B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
1                                                  
2  
DEQ Rulemaking       Saturday, October 4, 2025      
3  
 
          Workbook Summary      
4     Address federal air quality regulations in Oregon rules      
5     Program Operations, ACDP, Title V - air quality      
6     Brief description of rule proposal Worksheets Do nothing severity rating                          
7     The proposed rules would adopt new and amended federal air quality standards and related permit rules. This includes adopting new federal standards for boilers, solid waste incinerators, and stationary internal combustion engines. 1 Warm up                          
8     2 Basics Risk rating low → high      
9     3 Stakeholders     1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10      
10     4 Program   3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10      
11     5 Environmental   5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10      
12     6 Timing       1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10      
13     7 Financial   1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10      
14     8 Legal     3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10      
15     9 Technical     1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10      
16     10 Policy       1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10      
17     11 Political     1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10      
18     12 Implementation     1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10      
19                                                  
20   Schedule   legislative session                              
21                
22     2013 2014 2015          
23     Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4          
24       <Start --- --- Effective>                                    
25     <AdvCom>                                            
26         <Notice>                                        
27             EQC                                    
28   5 Environmental     The proposed rules involve                          
29     The proposed rules address an environmental problem directly. The environmental reach of the proposal is statewide The proposal aligns with 2 actions identified in the 2011-2015 EPA Strategic Plan and with 1 action identified in the Natural Step.The environmental consequence of doing nothing is: delay in public health protection.   Compliance   0 not involved        
30       Penalties   0 not involved        
31       Permits, certifications 8 new                          
32       Fees     0 not involved                  
33       State Implementation Plan 7 involved                        
34       Land use rules   7 involved                        
35     Ideal Reality Consequences        
36     What we want to happen. What we are trying to change. What will happen if we don't change.        
37     Addressing changes to federal air quality regulations and reducing DEQ's workload and the regulatory burden on businesses. In the short term there will be additional work to implement the changes. There are ongoing discussions on how to minimize the impacts on staff. The emissions reductions and fuel savings that would result from the implementation of the new federal standards would likely not happen.      
38     Alternatives considered Research/data needed Models                          
39     Leave implementation of the new federal standards for non-Title V sources to EPA. Outreach to potential owner or operators of boilers and stationary internal combustion engines to better define the scope of the sources affected. N/A      
40   3 Public involvement   Affected parties                              
41     Interest in this proposal is low/medium. DEQ does not plan to appoint an advisory committee. We plan to ask the committee to provide advice.   Business 4 affects hundreds currently regulated    
42       Manufacturing 3 affects hundreds currently regulated    
43       City/county/state 3 affects under 100 currently regulated  
44       Individuals 0 not affected                          
45       Custom entry 0 not affected                          
46       Custom entry 0 not affected                          
47                 Saturday, October 4, 2025    
48                                                  

Summary

  A B C D E F G H I
1 ⧀ Summary                
2     1 Warmed up      
3                  
4                  
5       Action Object Driver      
6       align existing regulatory program federal regulations     ï drop down Action/Object/Driver lists
7       carry out a commitment in PPA EPA direction     ï drop down Action/Object/Driver lists
8       expand existing regulatory program program business decision   ï drop down Action/Object/Driver lists
9       expand existing regulatory program federal regulations     ï drop down Action/Object/Driver lists
10       implement existing regulatory program federal regulations     ï drop down Action/Object/Driver lists
11                 ï drop down Action/Object/Driver lists
12                 ï drop down Action/Object/Driver lists
13                 ï drop down Action/Object/Driver lists
14                 ï drop down Action/Object/Driver lists
15       Optional discussion        
16                  
17       Process improvement        
18 Go to top     Itemize what regulatory programs are included      
19         Saturday, October 4, 2025    

1WarmUp

  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X
1 ⧀ Summary                                              
2     2 Basics   Address federal air quality regulations in Oregon rules        
3                                              
4    
Brief description of rule proposal                                  
5       The proposed rules would adopt new and amended federal air quality standards and related permit rules. This includes adopting new federal standards for boilers, solid waste incinerators, and stationary internal combustion engines.        
6                                                
7         Rulemaking type permanent Chapter 340 divisions 200, 216, 230, 238, 244     ï drop down Rulemaking type
8       Strengths/weaknesses going into rulemaking                                
9         The proposed rule… Risk option     Riskometer            
10         Had prior public input somewhat true   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   ï drop down to select options
11         Is backed by science somewhat true   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   ï drop down to select options
12         Is backed by data somewhat true   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   ï drop down to select options
13         Supports sustainability somewhat true   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   ï drop down to select options
14         Supports strategic directions definitely true   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   ï drop down to select options
15         Furthers DEQ priorities definitely true   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   ï drop down to select options
16         Would make DEQ's work easier somewhat true   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   ï drop down to select options
17         Would reduce DEQ costs somewhat true   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   ï drop down to select options
18                                                
19                                                
20             Risk average   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10      
21       Ideal - What do we envision?        
22       Short Addressing changes to federal air quality regulations and reducing DEQ's workload and the regulatory burden on businesses.        
23       Long The goal of this rulemaking is to addess the following problems that relate to changes in federal air quality regulations: management of DEQ workload; regulatory burden on businesses; changes to existing federal regulations; and adoption of new federal regulations.        
24       Reality - What are we trying to change?        
25       Short In the short term there will be additional work to implement the changes. There are ongoing discussions on how to minimize the impacts on staff.        
26       Long The adoption of new federal standards would require the permitting of hundreds of boilers and stationary internal combustion engines.        
27       Consequences - What will happen if we do nothing?        
28       Short The emissions reductions and fuel savings that would result from the implementation of the new federal standards would likely not happen.        
29       Long EPA is not in a position to implement the new federal regulations for boilers, solid waste incinerators, and stationary internal combustion engines. It is estimated that these regulations will reduce hazardous air pollutant emissions by over 18 million pounds per year and fuel usage by over 86 trillion Btus per year nationally. If DEQ does not implement the new federal regulations, it is unlikely that emission reductions and fuel savings will happen in Oregon.        
30       Alternatives to rulemaking already considered or to explore        
31       Short Leave implementation of the new federal standards for non-Title V sources to EPA.        
32       Long                                        
33       Research or data needed to develop proposal        
34       Short Outreach to potential owner or operators of boilers and stationary internal combustion engines to better define the scope of the sources affected.        
35       Long The AQ Regional Management Team does not want to implement the federal stationary internal combustion engine standards until they know how many engines there are in the Oregon and that we have developed a comprehensive implementation plan.        
36       Models that could be leveraged for this proposal        
37       Short N/A        
38       Long                                        
39             Land Use/SIP        
40             Land use rules   Y                         ï drop down to select Land Use/ SIP boxes
41                                                
42             State Implementation Plan Y                         ï drop down to select Land Use/ SIP boxes
43       Out of the scope for this proposal        
44       Topic   Reasoning                          
45              
 
46                  
47                  
48                                                
49       Compliance, penalties, permits, certifications, registrations and licensing        
50           Extent that proposal addresses listed items        
51        
                                     
52       Compliance                                      
53       Penalties                                      
54                                                
55       Air quality                                   ï drop down to select program
56                                                
57       Asbestos License                                      
58       Air Contaminant Discharge Permit                                      
59       Air Quality Registrations                                  
 
60       Open Burning Letter Permit                                      
61       Tanker Certification                                      
62       Title V permit                                      
63       Vehicle Emissions Certification                                      
64       Enter custom item here                                      
65       Enter custom item here                                      
66       Enter custom item here                                      
67                                                
68       Reminders                                    
69                
70       Process improvement                                    
71 Go to top     Why don't we have the option of choosing different questions under ideal, reality, consequences?        
72               Saturday, October 4, 2025      

2Basics

  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V
1 ⧀ Summary                                          
2     3 Stakeholders and public involvement Address federal air quality regulations in Oregon rules    
 
3                                          
4       "The Legislative Assembly finds and declares that it is the policy of this state that whenever possible the public be involved in the development of public policy by agencies and in the drafting of rules. The Legislative Assembly encourages agencies to seek public input to the maximum extent possible before giving notice of intent to adopt a rule. The agency may appoint an advisory committee that will represent the interests of persons likely to be affected by the rule, or use any other means of obtaining public views that will assist the agency in drafting the rule." ORS 183.333        
5       Affected parties                                  
6             Previously   Number affected          
7         Not involved Involved unregulated   10s 100s 1,000s          
8       Business               X             ï drop down to X boxes  
9       Manufacturing               X             ï drop down to X boxes  
10       City/county/state         X                   ï drop down to X boxes  
11       Individuals                                 ï drop down to X boxes  
12       Custom entry                                 ï drop down to X boxes  
13       Custom entry                                
ï drop down to X boxes		  
14       Stakeholder complexity                                
15      
                                   
16                                          
17       External stakeholder interest                                  
18       Selecting an interest level indicates the group to the left is a stakeholder.          
19       Group   Interest Riskometer          
20       Regulated community moderate interest 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10     ï drop down interest options  
21       Business and industry moderate interest 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10     ï drop down interest options  
22       Environmental groups minor interest 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10     ï drop down interest options  
23       Public minor interest 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10     ï drop down interest options  
24       State legislators minor interest 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10     ï drop down interest options  
25       Federal environmental regulators moderate interest 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10     ï drop down interest options  
26       Other state and federal agencies minor interest 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10     ï drop down interest options  
27       Local governments minor interest 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10     ï drop down interest options  
28       Tribal nations no interest 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10     ï drop down interest options  
29       Custom entry does not apply 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10     ï drop down interest options  
30       Custom entry does not apply 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10     ï drop down interest options  
31                                            
32                                            
33             Interest average 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10        
34       Optional stakeholder information                                  
35                
36       Advisory committee appointment
Type of committee (check all that apply)		        
37       No advisory committee   Fiscal     Scientific        
38       Use a standing committee   Policy     Rule language        
39       Reconvene a committee   Technical     Legally required        
40       Convene a new committee   Implementation     Custom entry        
41       No. of meetings                                
42         0                                  
43       Describe appointment strategy                                  
44                
45       Describe how DEQ will use their input                                  
46                
47                                            
48 Advisory Committee Guide                                        
49 ORS 183.333     Information meetings/hearings during public notice                              
50       Information meetings/hearings Public notice        
51       Portland area     No public notice                              
52       Regional     Public notice, no hearing                        
53         No. of meetings   Public notice with hearing                      
54         1   Re-notice        
55       Optional hearing information          
56       Plan is to have one hearing in Portland, but allow teleconferencing into the hearing at DEQ's Bend and Medford offices.        
57       Reminders                            
58                                            
59       Process improvement                                  
60 Go to Top                                          
61           October 4, 2025      

3Stakeholders

  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
1 ⧀ Summary                                            
2     4 Program Address federal air quality regulations in Oregon rules    
 
3                                              
4       Program name Program Operations, ACDP, Title V          
5                                              
6       Media air                               ï drop down Media list  
7       Program consequences of doing nothing   low to medium       ï drop down Media list  
8             Severity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10        
9       Loss of delegation                            
 
10       Failure to keep commitment                                
11       Failure to respond to legislature                                
12       Increased difficulty doing business                                
13       Unclear administrative rules                                
14       Loss of reputation                                
15       Enter custom consequences here        
16       Enter custom consequences here                                
17       Subject program considerations                                
18       Whether to adopt federal standards for smaller boilers and stationary internal combustion engines. If opting to register small boilers and stationary internal combustion engines, whether to wait until the Land Use Compatibility Statement issue is addressed.        
19       Other DEQ program considerations                                
20                                              
21       Dependencies    
                           
22      
                                     
23                                          
24       Optional dependency information                                
25       Adoption of RICE NSPSs/NESHAP dependent on outreach to potential RICE engine owners.        
26                                              
27       Include program considerations in:   potential for moderate complexity     ï drop down Complexity list  
28       Complexity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10      
29       Committee charter                                   ï drop down charter/map/proposal
30       Message map                                      
31       Proposal                                      
32       Reminders                                      
33                
34       Process Improvement                                  
35 Go to top              
36             Saturday, October 4, 2025      

4Program

  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W AA
1 ⧀ Summary                                        
   
2     5 Environmental Address federal air quality regulations in Oregon rules          
3                                                
4     The proposed rules address an environmental problem directly.                 ï drop down environmental correlation
5                                                
6       Environmental consequences of doing nothing   medium            
7             Severity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10     ï drop down Severity list    
8       Science does not apply to Oregon                                  
9       Delay in public health protection                                  
10       Adverse effect on vulnerable populations                                  
11 DEQ - EJ     Adverse effect on environmental justice communities                              
12       Enter custom environmental consequence here                                
13       Enter custom environmental consequence here                                
14       Describe environmental considerations                              
15       EPA identified boilers, solid waste incinerators, and stationary internal combustion engines as emitters of one or more of the 33 hazardous air pollutants that pose the greatest risk to public health in urban areas. Many of the hazardous air pollutants are also of particular concern in Oregon. For instance, boilers, solid waste incinerators, and stationary internal combustion engines emit mercury, which can impair neurological development and cause neurological damage, and is a toxic of concern in Oregon.          
16       Environmental reach                                    
17       Select the most expansive environmental reach of this proposed rule.                                
18      
                 
19    
                                         
20       Links                                        
21       2011-2015 EPA Strategic Plan                                  
22       The proposed rules align with actions in the EPA Strategic Plan:          
23       Taking Action on Climate Change/Improving AQ              
24       Protecting America's Waters          
25       Ensuring Safety of Chemicals/Preventing Pollution          
26       Enforcing Environmental Laws          
27       Cleaning Up Communities/Advancing Sustainable Development          
28                                                
29       the Natural Step                                  
30       The proposed rules support the elimination of Oregon's contribution to:                            
31       The progressive buildup of substances extracted from the Earth's crust (for example, heavy metals and fossil fuels)          
32       The progressive buildup of chemicals and compounds produced by society (for example, dioxins, PCBs, and DDT)          
33       The progressive physical degradation and destruction of nature and natural processes (for example, over harvesting forests and paving over critical wildlife habitat)          
34       Conditions that undermine people’s capacity to meet their basic human needs (for example, unsafe working conditions and not enough pay to live on)          
35       Environmental data                                    
36    
                     
37                                          
38                                                
39       Include environmental consideration in:     potential for minor complexity     ï drop down Complexity list    
40       Committee charter       Complexity   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   ï drop down charter/map/proposal  
41       Message map                                        
42       Proposal                                        
43       Reminders                                        
44                  
45       Process Improvement                                    
46 Go to top                
47             Saturday, October 4, 2025        

5Environmental

  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X
1 ⧀ Summary                                              
2     6 Timing Address federal air quality regulations in Oregon rules    
 
3                                                
4       Rationale for developing proposal now - drivers        
5       Compliance dates of new federal standards.        
6                                                
7           Consider any challenges to the rulemaking for each activity below that may occurs during a legislative session (Q1 of even years, Q1 and Q2 of odd years.)        
8                  
9           START END                              
10           Year Qtr Year Qtr                              
11       Start 2013 2                               ï drop down Year and Qtr  
12       Advisory committee 2013 1 2013 1 not involved     ï drop down Year and Qtr  
13       Rulemaking notice 2013 3 2013 3                           ï drop down Year and Qtr  
14       EQC Action 2014 1                               ï drop down Year and Qtr  
15       Effective 2014 1                               ï drop down Year and Qtr  
16       Timing challenges                                    
17       No challenge in meeting rule adoption   Compressed or extended timeframe for rule adoption     Difficult schedule, no contingencies allowed, uncontrolled changes to deadline likely        
18                                            
19                                                
20       Include timing rationale above in:       potential for minor complexity     ï drop down Complexity list  
21       Committee charter       Complexity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   ï drop down charter/map/proposal  
22       Message map                                        
23       Proposal                                        
24       Reminders                                        
25                
26       Process Improvement                                    
27 Go to Top     Why doesn't advisory committee go blank if one isn't involved        
28               Saturday, October 4, 2025      

6Timing

  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W
1 ⧀ Summary                                            
2     7 Financial Address federal air quality regulations in Oregon rules    
 
3                                              
4       Funding source                                      
5       Rulemaking Fee-funded                                
6       Implementation Fee-funded                                
7       Financial consequences of doing nothing     low     ï drop down Severity list  
8       Severity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10      
9               Optional notes                            
10       Loss of program funding                                
11       Failure to address costs                                
12       Loss of federal funding                                
13       Insufficient funding                                
14       Failure to address undue burden                                
15       Enter custom financial consequence here          
16       Enter custom financial consequence here                                
17       Fees                                      
18 ORS 291.055 (2)(d)   Action   DAS Fee Approval        
19       Establish new fees       Does not apply        
20       Increase existing fees       Exempt under ORS 291.55(2)(d)        
21       Decrease existing fees     Exempt under ORS 291.55(2)(m)        
22                                              
23       Authority to adopt, amend or repeal fees: ORS        
24       Fiscal impact on:   Impact     Riskometer        
25       Regulated community moderate cost increase   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   ï drop down Impact list  
26       Small business (50 emp or less) unknown at this time   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   ï drop down Impact list  
27       Business and industry moderate cost increase   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   ï drop down Impact list  
28       Local governments unknown at this time   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   ï drop down Impact list  
29       Other state or federal agencies unknown at this time   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   ï drop down Impact list  
30       Public minor cost increase   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   ï drop down Impact list  
31       DEQ unknown at this time   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   ï drop down Impact list  
32       Program -Air Quality unknown at this time   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   ï drop down Impact list  
33       Custom entry no fiscal impacts   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   ï drop down Impact list  
34       Custom entry no fiscal impacts   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   ï drop down Impact list  
35                                              
36                                              
37             Fiscal impact average   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10      
38       Optional fiscal discussion        
39       Moving gasoline dispensing facilities and metal fabrication and finishing operations from permits to registration would require the cancellation of hundreds of permits and result in lost revenue. However, the lost revenue would be offset because registration would allow DEQ to stop inspecting these facilities.        
40       Invoicing system                                      
41       Develop new     CHRIS     TRAACS                  
42       Access database     HazWaste Invoicing   UST Invoice.new          
43       Access template     SWIFT     WQSIS                    
44       Custom entry     Custom entry     Custom entry        
45       Since an invoicing system is involved with this rulemaking, please consult with resource system owner early in the rulemaking process.        
46       Description        
47                
48       Include description above in:                                  
49       Committee charter         potential for moderate complexity     ï drop down Complexity list  
50       Message map       Complexity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10      
51       Proposal                                      
52       Reminders                                      
53                
54       Process improvement                                  
55 Go to Top     No minor cost increase        
56             Saturday, October 4, 2025      
57                                              

7Financial

  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W AC
1 ⧀ Summary                                              
2     8 Legal   Address federal air quality regulations in Oregon rules    
   
3                                                
4 Go to ORS     Current authority   links links          
5       ORS 468.020, 468A.025, 468A.035, 468A.040, 468A.050 and 468A.310 http://www.deq.state.or.us/regulations/statutes.htm                                
6                                          
7       Requirement                                        
8       ORS 468.020, 468A.025, 468A.035, 468A.040, 468A.050 and 468A.310 http://www.deq.state.or.us/regulations/statutes.htm                                
9                                          
10       Dependencies                                        
11                                            
12                                          
13                                                
14       Legal consequences of doing nothing   low to medium       ï drop down Severity list    
15             Severity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10          
16               Optional notes                          
17       Rules will not align with the law            
18       Risks noncompliance                                  
19       Failure to comply with Clean Water Act                                  
20       Failure to comply with Clean Air Act                                  
21       Failure to comply with Resource Conservation and Recovery Act                                  
22       Enter custom legal consequence here            
23       Enter custom legal consequence here                                  
24       Describe legal consideration                                  
25                  
26                                                
27       Include description above in:   potential for minor complexity       ï drop down Complexity list    
28       Committee charter     Complexity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10          
29       Message map                                   ï drop down charter/map/proposal  
30       Proposal                                        
31       Reminders                                        
32                  
33       Process improvement                                    
34 Go to Top                
35             Saturday, October 4, 2025        

8Legal

  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V
1 ⧀ Summary                                          
2     9 Technical   Address federal air quality regulations in Oregon rules    
 
3       Describe technical considerations                                
4       Existing databases will support implementation of this rulemaking.        
5      
Innovation		                                
6                                            
7                                          
8      
Infrastructure		                                
9                                            
10                                          
11                                            
12       Include technical considerations below in: potential for minor complexity     ï drop down Complexity list  
13       Committee charter   Complexity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   ï drop down charter/map/proposal
14       Message map                                    
15       Proposal                                    
16       Reminders                                    
17              
18       Process improvement                                
19 Go to Top              
20           Saturday, October 4, 2025      

9Technical

  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W AF AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP AQ
1 ⧀ Summary                                                                    
2     10 Policy   Address federal air quality regulations in Oregon rules    
                           
3       Describe policy considerations                                
4       Whether to delay or leave to EPA implementation of the federal standards for small boilers and stationary internal combustion engines. Whether to maintain the current permitting threshold for stationary internal combustion engines or drop it from 500 to 375 KW to align with the more significant federal standards. Registration would also be an option for engines between 375 and 500 kW.                                  
5    
Policy risks
                                                       
6          
                                                         
7                                                                    
8                                                                      
9       Include policy consideration below in:     potential for major complexity     ï drop down Complexity list                            
10       Committee charter     Complexity   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10                                
11       Message map                                 ï drop down charter/map/proposal                          
12       Proposal                                                              
13       Reminders                                                              
14                                        
15       Process improvement                                                          
16 Go to Top                                        
17           Saturday, October 4, 2025                                

10Policy

  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W AF AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP AQ
1 ⧀ Summary                                                                    
2     11 Political   Address federal air quality regulations in Oregon rules    
                           
3       Describe political considerations                              
4       To minimize the number of new permits, this rulemaking would either maintain the current permitting threshold for stationary internal combustion engines or reduce it from 500 kW to 375 kW to align with the more significant federal standards. Registration would also be an option for engines between 375 and 500 kW. There is a potential for a negative backlash from new permittees or registrants.                                  
5                                                                      
6       Include political consideration below in:     potential for minor complexity     ï drop down Complexity list                            
7       Complexity   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10                                
8                                   ï drop down charter/map/proposal                          
9       Committee charter                                                              
10       Message map                                                              
11       Proposal                                                              
12       Reminders                                                              
13                                          
14       Process improvement                                                          
15 Go to Top                                        
16           Saturday, October 4, 2025                                

11Political

  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W AF AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP AQ
1 ⧀ Summary                                                                    
2     12 Implementation Address federal air quality regulations in Oregon rules    
                           
3       Describe implementation considerations                                                        
4       The adoption of new federal requirements will trigger a requirement that affected sources obtain a permit. To minimize the number of new permits, this rulemaking would maintain the current permitting threshold for boilers and either maintain the current permitting threshold for stationary internal combustion engines or reduce it from 500 kW to 375 kW to align with the more significant federal standards. Registration would also be an option for engines between 375 and 500 kW.        
5                                                                      
6                 potential for major complexity     ï drop down Complexity list                            
7       Include description below in: Complexity   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10                                
8       Committee charter                                 ï drop down charter/map/proposal                          
9       Message map                                                              
10       Proposal                                                              
11       Reminders                                
                           
12                                          
13       Process improvement                                                          
14                                          
15 Go to Top         Saturday, October 4, 2025                                
16                                                                      

12Implementation