A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DIVISION |
REDLINE/ STRIKEOUT |
SUMMARY TABLE | CROSS REFERENCES | ANNOTATE | the Department | 40 CFR | GGMK REVIEW | MISC NOTES |
2 | CHECK DATE (2014) ON CMM AND SSM | ||||||||
3 | 200 | done | NA | done | see rules and summary table | ||||
4 | 200 tables | NA | SIGNIFICANT EMISSION RATES FOR AREAS VIOLATING FEDERAL NAAQS - WHY? | ||||||
5 | 202 | done | done | done | done | done | done | need new # 0225 | |
6 | 202 tables | done | done | done | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
7 | 204 | done | done | done | NA | done | done | need new # 0300, talk to Rachel about NAA and maintenance area definitions | |
8 | 206 | done | done | done | NA | done | done | NA | |
9 | 208 | fix 2 excepts in opacity rule | finish 40% story - why are we deleting this standard? | done | NA | decide on exemption from statewide rules; | |||
10 | 30 second opacity | delete? | |||||||
11 | add Boiler NESHAP FR date to extension | decide on compliance deferral language (4) or (5); Limit to special control areas? | |||||||
12 | delete masking? | ||||||||
13 | 450 - particle fallout limitation | DOES THIS CROSS REFERENCE TO DIVISION 202 COVER THIS PROBLEM? FRANK’S ISSUE ON WHAT IS SUFFICIENT DURATION AND QUANTIYT? | |||||||
14 | need story on process weight rule | George? | |||||||
15 | 209 | 0070 informational meetings | NA | NA | done | NA | decide if we want to require sources to do this | ||
16 | 210 | 230(1)(o) | done | NA | done | delete LUCS requirement for NCs? | |||
17 | 240(1) | done | NA | done | NA | [Note: In non-attainment areas and maintenance areas, Type 4 changes may be subject to OAR 340 division 224, New Source Review. In attainment areas, Type 4 changes may be subject to OAR 340-224-0070, Prevention of Significant Deterioration, only if the source would be a federal major source after making the change.] ARE WE SUPPOSED TO HAVE "NOTES" IN OUR RULES? | |||
18 | 212 | figure out what to do with the SSM and CMM. | |||||||
19 | done | NA | done | done | Where to find the latest CFR dates? JULY 1, 2012 FOR ALL CFR REFERENCES (EXCEPT 238 AND 244 – JERRY) | ||||
20 | 214 | done | done | done | NA | done | NA | NA | |
21 | 216 | 0064(4)(d) | done | NA | done | NA | extend duration of simple permits? | ||
22 | 216 tables | Table 1Part B 28. | NA | NA | emergency generators over a certain size (or combined size) need to get permit rather than using the emissions | ||||
23 | Table 1 Part B 37 and 38 | grain elevators | |||||||
24 | Table 1 part C 4b. | done | NA | NA | GRUNOW: Part C: item 4.b. requires all sources subject to a RACT, BACT, LAER, NESHAP, NSPS, State MACT, or other significant Air Quality regulation, with > 10 tons/yr. actual emissions have a Standard ACDP (unless exempted elsewhere - see below). The history of this criteria may be the old Minimal Source ACDP threshold. Regional offices likely have sources operating with Simple permits that actually should have Standard permits under this requirement. This is especially true now with the advent of the area source NESHAPs for which many of our sources are now subject. I suggest that we cut this requirement from the rule and make the Simple/Standard applicability distinction based on IMD or policy statement. | ||||
25 | 218 | done | NA | done | NA | Allow us to include area source NESHAP general permit attachments to TV permits | |||
26 | 220 | done | done | NA | NA | done | NA | Have Andrea make these changes? | |
27 | 222 | ||||||||
28 | 224 | ||||||||
29 | 225 | done | |||||||
30 | 226 | done | done | NA |
(0120) Can you add ammonia slip as something to consider a rule
change on? Ammonia isn’t a regulated pollutant, but typically
a limit on ammonia slip is set in PSD permits when an SCR control
system is used. However, it’s not clear what authority we have
to set such a limit. Might be worth clarifying. statewide general vs industry specific? FIGURE OUT STORY FOR OPACITY AND GRAIN LOADING, EJ? |
||||
31 | 226 tables | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | Repeal for process weight? | |
32 | 228 | NA | done | NA | see rules and summary table | ||||
33 | 230 | done | done | NA | NA | done | done | decide on definition of CFR...move to 200? | |
34 | 232 | NA | NA | done | NA |
renumber defintions; CFR dates? |
|||
35 | 234 | done | NA | done | NA |
Continual monitoring definition – combine into one with continuous
monitoring? SEE RULES |
|||
36 | 236 | NA | NA | done | Jerry? | see rules and summary table | |||
37 | 240 | see rule | NA | done | NA | see rules and summary table | |||
38 | 242 | done | done | NA | done | NA | spray paint rules - Carrie Ann for repeal analysis | ||
39 | 258 | done | done | done | NA | done | done | NA | |
40 | 268 | done | NA | done | NA | see rules and summary table |
A | B | C | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | TOPIC | STORY FOR EPA | POWER POINT |
2 | Rule Restructure | ||
3 | Repeal 40% and 0.2 gr/dscf and add zeros | ||
4 | Delete 3-minute aggregate opacity limit and use 6-minute averages | ||
5 | Exempt sources with specific standards from general statewide grain loading/opacity standards | ||
6 | PSD 18-month extensions for good cause | ||
7 | Restructure nonattainment and maintenance NSR for non-federal majors - two separate programs for federal majors and non-federal majors | ||
8 | Net Air Quality Benefit | ||
9 | Areas violating NAAQS but not yet designated NAA | ||
10 | Attainment Plan/Maintenance Plan Bridge |