B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M	N	O	P	Q	R	S	T	U	V	W	X	Y	Z	AA
1
2			DEQ Rulemaking								Saturday, October 4, 2025
3										Workbook Summary
4			Address federal air quality regulations in Oregon rules
5			Program Operations - air quality
6			Brief description of rule proposal					Worksheets				Do nothing severity rating
7			The proposed rules would adopt new and amended federal air quality regulations and related permit rules.					1	Warm up
8								2	Basics				Risk rating low → high
9								3	Stakeholders				1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
10								4	Program			3	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
11								5	Environmental			5	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
12								6	Timing				1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
13								7	Financial			1	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
14								8	Legal			5	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
15								9	Technical				1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
16								10	Policy				1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
17								11	Political				1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
18								12	Implementation				1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
19
20		Schedule						legislative session
21
22			2013				2014				2015
23			Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Q1	Q2	Q3				Q4
24				<Start	---	Effective>
25			<AdvCom>
26					<Notice>
27						EQC
28		5	Environmental					The proposed rules involve
29			The proposed rules address an environmental problem directly. The environmental reach of the proposal is statewide The proposal aligns with 2 actions identified in the 2011-2015 EPA Strategic Plan and with 3 actions identified in the Natural Step.The environmental consequence of doing nothing is: delay in public health protection..					Compliance			0	not involved
30								Penalties			0	not involved
31								Permits, certifications			0	not involved
32								Fees			0	not involved
33								State Implementation Plan			7	involved
34								Land use rules			7	involved
35			Ideal				Reality				Consequences
36			What we want to happen.				What we are trying to change.				What will happen if we don't change.
37			Addressing changes to federal air quality regulations and reducing DEQ's workload and the regulatory burden on businesses.				Adopt new federal air quality regulations and reduce the number of permits.				Emissions reductions and fuel savings will not happen.
38			Alternatives considered				Research/data needed				Models
39			January 0, 1900				Outreach to potential owner or operators of stationary internal combustion engines				January 0, 1900
40		6	Public involvement					Affected parties
41			Interest in this proposal is medium. DEQ does not plan to appoint an advisory committee. We plan to ask the committee to provide advice.					Business		0	not affected
42								Manufacturing		0	not affected
43								City/county/state		0	not affected
44								Individuals		0	not affected
45								Custom entry		0	not affected
46								Custom entry		0	not affected
47									Saturday, October 4, 2025
48

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I
1	⧀ Summary
2			1	Warmed up
3
4
5				Action	Object	Driver
6				align	existing regulatory program	federal regulations			ï drop down Action/Object/Driver lists
7				carry out	a commitment in PPA	EPA direction			ï drop down Action/Object/Driver lists
8				improve	existing regulatory program	program business decision			ï drop down Action/Object/Driver lists
9				expand	existing regulatory program	federal regulations			ï drop down Action/Object/Driver lists
10				implement	existing regulatory program	federal regulations			ï drop down Action/Object/Driver lists
11									ï drop down Action/Object/Driver lists
12									ï drop down Action/Object/Driver lists
13									ï drop down Action/Object/Driver lists
14									ï drop down Action/Object/Driver lists
15				Optional discussion
16
17				Process improvement
18	Go to top
19					Saturday, October 4, 2025

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M	N	O	P	Q	R	S	T	U	V	W	X
1	⧀ Summary
2			2	Basics		Address federal air quality regulations in Oregon rules
3
4				Brief description of rule proposal
5				The proposed rules would adopt new and amended federal air quality regulations and related permit rules.
6
7					Rulemaking type	permanent		Chapter 340 divisions			200, 210, 216, 230, 238, 244												ï drop down Rulemaking type
8				Strengths/weaknesses going into rulemaking
9					The proposed rule…			Risk option			Riskometer
10					Had prior public input			somewhat true			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10			ï drop down to select options
11					Is backed by science			somewhat true			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10			ï drop down to select options
12					Is backed by data			somewhat true			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10			ï drop down to select options
13					Supports sustainability			somewhat true			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10			ï drop down to select options
14					Supports strategic directions			somewhat true			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10			ï drop down to select options
15					Furthers DEQ priorities			somewhat true			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10			ï drop down to select options
16					Would make DEQ's work easier			somewhat true			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10			ï drop down to select options
17					Would reduce DEQ costs			somewhat true			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10			ï drop down to select options
18
19
20							Risk average				1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
21				Ideal - What do we envision?
22				Short	Addressing changes to federal air quality regulations and reducing DEQ's workload and the regulatory burden on businesses.
23				Long	The goal of this rulemaking is to addess the following problems that relate to changes in federal air quality regulations: management of DEQ workload; regulatory burden on businesses; changes to existing federal regulations; and adoption of new federal regulations.
24				Reality - What are we trying to change?
25				Short	Adopt new federal air quality regulations and reduce the number of permits.
26				Long	This rulemking would adopt new national standards for sources such as boilers, solid waste incinerators, and stationary internal combustion engines. The rulemaking would also exempt some currently permitted gasoline dispensing facilities and metal fabrication and finishing operations from permitting and instead require them to register with DEQ.
27				Consequences - What will happen if we do nothing?
28				Short	Emissions reductions and fuel savings will not happen.
29				Long	EPA is not in a position to implement the new federal regulations for boilers, solid waste incinerators, and stationary internal combustion engines. It is estimated that these regulations will reduce hazardous air pollutant emissions by over 18 million pounds per year and fuel usage by over 86 trillion Btus per year nationally. If DEQ does not implement the new federal regulations, it is unlikely that emission reductions and fuel savings will happen in Oregon.
30				Alternatives to rulemaking already considered or to explore
31				Short
32				Long
33				Research or data needed to develop proposal
34				Short	Outreach to potential owner or operators of stationary internal combustion engines
35				Long	The Air Quality Regional Management Team does not want to implement the federal stationary internal combustion engine standards until they know how many engines there are in the Oregon and that we have developed a comprehensive implementation plan.
36				Models that could be leveraged for this proposal
37				Short
38				Long
39							Land Use/SIP
40							Land use rules			Y													ï drop down to select Land Use/ SIP boxes
41
42							State Implementation Plan			Y													ï drop down to select Land Use/ SIP boxes
43				Out of the scope for this proposal
44				Topic				Reasoning
45
46
47
48
49				Compliance, penalties, permits, certifications, registrations and licensing
50						Extent that proposal addresses listed items

51
52				Compliance
53				Penalties
54
55				Does not apply																			ï drop down to select program
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64				Enter custom item here
65				Enter custom item here
66				Enter custom item here
67
68				Reminders
69
70				Process improvement
71	Go to top
72								Saturday, October 4, 2025

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M	N	O	P	Q	R	S	T	U	V
1	⧀ Summary
2			3	Stakeholders and public involvement			Address federal air quality regulations in Oregon rules
3
4				"The Legislative Assembly finds and declares that it is the policy of this state that whenever possible the public be involved in the development of public policy by agencies and in the drafting of rules. The Legislative Assembly encourages agencies to seek public input to the maximum extent possible before giving notice of intent to adopt a rule. The agency may appoint an advisory committee that will represent the interests of persons likely to be affected by the rule, or use any other means of obtaining public views that will assist the agency in drafting the rule." ORS 183.333
5				Affected parties
6							Previously		Number affected
7					Not involved	Involved	unregulated		10s			100s			1,000s
8				Business								X									ï drop down to X boxes
9				Manufacturing								X									ï drop down to X boxes
10				City/county/state					X												ï drop down to X boxes
11				Individuals								X									ï drop down to X boxes
12				Custom entry																	ï drop down to X boxes
13				Custom entry																	ï drop down to X boxes
14				Stakeholder complexity
15
16
17				External stakeholder interest
18				Selecting an interest level indicates the group to the left is a stakeholder.
19				Group		Interest		Riskometer
20				Regulated community		unknown at this time		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10				ï drop down interest options
21				Business and industry		unknown at this time		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10				ï drop down interest options
22				Environmental groups		unknown at this time		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10				ï drop down interest options
23				Public		unknown at this time		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10				ï drop down interest options
24				State legislators		unknown at this time		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10				ï drop down interest options
25				Federal environmental regulators		unknown at this time		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10				ï drop down interest options
26				Other state and federal agencies		unknown at this time		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10				ï drop down interest options
27				Local governments		unknown at this time		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10				ï drop down interest options
28				Tribal nations		unknown at this time		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10				ï drop down interest options
29				Custom entry		does not apply		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10				ï drop down interest options
30				Custom entry		does not apply		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10				ï drop down interest options
31
32
33						Interest average		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
34				Optional stakeholder information
35
36				Advisory committee appointment		Type of committee (check all that apply)
37				No advisory committee			Fiscal			Scientific
38				Use a standing committee			Policy			Rule language
39				Reconvene a committee			Technical			Legally required
40				Convene a new committee			Implementation			Custom entry
41				No. of meetings
42					0
43				Describe appointment strategy
44
45				Describe how DEQ will use their input
46
47
48	Advisory Committee Guide
49	ORS 183.333			Information meetings/hearings during public notice
50				Information meetings/hearings			Public notice

51				Portland area			No public notice
52				Regional			Public notice, no hearing
53					No. of meetings		Public notice with hearing
54					1		Re-notice
55				Optional hearing information
56				Plan is to have one hearing in Portland, but allow teleconferencing into the hearing at DEQ's Bend and Medford offices.
57				Reminders
58
59				Process improvement
60	Go to Top
61						October 4, 2025

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M	N	O	P	Q	R	S	T	U	V	W
1	⧀ Summary
2			4	Program			Address federal air quality regulations in Oregon rules
3
4				Program name	Program Operations
5
6				Media	air																	ï drop down Media list
7				Program consequences of doing nothing					low to medium													ï drop down Media list
8							Severity		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
9				Loss of delegation
10				Failure to keep commitment
11				Failure to respond to legislature
12				Increased difficulty doing business
13				Unclear administrative rules
14				Loss of reputation
15				Enter custom consequences here
16				Enter custom consequences here
17				Subject program considerations
18
19				Other DEQ program considerations
20
21				Dependencies
22
23
24				Optional dependency information
25
26
27				Include program considerations in:						unknown												ï drop down Complexity list
28							Complexity			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
29				Committee charter																		ï drop down charter/map/proposal
30				Message map
31				Proposal
32				Reminders
33
34				Process Improvement
35	Go to top
36							Saturday, October 4, 2025

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M	N	O	P	Q	R	S	T	U	V	W	AA
1	⧀ Summary
2			5	Environmental			Address federal air quality regulations in Oregon rules
3
4			The proposed rules		address an environmental problem directly.																	ï drop down environmental correlation
5
6				Environmental consequences of doing nothing					medium
7							Severity		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10				ï drop down Severity list
8				Science does not apply to Oregon
9				Delay in public health protection
10				Adverse effect on vulnerable populations
11	DEQ - EJ			Adverse effect on environmental justice communities
12				Enter custom environmental consequence here
13				Enter custom environmental consequence here
14				Describe environmental considerations
15				EPA identified boilers, solid waste incinerators, and stationary internal combustion engines as emitters of one or more of the 33 hazardous air pollutants that pose the greatest risk to public health in urban areas. Many of the hazardous air pollutants are also of particular concern in Oregon. For instance, boilers, solid waste incinerators, and stationary internal combustion engines emit mercury, which can impair neurological development and cause neurological damage, and is a toxic of concern in Oregon.
16				Environmental reach
17				Select the most expansive environmental reach of this proposed rule.
18
19
20				Links
21				2011-2015 EPA Strategic Plan
22				The proposed rules align with actions in the EPA Strategic Plan:
23				Taking Action on Climate Change/Improving AQ
24				Protecting America's Waters
25				Ensuring Safety of Chemicals/Preventing Pollution
26				Enforcing Environmental Laws
27				Cleaning Up Communities/Advancing Sustainable Development
28
29				the Natural Step
30				The proposed rules support the elimination of Oregon's contribution to:
31				The progressive buildup of substances extracted from the Earth's crust (for example, heavy metals and fossil fuels)
32				The progressive buildup of chemicals and compounds produced by society (for example, dioxins, PCBs, and DDT)
33				The progressive physical degradation and destruction of nature and natural processes (for example, over harvesting forests and paving over critical wildlife habitat)
34				Conditions that undermine people’s capacity to meet their basic human needs (for example, unsafe working conditions and not enough pay to live on)
35				Environmental data
36
37
38
39				Include environmental consideration in:						unknown												ï drop down Complexity list
40				Committee charter				Complexity		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10			ï drop down charter/map/proposal
41				Message map
42				Proposal
43				Reminders
44
45				Process Improvement
46	Go to top
47							Saturday, October 4, 2025

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M	N	O	P	Q	R	S	T	U	V	W	X
1	⧀ Summary
2			6	Timing			Address federal air quality regulations in Oregon rules
3
4				Rational for developing proposal now - drivers
5				Compliance dates of new federal standards.
6
7						Consider any challenges to the rulemaking for each activity below that may occurs during a legislative session (Q1 of even years, Q1 and Q2 of odd years.)
8
9						START		END
10						Year	Qtr	Year	Qtr
11				Start		2013	2																ï drop down Year and Qtr
12				Advisory committee		2013	1	2013	1	not involved													ï drop down Year and Qtr
13				Rulemaking notice		2013	3	2013	3														ï drop down Year and Qtr
14				EQC Action		2013	4																ï drop down Year and Qtr
15				Effective		2013	4																ï drop down Year and Qtr
16				Timing challenges
17				No challenge in meeting rule adoption		Compressed or extended timeframe for rule adoption					Difficult schedule, no contingencies allowed, uncontrolled changes to deadline likely
18
19
20				Include timing rational above in:							potential for minor complexity												ï drop down Complexity list
21				Committee charter				Complexity			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10			ï drop down charter/map/proposal
22				Message map
23				Proposal
24				Reminders
25
26				Process Improvement
27	Go to Top
28								Saturday, October 4, 2025

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J	K	L	M	N	O	P	Q	R	S	T	U	V	W
1	⧀ Summary
2			7	Financial			Address federal air quality regulations in Oregon rules
3
4				Funding source
5				Rulemaking	Fee-funded
6				Implementation	Fee-funded
7				Financial consequences of doing nothing						low												ï drop down Severity list
8								Severity		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
9								Optional notes
10				Loss of program funding
11				Failure to address costs
12				Loss of federal funding
13				Insufficient funding
14				Failure to address undue burden
15				Enter custom financial consequence here
16				Enter custom financial consequence here
17				Fees
18	ORS 291.055 (2)(d)			Action				DAS Fee Approval
19				Establish new fees				Does not apply
20				Increase existing fees				Exempt under ORS 291.55(2)(d)
21				Decrease existing fees				Exempt under ORS 291.55(2)(m)
22
23				Authority to adopt, amend or repeal fees:			ORS
24				Fiscal impact on:			Impact			Riskometer
25				Regulated community			moderate cost decrease			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10			ï drop down Impact list
26				Small business (50 emp or less)			moderate cost decrease			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10			ï drop down Impact list
27				Business and industry			moderate cost decrease			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10			ï drop down Impact list
28				Local governments			moderate cost decrease			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10			ï drop down Impact list
29				Other state or federal agencies			moderate cost decrease			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10			ï drop down Impact list
30				Public			moderate cost decrease			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10			ï drop down Impact list
31				DEQ			moderate cost increase			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10			ï drop down Impact list
32				Program -Air Quality			moderate cost increase			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10			ï drop down Impact list
33				Custom entry			no fiscal impacts			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10			ï drop down Impact list
34				Custom entry			no fiscal impacts			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10			ï drop down Impact list
35
36
37							Fiscal impact average			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
38				Optional fiscal discussion
39
40				Invoicing system
41				Develop new			CHRIS			TRAACS
42				Access database			HazWaste Invoicing			UST Invoice.new
43				Access template			SWIFT			WQSIS
44				Custom entry			Custom entry			Custom entry
45				Since an invoicing system is involved with this rulemaking, please consult with resource system owner early in the rulemaking process.
46				Description
47
48				Include description above in:
49				Committee charter						potential for minor complexity												ï drop down Complexity list
50				Message map				Complexity		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10

51				Proposal
52				Reminders
53
54				Process improvement
55	Go to Top
56							Saturday, October 4, 2025
57