|
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
J |
K |
L |
M |
N |
O |
P |
Q |
R |
S |
T |
U |
V |
W |
X |
Y |
Z |
AA |
---|
1 |
PROPOSED FOR MEETING ON: |
12-Jul-12 |
TIME NEEDED |
30 minutes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
AGENDA ITEM PROPOSED BY: |
Linda & Joanie/Andy |
PRESENTER |
Linda/AQ Rule Making Team |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
TOPIC: |
Restart Postponed Rulemaking for Air Quality Permitting Program
Overhaul Rule |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PRESENTATION TIME PREFERENCE (am/pm) |
am |
EQUIPMENT |
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
Nature of the topic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
X |
For short-term decision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
For future decision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
For information only |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
RECOMMENDED DECISION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
Restart postponed rulemaking for air quality permitting program
overhaul rule. This was one of 10 agency rulemakings put on
our Stop/Postpone list (12/13/11) to create time for the breakthroughs.
The request is to restart this rulemaking when the Permit Breakthrough
is completed and resources are available and not in competition
with the implementation of the permitting breakthrough. Staff: Jill Inahara, hours: 1600 ; other staff, Hours: 770, Manager
Oversight: 65. Reviewers 20; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
DECISIONMAKER: |
EMT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
DECISION DUE DATE: |
12-Jul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimate of hours by Task |
|
|
|
|
Initial estimate of total hours |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
This item relates to the following criteria (check all that apply): |
|
|
|
NSR/PSD |
Breakthrough |
|
Reorg |
TOTAL HOURS |
weeks |
hours/week |
total hours |
24 |
|
Completion of framework for outcome-based management (to move
to full implementation) |
|
weeks |
hours/week |
Total Hours |
weeks |
hours/week |
Total Hours |
weeks |
hours/week |
Total Hours |
|
|
|
25 |
|
High level implementation of OCBM (measures review, breakthrough
assignment and tracking) |
Jill |
18 |
30 |
540 |
4 |
5 |
20 |
35 |
28 |
980 |
1540 |
53 |
30 |
1590 |
26 |
|
Budget development and budget operation (i.e. hiring, prioritization) |
GGM |
10 |
36 |
360 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
11 |
36 |
396 |
761 |
20 |
36 |
720 |
27 |
|
Other items of agency wide significance as determined by Director
and/or Deputy Director) |
Rachel |
10 |
5 |
50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
10 |
5 |
50 |
28 |
X |
Politically significant (e.g. rulemaking) |
Tom/Uri/David |
2 |
5 |
10 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
6 |
30 |
42 |
8 |
5 |
40 |
29 |
|
Impacts multiple divisions within the agency |
Andy |
2 |
5 |
10 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
15 |
27 |
5 |
5 |
25 |
30 |
X |
Impacts agency/statewide policy |
Review Team |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
10 |
20 |
31 |
|
Impacts the legislative agenda |
|
|
Total |
972 |
|
Total |
29 |
|
Total |
1423 |
2424 |
|
TOTAL |
2445 |
32 |
X |
Involves significant resource allocation *will use existing rulemaking staff whose time is already planned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
Information items that are requested to inform a future decision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
FACTS AND INFORMATION NEEDED FOR MAKING THE DECISION |
attach as needed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
This rulemaking will include new streamlining items identified
through the Permitting Breakthrough process as well as addresses
a number of need-to-fix items in the current AQ permitting rules.
Another issue to be rolled into the rulemaking will provide
regulatory relief to small and medium -sized AQ regulated businesses
in nonattainment areas. This rule revision needs to be addressed
as soon as is practicable because the Klamath Falls attainment
plan is scheduled for adoption this December and EPA will then
have 18 months to approve it. Once the area attains the standard,
we can then submit a maintenance plan and re-designation request,
and EPA will have 18 months to approve that also. So, from approval of the attainment plan until the area is re-designated
could be five or more years. During this entire time, new and expanding point sources over
15 tons/year will need to install the most expensive control
technology and obtain offsets (which are in scarce supply).
However, our analysis shows that woodstoves are the main cause
of nonattainment - not industry. We would like to explore a rule revision that would eliminate
the offset requirement for sources that are below the federal
major level of 100 tons/year. If this option can be done in a way that does not harm the environment
and is approvable by EPA, then the Klamath Falls community and
other nonattainment communities will not have industry penalized
for woodstove smoke and will be more attractive to incoming industry.
This rulemaking is also necessary for the Lakeview area which
is actually a nonattainment area but not designated as such.
Larger new businesses and major modifications are not approvable
because they cannot show compliance with the modeling requirements
since the background concentration is already over the ambient
air standard. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
OUTCOME OR DECISION MADE (including time line) |
record decision or outcome |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
Approved |
|
Approved for Agenda by |
|
For Agenda Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
Not Approved/Reason |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|