DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Chapter 340
Proposed Rulemaking
STATEMENT OF NEED AND FISCAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACT
Air Quality Rule Overhaul
The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) is proposing rules that would reorganize and rectify procedural permitting requirements, add requirements for areas violating standards, and repeal outdated rules.
This form accompanies a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Title of Proposed Rulemaking | Air Quality Rule Overhaul |
Statutory Authority or other Legal Authority
Statutes Implemented
| ORS 468.020, 468A.025 |
468.065, 468A.040, 468A.055, 468A.310 | |
Need for the Rule(s)
| Reorganize and Rectify Procedural Permitting Requirements: The proposed rules would move all the procedural requirements from the definitions to the appropriate rule division. They would also rectify requirements for new and modified sources that trigger the most extensive permitting requirements, making them congruent to the potential impact on the environment. Particulate Matter Permitting Requirements: DEQ is proposing rules to tighten grain loading and opacity standards based on EPA guidance and recently adopted fine particle ambient air quality standards. As a result of the new EPA standards, there are areas in Oregon where the air quality does not meet these human health based standards. Adoption of the rules will reduce emissions statewide and will help prevent future problems, especially in light of EPA’s plan to further reduce the standards. Permitting Rule Updates: In 2007, DEQ did the second phase of streamlining the Air Quality Program’s permitting process. This rulemaking proposes to further streamline and update the permitting process by clarifying requirements, eliminating duplicative and conflicting standards, keeping rules in line with federal requirements and correcting errors while maintaining equivalent environmental protection and stringency. It also repeals rules for which there are no longer sources in the state (e.g., aluminum plants, ferronickel processing plants, and sulfite pulp mills). This third phase of streamlining would make the permitting process more efficient. |
Documents Relied Upon for Rulemaking
| |
Requests for Other Options | Pursuant to ORS 183.335(2)(b)(G), DEQ requests public comment on whether other options should be considered for achieving the rule’s substantive goals while reducing negative economic impact of the rule on business. |
Fiscal and Economic Impact, Statement of Cost Compliance
|
Overview
| The proposed rules could have a fiscal and economic impact on approximately 1,256 permitted sources in addition to future applicants:
Business Type Business Size Permit Type Number
City/County Govt Large ACDP 42
City/County Govt Large Title V 2
State Government Large ACDP 22
State Government Large Title V 2
Federal Government Large ACDP 3
Federal Government Large Title V 1
Industrial Business Large ACDP 570
Industrial Business Large Title V 95
Estimated Number of Large Businesses Potentially Impacted 737
Business Type Business Size Permit Type Number
Industrial Business Small ACDP 502
Industrial Business Small Title V 17
Estimated Number of Small Businesses Potentially Impacted 519
• 117 facilities in Oregon that are permitted under the Air Quality Division’s Title V Permit Program • 1139 industrial facilities in Oregon that are permitted under the Air Quality Division’s Air Contaminant Discharge Permit (ACDP) program
|
Impacts on the General Public
| Reorganize and Rectify Procedural Permitting Requirements: DEQ does not anticipate any direct fiscal or economic impacts from the proposed rules on the general public. However, indirect fiscal or economic impacts to the public may occur through increased prices for services or products as a result of costs associated with additional control or process equipment that may be required if a source triggers NSR/PSD. DEQ expects any such price increases to be small and lacks available information upon which it could accurately estimate potential increases.
Particulate Matter Permitting Requirements: DEQ is proposing rules to tighten grain loading and opacity standards based on EPA guidance and recently adopted fine particle ambient air quality standards. As a result of the new EPA standards, there are areas in Oregon where the air quality does not meet these human health based standards. Adoption of the rules will reduce emissions statewide and will help prevent future problems, especially in light of EPA’s plan to further reduce the standards.
Permitting Rule Updates: DEQ anticipates that there will be no fiscal and economic impact on the general public as a result of the proposed rules. |
Impacts to Small Business (50 or fewer employees –ORS183.310(10)) | PM2.5 New Source Review/Prevention of Significant Deterioration and GHG PSD: DEQ anticipates that there will be a negative fiscal and economic impact on 269 small businesses because they will be required to make an initial estimate of PM2.5 and GHG emissions at time of permit renewal or modification so DEQ can incorporate emission levels into permits. These businesses have the option of assuming that PM2.5 emissions are the same as PM10 emissions (already included in their permits), eliminating any additional costs for reporting, recordkeeping or other administrative activities. GHG emissions can be estimated using a process similar to their GHG reporting requirements.
DEQ anticipates that there will be a negative fiscal and economic impact on new sources and existing sources if they make a modification to their facility that would trigger New Source Review or Prevention of Significant Deterioration. Additional costs could be incurred if the business had to add control equipment to meet control technology requirements. Sources are also required to perform computer modeling to ensure that the health standards are met and air quality in wilderness areas is not degraded. Most of the costs are the result of federal requirements and do not change as a result of adding PM2.5 and GHGs to the list of regulated pollutants in Oregon. The application fee for this type of permit is $42,000.
Reorganize and Rectify Procedural Permitting Requirements: DEQ does not anticipate any direct fiscal or economic impacts from the proposed rules on the general public. However, indirect fiscal or economic impacts to the public may occur through increased prices for services or products as a result of costs associated with additional control or process equipment that may be required if a source triggers NSR/PSD. DEQ expects any such price increases to be small and lacks available information upon which it could accurately estimate potential increases.
Particulate Matter Permitting Requirements: DEQ is proposing rules to tighten grain loading and opacity standards based on EPA guidance and recently adopted fine particle ambient air quality standards. As a result of the new EPA standards, there are areas in Oregon where the air quality does not meet these human health based standards. Adoption of the rules will reduce emissions statewide and will help prevent future problems, especially in light of EPA’s plan to further reduce the standards.
Permitting Rule Updates: DEQ anticipates that there will be no fiscal and economic impact as a result of the proposed rules. |
Cost of Compliance on Small Business (50 or fewer employees –ORS183.310(10)) | a) Estimated number of small businesses subject to the proposed rule | Currently 17 small businesses are required to hold Title V operating permits. Of the 1,139 industrial facilities holding Air Contaminant Discharge Permits, 502 of them are small businesses. |
b) Types of businesses and industries with small businesses subject to the proposed rule | There are several types of businesses and industries with small businesses that will be affected by the proposed rules. These may include asphalt manufacturing; ammonia manufacturing; chemical manufacturing; coffee roasting; commercial bakeries; commercial boilers; crematories; educational institutions; electric power generation; furniture manufacturing; food processing; hospitals; iron and steel; natural gas and oil production and processing; petroleum refining; pipe coaters; printers; sand, rock and gravel operations; seed and grain companies; synthetic resin manufacturing; and wood products manufacturing. | |
c) Projected reporting, recordkeeping and other administrative activities required by small businesses for compliance with the proposed rule, including costs of professional services | Additional costs for reporting, recordkeeping or other administrative activities are expected for approximately 269 small businesses if the amendments are adopted. These small businesses will be required to make an initial estimate of PM2.5 emissions. Businesses have the option of assuming that PM2.5 emissions are the same as PM10 emissions (already included in their permits), eliminating any additional costs for reporting, recordkeeping or other administrative activities. | |
d) The equipment, supplies, labor, and increased administration required by small businesses for compliance with the proposed rule | Additional costs for equipment, supplies, labor or administration are expected if the amendments are adopted and if the small business triggers NSR/PSD through facility modification or new construction. It is unknown how many small businesses would be affected. Most of the costs are the result of federal requirements and do not change as a result of adding PM2.5 and GHGs to the list of regulated pollutants. The application fee for this type of permit is $42,000. | |
e) A description of the manner in which DEQ involved small businesses in the development of this rulemaking | Small businesses are being informed by announcements on the DEQ website, through direct mailings and email lists, notices in the Secretary of State Bulletin, and ads in local papers. Comments are being requested during the Public Comment period and at Public Hearings held in November. DEQ staff will participate in the December Northwest Environmental Conference in Portland informing people about the rulemaking. Attendees at this conference include representatives from large and small businesses. |
_________________________________ __Jill Inahara______________________ ___09/16/2010____
Prepared by Printed name Date
_________________________________ _________________________________ __________________
Approved by DEQ Budget Office Printed name Date