Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
Enter date that comment period begins
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Enter caption
How to hide instructions and examples
All cobalt blue text and EXAMPLES are in the Font Effects | Hidden. Word identifies hidden text by underlining it with dots. You may use one of the following methods to show/hide hidden text:
1. Press paragraph symbol displayed in Paragraph grouping.
2. Press [Ctrl] [Shift] [8] keys simultaneously
To find and delete all hidden text before publishing, press [Ctrl] [F] keys, press Format button, and select the Font | Effects | Hidden box and press OK button. On the Replace tab, place cursor in Replace with: box and press Delete key then press Replace All button.
Administrative Procedures Act Requirements
All DEQ public writing for rulemaking must be clear and simple to meet requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act.
ORS 183.750 Readability of Public Writings
Article Content
183.750 State agency required to prepare public writings in readable form.
(1) Every state agency shall prepare its public writings in language that is as clear and simple as possible.
(2) As used in this section:
(a) “Public writing” means any rule, form, license or notice prepared by a state agency.
(b) “State agency” means any officer, board, commission, department, division or institution in the executive or administrative branch of state government. [Formerly 183.025]
Note: 183.750 was enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but was not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 183 or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.
ORS 183.335
Notice
(2)(a) The notice required by subsection (1) of this section must include:
…(B) An objective, simple and understandable statement summarizing the subject matter and purpose of the intended action in sufficient detail to inform a person that the persons interests may be affected, and the time, place and manner in which interested persons may present their views on the intended action.
Plain Language
When you write this document, and all other public rulemaking documents, your publication reviewers will follow plain language guidelines. We, your reviewers recommend the following resources for anyone who has not taken a plain language course or who needs a refresher.
FAA Plain Language Course. [] It will take about an hour. It has some quirkiness and a few shots of humor.
For more details in an online or printable format, use the Federal Plain Language Guidelines. [LINK]
Agency Communications on Q-Net offers the DEQ-centric Style and writing resources [LINK]
Overview |
Short summary
Enter a short high-level summary about what we propose. It needs to be factual and impartial. Use bullets to help your readers pick up the gist of our proposal at a glance. Do not include supporting evidence or justification for why we are proposing the rules though you may refer to the Statement of need section from more details.
EXAMPLE:
DEQ proposes rules to increase water quality fees by 2.9 percent for individuals, businesses and government agencies that hold the following permits effective Nov. 1 2014:
• National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits
• Water Pollution Control Facility permits
• Water Pollution Control Facility permits specific to onsite septic systems
TEXT
Required for SIP RulesDEQ proposes the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission approve the proposed rules for incorporation into the Oregon Clean Air Act State Implementation Plan and submittal to the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency for its approval under the federal Clean Air Act.
Brief history
OPTIONAL – Do not repeat information entered above or required in other sections of this document. The Statement of Need section includes different methods for presenting numerous, disparate issues.
TEXT
Regulated parties
TEXT
SIP OPTION The proposed amendment of Oregon Administrative Rule 340-200-0040 to incorporate Enter program name here TEXT into the State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan does not change the regulated parties.
Request for other options
During the public comment period, DEQ requests public comment on whether to consider other options for achieving the rule's substantive goals while reducing negative economic impact of the rule on business.REQUIRED LANGUAGE – DO NOT CHANGE
OPTIONALFreeform title EXAMPLE: Outline/Key issues/Crosswalk/Map |
If other sections in this document address the issues adequately, delete this section. The core team may adapt titles and in this section. Use one of the formats below to present your information.
Enter freeform title here
TEXT
Enter freeform title here
TEXT
Title | Title |
Subtitle | Subtitle |
TEXT | TEXT |
TEXT | TEXT |
Statement of need |
Select method below that best communicates the need for this proposal using the following required elements.
METHOD 1: For proposals that are straight forward
What need would the proposed rule address?
TEXT
How would the proposed rule address the need?
TEXT
How will DEQ know the rule addressed the need?
TEXT
METHOD 2: For proposals that address numerous, disparate issues
Proposed Rule or Topic | Discussion |
Enter rule or topic subtitle | |
What need would the proposed rule address? | |
How would the proposed rule address the need? | |
How will DEQ know the rule addressed the need? | |
Enter rule or topic subtitle | |
What need would the proposed rule address? | |
How would the proposed rule address the need? | |
How will DEQ know the rule addressed the need? | |
Enter rule or topic subtitle | |
What need would the proposed rule address? | |
How would the proposed rule address the need? | |
How will DEQ know the rule addressed the need? | |
Enter rule or topic title | |
What need would the proposed rule address? | |
How would the proposed rule address the need? | |
How will DEQ know the rule addressed the need? |
METHOD 3: For proposals that address numerous, disparate issues, Make a copy of the table for each issue.
#. Title | |
OPTIONAL Enter brief overview of this issue TEXT | |
What need would the proposed rule address? | How would the proposed rule address the need? |
TEXT | TEXT |
TEXT | TEXT |
TEXT | TEXT |
TEXT | TEXT |
TEXT | TEXT |
How will DEQ know the rule has addressed the need?
TEXT
METHOD 4: For proposals that address numerous, disparate issues
Enter rule or topic title
What need would the proposed rule address?
TEXT
How would the proposed rule address the need?
TEXT
How will DEQ know the rule addressed the need?
TEXT
Enter rule or topic title
What need would the proposed rule address?
TEXT
How would the proposed rule address the need?
TEXT
How will DEQ know the rule addressed the need?
TEXT
Enter rule or topic title
What need would the proposed rule address?
TEXT
How would the proposed rule address the need?
TEXT
How will DEQ know the rule addressed the need?
TEXT
METHOD 5: any combination of the methods above.
|
Lead division Program or activity
TEXT TEXT
Review PowerPoint slide to learn about the structure of a rule and definitions of the rule elements [LINK].
Chapter 340 action
Adopt | OAR 340-###-####, 340-###-#### or blank |
Amend | OAR 340-###-####, 340-###-#### or blank |
Repeal | OAR 340-###-####, 340-###-#### or blank |
Renumber | OAR 340-###-####, 340-###-#### or blank |
Amend and Renumber | OAR 340-###-#### to 340-###-####, 340-###-#### to 340-###-####where the first rule number is the current rule and the second number is the new number. You must move the entire rule not a partial rule then amend it in its new location. Leave this blank if there no amend an renumber. |
Statutory authority
ORS 468.020, 468.065, ###.###<Enter additional statutory authorities here if needed.
Other authority
ORS###.### < Enter other authorities here, if any.
Statute implemented
ORS ###.### < Enter here.TEXT
Legislation
Enter House Bill or Senate Bill ####, yyyy, if relevant TEXT
Documents relied on for rulemaking ORS 183.335(2)(b)(C)
List principal documents, reports or studies relied on to develop this proposal. Include the location where the documents are available for public inspection. If the list is extensive, you may identify where the complete list is located.
Document title | Document location |
Title | Example: web address Example:
|
Fee Analysis |
This rulemaking does not involve fees.
Statement of fiscal and economic impact ORS 183.335 (2)(b)(E) |
For proposals that address numerous issues, the core team may use one of the methods under the Statement of Need section to clarify how this section applies to the disparate elements of this rulemaking.
LINK to review the Statement of Fiscal Impact Q-Card for this section.
Fiscal and Economic Impact
At a very high level, summarize proposed rules that would or could create an impact.
TEXT
Statement of Cost of Compliance
For each entity below, consider both positive and negative impact in the description of the estimated fiscal and economic impacts and costs to comply with the proposed rules. If there is no impact, describe why there is no impact – it is not enough to say, “There is no fiscal impact.” If unable to estimate or quantify the impact, say something like, “DEQ is unable to quantify the impact at this time because …” then explain why. It is OK to say we do not have available data to make this estimate. Rather than repeat identical impacts, its OK to reference the impact on other entities such as, “For large businesses, the cost to comply with the proposed rules is identical to costs described under small businesses. Do not change the order of the entities in the list below because it aligns with our electronic filing with Secretary of State.
State OPTION: and federal agencies Discuss impacts to DEQ in this section if different from other agencies.
TEXT
Direct Impacts TEXT
Indirect Impacts TEXT
Local governments
TEXT
Direct Impacts TEXT
Indirect Impacts TEXT
Public
TEXT
Direct Impacts TEXT
Indirect Impacts TEXT
Large businesses - businesses with more than 50 employees
TEXT
Direct Impacts TEXT
Indirect Impacts TEXT
Small businesses – businesses with 50 or fewer employees ORS 183.336
Resources: The rules group has the latest Department of Employment data that includes employer name, location, number of employees and North American Industry Classification System Code
TEXT
Direct Impacts TEXT
Indirect Impacts TEXT
a. Estimated number of small businesses and types of businesses and industries with small businesses subject to proposed rule.
| TEXT
EXAMPLE: Using recent employment data, DEQ compared the 64 businesses registered with the Clean Fuels Program to current employment data to determine how many people the business employs. Thirty-eight are small businesses. Of those 38, two are Oregon producers of fuels, nine are small importers of finished fuels and 24 are large importers. TEXT
|
b. Projected reporting, recordkeeping and other administrative activities, including costs of professional services, required for small businesses to comply with the proposed rule.
| EXAMPLE: No additional activities are required to comply with the proposed rules. All manufacturers already pay registration feesTEXT |
c. Projected equipment, supplies, labor and increased administration required for small businesses to comply with the proposed rule.
| EXAMPLE: No additional resources are required for compliance with the proposed rules. All manufacturers already pay registration fees. TEXT
|
d. Describe how DEQ involved small businesses in developing this proposed rule.
| EXAMPLE: DEQ included small business representatives on the Oregon E-Cycles Registration Fee Advisory Committee that advised DEQ on the cost of compliance for small businesses. DEQ also provided rulemaking notice to all manufacturers registered with Oregon E-Cycles and fee-payers. These groups included small businesses. TEXT
|
Documents relied on for fiscal and economic impact
To meet Administrative Procedures Act requirements, DEQ lists all documents relied on to develop this fiscal section at this location even though you listed them in the Rules affected, authorities, supporting documents section above.
Document title | Document location |
Enter title here TEXT | Enter link or office address listed at bottom of this notice template TEXT |
Oregon Department of Employment # quarter 20yy data
| Employment Department 875 Union Street NE Salem OR 97311 |
Advisory committee
OPTION 1
DEQ appointed an advisory committee Select phrase a for the sole purpose of making a recommendation on this fiscal and economic impact statement. Alternatively, select phrase b to provide input on the proposed rules and make recommendations on this fiscal and economic impact statement.
To comply with ORS 183.333, DEQ asked for the committee’s recommendations on:
• Whether the proposed rules would have a fiscal impact,
• The extent of the impact, and
• Whether the proposed rules would have a significant impact on small businesses and complies with ORS 183.540.
The committee reviewed the draft fiscal and economic impact statement and documented its recommendations in the Select phrase a Enter title and date of document TEXT or phrase b approved minutes dated Enter date using style guide format – mmm dd, yyyy, EXAMPLE: Jan. 14, 2013.
The committee Enter specifics about the committee’s fiscal impact review. Phrase for small business involvement a To meet requirements in ORS 183.540, the committee considered how to reduce the economic impact on small business and determined Describe applicable elements under ORS 183.540 . Phrase for small business involvement b The committee determined the proposed rules would not have a positive or negative, or a direct or indirect economic impact on small businesses in Oregon.
OPTION 2
DEQ did not appoint an advisory committee. Enter statement describing why DEQ did not convene and advisory committee – be brief.
Housing cost
OPTION 1 – impact
To comply with ORS 183.534, DEQ determined the proposed rules Select phrase a would have or phrase b may have or a combination of both phrases an effect on the development cost of a 6,000-square-foot parcel and construction of a 1,200-square-foot detached, single-family dwelling on that parcel. Enter qualifying statement describing what/how these parcels are involved – be brief.
OPTION 2 – no impact
To comply with ORS 183.534, DEQ determined the proposed rules would have no effect on the development cost of a 6,000-square-foot parcel and construction of a 1,200-square-foot detached, single-family dwelling on that parcel. Enter reason why these parcels are not involved here – be brief. EXAMPLE: The proposed rules only affect manufacturers of electronic devices sold in or into Oregon.
|
"It is the policy of this state that agencies shall seek to retain and promote the unique identity of Oregon by considering local conditions when an agency adopts policies and rules. However, since there are many federal laws and regulations that apply to activities that are also regulated by the state, it is also the policy of this state that agencies attempt to adopt rules that correspond with equivalent federal laws and rules..." ORS 183.332
For proposals that address numerous issues, use one of the methods under the Statement of Need section above if needed to clarify numerous and disparate elements of this rulemaking
Relationship to federal requirements
This section complies with OAR 340-011-0029 and ORS 468A.327 to clearly identify the relationship between the proposed rules and applicable federal requirements.
Select the option below that applies to this rulemaking. Some proposals may need multiple options. Delete text under options not used for this rulemaking.
The purpose of the Federal Relationship form is to highlight the substantive differences between DEQ's rules and federal rules, not to explain every minor difference and trivial details such as DEQ using a different word than EPA.
OPTION 1 – verbatim or by reference
The proposed rules would adopt federal requirement select item from list > Choose an item.. Enter description that includes the name and citation here – be brief.
OPTION 2– substantively equivalent to federal requirements
The proposed rules are not “different from or in addition to federal requirements” and impose stringency equivalent to federal requirements. Enter description that includes the name and citation here – be brief.
OPTION 3– in addition to federal requirements
The proposed rules are “in addition to federal requirements.”
The proposed rules 3a incorporate science applicable to Oregon, 3b incorporate technological advances, 3c protect public health, 3d protect environment, 3e address administrative issues 3feconomic concerns 3g others. Enter additional information about how and why the proposed rules are different from the federal requirements here.
What alternatives did DEQ consider if any?
Enter description about why DEQ did not pursue these alternatives. If other parts of this document describes alternatives considered, DOJ advises us to duplicate the information here. TEXT
Land use |
“It is the (Environmental Quality) Commission's policy to coordinate the Department's (DEQ’s) programs, rules and actions that affect land use with local acknowledged plans to the fullest degree possible.” OAR 340-018-0010
For proposals that address numerous issues, you may use one of the methods under the Statement of Need section if it clarifies how this section applies to the disparate elements of this rulemaking.
Land-use considerations
To determine whether the proposed rules involve programs or actions that are considered a land-use action, DEQ considered:
• Statewide planning goals for specific references. Section III, subsection 2 of the DEQ State Agency Coordination Program document identifies the following statewide goal relating to DEQ's authority:
Goal Title
5 Open Spaces, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Natural Resources
6 Air, Water and Land Resources Quality
11 Public Facilities and Services
16 Estuarial Resources
9 Ocean Resources
• OAR 340-018-0030 for EQC rules on land-use coordination. Division 18 requires DEQ to determine whether proposed rules will significantly affect land use. If yes, how DEQ will:
◦ Comply with statewide land-use goals, and
◦ Ensure compatibility with acknowledged comprehensive plans, which DEQ most commonly achieves by requiring a Land Use Compatibility Statement.
• DEQ’s mandate to protect public health and safety and the environment.
• Whether DEQ is the primary authority responsible for land-use programs or actions in the proposed rules.
• Present or future land uses identified in acknowledged comprehensive plans.
Determination
OPTION 1
DEQ determined that the proposed rules listed under the Chapter 340 Action section above do not affect existing rules, programs or activities considered land-use programs and actions in OAR 340-018-0030 or in the DEQ State Agency Coordination Program.
OPTION 2
DEQ determined that the following proposed rules, listed under the Chapter 340 Action section above, are existing rules that affect programs or activities that the DEQ State Agency Coordination Program considers a land-use program.
OAR 340-000-0000 Optional TEXT
OAR 340-000-0000 Optional TEXT
2aDEQ’s statewide goal compliance and local plan compatibility procedures adequately cover the proposed rules. Enter rationale for why it is adequate –be brief. TEXT
EXAMPLE 1: OAR 340-018-0040(1) - compliance with statewide planning goals achieved by ensuring compatibility with acknowledged comprehensive plans.
EXAMPLE 2: OAR 340-018-0050(2)(a) - ensuring compatibility with acknowledged comprehensive plans may be accomplished through a Land Use Compatibility Statement.
2bDEQ’s statewide goal compliance and local plan compatibility procedures do not cover the proposed rules. Enter criteria and rationale used to determine the proposed rules are land-use rules here.
Potential text > DEQ reasonably expects the program, rules or actions to have Select from list > Choose an item. effect on resources, objectives or areas in the planning goals. Enter explanation. TEXT
2cThe proposed rules are not subject to existing compliance and local plan compatibility procedures. To ensure compliance and compatibility, DEQ will Enter information about new procedures DEQ will use to ensure compliance and compatibility. TEXT
Stakeholder and public involvement |
Advisory committee
The discussion of advisory committee activities in this location is to present a complete picture of public involvement in this rulemaking. Please make sure this section does not cause ambiguity with advisory committee information in the Statement of need section.
OPTION 1
DEQ did not convene an advisory committee. Enter SHORT reason for not involving advisory committee here
OPTION 2
DEQ convened the Enter committee name here advisory committee on Enter date using style guide format – mmm dd, yyyy, EXAMPLE: Jan. 14, 2013 TEXT. The advisory committee provided Describe high-level input using language from charter TEXT. The committee Web page is at: http://www.oregon.gov/deq/RulesandRegulations/Pages/advisorycom.aspx.
The ##-member committee included representatives from Generally describe committee makeup here. The committee met ## times over ## months. In additional to the recommendations described under the Statement of Fiscal and Economic Impact section above, the committee Summarize involvement and link to any formalized recommendation here.
Roster
Name | Representing |
Enter name, Chair | |
Enter name, Co-Chair | |
Enter name, Member | |
Meeting notifications
To notify people about advisory committee’s activities, DEQ sent GovDelivery bulletins, a free e-mail subscription service, to the following lists.
• DEQ sent a one-time notice to Name of permittee or other group notified TEXT subscribers to describe how to sign up for advisory committee meeting notices. ORS 192.640.
• People who signed up for advisory committee bulletin.
DEQ also added advisory committee announcements to DEQ’s calendar of public meetings at http://www.deq.state.or.us/news/events.asp.
The committee recommended that Summarize recommendation or involvement and link to any formal recommendation. The committee reviewed the fiscal impact statement, specifically the impact on small businesses.
EQC prior involvement
DEQ shares general rulemaking information with EQC through the monthly Director’s Report. OPTION 1 DEQ did not present additional information specific to this proposed rule revision. OPTION 2 DEQ shared information about this rulemaking with the EQC 2a at a facilitated hearing on Enter date using style guide format – mmm dd, yyyy, EXAMPLE: Jan. 14, 2013 TEXT, 2b through an informational item on the mmm dd, yyyy TEXT EQC agenda, 2c and in the Director's Report mmm dd, yyyy TEXT.
Public notice
DEQ provided notice of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking OPTION 1 with Hearing OPTION 2 without Hearing for this rulemaking. OPTION 1 On mmm dd,yyyy TEXT, DEQ provided notice to: OPTION 2 DEQ submitted notice to:
• Secretary of State for publication in the Enter month and year here, EXAMPLE August 2013 Oregon Bulletin OPTION on mmm dd, yyyy TEXT
• EPA OPTION on mmm dd, yyyy TEXT.
• The Rulemaking Web page Insert correct link when established http://www.oregon.gov/deq/RulesandRegulations/Pages/2013/RulemakingActivities.aspx OPTION on mmm dd, yyyy TEXT
• #### TEXT interested parties on the Agency Rulemaking List through GovDelivery OPTION on mmm dd, yyyy TEXT
• OPTION #### TEXT stakeholders on the Enter other mailing lists here TEXT OPTION on mmm dd, yyyy TEXT
• The following key legislators required under ORS 183.335 OPTION on mmm dd, yyyy TEXT:
Enter name, title, committee here. TEXT
Enter name, title, committee here. TEXT
Enter name, title, committee here. TEXT
• Members of the advisory committee OPTION on mmm dd, yyyy TEXT.
• #### TEXT interested parties describe OPTION on mmm dd, yyyy TEXT.
• #### TEXT interested parties through mail by U.S. Postal Service notice
• Enter other notices here OPTION on mmm dd, yyyy. TEXT
OPTION DEQ provided legal notice(s) in the following newspapers:
EXAMPLES
The Oregonian Publication date - mmm dd, yyyy TEXT
East Oregon (Pendleton) Publication date - mmm dd, yyyy TEXT
Register Guard (Eugene) Publication date - mmm dd, yyyy TEXT
Mail Tribune (Medford) Publication date - mmm dd, yyyy TEXT
Klamath Herald & News (Klamath Falls) Publication date - mmm dd, yyyy TEXT
La Grande Observer (La Grande) Publication date - mmm dd, yyyy TEXT
Daily Journal of Commerce Publication date - mmm dd, yyyy TEXT
Public hearings
DEQ plans to hold #### TEXT public hearing(s). The table(s) below explains how to participate in the hearing(s).
Before taking public comment and according to Oregon Administrative Rule 137-001-0030, OPTION 1the presiding officer OPTION 2staff presenter FOR BOTH OPTIONSwill summarize the content of the notice given under Oregon Revised Statute 183.335 and respond to any questions about the rulemaking.
DEQ will add the names, addresses and affiliations of all hearing attendees to the interested parties list for this rule if provided on a registration form or the attendee list. DEQ will consider all and written comments received at the hearings listed below before completing the draft rules. DEQ will summarize all comments and respond to comments on the Environmental Quality Commission staff report.
See the DEQ office addresses at the end of this document.
Delete the unused lines and hearings from the tables below. After the team has finalized the information in the table(s), copy them into STAFF.RPT-6.0~. The staff report includes directions on ungrouping hidden rows and deleting rows specific to the notice.
Ask Rules Group about an AT&T conference card tools and find other options at:
http://deq05/intranet/working/ORConnectWebConfSuite.htm
http://deq05/intranet/working/conferenceCalls.htm
Close of public comment period
The comment period will close Day Of Week, mmm dd, yyyy TEXT at ##:## TEXT p.m.
DEQ Offices
DEQ Headquarters Office
811 SW 6th Avenue
Portland 97204-1390
DEQ Northwest Region - Portland
2020 SW 4th Avenue, Suite 400
Portland, OR 97201
DEQ Northwest Region - North Coast Branch Office
65 N Highway 101, Suite 202
Warrenton, OR 97146
DEQ Northwest Region - Tillamook
Tillamook Office
2310 1st Street, Suite 4
Tillamook, OR 97141
DEQ Western Region - Salem
750 Front St NE, #120
Salem, OR 97301-1039
DEQ Western Region
165 East 7th Avenue, Suite 100
Eugene, OR 97401
EQ Western Region – Coos Bay
381 N Second Street
Coos Bay, OR 97420
DEQ Western Region - Medford
221 Stewart Avenue, Suite 201
Medford, OR 97501
DEQ Eastern Region – The Dalles
Columbia Gorge Community College
400 E Scenic Drive, Building 2
The Dalles, OR 97058
DEQ Eastern Region – La Grande
Regional Solutions Center
Eastern Oregon University
233 Badgley Hall, 1 University Blvd.
La Grande, OR 97850
DEQ Eastern Region - Bend
475 NE Bellevue, Suite 110
Bend, OR 97701
DEQ Eastern Region - Pendleton
700 SE Emigrant, #330
Pendleton, OR 97801
Formats used in this document Arial 14 bold, Text RGB 0-73-79, Box RGB 226-221-219 |
Subsection title Ariel 11
Level 1 text -- Times Roman 12 Level 2 text
A. Level 2 text
a. Level 3 text
b. Level 3 text
c. Last text
B. Level 2 text
▪ Level 1 bullet 1
▫ Level 2 bullet
▫ Level 2 bullet
▫ Last bullet
▪ Level 1 bullet
Table # (Arial 11) Table Title – (RGB 0-130-114 Bold Arial 13) | ||||
Column header (RGB 177-221-205 Arial 11) | Column header (RGB 177-221-205) | |||
RGB 223-241-235 Arial 10 | RGB 223-241-235 Arial 10 | RGB 223-241-235 Arial 10 | RGB 223-241-235 Arial 10 | |
Times Roman 121 | OR Times Roman 11 | OR Times Roman 10 | ||
1.5 pt | 1.5 pt 3 pt | 3 pt 1.5 pt | 1.5 pt | |
WORD PROBLEM
The extra column on the right corrects a Word error that prevents vertical alignment in last column of a Word table.
Maggie 5/1/2012
1 Footnote Times Roman 12
2 Footnote Times Roman 12