to speak out against the targeted affront on Bullseye Glass. We teach our students to work for the power of good and to gather all evidence before making a case and decision. I know that today the DEQ will be making a proposal that will potentially harm the employees, the artists, many Portland teachers and an organization that has built an international reputation that has put Portland on the map in its industry, and they will be doing so without scientific evidence of the issues Bullseye is accused of. I am an artist and educator and do my homework before choosing materials to use in my classroom and the organizations I buy the materials from. As a teacher it is an important part of walking our talk! Their is scientific evidence that clearly indicates their furnaces cannot turn Chromium III into Chromium VI. If they did, their glass would be ruined. For more information on this, see this explanation by Dr. LaCourse of Alfred University: <http://www.bullseyeglass.com/about-us/dr-lacourse-chromium-statement.html> http://www.bullseyeglass.com/about-us/dr-lacourse-chromium-statement.html When I first heard of the issues with the toxins found in SE I worried too. I live within 1.5 of Bullseye and drive past it going to and from work daily, for years! As I teach my students, gather your evidence, make a decision based on fact, not fear or peer pressure. I am not worried about the emissions from Bullseye until the evidence is clear- and it is not! The DEQ is making assumptions based on a lack of information and public fear in sighted by some people not doing their jobs and incorrect news reports. Don't fall into the trap of not doing your homework, caving to peer pressure and doing harm to many people in the aftermath. Please support Bullseye Glass, our small Portland business and don't sentence them before the jury is out. Thank you, Margaret Synan-Russell -- Margaret Synan-Russell Chair of the Visual and Performing Arts Department LS Art Teacher Oregon Episcopal School 6300 SW Nicol Rd. Portland OR 97223 |
Margaret Synan-Russell | synanrussellm@oes.edu | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;lynn.saxton@state.or.us | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;lynn.saxton@state.or.us | EX;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 123 | Agenda Special meeting of the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission |
To Those Who Are Considering enforcing sweeping “temporary”
regulations that will severely curtail Bullseye glass production, My name is Maria Gracia Cabanilla and I have worked for Bullseye Glass for 21 years. My husband works 1 block from Uroboros Glass and we live in the Overlook neighborhood - 1/2 mile for Uroboros Glass. We garden every year and during these last few years, we have raised a healthy and thriving family that includes us and our child. I'm reaching out to you to please ask you to think carefully about your new regulations that will destroy this industry and will put many out of work. Bullseye Glass is in the process of installing new filtering systems - So, why is the DEQ and EPA arbitrarily asking Bullseye Glass to stop using Cr (III), when they allow all other bottle producers to use this same compound? Pleas consider the scientific evidence that clearly indicates our furnaces cannot turn Chromium III into Chromium VI. If they did, our glass would be ruined. For more information on this, see this explanation by Dr. LaCourse of Alfred University: <http://www.bullseyeglass.com/about-us/dr-lacourse-chromium-statement.html> http://www.bullseyeglass.com/about-us/dr-lacourse-chromium-statement.html We all want clear air - Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Sincerely, Maria Gracia Cabanilla |
Maria-Gracia Cabanilla | mgcabanilla@hotmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;geneandmaria@comcast.net | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;gabriela.goldfarb@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;geneandmaria@comcast.net | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 124 | In Support of Oregon's Glass Manufacturers |
Dear Ms Hammond, I am emailing you today to express my support for Bullseye and Uroboros Glass Factories in Portland. I am a glass artist that has lived in SE Portland near Bullseye and in North Portland near Uroboros in the past. I currently live in Clackamas County and frequent the Bullseye factory for their exceptional classes, products, and expertise. Over the years, I have witnessed their dedication to supporting glass artists and their community. I have been impressed with the consistent, friendly, professionalism that is apparent in all their employees at every level in the company. As a small business owner and employer myself, I know that this is no small feat and comes from a dedication by the owners and upper management to their employees, their company and the art glass community. My respect and love of Bullseye aside, I have been very concerned about what I have seen in our local media coverage of this important issue. Unfortunately, it appears to me that people are putting the cart before the horse. Even just today, I heard on NPR that the results have come back and maybe its not as bad as everyone feared after all. In light of this report, it seems like a good thing that no one jumped to any conclusions at the DEQ/OEQC meeting earlier this week. I am also a member of the Oregon Glass Guild and feel that fellow member Bob Heath did an excellent job of articulating my feelings on the subject in the statement he made at the DEQ/OEQC meeting. Since he said it so well, I will quote him below. Please know that while I am borrowing his words, my concern over how this issue is being handled is very real and I truly hope that decisions will be made based on science and not emotion or politics. I am confident that options exist to keep people safe and, at the same time, to allow Bullseye and Uroboros to continue to thrive. "Due to what I consider to be largely irresponsible, sensationalistic news reporting on this matter, the public demand for immediate action has been extreme. I feel that these proposed new rules are an unwarranted over reaction that will not improve the situation. Two recent soil test studies have already shown that the severity of the problem isn’t nearly as great as what was originally feared and both of the Portland glass manufacturers cited as possible sources of pollution, Bullseye and Uroboros, have already taken actions to eliminate the use of, and therefore the potential for releases of, the identified hazardous materials. These actions, taken voluntarily and at significant sacrifice to these businesses demonstrate good will and the concern that both companies have for the air quality in our community." "...it would serve no purpose to restrict the use of Cr III by these glass manufacturers, but it would cause significant harm to both of these companies above and beyond that already resulting from their voluntary actions. The DEQ rule proposal identifies the public and the colored glass manufacturers as parties that would be affected by these proposed temporary rules. Their estimation of how the glass companies would be affected completely overlooks the impact of forcing them to further curtail their production, the layoffs that would follow, and the very real potential for the businesses to be forced to shut down entirely." "Oregon should be proud of and should help promote its home grown art glass industry. To my knowledge, there are only three companies in the world that make significant quantities of the type of art glass that can be readily used by fused glass artists, and we are fortunate to have two of them located here in Portland. Glass artists from all over the world travel to Portland every year to attend conferences and classes sponsored by these companies. Beyond the effect on the local economy, these unnecessary and scientifically unsupported new rules would also negatively impact the thousands of glass artists worldwide that depend on the products of these companies for their livelihood." I strongly urge that you to make the right decision and reject these proposed rule changes in favor of a balanced, reasoned and scientifically supported solution to the air contamination problem. The global art glass community is watching what you do...and praying that you don’t risk destroying the entire art glass industry in a rush to judgement." (Bob Heath, 3/15/16) Thank you for your time and consideration, Martha Martha Keane PO Box 1108 Mulino, OR 97042 503-329-1993 ???????›??????????›????????????????????????????????????????????›???????????????????›??????????????????????›??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????›?????????????????????????????????‰‰? |
Martha Keane | marthahovis@yahoo.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 125 | Portland contamination: Bullseye Glass |
Dear Mr Hammond I was very saddened to hear of the problems in Portland and sincerely hope that the scientists swiftly discover the source of the problem and measures are put in place to rectify and prevent further contamination. Health is, without question, paramount. The reason I feel compelled to write to you today is to support you in your decisions as you must be under enormous pressure to be seen to do something from residents of Portland who quite rightly are deeply concerned for their health. To presume the blame on one factory, Bullseye Glass, specifically the pending temporary ban of the use of Chromium III, before the facts are fully understood, however, will have serious detrimental repercussions for the factory; their employees and for Artists, like me, who rely on Bullseye Glass for our work. Bullseye glass is unique, it’s the best quality fusing glass available, globally. Because of its uniqueness and compatibility we cannot just use someone else’s glass in the interim. I appeal to you not to make a rash decision in the hopes of quelling the protestors and those that are demanding action. Testing IS action, and Bullseye have already actioned improvements to their emissions, beyond the measures they’re required to take, because they care. Chromium III is not the reason for contamination from this factory and therefore to prevent it’s use, temporary or not is injudicious. Kind regards Melanie Pope Curator Glass Design Workshop England, UK |
Mel Pope | mel@glassdesignworkshop.co.uk | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 126 | Support Bullseye, our Community, and the Arts |
Dear Elected and Government Officials: Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Did you know?: Neither DEQ or EPA have required any other US producer, of green glass, to entirely and arbitrarily stop their production without notice and perform the kind of extensive testing and modeling that DEQ is asking for. A typical green bottle manufacturer uses 1,000 times more Cr(III) per year than Bullseye Glass. A bottle producer, with emission controls, would melt more Cr(III) each day than Bullseye uses in a year. Why don't we apply good sense, good science to this concern? Panic, paranoia, and fear. Let's go with science. We recently read the DEQ report that exonerates Bullseye. <http://www.oregon.gov/newsroom/Pages/NewsDetail.aspx?newsid=1029> http://www.oregon.gov/newsroom/Pages/NewsDetail.aspx?newsid=1029 I am curious what we are doing to halt the production by other manufacturers of glass or metals who emit Cr(III). It's not democratic or good business to single out two small producers of glass. It would result in employee layoffs, huge economic impacts to Bullseye and our worldwide customers, and could even drive us out of business. While you may think BE is small - the trickle down effect is huge. There are wholesalers, retailors, artists and recipients. This will hurt the entire glass community. I am a glass artist and I support Bullseye. Melody Roth |
Melody Roth | mroth97@msn.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;senator_merkley@merkley.senate.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;gabriela.goldfarb@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;senator_merkley@merkley.senate.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 127 | future for Bullseye Glass... |
TO : Joni Hammond, Interim Director, Oregon Dept. of Environmental
Quality March 14th, 2016 Bullseye Glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to please rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Thank you for your understanding ! Gratefully, Mel Ball, Portland, Oregon |
Melvyn Ball | melvyjball@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 128 | Bullseye Glass - Portland |
Joni, Lynn: I live in SE Portland, about a mile from Bullseye’s factory. I am an Architect and a glass artist. I have been and am a supporter of Bullseye’s products and their business model. I fear that the publicity around Bullseye’s emissions is forcing a business that is trying to do the right thing on all fronts, into a financial corner from which it will have a hard time emerging. Please look at this situation in a reasonable manner and not a political one; allow them time to make corrections and not suffer unrecoverable financial loses. Relatively new businesses like Bullseye Glass are ones that are making Portland and Oregon a destination for a lot of people. Please champion the right and reasonable side of this ordeal. Thank you, Michael Beaman, Architect President, Beaman Architecture, Ltd. (503) 236-3300 <blocked::mailto:mb@beamanarch.com> mb@beamanarch.com <http://www.beamanarch.com/> www.beamanarch.com This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply, e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. |
Michael Beaman | mb@beamanarch.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8 | EX;EX | High | Normal | ||||||||||
| 129 | Glass Production in Portland |
Dear Ms. Joni Hammond, Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Sincerely, Michael Rogers Full Professor, Glass Program School For American Crafts Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, NY 585 733 5826 marsac@rit.edu |
Michael Rogers | marsac@rit.edu | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 130 | Bullseye Glass |
Regarding the over-reaction by some to the issues in Portland
and the misguided blame pointed at Bullseye glass, please let
the science be the determining factor and not uninformed panic.
thank you for your time, Terry Rothwell, Santa Fe NM |
Michelle and Terry Rothwell | tsrothwell@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 131 | DEQ rules for Bullseye Glass |
Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I
stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations
as a responsible citizen of the social and business community
of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Michelle Galli Depoe Bay Oregon |
Michelle Galli | mmgalli33@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 132 | Portland, Glass, and the question of Toxic Pollution |
I would like to ask that before any sweeping temporary or permanent
regulations are enacted, everyone take the time and effort to
be educated by experts in the fields of chemistry, glass manufacturing,
health, and environmental sciences. Making uninformed (or not
fully informed) regulations can have irreparable impacts on Portland's
economy by potentially shutting down companies that haven't violated
any rules or regulations and who have acted respectfully and
in full compliance (often voluntarily!). The loss of the glass
manufacturers in Portland will have global impact as their products
are used globally and in countless applications - not just stained
glass windows or fused glass bowls. Thank you very much for your time and consideration. Respectfully, Michelle Janicki |
Michelle J | sunrising42@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 133 | Bullseye Glass |
Dear Ms. Hammond, Bullseye Glass has a long history of responsible operation. It's owners' personal commitment to the people of our community is legendary. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. As a scientist, I know the importance of ensuring that regulatory decisions are based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Thank you for your careful analysis and rational action at this critical time. Sincerely, Iris F. Litt, M.D. Professor, Emerita Stanford University 5028 SW Dosch Lane Portland, OR Iris F. Litt, M.D. The Marron and Mary Elizabeth Kendrick Professor of Pediatrics (Emerita) |
Microsoft Exchange | irislitt@stanford.edu | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Iris Litt | irislitt@gmail.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 134 | DEQ Temporary Ruling + Bullseye Glass Company |
Greetings, elected officials and area regulators. I am an employee at Bullseye Glass Company - I have been for almost ten years. I have had the pleasure and honor to work with and for a company that has innovated art glass and its production. I am writing to you all in response to the temporary rules planned as a stop-gap measure to allay public concern over recent moss and air tests showing elevated levels of heavy metals in the neighborhood. Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. In my decade of working for Bullseye I have been proud to represent and be a part of this unique industry. I've seen the conscientious, mindful business practices of my colleagues, and I've seen the positive impacts of our products and education in the contemporary art and craft worlds - both local and international. Bullseye is taking these recent environmental concerns seriously - having hired an environmental consulting firm February 2nd to review production practices and processes (http://www.bullseyeglass.com/news/bullseye-statement-on-deq-test-results-in-portland.html). They are in the process of installing a baghouse filtration system (http://koin.com/2016/03/10/bullseyes-world-dull-gray-hopes-to-be-bright-soon/), which goes above and beyond current regulation. In order to continue carving this new path, Bullseye needs to remain in operation. Installing and testing the new filtration system will take time and money - both of which will disappear if a complete chromium ban is put in place. Portlanders have been reminded of the ongoing environmental concerns of our area. I believe that Bullseye would like to be a part of the solution - acting as an example to other industries in the area via continued collaboration with our neighbors, regulators, and by setting new standards for environmental stewardship - not by being a cautionary tale as a casualty to hasty, reactionary, unfounded rules. Thank you for your time and consideration, Minna Shirley 70 SE 87th Ave Portland, OR 97216 |
Minna | minnaming@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;robnosse@state.or.us;REP VegaPederson;gabriela.goldfarb@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;robnosse@state.or.us;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;gabriela.goldfarb@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;SMTP;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 135 | DEQ |
I attended the meeting for the hearing of the glass manufacturers
on March 16, 2016. I was shocked at several parts of the meeting
that took place. First was the lack of knowledge of the industry that the DEQ commissioners had and were going to use to close down production that could lay off over 70 people with living wages in the Portland metro region. The top art glass manufacturers in country are all here in the Pacific Northwest. These are Bullseye Glass Co., Uroboros, System 96, Spectrum Glass, Creation is Messy, Northstar Glassworks, Glass Alchemy and Trautman Art Glass. Two other companies are located in the Midwest; Kokmo Glass and The Paul Wissach Glass Co. These companies produce almost all of the art glass that is used worldwide by glass artists. I was taken back that the commissioners wanted information from California; they don’t produce art glass. Second is the lack of knowledge of the chromium that is at the forefront of this investigation. Shouldn’t information be known if it is the chromium that is unsafe or not before thinking it is the one that causes harm to humans. The third is the information that was given to the commissioners was from the DEQ research team. The Moss study finished in 2012 found high levels of certain metals in the Portland Metro region. DEQ receive the studies in May of 2015. To find out more about the levels the DEQ research team decided to have more studies around the heavy metal locations. But the problem is how they then attained the second batch of air study data around Bullseye Glass. The high levels of toxic metals emissions readings data was collected from this air study in October 2015. When the results were done, DEQ published a report and stated that the moss study “prompted DEQ to set up air monitoring systems near a glass company.” The air monitoring systems finding also stated, “art glass manufacturing are more likely than not to emit potentially unsafe levels of certain metals, including arsenic, cadmium, hexavalent chromium and nickel.” But the paper data or the verbal report never identified the levels in the air tests as low, medium, high scale or a scale that is predominating in the field. This is so we could compare the finding in the DEQ own soil tests. Before Bullseye Glass even saw the report from the DEQ, the findings were published in a newspaper article. This article stated that heavy metals were found in the air and were conducted by DEQ,, sent the neighborhoods in the area into panic mode, fueled by other news media. So how did the DEQ do the air study? They didn’t. In this meeting the DEQ gave verbal testimony that they didn’t have resources to fund the air study themselves, so they enlisted a professor from Reed College to have students run a college science project. They also had to borrow equipment to conduct the study. Did the professor have current knowledge of this particular equipment to be able to teach the students how to run it for the students’ science project? Was the machine in good working order? Was the college professor able to certify that this borrowed machine could be calibrated or set functions to make sure it was in working order? How did they assure that the machine was collecting reliable data? Yet another problem is that the air quality machine was placed in an open, unsecured parking lot adjacent to Bullseye Glass. Was the equipment left unattended? Could people walking by the lot interfere with the equipment or meddle with the machine? Could the data from the borrowed machine of the college students’ science project be compromised? Last, the main issue is that another study was made by the DEQ that discounted the data from the borrowed machine and the college science project. Here the DEQ tested soil samples that were taken again from around the parking lot where the air quality machine was placed. They also tested in a park, swell and a daycare. DEQ researchers themselves did these soil studies and found that the levels met acceptable and low risk levels for the heavy metals. So the high levels from the air study that came from the borrowed equipment run by the college students’ science project does not correlate with their own DEQ researchers’ soil samples. Which study would you believe? The DEQ research team even said that, “They really don’t have all the information but it still would be limited at this time.” But the DEQ is willing to shut down most of glass plant and laying off maybe over 70 people because the DEQ is using the data from the college science project data that doesn’t correlate with DEQ’s own findings. The time now is to have patience and wait until the two larger companies have installed the Baghouses. Then reanalyze the data done by DEQ’s own researchers! Are you really ready to have two companies lay off maybe over 70 people and close three other companies, for a study filled with non-corroborated data that was done by college students? This is the information given to us at the Temporary Rule meeting on March 14, 2016. Thank you for your time in reading this information. It does have implications for companies, employees and artists that used the art glass worldwide. Sincerely, Mitzi Kugler -- Cheers, Mitzi Kugler Check out my art <https://squareup.com/market/mitzi-kart> |
Mitzi Kugler | mitzikart@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 136 | Glass manufacturers |
I attended the meeting for the hearing of the glass manufacturers
on March 16, 2016. I was shocked at several parts of the meeting
that took place. First was the lack of knowledge of the industry that the DEQ commissioners had and were going to use to close down production that could lay off over 70 people with living wages in the Portland metro region. The top art glass manufacturers in country are all here in the Pacific Northwest. These are Bullseye Glass Co., Uroboros, System 96, Spectrum Glass, Creation is Messy, Northstar Glassworks, Glass Alchemy and Trautman Art Glass. Two other companies are located in the Midwest; Kokmo Glass and The Paul Wissach Glass Co. These companies produce almost all of the art glass that is used worldwide by glass artists. I was taken back that the commissioners wanted information from California; they don’t produce art glass. Second is the lack of knowledge of the chromium that is at the forefront of this investigation. Shouldn’t information be known if it is the chromium that is unsafe or not before thinking it is the one that causes harm to humans. The third is the information that was given to the commissioners was from the DEQ research team. The Moss study finished in 2012 found high levels of certain metals in the Portland Metro region. DEQ receive the studies in May of 2015. To find out more about the levels the DEQ research team decided to have more studies around the heavy metal locations. But the problem is how they then attained the second batch of air study data around Bullseye Glass. The high levels of toxic metals emissions readings data was collected from this air study in October 2015. When the results were done, DEQ published a report and stated that the moss study “prompted DEQ to set up air monitoring systems near a glass company.” The air monitoring systems finding also stated, “art glass manufacturing are more likely than not to emit potentially unsafe levels of certain metals, including arsenic, cadmium, hexavalent chromium and nickel.” But the paper data or the verbal report never identified the levels in the air tests as low, medium, high scale or a scale that is predominating in the field. This is so we could compare the finding in the DEQ own soil tests. Before Bullseye Glass even saw the report from the DEQ, the findings were published in a newspaper article. This article stated that heavy metals were found in the air and were conducted by DEQ,, sent the neighborhoods in the area into panic mode, fueled by other news media. So how did the DEQ do the air study? They didn’t. In this meeting the DEQ gave verbal testimony that they didn’t have resources to fund the air study themselves, so they enlisted a professor from Reed College to have students run a college science project. They also had to borrow equipment to conduct the study. Did the professor have current knowledge of this particular equipment to be able to teach the students how to run it for the students’ science project? Was the machine in good working order? Was the college professor able to certify that this borrowed machine could be calibrated or set functions to make sure it was in working order? How did they assure that the machine was collecting reliable data? Yet another problem is that the air quality machine was placed in an open, unsecured parking lot adjacent to Bullseye Glass. Was the equipment left unattended? Could people walking by the lot interfere with the equipment or meddle with the machine? Could the data from the borrowed machine of the college students’ science project be compromised? Last, the main issue is that another study was made by the DEQ that discounted the data from the borrowed machine and the college science project. Here the DEQ tested soil samples that were taken again from around the parking lot where the air quality machine was placed. They also tested in a park, swell and a daycare. DEQ researchers themselves did these soil studies and found that the levels met acceptable and low risk levels for the heavy metals. So the high levels from the air study that came from the borrowed equipment run by the college students’ science project does not correlate with their own DEQ researchers’ soil samples. Which study would you believe? The DEQ research team even said that, “They really don’t have all the information but it still would be limited at this time.” But the DEQ is willing to shut down most of glass plant and laying off maybe over 70 people because the DEQ is using the data from the college science project data that doesn’t correlate with DEQ’s own findings. The time now is to have patience and wait until the two larger companies have installed the Baghouses. Then reanalyze the data done by DEQ’s own researchers! Are you really ready to have two companies lay off maybe over 70 people and close three other companies, for a study filled with non-corroborated data that was done by college students? This is the information given to us at the Temporary Rule meeting on March 14, 2016. Thank you for your time in reading this information. It does have implications for companies, employees and artists that used the art glass worldwide. Sincerely, Mitzi Kugler -- Cheers, Mitzi Kugler Check out my art <https://squareup.com/market/mitzi-kart> |
Mitzi Kugler | mitzikart@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 137 | Bullseye glass: Air Quality 2016 Temporary Rules meeting |
Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to you with regards to the proposed measures that may be imposed on glass production at Bullseye glass, Portland. My understanding is that these proposed measures have arisen from the concern that Cr(III), a harmless and naturally occurring compound, will be converted into its more harmful form Cr(VI) during the production of Bullseye glass and that this will lead to harmful levels of exposure to humans. However, Bullseye have been using Cr(III) responsibly and the processes they use in glass making do not produce toxic chromium (Cr(VI)). So environmental exposure to chromium from the production of bullseye glass will be exposure to Cr(III) not Cr(VI). Regarding hazard, both DEQ and EPA have acknowledged there is no clear evidence of acute or chronic health risks based on Bullseye’s use of Cr(III). Humans are regularly exposed to Cr(III) from natural sources as well as industrial production. Bullseye have commitment to monitor emissions of Cr(III) and keep them within the allowed levels, therefore it can be expected that the risk of harmful effects in humans will be low. It is important to note that other glass manufacturers in the USA are known to use much higher amounts of Cr(III) than Bullseye on a yearly basis and this has been deemed safe, so there are precedents of previous exposure to Cr(III) at higher levels with low risk. This means that the lower levels of Cr(III) emitted by Bullseye production will also result in low risk . Taking into account this information, I would like to urge DEQ to rely on the available scientific evidence and to use standard risk assessment approaches (taking into account hazard potential and exposure) before imposing these strict rules. There is no doubt that the protection of humans living in the vicinity of glass factories is essential, but public pressure and political motivation should not drive the imposition of disproportionate regulations. Best regards Dr. Monica Garcia-Alonso Estel Consult Ltd. Tel: +44 1344 484 197 Mobile: +44 741257 9496 Skype: mongaral mgarcia@estelconsult.com <mailto:mgarcia@estelconsult.com> www.estelconsult.com <http://www.estelconsult.com/> This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> |
Monica Garcia-Alonso | mgarcia@estelconsult.com | SMTP | Monica Garcia Alonso | mgarcia@estelconsult.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 138 | Bullseye Glass |
Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I
stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations
as a responsible citizen of the social and business community
of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. I certainly do not worry about heavy metals using Bullseye's products. These "temporary" regulations affect my ability to make a living as an artist. Mike Rerick |
mrerick@comcast.net | mrerick@comcast.net | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 139 | New regulation proposals |
Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I
stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations
as a responsible citizen of the social and business community
of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Denise Mullen | President Oregon College of Art and Craft OCAC is dedicated to Craft as the creative material practice at the core of art and design. 8245 SW Barnes Road | Portland OR 97225 971.255.4227 p | 503.297.3155 f www.ocac.edu <http://www.ocac.edu/> |
Mullen, Denise | dmullen@ocac.edu | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 140 | Bullseye Glass |
I am not a resident of Oregon, however, as a consumer of Bullseye
Glass products, your decision is going to affect me and thousands
of other consumers. Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. I urge you to do the right thing. Nancy Sala www.kaleidoglass.com 7016 Husky Dr NE Rio Rancho, NM 87144 505-206-6481 |
Nancy Sala | nancy@kaleidoglass.com | SMTP | SAXTON LYNNE;HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX;EX | REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 141 | PLEASE READ: BULLSEYE GLASS CO. |
Ms. Hammond, It has come to my attention that your department is set to impose "temporary", new rules on at least 2 local glass manufacturers. It is widely known that these new rules are not based on accurate science. Fear and politics seem to be the driving force here. I have read your recent press release regarding the vote tomorrow/today (depending on when/if you read this) and have found that you use the words "possibly" and "potentially" too many times. Scary. You also use a lot of words to basically say that the DEQ hasn't done it's job for 30-40 years. I would like you to know that it is completely unacceptable for you to hold at least 2 companies, their employees, their employees families and thousands of people around the world that rely on these companies product hostage over the fact that YOU DIDN'T DO YOUR JOB. Apparently the "possible" pollution you mention has been going on for 30 years. Is another 6 months or a year, during which you can do some real testing and present scientific facts to the public, gonna really hurt anyone? The answer is NO. You know it and I know it. What you don't know is that my entire life is connected to the Bullseye factory in SE. My wife works there. I worked there for 8 years. I travel the world teaching classes to THOUSANDS of people who use their product. Many of whom rely on it for their income. I also personally use their product on a daily basis in my studio in North Portland. Everyone I know uses their product on a daily basis. I bet if you counted the number of people whos lives you will affect with your temporary rules it is much larger than the number of people who could "possibly" be affected by "potential" airborne hazards. YOU WILL RUIN MY LIFE if you stop Bullseye from producing the product they have been allowed to produce for 30 years. Hows that for fear. A suggestion: Get the City of Portland to adopt proper zoning laws. Who builds a daycare next to a smokestack of any kind? Please do your job properly. Nathan Sandberg -- www.nathansandberg.com <http://www.nathansandberg.com> |
Nathan Sandberg | nathansandberg@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 142 | Bullseye Glass |
Hello! I am very concerned about the current vendetta against Bullseye glass, claiming that the company is contributing unduly to environmental contamination in Portland. Bullseye Glass has gone overboard to comply with and address environmental concerns about the chemicals and effluent from its production operations, and has made every effort to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. I would appreciate your support to this community minded and vital company. Glass artists around the world count on Bullseye. Warm regards, Nina Frankel |
Nina Frankel | ninafrankel@gmail.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||||||||
| 143 | DEQ Meeting, Bullseye |
Dear Sir, I urge you to base your decision on scientific facts. I support Bullseye's efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the business community. A bottle producer, with emission controls, would melt more Chromium each day than Bullseye uses in a year. Scientific evidence indicates Bullseye's furnaces cannot turn Chrominum III into Chromium IV. Chrominum is a naturally occurring compound. Please consider the scientific facts and at least wait until the air is tested after the filters are added to the furnaces at Bullseye. Thank you, Nina Pollock Portland, Oregon |
Nina Pollock | nina_pollock@yahoo.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 144 | Bullseye Glass |
Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I
stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations
as a responsible citizen of the social and business community
of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Sincerely, Patricia Denny www.patriciadenny.com |
Patty | glassiquecreations@yahoo.com | SMTP | SAXTON LYNNE;HAMMOND Joni;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 145 | Bullseye |
I fully support responsible use of toxic materials, and I support
the state's effort to protect the health of everyone. However, I am concerned that the proposed temporary rules related to Chromium are not well based. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Paul Messink |
Paul Messink | turtlebayglass@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8 | EX;EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 146 | DEQ regulation of Bullseye Glass |
As a user of Bullseye glass in my artwork, I am aware of their
long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye
Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible
citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon.
Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. There is no basis for making Bullseye subject to regulations that are not imposed on other, decidedly larger makers of green glass. The economic, job and industry-wide impacts of imposing such unnecessary regulations will be widespread. It is beyond my understanding why the powers that be wish to take such destructive measures without any proof of necessity. I urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules based on some political agenda. Peggy King www.snowflakeglass.com glasslady@snowflakeglass.com |
Peggy King | glasslady@snowflakeglass.com | SMTP | 'Peggy King' | glasslady@snowflakeglass.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 147 | Pending Restrictions related to Portland Air Quality |
Dear Director Saxton (OHA), Dear Director Hammond (DEQ), Dear Governor Brown, Dear State Representative Nosse, Dear State Representative Pederson, Dear U.S. Representative Blumenauer, Dear Senator Merkley, Dear Senator Wyden, Dear County Representative Kafoury, Dear Oregon Natural Resources Policy Advisor Goldfarb, Dear Portland Mayor Hales, Dear Portland Commissioner Novick, Dear Portland Commissioner Fish, Dear Portland Commissioner Saltzman, Dear Portland Commissioner Fritz I am a US citizen (CT) residing in the UK. Well you might think I have no business writing to elected representatives of the state of Oregon and City of Portland, but I also have nieces, nephews, great-nieces and great-nephews who live in the beautiful city of Portland. I do not write my letter in “isolation” from concern over the health and safety of Portland and its environs. Having prefaced with that, I am writing in support of the Bullseye Glass Company - not only as a quality producer of American glass but as a solid, responsible company. Bullseye Glass has a long history of sound and compliant operation, and I support them in their actions to continue operations as a trustworthy citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. I have followed with concern the flurry of accusations, claims and counterclaims surrounding recent tests of both air and soil quality. I am distressed to read of reactionary restrictions that have been proposed on Bullseye Glass as a result of what is clearly insufficient data collection and incomplete analysis regarding the cause or source of compounds that have not been proven to be damaging, as well as ignorance of the actual process used in creating the product that has been brought under question. As a concerned US citizen - and I DO vote - regulatory decisions must be based on science. Period. It is my understanding that the process used by Bullseye Glass does NOT result in the production of toxic chromium. I urge Oregon’s DEQ to base their decisions on science and fact in the course of carrying out their important mission. Poorly drafted and misdirected regulations that will only serve to cause economic hardship and not even address the propertied environmental issue will do more harm than good. Sincerely, Susan Sinclair n.b. For those recipients for whom I have been unable to find email addresses, a copy of this email will be sent via their online contact forms, or by postal letter. As a concerned Connecticut constituent, I am also copying my Federal representatives, cc: Representative Esty, Senator Blumenthal, Senator Murphy |
Pete and Sue Sinclair | kildeer123@icloud.com | SMTP | SAXTON LYNNE;HAMMOND Joni;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;mult.chair@multco.us;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;mult.chair@multco.us;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 148 | Bullseye glass |
Dear Joni Hamond: Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. We sincerely appreciate any support you can provide right now. Sincerely, Phil and Brenda Petersen 200 Sycamore St. Tipton, IA 52772 www.stainedglassheirlooms.com <http://www.stainedglassheirlooms.com> |
Phil Petersen | phil@stainedglassheirlooms.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 149 | Bullseye Glass Co. |
Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I
stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations
as a responsible citizen of the social and business community
of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Pippa Bluck Warm Glass UK - Director 01934 863344 Psssst - check out what’s <https://www.facebook.com/warmglassUK/photos_stream?tab=photos_stream> coming out of the studio this week |
Pippa Bluck | pippa@warm-glass.co.uk | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 150 | Bullseye Glass |
Dear Ms. Hammond Bullseye glass is an important part of the vibrant Portland community. They have a history of ethical ownership and operation. In deed, they form an integral part of a larger world community of glass artists, crafts people, architects and hobbyists. I urge you to make regulatory decisions based on the science and not political issues. I hope DEQ will act based on good science and not impose measures not based on science and ultimately damage Bullseye and and the community it supports. Sincerely Howard Rectanus |
rectanus | rectanus@yahoo.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 151 | DEQ ruling on Chromium III |
As a firm supporter of Bullseye Glass, please use responsible
decision making when determining the use/non-use of Chromium
III. Bullseye Glass has been, and hopes to continue to be, a
member of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon.
Please do not rush to a decision that isn’t based on science
and facts. There is scientific evidence showing that the use
of Chromium III by Bullseye Glass does not produce any toxic
emissions, nor does the use of Chromium III result in a change
to Chromium VI within their furnaces. I urge you to review all the scientific facts before making a ruling. Thank you for your consideration Renee Farr |
Renee Farr | rfarr@exactdata.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 152 | DEQ proposed regulation on green glass |
Ms. Hammond: I object to the DEQ's proposed regulation. I think it was hastily written to allay public fears that have largely been stirred up by the press. It does not represent sound science. Naturally occurring Cr III will not turn into Cr VI in the process used by the art glass manufacturers in Portland. This regulation requires some serious in-depth scientific study and should not be passed until such a study has been completed. John C. Ringle, PhD |
ringlejc@engr.orst.edu | ringlejc@engr.orst.edu | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Ringle, John | ringlejc@ne.orst.edu | SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 153 | DEQ and Glass Manufacturing |
As a chemical engineer and glass artist, I have been following the recent events about the DEQ report on community health risks quite closely. While I certainly applaud the desire to keep the public safe, it appears that the testing and analysis is incomplete, especially in light of the fact that the background levels of the chemicals identified in some cases exceeds those in the samples. Responses from Bullseye Glass and Uroboros have been in the public interest and it appears that both companies are willing to work to develop new procedures going forward. A politically expedient but not scientifically based response is in no one's best interest. To adequately respond to the public and business needs in this matter, I respectfully request that the following actions be taken now: 1) Any passage of the currently contemplated rules (General Provisions for Stationary Sources 340-244-0) should be put on hold. 2) Formation of a committee of scientists, engineers, health care professionals, and glass industry professionals with expertise in glass manufacture and industrial safety to determine the correct requirements for such rules. There should also be community and glass artist representation on this committee. 3) A minimum of six weeks allowed for public comment by email, registered mail, or public appearance, with at least one public hearing, preferably more, before the issue is decided. Thank you. Your help in this matter greatly appreciated. Risa Sreden Prince Glass Artist RPM Galleries www.rpmgalleries.com <http://www.rpmgalleries.com> 513 290 5141 |
Risa Sreden Prince | risasredenprince@gmail.com | SMTP | JOHNSON Colleen;EDEN Melinda;OKEEFFE Jane;ARMSTRONG Ed;RIDER Morgan;HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP VegaPederson;REP Nosse;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JOHNSON Colleen176;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=EDEN Melindae77;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OKEEFFE Janee72;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ARMSTRONG Edce9;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RIDER Morgan94f;/O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 154 | Bullseye Glass |
Dear Sir/Madam I understand you are meeting today, and may bring in temporary legislation that will quite likely put Bullseye Glass, based in Portland, out of business. I am writing to ask you to consider the wider impact of such a move. Not only would it cause many people to be laid off in Portland, businesses from around the world will be significantly impacted and have to also close as there are only two fused glass producers - both of whom are based in Portland. This will bring great financial loss to many. Our very livelihoods depend on the fused glass manufacturers - and doesn't just include glass artists, but glass shops, kiln makers, and a huge array of people connected to fused glass making. There is NO other alternative as no other manufacturers exist in the world that make a product like this. As far as I can see from all the evidence that has been reported there is no concrete reason for restricting the use of certain essential ingredients in the production of the glass. Bullseye have already voluntarily taken steps to limit the use of some chemicals. A leading scientist, Dr LaCourse, has assured us that Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. It also seems disproportionately aimed at fused glass - as green bottle producers melt more Cr(III) each day than Bullseye uses in a year. I realise when it comes to health it may be easy to have a knee-jerk reaction to feel like you're doing something, but please consider the facts. There is no proof Bullseye are causing harm to health, and they're willing to take steps to further limit any possibility for exposure. To bring in this temporary measure will be harsh and disproportionate to the issue at hand. So I respectfully request that you consider the wider impact of any actions you take at your meeting today. Many thanks for your time in reading this. Kind Regards Ruth |
Ruth Hamnett | ruth.hamnett1@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 155 | Bullseye Glass |
I am a glass artist who uses Bullseye glass exclusively, and while
I don’t live in Portland I have many friends and some relatives
who do. I care about there health and I care about my livelihood
as well. If the decisions that are going to be made were based
on fact I wouldn’t be writing this letter. While I appreciate
the public issue you are dealing I think that when lives are
affected your decision should be based in fact not fear. Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. I sincerely appreciate any support you can provide right now. Sharon Dolan |
S D | sharonldolan@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 156 | Science NOT Politics |
Ladies and Gentlemen: I am a glass artist and an environmentalist. Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Don't be responsible for send these American jobs overseas. Sandi Draper Email: sdraper@mac.com <mailto:sdraper@mac.com> Office: 949.916.1753 Cell: 949.742.5864 |
Sandra Draper | sdraper@mac.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 157 | I support Bullseye Glass |
Dear Ms. Hammond, As a long time Portland resident and artist, I have been following the air toxics issue regarding Bullseye Glass with great interest and concern. Bullseye glass has a long history of responsibly producing art glass, and has implemented a number of environmental improvements to their facility over the years. They have complied with every regulation, and voluntarily agreed to go the extra mile to mitigate the public’s fears, despite the DEQ’s lack of proof that they are the sole contributor to these SE air emissions. I visit the Bullseye factory regularly, and have noted the incredibly active Brooklyn Annex railyard with hundreds of diesel trucks going through every day, the many auto repair shops, the cement producer across from CCLC, and more industrial businesses that could be contributing to this issue far more than Bullseye does. I absolutely stand with Bullseye Glass, and support them 100%, in its ongoing efforts to continue glass production as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. I applaud their decision to implement new pollution controls, as part of their 40+ year mission to be good stewards to the environment. Regulatory decisions MUST be based on proven science, not political issues. To scapegoat two small art glass manufacturers in a sea of emitting industrial businesses is NOT going to solve this much larger city-wide problem. This will only result in allowing the worst pollution emitters to get away with it, will cripple the global glass art community, and Portland will lose 120+ local jobs unnecessarily. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse of Alfred University, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium, and if it did, the glass would be ruined. Please provide and promote the REAL science to the public! I strongly urge DEQ to rely on SCIENCE AND FACTS, and not to rush to impose poorly written and misdirected rules and regulations. Sincerely, Sarah Givens |
Sarah | sarisu7@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 158 | Oregon Environmental Quality Commission Meeting |
I am a UK glass artist working in the UK. I rely on glass products
imported from Bullseye to make my work. I understand you are
meeting later today with a view to determining future action
with regard to possible pollution in the Portland area caused
by various glass manufacturing companies. I understand from your website that following concerns of pollution by heavy metals testing has been carried out which has shown levels generally below “background” levels in soil samples taken. I also understand that despite these results Bullseye has already began the process of installing 99% efficient baghouses on furnaces that melt heavy metals, and have agreed to test these filtration devices once they’re installed and in operation. I also understand that Bullseye are offering reassurances supported by scientific evidence that their furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. I believe Bullseye Glass are taking every effort to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Taking steps that will effectively mean that production will have to stop immediately will affect people’s livelihoods both in Portland, the wider USA and across the world. Please do not implement the new temporary regulations unless there is robust scientific evidence that this is the only way to deal with the issue. Thank you for taking the time to read this email. Sarah Haworth |
Sarah Haworth | sarahj.haworth@btinternet.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 159 | RE: |
Thank you for your input regarding air quality in Portland. I
will be sure that your comments become part of the permanent
record regarding this important issue. If you haven’t already,
please visit www.saferairportland.oregon.gov <http://www.saferairportland.oregon.gov>
for the latest information and data – including an opportunity
to sign-up for regular updates. Thank you again for your engagement. Sincerely, Lynne Saxton From: Cherie Kennedy [mailto:teacak@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 10:18 PM To: Saxton Lynne <LYNNE.SAXTON@dhsoha.state.or.us>; hammond.joni@deq.state.or.us; REP Nosse <Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us>; REP VegaPederson <Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us>; Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov; mult.chair@multco.us; mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov; dan@portlandoregon.gov; nick@portlandoregon.gov; Amanda@portlandoregon.gov; novick@portlandoregon.gov Subject: Dear Gentlemen; Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. It will be in poor judgement to impose regulations not based on a facts, but on a feeling as a "likely source of metals air emissions". It would be irresponsible to not have additional testing and a definitive conclusion to the issue at hand. Please do not pass regulations and judgement until additional study can find a conclusion based on facts. Cherie Kennedy Infinite Glass Art Sent from my iPad Sent from my iPad |
Saxton Lynne | lynne.saxton@state.or.us | SMTP | Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;hammond.joni@deq.state.or.us;SAXTON LYNNE;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;nick@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;REP VegaPederson;REP Nosse;Cherie Kennedy | amanda@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;gabriela.goldfarb@oregon.gov;joni.hammond@state.or.us;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;nick@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;teacak@sbcglobal.net | SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;EX;EX;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 160 | RE: Bullseye & Uroborus |
Thank you for your input regarding indoor air quality in Portland.
I will be sure that your comments become part of the permanent
record regarding this important issue. If you haven’t already,
please visit www.saferairportland.oregon.gov <http://www.saferairportland.oregon.gov>
for the latest information and data – including an opportunity
to sign-up for regular updates. Thank you again for your engagement. Sincerely, Lynne Saxton From: Alice Haga [mailto:alicehaga11@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 9:38 AM To: hammond.joni@deq.state.or.us; Saxton Lynne <LYNNE.SAXTON@dhsoha.state.or.us>; REP Nosse <Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us>; REP VegaPederson <Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us>; Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov; mult.chair@multco.us; mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov Subject: Bullseye & Uroborus I DO stand with Bullseye Glass in it's efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. It has a long history of responsible operation. I am a glass artist who goes there regularly. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. Because Dr. LaCourse has said that Bullseye's furnaces do NOT produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. We sincerely appreciate any support and clear thinking you can provide right now. Sincerely, Alice Haga |
Saxton Lynne | lynne.saxton@state.or.us | SMTP | Alice Haga;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;hammond.joni@deq.state.or.us;SAXTON LYNNE;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;REP VegaPederson;REP Nosse | alicehaga11@gmail.com;gabriela.goldfarb@oregon.gov;joni.hammond@state.or.us;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97 | SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;EX;SMTP;SMTP;EX;EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 161 | RE: Bullseye & Uroburos Glass |
Thank you for your input regarding indoor air quality in Portland.
I will be sure that your comments become part of the permanent
record regarding this important issue. If you haven’t already,
please visit www.saferairportland.oregon.gov <http://www.saferairportland.oregon.gov>
for the latest information and data – including an opportunity
to sign-up for regular updates. Thank you again for your engagement. Sincerely, Lynne Saxton From: stephanie johnston [mailto:sljohnston08@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 2:31 AM To: hammond.joni@deq.state.or.us; Saxton Lynne <LYNNE.SAXTON@dhsoha.state.or.us>; REP Nosse <Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us>; REP VegaPederson <Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us>; Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov; mult.chair@multco.us; mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov; dan@portlandoregon.gov; nick@portlandoregon.gov; Amanda@portlandoregon.gov; novick@portlandoregon.gov Subject: Bullseye & Uroburos Glass Bullseye and Uroburos glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye and Uroburos Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Thank you, Stephanie Johnston |
Saxton Lynne | lynne.saxton@state.or.us | SMTP | Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;hammond.joni@deq.state.or.us;SAXTON LYNNE;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;nick@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;REP VegaPederson;REP Nosse;stephanie johnston | amanda@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;gabriela.goldfarb@oregon.gov;joni.hammond@state.or.us;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;nick@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;sljohnston08@gmail.com | SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;EX;EX;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 162 | RE: In support of art glass manufacturers |
Thank you for your input regarding indoor air quality in Portland.
I will be sure that your comments become part of the permanent
record regarding this important issue. If you haven’t already,
please visit www.saferairportland.oregon.gov for the latest information
and data – including an opportunity to sign-up for regular
updates. Thank you again for your engagement. Sincerely, Lynne Saxton -----Original Message----- From: Jennifer Cheng [mailto:jenccheng39@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 8:13 PM To: hammond.joni@deq.state.or.us; Saxton Lynne <LYNNE.SAXTON@dhsoha.state.or.us>; REP Nosse <Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us>; nick@portlandoregon.gov; novick@portlandoregon.gov; REP VegaPederson <Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us>; dan@portlandoregon.gov; amanda@portlandoregon.gov; mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov; mult.chair@multco.us; gabriela.goldfarb@oregon.gov Subject: In support of art glass manufacturers Dear Regulators and Elected Representatives, I am writing to you in regard to the just announced DEQ special meeting to be held on March 15, 2016 for the purpose of considering rule changes directed at Oregon Colored Art Glass Manufacturers. I have read the DEQ proposal for new temporary rules to be considered for adoption at this meeting as outlined here: http://www.oregon.gov/deq/EQC/Documents/2016/031516eqcAgenda.pdf While I applaud the intent of the DEQ to protect our air quality and the health and safety of those living in the neighborhoods near Oregon’s glass manufacturing facilities, I feel that these proposed new rule changes are misguided and will not help achieve that goal. I am a glass artist and am concerned for the well-being of Oregon’s colored art glass manufacturing industry, those employed in that industry and those dependent on the products of that industry. In the recent furor over air contamination possibly coming from local glass manufacturing facilities, I think that these latter two constituencies have been largely overlooked. Due to what I consider to be largely irresponsible, sensationalistic news reporting on this matter, the public demand for immediate action has been extreme. I feel that these proposed new rules are an unwarranted over reaction that will not improve the situation. Two recent soil test studies, have already shown that the severity of the problem isn’t nearly as great as what was originally feared and both of the Portland glass manufacturers cited as possible sources of pollution, Bullseye and Uroboros, have already taken actions to eliminate the use of, and therefore the potential for, releases of the identified hazardous materials. These actions, taken voluntarily and at significant sacrifice to these businesses demonstrate the good will and concern that both have for the air quality in our community. The new rules proposed by the DEQ would force these businesses to make even more significant reductions in their production. The specific change that the new rules would enforce would be the elimination of the use of Chromium III because of the potential for this material to be transformed during production to a hazardous form; Chromium VI. Note, that the proposed DEQ rules also mistakenly make multiple references to another material, Chromium IV, which is indicative of the haste and lack of review with which these proposed rules were drafted. Although the potential conversion of Cr III to Cr VI does exist, glass manufacturers have the ability, and in-fact, the necessity, to prevent such conversion from occurring during the manufacturing process. If they did not, their process would not yield the green glass color they were aiming to produce and their production would be wasted. The scientific reasons behind this are explained by Dr. LaCourse of Alfred University here: http://www.bullseyeglass.com/about-us/dr-lacourse-chromium-statement.html. In short, it would serve no purpose to restrict the use of Cr III by these glass manufacturers, but it would cause significant harm to both of these companies above and beyond that already resulting from their voluntary actions. The DEQ rule proposal identifies the public and the colored glass manufacturers as parties that would be affected by these proposed temporary rules. Their estimation of how the glass companies would be affected completely overlooks the impact of forcing them to further curtail their production, the layoffs that would follow, and the very real potential for the businesses to be forced to shut down entirely. Oregon should be proud of and should help promote its home grown art glass industry. To my knowledge, there are only three companies in the world that make significant quantities of the type of art glass that can be readily used by fused glass artists, and we are fortunate to have two of them located here in Portland. Beyond the effect on the local economy, these unnecessary and scientifically unsupported new rules would also negatively impact the thousands of glass artists worldwide that depend on the products of these companies for their livelihood, potentially destroying the entire fused art glass industry. I hope that you will lend your voice to help DEQ understand that we need a balanced, reasoned and scientifically supported solution to this air contamination problem and not an ineffective, knee-jerk reaction as represented by these proposed rules. Sincerely, Jennifer Cheng Sent from my iPad |
Saxton Lynne | lynne.saxton@state.or.us | SMTP | amanda@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;gabriela.goldfarb@oregon.gov;Jennifer Cheng;hammond.joni@deq.state.or.us;SAXTON LYNNE;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;nick@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;REP VegaPederson;REP Nosse | amanda@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;gabriela.goldfarb@oregon.gov;jenccheng39@yahoo.com;joni.hammond@state.or.us;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;nick@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97 | SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;EX;EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 163 | RE: Support Bullseye, our Community, and the Arts |
Thank you for your input regarding indoor air quality in Portland.
I will be sure that your comments become part of the permanent
record regarding this important issue. If you haven’t already,
please visit www.saferairportland.oregon.gov <http://www.saferairportland.oregon.gov>
for the latest information and data – including an opportunity
to sign-up for regular updates. Thank you again for your engagement. Sincerely, Lynne Saxton From: Melody Roth [mailto:mroth97@msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 8:23 PM To: hammond.joni@deq.state.or.us; Saxton Lynne <LYNNE.SAXTON@dhsoha.state.or.us>; REP Nosse <Rep.RobNosse@state.or.us>; REP VegaPederson <Rep.JessicaVegaPederson@state.or.us>; Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov; mult.chair@multco.us; mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov; dan@portlandoregon.gov; nick@portlandoregon.gov; amanda@portlandoregon.gov; novick@portlandoregon.gov; senator_merkley@merkley.senate.gov Subject: Support Bullseye, our Community, and the Arts Dear Elected and Government Officials: Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Did you know?: Neither DEQ or EPA have required any other US producer, of green glass, to entirely and arbitrarily stop their production without notice and perform the kind of extensive testing and modeling that DEQ is asking for. A typical green bottle manufacturer uses 1,000 times more Cr(III) per year than Bullseye Glass. A bottle producer, with emission controls, would melt more Cr(III) each day than Bullseye uses in a year. Why don't we apply good sense, good science to this concern? Panic, paranoia, and fear. Let's go with science. We recently read the DEQ report that exonerates Bullseye. http://www.oregon.gov/newsroom/Pages/NewsDetail.aspx?newsid=1029 I am curious what we are doing to halt the production by other manufacturers of glass or metals who emit Cr(III). It's not democratic or good business to single out two small producers of glass. It would result in employee layoffs, huge economic impacts to Bullseye and our worldwide customers, and could even drive us out of business. While you may think BE is small - the trickle down effect is huge. There are wholesalers, retailors, artists and recipients. This will hurt the entire glass community. I am a glass artist and I support Bullseye. Melody Roth |
Saxton Lynne | lynne.saxton@state.or.us | SMTP | amanda@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;hammond.joni@deq.state.or.us;SAXTON LYNNE;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;Melody Roth;mult.chair@multco.us;nick@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;REP VegaPederson;REP Nosse;senator_merkley@merkley.senate.gov | amanda@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;gabriela.goldfarb@oregon.gov;joni.hammond@state.or.us;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;mroth97@msn.com;mult.chair@multco.us;nick@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;senator_merkley@merkley.senate.gov | SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;EX;EX;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 164 | Glass manufacturer rules comment |
I don't live in Portland, some of my family do, but I do watch
the news and listen to the comments and actions taken in response
to the glass manufacturer pollution issue. I am in favor of environmental protections, and fully support further study and stronger limitations on emissions. However, in listening to an interview on the radio with a government official about how he had recommended no one within a mile of a glass company eat the food from their yard before he had gotten any test results back, and then learning that the only concern was within blocks of Bullseye, and that even a child eating that dirt is not in any real danger, is not "acting in an abundance of caution"; it is extremism and inflammatory without justification, and demonstrates there is a political motivation here. I believe that Bullseye and Uroboros have demonstrated that they are good community partners, and that this situation is vastly different from a situation like that in Flint, for instance. I would like to see some studies, thoughtful scientific, medical, and environmental information coming out of the DEQ and other governmental organizations to inform the community in order to give us the information we need to rationally address this issue. And, not just the pollution putatively from Bullseye and Uroboros but pollution from the many many sources one finds in the city, including vehicle emissions. It may be that we need stronger limitations in the limited area of glass manufacturing, but you haven't convinced me, yet. Serena Smith The Dalles |
SERENA SMITH | serenasmith@embarqmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 165 |
Dear Mr Hammond, In my fifteen year association with Bullseye glass, I know them to be people of integrity with a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in their efforts as members of the community who are concerned with sound practices that respect the environment. The decisions you are making must be based on scientific data and not fear or politics. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse has said Bullseye's furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. Please do not rush to impose misdirected rules. I appreciate any support you can provide. Sharon Agnor Vancouver WA. |
sharonagnor@comcast.net | sharonagnor@comcast.net | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | |||||||||||
| 166 | Portland/Milwaukie Emissions - Concerned Father and Resident |
Hello All , I write to you as a lifelong Oregonian, Father, Husband, gardener, bike commuter, and environmentalist. And as a human, with the only lungs, kidneys, heart and body that I’ll ever get. Over the last month, pollution issues in Portland and Milwaukie have become front and center, and the public is becoming aware of how big of a problem it is. From children schools located next to highly congested freeways, metal plating industry emissions, unregulated dirty diesel, dirty wood stoves, petroleum refinement, and glass makers and metal casting with heavy metal emissions into the neighborhoods that they moved into (to name a few). DEQ’s lack of enforcement, sound science, precautionary based benchmarks, and prioritizing human health over profit has become quite apparent. DEQ has become an agency that caters to industry and allows for industry to help write the rules. Polluters have a say, yet those who must breathe them in do not nor are they notified. The health effects of these hotspots put residents, workers, and developing children at great risk. The consequences of which may be lifelong and result in higher rates of disease, medical issues, and mortality rates. And while there may be no acute (immediate) danger to the average person, there are pregnant mothers, young children, and others who do not have the same resilience that the average person’s body might have. Chronic exposure is hard to measure and the consequences of which may take decades to make an appearance. The revelations of toxic hotspots in Portland and Milwaukie, as well as our overall terrible air quality need to be a priority. Holding those responsible for its bad shape should be the first step. Implementing up to date pollution control for all polluters in a phased approach within realistic timelines that the public can feel good about. Reducing dirty diesel, having a risk/health based regulation approach, incentivising clean wood burning stoves (especially for those that cannot afford them), keeping polluters responsible for the cost and not the public. I frequently smell diesel emissions as I bike to work from my child's daycare. It is disgusting to have to breathe in and is concerning in terms of my health. The loophole Bullseye helped create, is a contributing factor that lead to this mess. No more loopholes. Our society has been a 'pollute first, ask questions later'. Instead, we need to ask questions, get answers, and then, only if it is deemed safe to health and the environment, should pollution into the air, water, and soil be allowed. Polluters should also bear the cost of getting these answers, not taxpayers. My request is that we apply the Precautionary Principle towards laws and regulation: "When an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically. In this context the proponent of an activity, rather than the public, should bear the burden of proof. The process of applying the precautionary principle must be open, informed and democratic and must include potentially affected parties. It must also involve an examination of the full range of alternatives, including no action." - Wingspread Statement on the Precautionary Principle, Jan. 1998 We need a governing body with whom can properly test, enforce, regulate, and permit emissions of any kind. I fully support Portland Metro forming its own agency, rules, and regulations that keep us and our children safe. The DEQ we currently have caters to polluters and rarely, if ever, enforces rules and regulation or tests what comes out of emitters pipes. I would like to see the public better kept in the loop in terms of who pollutes what. If a business is applying for a new permit or a renewal (should be annual if not already), the public should be notified within a certain distance (homeowners, businesses, schools etc. and at a distance of 1 mile radius for example). Permit costs should take this additional cost of notification into account. For polluters, there needs to be consistent and regular fence monitoring. We should all know what is coming out of their pipes and into our soil, water, and air. Not a lump cap where they are allowed to emit without disclosing the pollution material. It should be expensive to pollute in an effort to curb it. It needs to make more fiscal sense for a business to implement pollution control than to pollute unabated. I fear special interests, including the glass manufacturers and artists, will push an agenda of regulation being a job/craft killer. I urge you to approach these issues with an open mind and to not let this tactic of fear prevent you from putting the health of your constituents before the pressure of the industry. The fear for them is lost profits and so they will use whatever ammunition they have, being jobs and glass color options, to distract. The public is not asking for regulations in an effort to put these places out of business, but rather to implement up to date pollution control that will end adverse health effects moving forward. The efforts of these industries will also try to downplay the pollution by drawing attention away from the drastically high air/moss samples, to those of soils samples. The soil samples that were taken in one of the wettest seasons of the year. They do not represent long term data, like the moss, but rather a moment in time. To truly ensure that the soil is not contaminated, more testing over longer periods of time must be done. Testing must be done at the pipe rather than 100s of yards away. But regardless, low levels in the soil, does not mean damage has not been done. Air is different then soil. Each have benchmarks and each benchmarks need to be met regardless. My family currently lives 1.5 miles from Precision Castparts and McClure Industries. Both locations emit cancer causing emissions (news to us). Heavy metal hotspots have been detected near Precision, and you can smell the styreane in the air near McClure. The big white stacks that appear to have no filters. My son will be attending Seth Lewelling Elementary School next year which is very close to these locations. I cannot allow him to attend a school that is so close to these heavy polluters without them implementing pollution control. These businesses are in the middle of crowded residential areas. Residents here grow their own food, their children play in the yard, we go on walks, and the Springwater corridor runs through these businesses. The air outside fills our houses when we open them up in the warmer weather. This is the air we breathe as do our developing children, which whom are at greater risk to toxics. My family was low income until I got a job at the Fred Meyer office next to Bullseye. We put our 2 year old son at the CCLC daycare. Never would I have imagined that I would be putting him in harm’s way. I had concerns with semi-trucks in the area at that corner. Even filed a complaint with DEQ, and never heard back. As a working family we do not have the luxury of time and energy to continually follow up. We relied on DEQ to ensure the air our son breathed and soil he played in was safe. Our son had detectable levels of cadmium in his urine. While we were strangely assured his levels were normal for an adult in an urban area (he is 4 so not sure how they landed there), I can’t help but believe these levels are influenced by the emissions that were allowed to go on nearby. Emissions we were never made aware of, despite DEQ knowing these levels were high. Tests for other heavy metals in our son are useless at this point, as arsenic and chromium leave the body in less than a week. So there is no way for us to feel reassured that he was not chronically exposed to these metals. We immediately pulled him from the daycare, and have moved him to a new one. Many families however are unable to make that change. Both in availability and cost. And that kind of change is so hard on a child. Our son has experienced more stress and acts out in ways he didn’t prior to us moving him. We now have to help him adjust. The polluter’s presence has turned everyone’s life upside down with no real benefit, but instead we face health costs, stress, fear, and anger. There is no clear direction, no adequate notice for public input. We are being kept in the dark. There are so many families that you will not hear from. Families working two to three jobs. Families that do not have the luxury to reach out to you. Please be aware that for every letter from a concerned citizen you receive, there are more likely hundreds more that do not have the luxury of time, education, time off from work, etc. to do so. So we speak for them all. Portland, and Oregon as a whole, can become a place where clean business is the norm. Ignore the tactics of Industry that use threats of job loss and craft killing as their basis. The benefits dirty business bring are greatly outweighed by the health and economic costs associated with. Thank you for you time, Shawn Ingersoll |
Shawn Ingersoll | shawnwingersoll@gmail.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||||||||
| 167 | Cr(III) and Bullseye support. |
Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I
stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations
as a responsible citizen of the social and business community
of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. I've copied a text suggested on the net, but that is just because I am Norwegian, and not fluent in English. Definetely not when it comes to spelling and grammar. I agree 100% in the message. Kind regards Signe Mauritzen. |
Signe Helene | SigneHMauritzen@hotmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 168 | Latest Cybersecurity Solutions for Government |
Dear Hammond, My woman-owned, minority-owned, small disadvantaged business (Federal 8(a) certified) is an authorized reseller of some of the most cutting-edge cybersecurity products and solutions in the marketplace today including – 1. FireEye 2. AppDetective 3. Qualys 4. Tenable (Nessus) We have over 18 years of direct experience in cybersecurity. For over 18 years, this has been our sole expertise. Cybersecurity isn't something we do as part of a wider range of services, it is the only thing we do and have done for over 18 years. Our client retention rate over these 18 years has been 95%. Attached is our capabilities statement. We possess strong experience and past performance in working with government organizations (Federal as well as State and Local) including several client agencies under the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, Department of State, and Department of Treasury. We also work with very reputable government and private organizations such as the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA), West Virginia State Treasurer’s Office, Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART), New York City Employee Retirement System (NYCERS), Heico Aerospace, SONY Electronics, Banco Santander, Credit Agricole, Bacardi Martini, and Mount Sinai Medical Center, among several others. If you are looking for cybersecurity products and solutions I’d genuinely look forward to an opportunity to speak with you. You can reach me at any time at 305-447-6750 or 305-335-7610. Best Regards, -- Silka Gonzalez, CISSP, CISM, CISA, CRISC, PCI-QSA, CITP, CPA President Enterprise Risk Management SBA CERTIFIED:8(A), EDWOSB, Minority Owned Business GSA 70, GSA 520 CAGE# 5FDC2 800 S. Douglas Road, North Tower #940 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 USA phone 305 447 6750 cell 305 335 7610 fax 305 447 6752 <mailto:silka@emrisk.com> silka@emrisk.com <http://www.emrisk.com/> www.emrisk.com LinkedIN: <http://www.linkedin.com/in/silkagonzalez> www.linkedin.com/in/silkagonzalez Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/emrisk> www.twitter.com/emrisk YouTube: <http://www.youtube.com/EMRiskOnline> www.youtube.com/EMRiskOnline Blog: <http://www.emrisk.com/blog> www.emrisk.com/blog CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This electronic transmission, including any attachments, contains information belonging to ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT, which is confidential, legally privileged and/or a trade secret. Its unauthorized disclosure, copying or distribution is strictly prohibited. The same is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. You are hereby warned that electronic messages may be altered and that we will not be liable for any damages resulting any modification, alternation or falsification of an electronic communication that is originated by us. VIRUSES: Although the company has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments. If you do not wish to be contacted in the future, please reply to this e-mail and indicate so. |
Silka Gonzalez | silka@emrisk.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 169 | Bullseye Glass and the implications of DEQ rules |
Dear Mrs Hammond After reading about the temporary regulations which are being proposed by DEQ at today’s meeting, I feel that I must highlight the wider implications of implementing such rules. I understand that the proposed DEQ rules will severely curtail production at Bullseye Glass. The implication of the DEQ rules will not only affect the hundreds of businesses which supply Bullseye Glass but many thousands of people around the world who make a living from supplying and using Bullseye Glass. I employ 25 people in the UK and we are one of 74 Bullseye Glass distributors around the world. Each distributor will have several thousand customers, many of these are individual artists who make a living using Bullseye glass. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose rules which will affect the way that many thousands of people around the world make a living. Yours Sincerely Simon Gue Simon Gue MDes. RCA | Warm Glass UK Director 01934 863344 <mailto:simon@warm-glass.co.uk> simon@warm-glass.co.uk |
Simon Gue | simon@warm-glass.co.uk | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 170 | glass restrictions |
Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I
stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations
as a responsible citizen of the social and business community
of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. The glass industry is a viable part of society, work with them. You wouldn’t shut down the Auto industry as it would cripple society. Your rash action will cripple the glass industry. Consideration to all must be kept in mind. Denise Presland |
Simply Stained Glass | simplystainedglass9@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 171 | Regarding Bullseye Manufacturing Company |
Dear Joni Hammond (Interim Director), Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Please investigate for the truth before any decisions are made acutely. Kindest Regards, Sheila Kain Cody, Wyoming |
skain@tritel.net | skain@tritel.net | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 172 | Proposed DEQ Regulations for art glass manufacturers |
Dear Joni, As community members, small business owners and glass artists we are deeply concerned about the sweeping changes proposed. We urge you to more thoughtfully consider the impact of these changes before making a hasty decision that will affect our passion--art glass. Without the ability to purchase our main material, glass, there will be no other options for continuing our small but mighty operation. We feel that Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. We stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. We sincerely appreciate any support you can provide right now. We are relying on you to make the right decision for all, and hope you will consider more thorough evaluation of the situation before making sweeping changes. Melina, Julie and Margie family glass artists of SlateGlass Clackamas County, Oregon |
Slate Glass | slateglass@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 173 | I support Bullseye Glass |
Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Let's be fair here. Do you really want to be responsible for a well respected businesses demise because of an environmental scare story? Do the necessary studies. We will live with the truth of the scientific evidence rather than the emotion of politics. Sincerely, Margery Slate Sent from my iPad |
slateglass | slateglass@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 174 | Bullseye & Uroburos Glass |
Bullseye and Uroburos glass has a long history of responsible
operation. I stand with Bullseye and Uroburos Glass in its efforts
to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social
and business community of Portland, Oregon. Thank you, Stephanie Johnston |
stephanie johnston | sljohnston08@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;gabriela.goldfarb@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 175 | Temporary Regulations for Glassmakers |
I am a long time Portland resident, who is concerned about the
propaganda that The Oregonian/OregonLive has been putting out
about Bullseye Glass. Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible
operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue
operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business
community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Putting these undue restrictions on local glassmakers will not only cater to the sensationalism brought about by the media, but also rob many Portlanders of their jobs and cripple two great local employers (the glassmakers). At a time when every job is important, we need to look at the science of the situation and respond accordingly. ------------------------------ Sue Brantley 4511 NE 31st Avenue Portland, OR 97211 503 407-9677 |
Sue Brantley | suebrantley@comcast.net | SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||||||||
| 176 | Bullseye Glass - letter of support |
Dear Sir / Madam, I am writing in support of the Bullseye company. I have been following the recent environmental issues with interest. I make successful living as owner of a small business in the UK creating glass art for corporate and domestic clients using Bullseye Glass. I pride myself on running my business in an environmentally friendly way minimising my impact on the environment. Because of the properties of Bullseye Glass, I am able to use every piece, however small. Whilst I share the concerns relating to recent air pollution samples, and it is important for the neighbouring community is not put at risk, I urge you to consider any restrictions to be based on the scientific evidence rather than succumb to pressure to be seen to be doing something. I don’t pretend to understand all the scientific information about this issue, I am an artist! but please consider the explanation someone who does, Dr. LaCourse of Alfred University - detail from this link - https://www.bullseyeglass.com/about-us/dr-lacourse-chromium-statement.html In the scheme of glass production in US, Bullseye is a very small fish, but the ripples spread across to many small businesses across the world, like my own. Regards Sue Tinkler |
sue tinkler | sue@tinklertastic.co.uk | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | questions@bullseyeglass.com;pippa@warm-glass.co.uk | questions@bullseyeglass.com;pippa@warm-glass.co.uk | SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||
| 177 | Today's meeting to restrict bullseye glass production |
Good morning! I worked as an EHS Manager for a Portland manufacturer
for 7 years and continue myEHS career in manufacturing plants
around the country. After 34 years in EHS work, it is very disappointing to think ODEQ may try to curtail Bullseye operations when a multitude of analyses have not proven them as the source of heavy metals contamination! Please reconsider the reaction of shutting down Bullseye, until the science really proves a connection. And even then, please commit to working with business to phase in new rules, so businesses can economically and effectively stay in Portland. Regards Susan Arrington <http://overview.mail.yahoo.com?.src=iOS> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone |
Susan Arrington | suze1958@yahoo.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 178 | Air Quality and Bullseye Glass- Please Use Science and Reason |
Greetings- I am writing to you as a 21 year employee of Bullseye Glass Company. I implore you to think carefully before preventing our company from staying in business. There is absolutely NO scientific evidence that Cr III is anything but a benign substance. If you prevent us from using it, you may very well put 150 families out of work. Not to mention thousands and thousands of people around the WORLD out of business. Bullseye is committed to doing the right thing for the environment. We are working as fast as the DEQ will allow us to. We have always been a responsible company. Please base your decisions on FACTS- not panic, hysteria, half-truths, bad science or anything else. Thank you for doing the right thing- Susan Green Susan Green Sales Supervisor Bullseye Glass Company 503-232-8887 I 1-888-220-3002 x113 www.bullseyeglass.com |
Susan Green | SusanGreen@bullseyeglass.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||||||||
| 179 | Bullseye regulations |
Dear Director Hammond I moved to Portland in the late 1970’s and have watched it evolve from a quiet little city to a now vibrant community.. Much of that was due to progressive and thoughtful governmental decisions at both a state and local level. But some of that was also because of a number of businesses that helped put Portland and Oregon on the national radar for quality design. Rejuvenation Houseparts, Pratt and Larson Tiles and, of course, Bullseye Glass were a few of these companies. It is with some concern that I have watched the rapid escalation of the response to Bullseye Glass around the air quality issues.This is not to say that I don’t believe that the company could and should improve their emissions control, but my concern is that in an effort to improve a problem we are about to destroy a nationally acclaimed business that has provided jobs and nurtured a whole art movement. I find it particularly disconcerting that while the city and state has provided numerous incentives to recruit and maintain businesses it appears we are not working with this company to help them become a model of clean glass manufacturing. I would encourage the the state to implement regulations in such a way as to allow Bullseye to function as a responsible manufacturer. Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely Tami Katz |
Tami Katz | tamibeth@comcast.net | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 180 | Bullseye |
March 15, 2016 As an amateur glass artist living in the Portland area, I have ready access to some of the finest glass product available in the world … from Bullseye and Uroboros. Over the past couple of months, I have become very weary of hyper-reactive media coverage about the dangers of emissions from glass production at both companies. I stand behind Bullseye, who has followed state DEQ standards in the past and is currently making whatever changes are necessary to conform to new air quality standards. These new regulatory decisions must be based upon science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium, so I urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to impose poorly written and misdirected rules, even if they are meant to be temporary. From what I see, Bullseye has been forthright in its efforts to solve the emission complaints, by suspending use of Arsenic, Cadmium and Chromium until they have installed and tested a filter system. Imposing impractical, hyper-reactive rules at this time would seem to me to be in poor faith. Please rely on science and fact … not political issues. Ted Bach Hillsboro, OR tbach.tbach@comcast.net <mailto:tbach.tbach@comcast.net> |
Ted Bach | tbach.tbach@comcast.net | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 181 | DEQ proposal to curtail the production of the Glass Industry |
Dear Joni Hammond, I would like to comment on the DEQ proposal to curtail the production of the Glass Industry. It is trying to address the production of Chromium VI. There is scientific evidence that the glass furnaces cannot turn Chromium III into Chromium VI. If it did the glass would be ruin. I consider myself a great environmentalist and understand the concern. However so far the process has been fear mongering where everyone is in a lose lose situation. People have been in fear for their lives and have spent untold energy chasing the wrong culprits. In this atmosphere you are risking the demise of an important artistic community that not only exists in Oregon but nationwide. The task to safeguard quality of life issue involves finding the root causes and providing a sane solution. The area that is being looked at involves an ancient volcanic area and recently other industrial uses that predated the existence of Glass Industry. With both of these precursors there are ample candidates for the contamination of the site. Recent Soil test have shown no evidence of direct contamination by the glass industry. So why are regulation made to only curtail the glass industry. This is misdirection. I applaud clean air technology and many if not all glass artist encourage the glass industry to employ the best that can be done. I urge a much more real approach to the environmental issues. Track down the real source and propose real solutions. Leave out the false blame game and be true to the people of your state. Sincerely, Terry Ow-Wing Glass Artist |
Terry Ow-Wing Designs | towdesign@yahoo.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 182 | Bullseye Glass DEQ and EPA |
Bullseye Glass has a long history of responsible operation. I
stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations
as a responsible citizen of the social and business community
of Portland, Oregon. Bullseye Glass manufactures a wholly unique product. If Bullseye Glass is forced into compliance, we and thousands of others like us, will be forced out of business. Chromium III is essential to the production of green glass. Scientific evidence shows the use of this compound by Bullseye Glass is not harmful. Nevertheless, the DEQ wants to restrict Bullseye from using Cr(III) for an extended period of time. They are essentially basing these rules off an assumption of guilt without any supporting evidence. Neither DEQ or EPA have required any other US producer, of green glass, to entirely and arbitrarily stop their production without notice and perform the kind of extensive testing and modeling that DEQ is asking for. A typical green bottle manufacturer uses 1,000 times more Cr(III) per year than Bullseye Glass. A bottle producer, with emission controls, would melt more Cr(III) each day than Bullseye uses in a year. These newly proposed regulations are based on politics and fear, not science. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye's furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. These regulations could be forced upon Bullseye Glass in the next 24 hours via a temporary rule making procedure by DEQ. If Bullseye Glass not allowed to use Cr (III), they can no longer make green glass. On top of their voluntary suspension of cadmium glass production until their baghouse is in place, this new limitation would eliminate 50% of their product line. It would result in employee layoffs, huge economic impacts to Bullseye and could even drive them out of business. It also impacts us, medium to small businesses and artisans and hobbyists all over the world. We are a new start-up glass business with 5 employees, one of whom has metastasized breast cancer and has not been able to find employment elsewhere, a fifteen year old kid who's dad just passed away and is trying to help his mom, a young woman with chronic lime's disease, a young mom with 50% hearing loss and a woman with scleroderma. All these people need their jobs! Please help! Meryl Raiffe The Glass Underground 167 Washington Valley Rd. Warren, NJ 07059 732-384-7504 888-287-4038 theglassunderground@gmail.com <mailto:theglassunderground@gmail.com> www.theglassundergroundnj.com <http://www.theglassundergroundnj.com> www.shoptheunderground.com <http://www.shoptheunderground.com> Hours of Operation: Tues-Thurs 10-6 Fri-Sat 10-6:30 Sun 10-5 |
The Glass Underground | theglassunderground@gmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON | EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 183 | Bullseye Glass and the DEQ |
I am writing on behalf of Bullseye Glass. As you may, or may
not, know tomorrow (Tuesday) DEQ will be meeting to decide on
sweeping "temporary" restrictions on Bullseye glass. These
restriction will severely impact their ability to conduct business
in Portland. These restriction are knee jerk reactions and totally
unwarranted - based on the scientific facts presented by Bullseye,
and an independent consultant. Since the initial issue surfaced regarding air quality in the area around Bullseye's facility in Portand they have cooperated fully, and took action on their own, to abate the initial problem while a long term solution could be implemented. This was done even though they were in compliance with DEQ's policies before and after the issue. Now a new, and unjustified, issue has surfaced. If this restriction is allowed to be put in place it will cost jobs in the Portland area, possible force a company to shut down entirely in the Portland area, and possibly drive this process overseas. The last thing we need in Oregon, or any part of the country is to lose jobs. I respect, and I am totally behind, clean air and keeping environment safe - but lets do it where it is necessary and will do the most good - this is NOT one of those areas. Bullseye glass has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. We urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. We sincerely appreciate any support you can provide right now. Thomas A. Shedore A voting and concerned Oregon citizen. Klamath Falls, OR "Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss" |
Thomas A. Shedore Sr. | thomasshedoresr@hotmail.com | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 184 | Oregon Environmental Quality Meeting |
To All, I am a glass artist located on the west coast. As such, I have been watching the drama unfolding in Portland with great interest. Of note is the apparent fact of how badly this incident has been handled from the very beginning, and how now the DEQ is ready to take any action to save face, whether based upon fact or fiction. DEQ's very own agenda for this meeting states: "Elevated and possibly unsafe levels of metals have been found in the air around two glass manufacturing facilities in Portland." One would think that if DEQ needs to take what they deem as drastic action that they would be able to state with some clarity that a danger exists. There certainly has been conflicting information from other sources that it does not. Bullseye and Urororos Glass companies are far from being the only glass manufacturers in the Country. As pertaining to the most recent scare, that being Chromium which is used to make green glass, one simply needs to look in the supermarket to see how many things come in green glass bottle. There is easily obtainable scientific evidence that verifies that Chromium III does not change to Chromium VI in the glass melting process used by Bullseye and Uroboros Glass, but why we possibly look to science rather than public opinion and political concerns? Both Portland glass companies not only employ hundreds of workers, they also provide glass to customers worldwide. The DEQ would lead you to believe that the impact of these immediate regulations would be minimal when in fact they would be profound and far reaching. I’m certain I’m not stating anything different than you have already heard from many others, however I would like to indicate my support of both glass companies, who have been business for over 70 combined years, and ask that the DEQ and other involved environmental agencies simply do their research, their responsibility, and their jobs so as to allow them to make accurate, science based decision rather than making decisions based upon shame and public opinion. We do not need to either destroy, or drive from our great Country, any more businesses when simple processes and reasonable actions can make them safe. Thank You, Tim |
Tim Yardic | tyardic@sbcglobal.net | SMTP | novick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;REP VegaPederson;REP Nosse;SAXTON LYNNE;HAMMOND Joni;RIDER Morgan;ARMSTRONG Ed;OKEEFFE Jane;EDEN Melinda;JOHNSON Colleen | novick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RIDER Morgan94f;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ARMSTRONG Edce9;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OKEEFFE Janee72;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=EDEN Melindae77;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JOHNSON Colleen176 | SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX;EX | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 185 | Bullseye Glass - Restrictions/Laws |
Dear Sirs and Madams: I am writing from the great state of Texas in support of the Bullseye Glass Company. As you may or may not know, Bullseye has a long history of responsible operation. I stand with Bullseye Glass in its efforts to continue operations as a responsible citizen of the social and business community of Portland, Oregon. Regulatory decisions must be based on science, not political issues. A leading scientist, Dr. LaCourse, has said Bullseye’s furnaces do not produce toxic chromium. I urge DEQ to rely on science and fact, and not to rush to impose these poorly written and misdirected rules. Please, please, please carefully consider the impact these proposed actions will have on this family owned company and the city where it employs people and manufactures glass for many of us who do not live there. Thank you and sncerely, Tish Reed 2903 Shadowdale Dr. Houston, TX 77043 713-304-2134 |
tishreed@sbcglobal.net | tishreed@sbcglobal.net | SMTP | HAMMOND Joni;SAXTON LYNNE;REP Nosse;REP VegaPederson;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | /O=DEQ/OU=DEQHQ/cn=Recipients/cn=JHAMMON;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OR0068932ac8;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Nosseb97;/O=DEQ/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rep Vega Pederson119;Gabriela.GOLDFARB@oregon.gov;mult.chair@multco.us;mayorcharliehales@portlandoregon.gov;dan@portlandoregon.gov;nick@portlandoregon.gov;Amanda@portlandoregon.gov;novick@portlandoregon.gov | EX;EX;EX;EX;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP;SMTP | Normal | Normal | ||||||||||
| 186 | DEQ Air Quality Meeting |
As a glass artist and resident of Portland, I have followed the
news surrounding the use of arsenic, cadmium and chromium III
in glass production by Bullseye closely. I have had a relationship
with Bullseye for over 10 years. Throughout this time, Bullseye
has demonstrated a commitment to safety in all areas of glass
work. It seems to me that DEQ & the EPA made a critical error 10+ years ago, by not establishing proper filtration requirements on the glass industry and to cover this gross government error is looking for someone to blame. Had either of these organizations done their homework years ago, Bullseye and Portland residents would not be dealing with the current situation. Although I feel for the Portland residents that live near the factory, the fact remains that Bullseye has passes all the relevant air quality tests set by DEQ & the EPA. Bullseye is cooperating with these agencies, voluntarily suspending use of the heavy metals until better filtration can be installed, and diligently working toward a sound solution and clean air. The DEQ meeting today is nothing more than a public execution. DEQ and the EPA need someone to blame for their error and they have chosen Bullseye. It is disgraceful. Let’s work together to find a solution rather than shutting the company down and putting people out of work. Tonya Lowrey |
Tonya Lowrey | tohjnya1@yahoo.com | SMTP | Normal | Normal | |||||||||||||
| 187 | JILL EMAIL COMMENTS | |||||||||||||||||||