A B C D E F G H
1 Source Permit No. Latitude Longitude Limit Major HAP Source? Control Device Needed? Comment
2 Amalgamated Sugar 23-0002 43.8756 -116.9905 40%     Unknown compliance status, currently closed
3 Ash Grove Cement 01-0029 44.5428 -117.4258 40% no   Unknown compliance status
4 Boise Cascade (Pilot Rock) 30-0016 45.4915 -118.8307 40%/0.2 no yes Backup to natural gas fired boiler. Previous test results: Boiler 1: 0.08-0.17 and 0.4% (6 tests); Boiler 3: 0.08-0.19 and 0-1% (8 tests); Boiler 4: 0.06-0.10 (4 tests)
5 Cascade Pacific Pulp 22-3501 44.3827 -123° 11' 20%/0.2   no 0.173 source test, uses mostly NG
6 Collins (Fremont Sawmill) 19-0002 42.1832 -123.1605 20%/0.1 no Multiclone Most recent test results are 0.13 for boiler 1 and 0.09 for boiler 2.
7 Columbia Forest Products 18-0014 42.1791 -121.7996 20%/0.2 (KFalls rules) no Multiclone-BLR-S; no controls-BLR-N Previous test results: BLR-S: 0.08 - 0.19 (11 tests); 5 - 17% (10 tests); BLR-N: 0.09 - 0.14 (3 tests); 1 - 5% (3 tests)
8 Frank Lumber 22-2525 44.7491 -122.504 40%/0.2 no ESP 0.137 source test
9         20%/0.2 no yes - BH Unknown compliance status for grain loading
10 Harney Rock and Paving 13-0010 43.5802 -119.0485 40%/0.2 no wet scrubber 19% and 0.22 (1999 source test)
11 Interfor Pacific 18-0005 43.4782 -121.691 40%/0.2 no yes Common stack - can comply with 20% and 0.1 during normal operations Last test results: Boiler 1 - 6% and 0.11; Boiler 2 - 2% and 0.07
12 KF Jacobsen Asphalt 26-1764 45.5391 -122.6799 40%/0.2   Inefficient baghouse Currently in enforcement, moving to standard permit to monitor compliance
13 RSG Forest Products 03-1791 45.1904 -122.5872 405/0.2     ? (Grunow)
14 Rogers Asphalt Paving 31-0001 45.3417 -1180438 20%/0.2     0.11 source test
15 Stimson Lumber Clatskanie 05-1777 46.0005 -123.122 0.2     Okay for opacity, unknown compliance status for grain loading
16 Swanson Group Roseburg 10-0030 43.181 -123.3656 40 %/0.2   yes Source test in 2009: 0.384; $800,000 for ESP
17 Swanson Group (LRAPA) 20-7510 44.0413 -123.0015 20%/0.2 no multiclone 5% and 0.115; $2.3MM for ESP
18 Umpqua Lumber 10-0027 43.0833 -123.3667 20%   yes Currently closed
19 Hampton Lumber 04-0041 46.173 -123.9156 20%/0.10     Trouble meeting 0.10, currently closed

Sources

  A B
1 Potential PM2.5 Nonattainment Areas Area defined?
2 Areas above 35 ug/m3:  
3 Klamath Falls "Klamath Falls NAA"
4 Oakridge “Oakridge UGB”
5 Lakeview "Lakeview UGB"
7 Areas above 25 ug/m3:  
8 Portland “Portland AQMA”
9 Sweet Home (neph data) https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1794/10519/FINAL_Sweet_Home_BLI.pdf?sequence=1
10 Eugene/Springfield Eugene-Springfield UGB
11 Grants Pass "Grants Pass UGB"
12 Medford “Medford-Ashland Air Quality Maintenance Area”
13 Prineville http://www.cityofprineville.com/assets/doc/colibrary/Ordinance_No._1193_-_Adjusting_the_Prineville_UBG_and_Comp_Plan_&_Zone_Change.pdf
14 John Day (neph data) http://www.oregon.gov//ODOT/TD/TDATA/gis/docs/citymaps/John_Day.pdf
15 Burns http://maps.google.com/maps?ie=UTF-8&hl=en&tab=wl
17 Areas above 20 ug/m3:  
18 Salem (neph data) “Salem-Keizer Area Transportation Study”
19 Albany (neph data) http://www.cityofalbany.net/images/stories/planning/comp_plan/11_Maps.pdf
20 Cottage Grove http://www.lanecounty.org/BCC_Info/Meeting_Info/2011/OrderText/4-13/Passed/PA1279.pdf
21 Pendleton http://pendleton.or.us/sites/pendleton.or.us/files/File/community_development/planning_dept/periodic_review/2012-06-28_Tech_Memo_5.2_-_Potential_Public_Designations_and_Maps.pdf
22 Baker City (neph data) http://library.state.or.us/repository/2009/200906020854062/ODOT_TD_TDATA_gis_docs_citymaps_Baker_City.pdf

Potential NAAs