August 30, 2012
Dennis McLerran
Regional Administrator
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
1200 Sixth Avenue, RA-140
Seattle, WA 98101
Dear Mr. McLerran:
This submittal is to update Oregon’s Title V Program with rules adopted by the Environmental Quality Commission on April 21, 2011. The Oregon Administrative Rules added PM2.5 and greenhouse gases as regulated pollutants to our Title V program. Attachments including a cover memo to the EQC, redline version of the rule, public notice, and Secretary of State filing have been forwarded to Lucita Valiere. This submittal implements Item IV, Operating Permit program Updates, of the Title V Implementation Agreement between Oregon and EPA. The table that highlights the rule changes relied upon to implement our Title V program is attached. We would appreciate it if you could also process and approve the October 17, 2008 Title V Program update (cover letter attached) along with this submittal.
The staff contacts for this submittal are Jill Inahara, Program Operations, at 503-229-5001, and Nicole Vick, SIP Coordinator, at (503) 229-5946.
Sincerely,
Dick Pedersen
Director
cc w/attachments: Lucita Valiere, EPA, Region 10
cc w/o attachments: Nicole Vick, DEQ AQ SIP Coordinator
Andrew Ginsburg, DEQ AQ Administrator
Paul Koprowski, EPA Oregon Operations office
Attachments:
Attachment 1: Summary of Title V Program Rule Changes
Attachment 2: Staff Report, Agenda Item D of the April 2-21, 2011 EQC Meeting
Attachment 3: Provisions Submitted for Approval
Attachment 4: Public Notice and Adoption Documents
Public notice in the Secretary of State’s Oregon Bulletin April 01, 2007
Certificate and Order for Filing Permanent Administrative Rules, filed November 08, 2007.
Attachment 5: Compilation of Public Comments and Department’s Response
Presiding Officer’s Report for Rulemaking Hearings dated May 01, 2007
Summary of Public Comment and Agency Response dated February 28, 2011
Attachment 6: Cover Letter for 2008 Title V Program Update Submittal
Attachment 1
Summary of April 21, 2011Title V Program Rule Changes
Division 200 – General Air Pollution Definitions – was changed to add the definition of greenhouse gases and modify the definition of regulated air pollutant. Changes were also made to definitions that are used in our Prevention of Significant Deterioration program to include greenhouse gases. Division 224 – Major New Source Review – was changed to incorporate greenhouse gases into our Prevention of Significant Deterioration program.
Rule Number | Rule | Reason for Change |
OAR 340-200-0020(3) | Definition of “actual emissions” | Add GHGs |
OAR 340-200-0020(7) | Definition of “aggregate insignificant emissions” | Add GHGs and PM2.5 |
OAR 340-200-0020(13) | Definition of “baseline emission rate” | Add GHGs and exemption for PM2.5 |
OAR 340-200-0020(14) | Definition of “baseline period” | Add GHGs |
OAR 340-200-0020(16) | Add definition of “biomass” | Added to provide biomass exemption |
OAR 340-200-0020(19) | Add definition of “carbon dioxide equivalent” | Needed for units of measurement for GHGs |
OAR 340-200-0020(55) | Definition of “federal major source” | Add GHGs |
OAR 340-200-0020(60) | Definition of “greenhouse gases” | Add GHGs |
OAR 340-200-0020(71) | Definition of “major source” | Add GHGs |
OAR 340-200-0020(96) | Definition of “PM2.5” | Add precursors |
OAR 340-200-0020(105) | Definition of “regulated air pollutant” | Add GHGs |
340-224-0010(5) through (7) | Major New Source Review Applicability and General Prohibitions | Add GHGs to the PSD program for “anyways” sources and for new federal major sources |
Attachment 2
Staff Report
State of Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality Memorandum
Date: July 28, 2010
To: Environmental Quality Commission
From: Dick Pedersen, Director
Subject: Agenda item N, Temporary rule adoption: PM2.5 New Source Review/Prevention of Significant Deterioration/Air Contaminant Discharge Permit Deferral
August 18-19, 2010 EQC meeting
Why is this important | EPA is planning to revoke a policy that has deferred application of preconstruction permitting requirements for major new or modified sources of PM2.5, or fine particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter. These proposed temporary rules include the basic program elements needed by DEQ to implement the preconstruction permitting program for PM2.5.
In addition, the EQC has recently adopted new federal standards that reduce hazardous air pollutant emissions from a large number of small sources, many of which are subject to permitting for the first time. This has resulted in a large number of permit applications that need to be submitted and processed at the same time. These proposed temporary rules would allow DEQ to phase-in the permitting requirements by source category and allow for more timely and efficient processing of applications. |
DEQ recommendation and EQC motion | DEQ recommends that the commission adopt the statement of need and justification for temporary rules as shown in Attachment D, and adopt amendments to OAR 340, Divisions 200, 202, 216, 224 and 225 as shown in Attachment A. |
Background and need for rulemaking | New Source Review/Prevention of Significant Deterioration
In 1997, EPA adopted the first National Ambient Air Quality Standards for PM2.5 based on the link between fine particulate matter and serious health problems ranging from increased respiratory and pulmonary symptoms, hospital admissions and emergency room visits to premature death for people with heart and lung disease. Once EPA adopted these standards, major new and modified sources of PM2.5 became subject to the New Source Review/Prevention of Significant Deterioration program.
However, due to a lack of tools and procedures needed to implement NSR/PSD for PM2.5, EPA adopted a PM10 Surrogate Policy covering particulate matter less than or equal to 10 micrometers in diameter. The policy enabled sources to demonstrate compliance with PSD/NSR using PM10 as a surrogate for PM2.5. Recently, EPA determined that undertaking a PM2.5 analysis is no longer constrained by technical challenges that included a lack of PM2.5 monitoring sites, tools to calculate PM2.5 emissions and related precursors, and modeling techniques to project ambient impacts. As a result, EPA plans to revoke the PM10 surrogate policy.
NSR/PSD is a pre-construction permitting program that serves two important purposes: 1. It ensures air quality is maintained when factories, industrial boilers and power plants are built or modified. 2. It also ensures that state-of-the art emission control technology is installed at new plants or existing plants that are undergoing a major modification.
If a major source makes a change at its facility that increases emissions above a threshold, the owner or operator must go through NSR/PSD to make sure the source is not causing additional air quality problems. NSR ensures that major new and modified sources help improve air quality in designated areas that violate ambient air quality standards. PSD ensures that major new and modified sources do not cause significant worsening of air quality in areas that meet ambient air quality standards.
There are about 115 major sources in Oregon including businesses such as pulp and paper, steel mills, wood products, electronics, and power generation. The NSR/PSD analysis includes a review of control technology, modeling air quality impacts and assessing impacts on soils, vegetation and visibility. This could result in a need to install new emission controls. The fee for this type of permit is $42,000 and can take at least seven months to process.
EPA’s pending revocation of the PM10 Surrogate Policy creates a problem since Oregon has not yet adopted rules needed to implement the NSR/PSD program for PM2.5. There is no threshold, or significant emission rate, for PM2.5 in Oregon’s rules, so any increase in permitted PM2.5 emissions would trigger the extensive PSD/NSR analysis. This would cause a considerable increase in workload for the regulated community and DEQ with no appreciable environmental benefit. These proposed rule changes prevent these problems by adopting EPA’s PM2.5 PSD thresholds and other NSR/PSD implementing rules.
Area Source NESHAP Permitting
DEQ is in the process of permitting sources newly subject to federal area source National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants. In December 2009, the commission adopted new area source NESHAP rules, which apply to a large number of small hazardous air pollutant emission sources that collectively contribute to significant public health risks. To ensure compliance with the NESHAPs, the rules require over one thousand businesses to obtain an air quality permit, many of which are subject to permitting for the first time.
The current rules allow DEQ to defer the deadline to apply for these permits until October 2010, and to defer the deadline to obtain these permits until December 2010. However, the commission’s rules allow sources to apply as late 60 days before the permit issuance deadlines. As a result, hundreds of sources could apply for their permits in October 2010. DEQ lacks the permitting resources to process and issue hundreds of new permit applications in two months, and therefore many sources would not receive their permits by December 2010 as required by law. The NESHAP permit application overload could prevent DEQ permitting staff from completing the remainder of its permit work in a timely fashion.
The proposed temporary rule would alleviate these potential problems by allowing DEQ to phase-in permit application deadlines by source category, so that not all source categories would submit their applications at the same time and overwhelm DEQ’s capacity to process them. |
Effect of rule
| The proposed temporary rule amendments would adopt a significant emission rate, or threshold, of 10 tons per year of PM2.5. A facility would not need to go through the New Source Review/Prevention of Significant Deterioration permitting process unless the company made a physical change that increased emissions above this threshold. The proposed amendments would also adopt significant air quality impact levels (used to determine if additional air quality analysis is required), PSD increments (used to track the cumulative impact of emissions growth in areas that meet air quality standards), and significant monitoring concentrations for PM2.5 (used to determine if preconstruction monitoring is required). The proposal would allow businesses to continue to use the PM10 Surrogate Policy until it is revoked by EPA. These changes are needed for DEQ to implement the New Source Review/Prevention of Significant Deterioration program for PM2.5 without causing an excessive burden for both DEQ and regulated businesses.
The proposed temporary rulemaking would also allow DEQ to defer the requirement for certain sources subject to new air quality standards to submit an application for, or to obtain, an Air Contaminant Discharge Permit for up to twelve months, as compared to six months allowed in the current rules.
A summary of rule changes, including the reason or basis for each change, is shown in Attachment B. |
Commission authority | The commission has authority to take this action under ORS 468.020, ORS 468.065, ORS 468A.025, ORS 468A.040, and ORS 468A.055. |
Stakeholder involvement
| DEQ held a public meeting to discuss the proposed PM2.5 permitting rule changes and the Air Contaminant Discharge Permit application deferral on July 19, 2010. Stakeholders including permit holders and people interested in air quality rulemakings were invited. Comments on the proposed temporary rules were accepted at the meeting and by email. |
Public comment
| A temporary rulemaking does not require a public comment period; however, DEQ accepted comment on the temporary rulemaking during the July 19 stakeholder meeting. Attachment C summarizes public comment. |
Key issues | The proposed rule amendments would help DEQ and businesses implement New Source Review/Prevention of Significant Deterioration as EPA intended. It would also allow DEQ to defer permitting deadlines for up to twelve months, thus allowing DEQ to phase-in permitting requirements by source category, so that DEQ permitting staff members are not overwhelmed by permit applications that are submitted just before the single application deadline for all sources, and that DEQ cannot process timely and as needed by sources. |
Next steps | If adopted, the proposed temporary rule amendments would become effective upon filing with the Secretary of State and would be effective for no more than 180 days. Training will be needed to implement the proposed rule. In February 2011, DEQ will propose a permanent PM2.5 New Source Review/Prevention of Significant Deterioration rule. Also in February 2011, DEQ will propose to make the twelve-month permitting deferral permanent. |
Attachments | A. Proposed rule (with amendments shown in redline format) B. Summary of Rule Changes (including reason/basis for changes) C. Public comments D. Statement of Need and Justification
|
Available upon request | 1. ORS 468.020, ORS 468.065, ORS 468A.025, ORS 468A.040, and ORS 468A.055.
|
Approved:
Division: ____________________________
Andrew Ginsburg
Section: ____________________________
Uri Papish
Report prepared by: Jill Inahara
Phone: (503) 229-5001
Attachment 3
Provisions Submitted for Approval
DIVISION 200
GENERAL AIR POLLUTION
PROCEDURES AND DEFINITIONS
340-200-0020
General Air Quality Definitions
As used in divisions 200 through 268, unless specifically defined otherwise:
(1) "Act" or "FCAA" means the Federal Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.A. 7401 to 7671q.
(2) "Activity" means any process, operation, action, or reaction (e.g., chemical) at a source that emits a regulated pollutant.
(3) "Actual emissions" means the mass emissions of a pollutant from an emissions source during a specified time period.
(a) For determining actual emissions as of the baseline period:
(A) Except as provided in paragraphs (B) and (C) of this subsection and subsection (b) of this section, actual emissions equal the average rate at which the source actually emitted the pollutant during an applicable baseline period and that represents normal source operation;
(B) The Department presumes that the source-specific mass emissions limit included in a source's permit that was effective on September 8, 1981 is equivalent to the source's actual emissions during the applicable baseline period if it is within 10% of the actual emissions calculated under paragraph (A) of this subsection.
(C) Actual emissions equal the potential to emit of the source for the sources listed in paragraphs (i) through (iii) of this paragraph. The actual emissions will be reset if required in accordance with subsection (c) of this section.
(i) Any source or part of a source that had not begun normal operations during the applicable baseline period but was approved to construct and operate before or during the baseline period in accordance with OAR 340 division 210, or
(ii) Any source or part of a source of greenhouse gases that had not begun normal operations prior to January 1, 2010, but was approved to construct and operate prior to January 1, 2011 in accordance with OAR 340 division 210, or
(iii) Any source or part of a source that had not begun normal operations during the applicable baseline period and was not required to obtain approval to construct and operate before or during the applicable baseline period.
(b) For any source or part of a source that had not begun normal operations during the applicable baseline period, but was approved to construct and operate in accordance with OAR 340 division 224, actual emissions on the date the permit is issued equal the potential to emit of the source. The actual emissions will be reset if required in accordance with subsection (c) of this section.
(c) Where actual emissions equal potential to emit under paragraph (a)(C) or subsection (b) of this section, the potential emissions will be reset to actual emissions as follows:
(A) Paragraphs (A) through (D) of this subsection apply to sources whose actual emissions of greenhouse gases were determined pursuant paragraph 3(a)(C), and to all other sources of all other regulated pollutants that are permitted in accordance with OAR division 224 on or after May 1, 2011.
(B) Except as provided in paragraph (D) of this subsection, ten years from the end of the applicable baseline period under paragraph (a)(C) or ten years from the date the permit is issued under subsection (b), or an earlier time if requested by the source in a permit application involving public notice, the Department will reset actual emissions to equal the highest actual emission rate during any consecutive 12-month period during the ten year period or any shorter period if requested by the source.
(C) Any emission reductions achieved due to enforceable permit conditions based on OAR 340-226-0110 and 0120 (highest and best practicable treatment and control) are not included in the reset calculation required in paragraph (B) of this subsection.
(D) The Department may extend the date of resetting by five additional years upon satisfactory demonstration by the source that construction is ongoing or normal operation has not yet been achieved.
(d) For determining actual emissions for Emission Statements under OAR 340-214-0200 through 340-214-0220 and Oregon Title V Operating Permit Fees under OAR 340 division 220, actual emissions include, but are not limited to, routine process emissions, fugitive emissions, excess emissions from maintenance, startups and shutdowns, equipment malfunction, and other activities, except categorically insignificant activities and secondary emissions.
(e) For Oregon Title V Operating Permit Fees under OAR 340 division 220, actual emissions must be directly measured with a continuous monitoring system or calculated using a material balance or verified emission factor determined in accordance with division 220 in combination with the source's actual operating hours, production rates, or types of materials processed, stored, or combusted during the specified time period.
(4) "Adjacent" means interdependent facilities that are nearby to each other.
(5) "Affected source" means a source that includes one or more affected units that are subject to emission reduction requirements or limitations under Title IV of the FCAA.
(6) "Affected states" means all states:
(a) Whose air quality may be affected by a proposed permit, permit modification, or permit renewal and that are contiguous to Oregon; or
(b) That are within 50 miles of the permitted source.
(7) "Aggregate insignificant emissions" means the annual actual emissions of any regulated air pollutant from one or more designated activities at a source that are less than or equal to the lowest applicable level specified in this section. The total emissions from each designated activity and the aggregate emissions from all designated activities must be less than or equal to the lowest applicable level specified.
(a) One ton for total reduced sulfur, hydrogen sulfide, sulfuric acid mist, any Class I or II substance subject to a standard promulgated under or established by Title VI of the Act, and each criteria pollutant, except lead;
(b) 120 pounds for lead;
(c) 600 pounds for fluoride;
(d) 500 pounds for PM10 in a PM10 nonattainment area;
(e) 500 pounds for direct PM2.5 in a PM2.5 nonattainment area;
(f) The lesser of the amount established in OAR 340-244-0040, Table 1 or 340-244-0230, Table 3, or 1,000 pounds;
(g) An aggregate of 5,000 pounds for all Hazardous Air Pollutants;
(h) 2,756 tons CO2e for greenhouse gases.
(8) "Air Contaminant" means a dust, fume, gas, mist, odor, smoke, vapor, pollen, soot, carbon, acid or particulate matter, or any combination thereof.
(9) "Air Contaminant Discharge Permit" or "ACDP" means a written permit issued, renewed, amended, or revised by the Department, pursuant to OAR 340 division 216.
(10) "Alternative method" means any method of sampling and analyzing for an air pollutant that is not a reference or equivalent method but has been demonstrated to the Department's satisfaction to, in specific cases, produce results adequate for determination of compliance. An alternative method used to meet an applicable federal requirement for which a reference method is specified must be approved by EPA unless EPA has delegated authority for the approval to the Department.
(11) "Ambient Air" means that portion of the atmosphere, external to buildings, to which the general public has access.
(12) "Applicable requirement" means all of the following as they apply to emissions units in an Oregon Title V Operating Permit program source or ACDP program source, including requirements that have been promulgated or approved by the EPA through rule making at the time of issuance but have future-effective compliance dates:
(a) Any standard or other requirement provided for in the applicable implementation plan approved or promulgated by the EPA through rulemaking under Title I of the Act that implements the relevant requirements of the Act, including any revisions to that plan promulgated in 40 CFR Part 52;
(b) Any standard or other requirement adopted under OAR 340-200-0040 of the State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan, that is more stringent than the federal standard or requirement which has not yet been approved by the EPA, and other state-only enforceable air pollution control requirements;
(c) Any term or condition in an ACDP, OAR 340 division 216, including any term or condition of any preconstruction permits issued pursuant to OAR 340 division 224, New Source Review, until or unless the Department revokes or modifies the term or condition by a permit modification;
(d) Any term or condition in a Notice of Construction and Approval of Plans, OAR 340-210-0205 through 340-210-0240, until or unless the Department revokes or modifies the term or condition by a Notice of Construction and Approval of Plans or a permit modification;
(e) Any term or condition in a Notice of Approval, OAR 340-218-0190, issued before July 1, 2001, until or unless the Department revokes or modifies the term or condition by a Notice of Approval or a permit modification;
(f) Any term or condition of a PSD permit issued by the EPA until or unless the EPA revokes or modifies the term or condition by a permit modification;
(g) Any standard or other requirement under section 111 of the Act, including section 111(d);
(h) Any standard or other requirement under section 112 of the Act, including any requirement concerning accident prevention under section 112(r)(7) of the Act;
(i) Any standard or other requirement of the acid rain program under Title IV of the Act or the regulations promulgated thereunder;
(j) Any requirements established pursuant to section 504(b) or section 114(a)(3) of the Act;
(k) Any standard or other requirement under section 126(a)(1) and(c) of the Act;
(l) Any standard or other requirement governing solid waste incineration, under section 129 of the Act;
(m) Any standard or other requirement for consumer and commercial products, under section 183(e) of the Act;
(n) Any standard or other requirement for tank vessels, under section 183(f) of the Act;
(o) Any standard or other requirement of the program to control air pollution from outer continental shelf sources, under section 328 of the Act;
(p) Any standard or other requirement of the regulations promulgated to protect stratospheric ozone under Title VI of the Act, unless the Administrator has determined that such requirements need not be contained in an Oregon Title V Operating Permit; and
(q) Any national ambient air quality standard or increment or visibility requirement under part C of Title I of the Act, but only as it would apply to temporary sources permitted pursuant to section 504(e) of the Act.
(13) "Baseline Emission Rate" means the actual emission rate during a baseline period. Baseline emission rate does not include increases due to voluntary fuel switches or increased hours of operation that occurred after that baseline period.
(a) A baseline emission rate will be established only for regulated pollutants subject to OAR 340 division 224 as specified in the definition of regulated pollutant. A baseline emission rate will not be established for PM2.5.
(b) The baseline emission rate for greenhouse gases, on a CO2e basis, will be established with the first permitting action issued after July 1, 2011, provided the permitting action involved a public notice period that began after July 1, 2011.
(c) For a pollutant that becomes a regulated pollutant subject to OAR 340 division 224 after May 1, 2011, the initial baseline emission rate is the actual emissions of that pollutant during any consecutive 12 month period within the 24 months immediately preceding its designation as a regulated pollutant if a baseline period has not been defined for the pollutant.
(d) The baseline emission rate will be recalculated if actual emissions are reset in accordance with the definition of actual emissions.
(e) Once the baseline emission rate has been established or recalculated in accordance with subsection (d) of this section, the production basis for the baseline emission rate may only be changed if a material mistake or an inaccurate statement was made in establishing the production basis for baseline emission rate.
(14) "Baseline Period" means:
(a) Any consecutive 12 calendar month period during the calendar years 1977 or 1978 for any regulated pollutant other than greenhouse gases. The Department may allow the use of a prior time period upon a determination that it is more representative of normal source operation.
(b) Any consecutive 12 calendar month period during the calendar years 2000 through 2010 for greenhouse gases.
(15) "Best Available Control Technology" or "BACT" means an emission limitation, including, but not limited to, a visible emission standard, based on the maximum degree of reduction of each air contaminant subject to regulation under the Act which would be emitted from any proposed major source or major modification which, on a case-by-case basis, taking into account energy, environmental, and economic impacts and other costs, is achievable for such source or modification through application of production processes or available methods, systems, and techniques, including fuel cleaning or treatment or innovative fuel combustion techniques for control of such air contaminant. In no event may the application of BACT result in emissions of any air contaminant that would exceed the emissions allowed by any applicable new source performance standard or any standard for hazardous air pollutant. If an emission limitation is not feasible, a design, equipment, work practice, or operational standard, or combination thereof, may be required. Such standard must, to the degree possible, set forth the emission reduction achievable and provide for compliance by prescribing appropriate permit conditions.
(16) “Biomass” means non-fossilized and biodegradable organic material originating from plants, animals, and micro-organisms, including products, byproducts, residues and waste from agriculture, forestry, and related industries as well as the non-fossilized and biodegradable organic fractions of industrial and municipal wastes, including gases and liquids recovered from the decomposition of non-fossilized and biodegradable organic matter.
(17) "Capacity" means the maximum regulated pollutant emissions from a stationary source under its physical and operational design.
(18) "Capture system" means the equipment (including but not limited to hoods, ducts, fans, and booths) used to contain, capture and transport a pollutant to a control device.
(19) “Carbon dioxide equivalent” or “CO2e” means an amount of a greenhouse gas or gases expressed as the equivalent amount of carbon dioxide, and shall be computed by multiplying the mass of each of the greenhouse gases by the global warming potential published for each gas at 40 CFR Part 98, subpart A, Table A–1—Global Warming Potentials, and adding the resulting value for each greenhouse gas to compute the total equivalent amount of carbon dioxide. (20) "Categorically insignificant activity" means any of the following listed pollutant emitting activities principally supporting the source or the major industrial group. Categorically insignificant activities must comply with all applicable requirements.
(a) Constituents of a chemical mixture present at less than 1% by weight of any chemical or compound regulated under divisions 200 through 268 excluding divisions 248 and 262 of this chapter, or less than 0.1% by weight of any carcinogen listed in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service's Annual Report on Carcinogens when usage of the chemical mixture is less than 100,000 pounds/year;
(b) Evaporative and tail pipe emissions from on-site motor vehicle operation;
(c) Distillate oil, kerosene, and gasoline fuel burning equipment rated at less than or equal to 0.4 million Btu/hr;
(d) Natural gas and propane burning equipment rated at less than or equal to 2.0 million Btu/hr;
(e) Office activities;
(f) Food service activities;
(g) Janitorial activities;
(h) Personal care activities;
(i) Groundskeeping activities including, but not limited to building painting and road and parking lot maintenance;
(j) On-site laundry activities;
(k) On-site recreation facilities;
(l) Instrument calibration;
(m) Maintenance and repair shop;
(n) Automotive repair shops or storage garages;
(o) Air cooling or ventilating equipment not designed to remove air contaminants generated by or released from associated equipment;
(p) Refrigeration systems with less than 50 pounds of charge of ozone depleting substances regulated under Title VI, including pressure tanks used in refrigeration systems but excluding any combustion equipment associated with such systems;
(q) Bench scale laboratory equipment and laboratory equipment used exclusively for chemical and physical analysis, including associated vacuum producing devices but excluding research and development facilities;
(r) Temporary construction activities;
(s) Warehouse activities;
(t) Accidental fires;
(u) Air vents from air compressors;
(v) Air purification systems;
(w) Continuous emissions monitoring vent lines;
(x) Demineralized water tanks;
(y) Pre-treatment of municipal water, including use of deionized water purification systems;
(z) Electrical charging stations;
(aa) Fire brigade training;
(bb) Instrument air dryers and distribution;
(cc) Process raw water filtration systems;
(dd) Pharmaceutical packaging;
(ee) Fire suppression;
(ff) Blueprint making;
(gg) Routine maintenance, repair, and replacement such as anticipated activities most often associated with and performed during regularly scheduled equipment outages to maintain a plant and its equipment in good operating condition, including but not limited to steam cleaning, abrasive use, and woodworking;
(hh) Electric motors;
(ii) Storage tanks, reservoirs, transfer and lubricating equipment used for ASTM grade distillate or residual fuels, lubricants, and hydraulic fluids;
(jj) On-site storage tanks not subject to any New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), including underground storage tanks (UST), storing gasoline or diesel used exclusively for fueling of the facility's fleet of vehicles;
(kk) Natural gas, propane, and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) storage tanks and transfer equipment;
(ll) Pressurized tanks containing gaseous compounds;
(mm) Vacuum sheet stacker vents;
(nn) Emissions from wastewater discharges to publicly owned treatment works (POTW) provided the source is authorized to discharge to the POTW, not including on-site wastewater treatment and/or holding facilities;
(oo) Log ponds;
(pp) Storm water settling basins;
(qq) Fire suppression and training;
(rr) Paved roads and paved parking lots within an urban growth boundary;
(ss) Hazardous air pollutant emissions of fugitive dust from paved and unpaved roads except for those sources that have processes or activities that contribute to the deposition and entrainment of hazardous air pollutants from surface soils;
(tt) Health, safety, and emergency response activities;
(uu) Emergency generators and pumps used only during loss of primary equipment or utility service due to circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the owner or operator, or to address a power emergency as determined by the Department;
(vv) Non-contact steam vents and leaks and safety and relief valves for boiler steam distribution systems;
(ww) Non-contact steam condensate flash tanks;
(xx) Non-contact steam vents on condensate receivers, deaerators and similar equipment;
(yy) Boiler blowdown tanks;
(zz) Industrial cooling towers that do not use chromium-based water treatment chemicals;
(aaa) Ash piles maintained in a wetted condition and associated handling systems and activities;
(bbb) Oil/water separators in effluent treatment systems;
(ccc) Combustion source flame safety purging on startup;
(ddd) Broke beaters, pulp and repulping tanks, stock chests and pulp handling equipment, excluding thickening equipment and repulpers;
(eee) Stock cleaning and pressurized pulp washing, excluding open stock washing systems; and
(fff) White water storage tanks.
(21) "Certifying individual" means the responsible person or official authorized by the owner or operator of a source who certifies the accuracy of the emission statement.
(22) "CFR" means Code of Federal Regulations.
(23) "Class I area" means any Federal, State or Indian reservation land which is classified or reclassified as Class I area. Class I areas are identified in OAR 340-204-0050.
(24) "Commence" or "commencement" means that the owner or operator has obtained all necessary preconstruction approvals required by the Act and either has:
(a) Begun, or caused to begin, a continuous program of actual on-site construction of the source to be completed in a reasonable time; or
(b) Entered into binding agreements or contractual obligations, which cannot be canceled or modified without substantial loss to the owner or operator, to undertake a program of construction of the source to be completed in a reasonable time.
(25) "Commission" or "EQC" means Environmental Quality Commission.
(26) "Constant Process Rate" means the average variation in process rate for the calendar year is not greater than plus or minus ten percent of the average process rate.
(27) "Construction":
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section means any physical change including, but not limited to, fabrication, erection, installation, demolition, or modification of a source or part of a source;
(b) As used in OAR 340 division 224 means any physical change including, but not limited to, fabrication, erection, installation, demolition, or modification of an emissions unit, or change in the method of operation of a source which would result in a change in actual emissions.
(28) "Continuous compliance determination method" means a method, specified by the applicable standard or an applicable permit condition, which:
(a) Is used to determine compliance with an emission limitation or standard on a continuous basis, consistent with the averaging period established for the emission limitation or standard; and
(b) Provides data either in units of the standard or correlated directly with the compliance limit.
(29) "Continuous Monitoring Systems" means sampling and analysis, in a timed sequence, using techniques which will adequately reflect actual emissions or concentrations on a continuing basis in accordance with the Department's Continuous Monitoring Manual, and includes continuous emission monitoring systems, continuous opacity monitoring system (COMS) and continuous parameter monitoring systems.
(30) "Control device" means equipment, other than inherent process equipment, that is used to destroy or remove air pollutant(s) prior to discharge to the atmosphere. The types of equipment that may commonly be used as control devices include, but are not limited to, fabric filters, mechanical collectors, electrostatic precipitators, inertial separators, afterburners, thermal or catalytic incinerators, adsorption devices(such as carbon beds), condensers, scrubbers(such as wet collection and gas absorption devices), selective catalytic or non-catalytic reduction systems, flue gas recirculation systems, spray dryers, spray towers, mist eliminators, acid plants, sulfur recovery plants, injection systems(such as water, steam, ammonia, sorbent or limestone injection), and combustion devices independent of the particular process being conducted at an emissions unit(e.g., the destruction of emissions achieved by venting process emission streams to flares, boilers or process heaters). For purposes of OAR 340-212-0200 through 340-212-0280, a control device does not include passive control measures that act to prevent pollutants from forming, such as the use of seals, lids, or roofs to prevent the release of pollutants, use of low-polluting fuel or feedstocks, or the use of combustion or other process design features or characteristics. If an applicable requirement establishes that particular equipment which otherwise meets this definition of a control device does not constitute a control device as applied to a particular pollutant-specific emissions unit, then that definition will be binding for purposes of OAR 340-212-0200 through 340-212-0280.
(31) "Criteria Pollutant" means nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds, particulate matter, PM10, PM2.5, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, or lead.
(32) "Data" means the results of any type of monitoring or method, including the results of instrumental or non-instrumental monitoring, emission calculations, manual sampling procedures, recordkeeping procedures, or any other form of information collection procedure used in connection with any type of monitoring or method.
(33) "De minimis emission levels" mean the levels for the pollutants listed in Table 4.
NOTE: De minimis is compared to all increases that are not included in the PSEL.
(34) "Department":
(a) Means Department of Environmental Quality; except
(b) As used in OAR 340 divisions 218 and 220 means Department of Environmental Quality or in the case of Lane County, Lane Regional Air Protection Agency.
(35) "Device" means any machine, equipment, raw material, product, or byproduct at a source that produces or emits a regulated pollutant.
(36) “Direct PM2.5” has the meaning provided in the definition of PM2.5.
(37) "Director" means the Director of the Department or the Director's designee.
(38) "Draft permit" means the version of an Oregon Title V Operating Permit for which the Department or Lane Regional Air Protection Agency offers public participation under OAR 340-218-0210 or the EPA and affected State review under 340-218-0230.
(39) "Effective date of the program" means the date that the EPA approves the Oregon Title V Operating Permit program submitted by the Department on a full or interim basis. In case of a partial approval, the "effective date of the program" for each portion of the program is the date of the EPA approval of that portion.
(40) "Emergency" means any situation arising from sudden and reasonably unforeseeable events beyond the control of the owner or operator, including acts of God, which situation requires immediate corrective action to restore normal operation, and that causes the source to exceed a technology-based emission limitation under the permit, due to unavoidable increases in emissions attributable to the emergency. An emergency does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by improperly designed equipment, lack of preventative maintenance, careless or improper operation, or operator error.
(41) "Emission" means a release into the atmosphere of any regulated pollutant or any air contaminant.
(42) "Emission Estimate Adjustment Factor" or "EEAF" means an adjustment applied to an emission factor to account for the relative inaccuracy of the emission factor.
(43) "Emission Factor" means an estimate of the rate at which a pollutant is released into the atmosphere, as the result of some activity, divided by the rate of that activity (e.g., production or process rate).
(44)(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, "Emission Limitation" and "Emission Standard" mean a requirement established by a State, local government, or the EPA which limits the quantity, rate, or concentration of emissions of air pollutants on a continuous basis, including any requirements which limit the level of opacity, prescribe equipment, set fuel specifications, or prescribe operation or maintenance procedures for a source to assure continuous emission reduction.
(b) As used in OAR 340-212-0200 through 340-212-0280, "Emission limitation or standard" means any applicable requirement that constitutes an emission limitation, emission standard, standard of performance or means of emission limitation as defined under the Act. An emission limitation or standard may be expressed in terms of the pollutant, expressed either as a specific quantity, rate or concentration of emissions (e.g., pounds of SO2 per hour, pounds of SO2 per million British thermal units of fuel input, kilograms of VOC per liter of applied coating solids, or parts per million by volume of SO2) or as the relationship of uncontrolled to controlled emissions (e.g., percentage capture and destruction efficiency of VOC or percentage reduction of SO2). An emission limitation or standard may also be expressed either as a work practice, process or control device parameter, or other form of specific design, equipment, operational, or operation and maintenance requirement. For purposes of 340-212-0200 through 340-212-0280, an emission limitation or standard does not include general operation requirements that an owner or operator may be required to meet, such as requirements to obtain a permit, to operate and maintain sources in accordance with good air pollution control practices, to develop and maintain a malfunction abatement plan, to keep records, submit reports, or conduct monitoring.
(45) "Emission Reduction Credit Banking" means to presently reserve, subject to requirements of OAR 340 division 268, Emission Reduction Credits, emission reductions for use by the reserver or assignee for future compliance with air pollution reduction requirements.
(46) "Emission Reporting Form" means a paper or electronic form developed by the Department that must be completed by the permittee to report calculated emissions, actual emissions, or permitted emissions for interim emission fee assessment purposes.
(47) "Emissions unit" means any part or activity of a source that emits or has the potential to emit any regulated air pollutant.
(a) A part of a source is any machine, equipment, raw material, product, or byproduct that produces or emits regulated air pollutants. An activity is any process, operation, action, or reaction (e.g., chemical) at a stationary source that emits regulated air pollutants. Except as described in subsection (d) of this section, parts and activities may be grouped for purposes of defining an emissions unit if the following conditions are met:
(A) The group used to define the emissions unit may not include discrete parts or activities to which a distinct emissions standard applies or for which different compliance demonstration requirements apply; and
(B) The emissions from the emissions unit are quantifiable.
(b) Emissions units may be defined on a pollutant by pollutant basis where applicable.
(c) The term emissions unit is not meant to alter or affect the definition of the term "unit" under Title IV of the FCAA.
(d) Parts and activities cannot be grouped for determining emissions increases from an emissions unit under OAR 340-224-0050 through 340-224-0070, or 340 division 210, or for determining the applicability of any New Source Performance Standard (NSPS).
(48) "EPA" or "Administrator" means the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency or the Administrator's designee.
(49) "Equivalent method" means any method of sampling and analyzing for an air pollutant that has been demonstrated to the Department's satisfaction to have a consistent and quantitatively known relationship to the reference method, under specified conditions. An equivalent method used to meet an applicable federal requirement for which a reference method is specified must be approved by EPA unless EPA has delegated authority for the approval to the Department.
(50) "Event" means excess emissions that arise from the same condition and occur during a single calendar day or continue into subsequent calendar days.
(51) "Exceedance" means a condition that is detected by monitoring that provides data in terms of an emission limitation or standard and that indicates that emissions (or opacity) are greater than the applicable emission limitation or standard(or less than the applicable standard in the case of a percent reduction requirement) consistent with any averaging period specified for averaging the results of the monitoring.
(52) "Excess emissions" means emissions in excess of a permit limit or any applicable air quality rule.
(53) "Excursion" means a departure from an indicator range established for monitoring under OAR 340-212-0200 through 340-212-0280 and 340-218-0050(3)(a), consistent with any averaging period specified for averaging the results of the monitoring.
(54) "Federal Land Manager" means with respect to any lands in the United States, the Secretary of the federal department with authority over such lands.
(55) “Federal Major Source” means a source with potential to emit any individual regulated pollutant, excluding hazardous air pollutants listed in OAR 340 division 244, greater than or equal to 100 tons per year if in a source category listed below, or 250 tons per year if not in a source category listed. In addition, for greenhouse gases, a federal major source must also have the potential to emit CO2e greater than or equal to 100,000 tons per year. The fugitive emissions and insignificant activity emissions of a stationary source are considered in determining whether it is a federal major source. Potential to emit calculations must include emission increases due to a new or modified source and may include emission decreases.
(a) Fossil fuel-fired steam electric plants of more than 250 million BTU/hour heat input;
(b) Coal cleaning plants with thermal dryers;
(c) Kraft pulp mills;
(d) Portland cement plants;
(e) Primary Zinc Smelters;
(f) Iron and Steel Mill Plants;
(g) Primary aluminum ore reduction plants;
(h) Primary copper smelters;
(i) Municipal Incinerators capable of charging more than 50 tons of refuse per day;
(j) Hydrofluoric acid plants;
(k) Sulfuric acid plants;
(l) Nitric acid plants;
(m) Petroleum Refineries;
(n) Lime plants;
(o) Phosphate rock processing plants;
(p) Coke oven batteries;
(q) Sulfur recovery plants;
(r) Carbon black plants, furnace process;
(s) Primary lead smelters;
(t) Fuel conversion plants;
(u) Sintering plants;
(v) Secondary metal production plants;
(w) Chemical process plants;
(x) Fossil fuel fired boilers, or combinations thereof, totaling more than 250 million BTU per hour heat input;
(y) Petroleum storage and transfer units with a total storage capacity exceeding 300,000 barrels;
(z) Taconite ore processing plants;
(aa) Glass fiber processing plants;
(bb) Charcoal production plants.
(56) "Final permit" means the version of an Oregon Title V Operating Permit issued by the Department or Lane Regional Air Protection Agency that has completed all review procedures required by OAR 340-218-0120 through 340-218-0240.
(57) "Fugitive Emissions":
(a) Except as used in subsection (b) of this section, means emissions of any air contaminant which escape to the atmosphere from any point or area that is not identifiable as a stack, vent, duct, or equivalent opening.
(b) As used to define a major Oregon Title V Operating Permit program source, means those emissions which could not reasonably pass through a stack, chimney, vent, or other functionally equivalent opening.
(58) "General permit":
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, means an Oregon Air Contaminant Discharge Permit established under OAR 340-216-0060;
(b) As used in OAR 340 division 218 means an Oregon Title V Operating Permit established under OAR 340-218-0090.
(59) "Generic PSEL" means the levels for the pollutants listed in Table 5.
NOTE: Sources are eligible for a generic PSEL if expected emissions are less than or equal to the levels listed in Table 5. Baseline emission rate and netting basis do not apply to pollutants at sources using generic PSELs.
(60)(a) “Greenhouse Gases” or “GHGs” means the aggregate group of six greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, methane, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride. Each gas is also individually a greenhouse gas.
(b) The definition of greenhouse gases in subsection (a) of this section does not include, for purposes of division 216, 218, and 224, carbon dioxide emissions from the combustion or decomposition of biomass except to the extent required by federal law.
(61) "Growth Allowance" means an allocation of some part of an airshed's capacity to accommodate future proposed major sources and major modifications of sources.
(62) "Immediately" means as soon as possible but in no case more than one hour after a source knew or should have known of an excess emission period.
(63) "Inherent process equipment" means equipment that is necessary for the proper or safe functioning of the process, or material recovery equipment that the owner or operator documents is installed and operated primarily for purposes other than compliance with air pollution regulations. Equipment that must be operated at an efficiency higher than that achieved during normal process operations in order to comply with the applicable emission limitation or standard is not inherent process equipment. For the purposes of OAR 340-212-0200 through 340-212-0280, inherent process equipment is not considered a control device.
(64) "Insignificant Activity" means an activity or emission that the Department has designated as categorically insignificant, or that meets the criteria of aggregate insignificant emissions.
(65) "Insignificant Change" means an off-permit change defined under OAR 340-218-0140(2)(a) to either a significant or an insignificant activity which:
(a) Does not result in a re-designation from an insignificant to a significant activity;
(b) Does not invoke an applicable requirement not included in the permit; and
(c) Does not result in emission of regulated air pollutants not regulated by the source's permit.
(66) "Late Payment" means a fee payment which is postmarked after the due date.
(67) "Lowest Achievable Emission Rate" or "LAER" means that rate of emissions which reflects: the most stringent emission limitation which is contained in the implementation plan of any state for such class or category of source, unless the owner or operator of the proposed source demonstrates that such limitations are not achievable; or the most stringent emission limitation which is achieved in practice by such class or category of source, whichever is more stringent. The application of this term cannot permit a proposed new or modified source to emit any air contaminant in excess of the amount allowable under applicable New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) or standards for hazardous air pollutants.
(68) "Maintenance Area" means a geographical area of the State that was designated as a nonattainment area, redesignated as an attainment area by EPA, and redesignated as a maintenance area by the Environmental Quality Commission in OAR 340, division 204.
(69) "Maintenance Pollutant" means a pollutant for which a maintenance area was formerly designated a nonattainment area.
(70) "Major Modification" means any physical change or change in the method of operation of a source that results in satisfying the requirements of both subsections (a) and (b) of this section, or of subsection (c) of this section for any regulated air pollutant. Major modifications for ozone precursors or PM2.5 precursors also constitute major modifications for ozone and PM2.5, respectively.
(a) Except as provided in subsection (d) of this section, a PSEL that exceeds the netting basis by an amount that is equal to or greater than the significant emission rate.
(b) The accumulation of emission increases due to physical changes and changes in the method of operation as determined in accordance with paragraphs (A) and (B) of this subsection is equal to or greater than the significant emission rate.
(A) Calculations of emission increases in subsection (b) of this section must account for all accumulated increases in actual emissions due to physical changes and changes in the method of operation occurring at the source since the applicable baseline period, or since the time of the last construction approval issued for the source pursuant to the New Source Review Regulations in OAR 340 division 224 for that pollutant, whichever time is more recent. These include fugitive emissions and emissions from insignificant activities.
(B) Emission increases due solely to increased use of equipment or facilities that existed or were permitted or approved to construct in accordance with OAR 340 division 210 during the applicable baseline period are not included, except if the increased use is to support a physical change or change in the method of operation.
(c) Any change at a source, including production increases, that would result in a Plant Site Emission Limit increase of 1 ton or more for any regulated pollutant for which the source is a major source in nonattainment or maintenance areas or a federal major source in attainment or unclassified areas, if the source obtained permits to construct and operate after the applicable baseline period but has not undergone New Source Review.
(A) Subsection (c) of this section does not apply to PM2.5 and greenhouse gases.
(B) Changes to the PSEL solely due to the availability of better emissions information are exempt from being considered an increase.
(d) If a portion of the netting basis or PSEL (or both) was set based on PTE because the source had not begun normal operations but was permitted or approved to construct and operate, that portion of the netting basis or PSEL (or both) must be excluded from the tests in subsections (a) and (b) of this section until the netting basis is reset as specified in the definitions of baseline emission rate and netting basis.
(e) The following are not considered major modifications:
(A) Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section, proposed increases in hours of operation or production rates that would cause emission increases above the levels allowed in a permit and would not involve a physical change or change in method of operation in the source;
(B) Routine maintenance, repair, and replacement of components;
(C) Temporary equipment installed for maintenance of the permanent equipment if the temporary equipment is in place for less than six months and operated within the permanent equipment's existing PSEL;
(D) Use of alternate fuel or raw materials, that were available and the source was capable of accommodating in the baseline period.
(71) "Major Source":
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, means a source that emits, or has the potential to emit, any regulated air pollutant at a Significant Emission Rate. The fugitive emissions and insignificant activity emissions of a stationary source are considered in determining whether it is a major source. Potential to emit calculations must include emission increases due to a new or modified source and may include emission decreases.
(b) As used in OAR 340 division 210, Stationary Source Notification Requirements, OAR 340 division 218, rules applicable to sources required to have Oregon Title V Operating Permits, OAR 340 division 220, Oregon Title V Operating Permit Fees, and 340-216-0066 Standard ACDPs, means any stationary source (or any group of stationary sources that are located on one or more contiguous or adjacent properties and are under common control of the same person (or persons under common control)) belonging to a single major industrial grouping or supporting the major industrial group and that is described in paragraphs (A), (B), (C) or (D) of this subsection. For the purposes of this subsection, a stationary source or group of stationary sources is considered part of a single industrial grouping if all of the pollutant emitting activities at such source or group of sources on contiguous or adjacent properties belong to the same Major Group (i.e., all have the same two-digit code) as described in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual (U.S. Office of Management and Budget, 1987) or support the major industrial group.
(A) A major source of hazardous air pollutants, which means:
(i) For pollutants other than radionuclides, any stationary source or group of stationary sources located within a contiguous area and under common control that emits or has the potential to emit, in the aggregate, 10 tons per year (tpy) or more of any hazardous air pollutants that has been listed pursuant to OAR 340-244-0040; 25 tpy or more of any combination of such hazardous air pollutants, or such lesser quantity as the Administrator may establish by rule. Emissions from any oil or gas exploration or production well, along with its associated equipment, and emissions from any pipeline compressor or pump station will not be aggregated with emissions from other similar units, whether or not such units are in a contiguous area or under common control, to determine whether such units or stations are major sources; or
(ii) For radionuclides, "major source" will have the meaning specified by the Administrator by rule.
(B) A major stationary source of air pollutants, as defined in section 302 of the Act, that directly emits or has the potential to emit 100 tpy or more of any regulated air pollutant, except greenhouse gases, including any major source of fugitive emissions of any such pollutant. The fugitive emissions of a stationary source are not considered in determining whether it is a major stationary source for the purposes of section 302(j) of the Act, unless the source belongs to one of the following categories of stationary source:
(i) Coal cleaning plants (with thermal dryers);
(ii) Kraft pulp mills;
(iii) Portland cement plants;
(iv) Primary zinc smelters;
(v) Iron and steel mills;
(vi) Primary aluminum ore reduction plants;
(vii) Primary copper smelters;
(viii) Municipal incinerators capable of charging more than 50 tons of refuse per day;
(ix) Hydrofluoric, sulfuric, or nitric acid plants;
(x) Petroleum refineries;
(xi) Lime plants;
(xii) Phosphate rock processing plants;
(xiii) Coke oven batteries;
(xiv) Sulfur recovery plants;
(xv) Carbon black plants(furnace process);
(xvi) Primary lead smelters;
(xvii) Fuel conversion plants;
(xviii) Sintering plants;
(xix) Secondary metal production plants;
(xx) Chemical process plants;
(xxi) Fossil-fuel boilers, or combination thereof, totaling more than 250 million British thermal units per hour heat input;
(xxii) Petroleum storage and transfer units with a total storage capacity exceeding 300,000 barrels;
(xxiii) Taconite ore processing plants;
(xxiv) Glass fiber processing plants;
(xxv) Charcoal production plants;
(xxvi) Fossil-fuel-fired steam electric plants of more than 250 million British thermal units per hour heat input; or
(xxvii) Any other stationary source category, that as of August 7, 1980 is being regulated under section 111 or 112 of the Act.
(C) Beginning July 1, 2011, a major stationary source of air pollutants, as defined by Section 302 of the Act, that directly emits or has the potential to emit 100 tpy or more of greenhouse gases and directly emits or has the potential to emit 100,000 tpy or more CO2e, including fugitive emissions.
(D) A major stationary source as defined in part D of Title I of the Act, including:
(i) For ozone nonattainment areas, sources with the potential to emit 100 tpy or more of VOCs or oxides of nitrogen in areas classified as "marginal" or "moderate," 50 tpy or more in areas classified as "serious," 25 tpy or more in areas classified as "severe," and 10 tpy or more in areas classified as "extreme"; except that the references in this paragraph of this subsection to 100, 50, 25, and 10 tpy of nitrogen oxides do not apply with respect to any source for which the Administrator has made a finding, under section 182(f)(1) or (2) of the Act, that requirements under section 182(f) of the Act do not apply;
(ii) For ozone transport regions established pursuant to section 184 of the Act, sources with the potential to emit 50 tpy or more of VOCs;
(iii) For carbon monoxide nonattainment areas:
(I) That are classified as "serious"; and
(II) In which stationary sources contribute significantly to carbon monoxide levels as determined under rules issued by the Administrator, sources with the potential to emit 50 tpy or more of carbon monoxide.
(iv) For particulate matter(PM10) nonattainment areas classified as "serious," sources with the potential to emit 70 tpy or more of PM10.
(72) "Material Balance" means a procedure for determining emissions based on the difference in the amount of material added to a process and the amount consumed and/or recovered from a process.
(73) "Modification," except as used in the term "major modification," means any physical change to, or change in the method of operation of, a stationary source that results in an increase in the stationary source's potential to emit any regulated air pollutant on an hourly basis. Modifications do not include the following:
(a) Increases in hours of operation or production rates that do not involve a physical change or change in the method of operation;
(b) Changes in the method of operation due to using an alternative fuel or raw material that the stationary source was physically capable of accommodating during the baseline period; and
(c) Routine maintenance, repair and like-for-like replacement of components unless they increase the expected life of the stationary source by using component upgrades that would not otherwise be necessary for the stationary source to function.
(74) "Monitoring" means any form of collecting data on a routine basis to determine or otherwise assess compliance with emission limitations or standards. Monitoring may include record keeping if the records are used to determine or assess compliance with an emission limitation or standard (such as records of raw material content and usage, or records documenting compliance with work practice requirements). Monitoring may include conducting compliance method tests, such as the procedures in appendix A to 40 CFR part 60, on a routine periodic basis. Requirements to conduct such tests on a one-time basis, or at such times as a regulatory authority may require on a non-regular basis, are not considered monitoring requirements for purposes of this definition. Monitoring may include one or more than one of the following data collection techniques as appropriate for a particular circumstance:
(a) Continuous emission or opacity monitoring systems.
(b) Continuous process, capture system, control device or other relevant parameter monitoring systems or procedures, including a predictive emission monitoring system.
(c) Emission estimation and calculation procedures (e.g., mass balance or stoichiometric calculations).
(d) Maintaining and analyzing records of fuel or raw materials usage.
(e) Recording results of a program or protocol to conduct specific operation and maintenance procedures.
(f) Verifying emissions, process parameters, capture system parameters, or control device parameters using portable or in situ measurement devices.
(g) Visible emission observations and recording.
(h) Any other form of measuring, recording, or verifying on a routine basis emissions, process parameters, capture system parameters, control device parameters or other factors relevant to assessing compliance with emission limitations or standards.
(75) "Netting Basis" means the baseline emission rate MINUS any emission reductions required by rule, orders, or permit conditions required by the SIP or used to avoid SIP requirements, MINUS any unassigned emissions that are reduced from allowable under OAR 340-222-0045, MINUS any emission reduction credits transferred off site, PLUS any emission increases approved through the New Source Review regulations in OAR 340 division 224 MINUS any emissions reductions required by subsection (g) of this section.
(a) A netting basis will only be established for regulated pollutants subject to OAR 340 division 224 as specified in the definition of regulated pollutant.
(b) The initial PM2.5 netting basis and PSEL for a source that was permitted prior to May 1, 2011 will be established with the first permitting action issued after July 1, 2011, provided the permitting action involved a public notice period that began after July 1, 2011.
(A) The initial netting basis is the PM2.5 fraction of the PM10 netting basis in effect on May 1, 2011. DEQ may increase the initial PM2.5 netting basis by up to 5 tons if necessary to avoid exceedance of the PM2.5 significant emission rate as of May 1, 2011.
(B) Notwithstanding OAR 340-222-0041(2), the initial source specific PSEL for a source with PTE greater than or equal to the SER will be set equal to the PM2.5 fraction of the PM10 PSEL.
(c) The initial greenhouse gas netting basis and PSEL for a source will be established with the first permitting action issued after July 1, 2011, provided the permitting action involved a public notice period that began after July 1, 2011.
(d) Netting basis is zero for:
(A) Any regulated pollutant emitted from a source that first obtained permits to construct and operate after the applicable baseline period for that regulated pollutant, and has not undergone New Source Review for that pollutant;
(B) Any pollutant that has a generic PSEL in a permit;
(C) Any source permitted as portable; or
(D) Any source with a netting basis calculation resulting in a negative number.
(e) If a source relocates to an adjacent site, and the time between operation at the old and new sites is less than six months, the source may retain the netting basis from the old site.
(f) Emission reductions required by rule, order, or permit condition affect the netting basis if the source currently has devices or emissions units that are subject to the rules, order, or permit condition. The baseline emission rate is not affected. The netting basis reduction will be effective on the effective date of the rule, order, or permit condition requiring the reduction. The PSEL reduction will be effective on the compliance date of the rule, order, or permit condition.
(g) For permits issued after May 1, 2011 under New Source Review regulations in OAR 340 division 224, and where the netting basis initially equaled the potential to emit for a new or modified source, the netting basis will be reduced in accordance with the definition of actual emissions. Notwithstanding OAR 340-222-0041(2), this adjustment does not require a reduction in the PSEL.
(h) Emission reductions required by rule do not include emissions reductions achieved under OAR 340-226-0110 and 0120.
(i) Netting basis for a pollutant with a revised definition will be adjusted if the source is emitting the pollutant at the time of redefining and the pollutant is included in the permit's netting basis.
(j) Where EPA requires an attainment demonstration based on dispersion modeling, the netting basis will be established at no more than the level used in the dispersion modeling to demonstrate attainment with the ambient air quality standard (i.e., the attainment demonstration is an emission reduction required by rule).
(76) "Nitrogen Oxides" or "NOx" means all oxides of nitrogen except nitrous oxide.
(77) "Nonattainment Area" means a geographical area of the State, as designated by the Environmental Quality Commission or the EPA, that exceeds any state or federal primary or secondary ambient air quality standard.
(78) "Nonattainment Pollutant" means a pollutant for which an area is designated a nonattainment area.
(79) "Normal Source Operation" means operations which do not include such conditions as forced fuel substitution, equipment malfunction, or highly abnormal market conditions.
(80) "Offset" means an equivalent or greater emission reduction that is required before allowing an emission increase from a proposed major source or major modification of an existing source.
(81) "Opacity" means the degree to which an emission reduces transmission of light and obscures the view of an object in the background as measured in accordance with OAR 340-212-0120 and 212-0140. Unless otherwise specified by rule, opacity shall be measured in accordance with EPA Method 9 or a continuous opacity monitoring system (COMS) installed and operated in accordance with the Department's Continuous Monitoring Manual. For all standards, the minimum observation period shall be six minutes, though longer periods may be required by a specific rule or permit condition. Aggregate times (e.g. 3 minutes in any one hour) consist of the total duration of all readings during the observation period that equal or exceed the opacity percentage in the standard, whether or not the readings are consecutive.
(82) "Oregon Title V Operating Permit" means any permit covering an Oregon Title V Operating Permit source that is issued, renewed, amended, or revised pursuant to division 218.
(83) "Oregon Title V Operating Permit program" means a program approved by the Administrator under 40 CFR Part 70.
(84) "Oregon Title V Operating Permit program source" means any source subject to the permitting requirements, OAR 340 division 218.
(85) “Ozone Precursor” means nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds as measured by an applicable reference method in accordance with the Department's Source Sampling Manual(January, 1992) or as measured by an EPA reference method in 40 CFR Part 60, appendix A or as measured by a material balance calculation for VOC as appropriate.
(86) "Ozone Season" means the contiguous 3 month period during which ozone exceedances typically occur (i.e., June, July, and August).
(87) "Particulate Matter" means all finely divided solid or liquid material, other than uncombined water, emitted to the ambient air. When used in emission standards, particulate matter is defined by the method specified within the standard or by an applicable reference method in accordance with OAR 340-212-0120 and 340-212-0140. Unless otherwise specified, sources with exhaust gases at or near ambient conditions may be tested with DEQ Method 5 or DEQ Method 8, as approved by the Department. Direct heat transfer sources shall be tested with DEQ Method 7; indirect heat transfer combustion sources and all other non-fugitive emissions sources not listed above shall be tested with DEQ Method 5.
(88) "Permit" means an Air Contaminant Discharge Permit or an Oregon Title V Operating Permit.
(89) "Permit modification" means a permit revision that meets the applicable requirements of OAR 340 division 216, 340 division 224, or 340-218-0160 through 340-218-0180.
(90) "Permit revision" means any permit modification or administrative permit amendment.
(91) "Permitted Emissions" as used in OAR division 220 means each regulated pollutant portion of the PSEL, as identified in an ACDP, Oregon Title V Operating Permit, review report, or by the Department pursuant to OAR 340-220-0090.
(92) "Permittee" means the owner or operator of the facility, authorized by the ACDP or the Oregon Title V Operating Permit to operate the source.
(93) "Person" means individuals, corporations, associations, firms, partnerships, joint stock companies, public and municipal corporations, political subdivisions, the State of Oregon and any agencies thereof, and the federal government and any agencies thereof.
(94) "Plant Site Emission Limit" or "PSEL" means the total mass emissions per unit time of an individual air pollutant specified in a permit for a source. The PSEL for a major source may consist of more than one permitted emission.
(95) "PM10":
(a) When used in the context of emissions, means finely divided solid or liquid material, including condensable particulate, other than uncombined water, with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 micrometers, emitted to the ambient air as measured by an applicable reference method in accordance with the Department's Source Sampling Manual(January, 1992);
(b) When used in the context of ambient concentration, means airborne finely divided solid or liquid material with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 micrometers as measured in accordance with 40 CFR Part 50, Appendix J.
(96) "PM2.5":
(a) When used in the context of direct PM2.5 emissions, means finely divided solid or liquid material, including condensable particulate, other than uncombined water, with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 2.5 micrometers, emitted to the ambient air as measured by EPA reference methods 201A and 202 in 40 CFR Part 51, appendix M.
(b) When used in the context of PM2.5 precursor emissions, means sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) emitted to the ambient air as measured by EPA reference methods in 40 CFR Part 60, appendix A.
(c) When used in the context of ambient concentration, means particles with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 2.5 micrometers as measured by a reference method based on 40 CFR Part 50, Appendix L, or an equivalent method designated in accordance with 40 CFR Part 53.
(97) “PM2.5 fraction” means the the fraction of PM2.5 to PM10 for each emissions unit that is included in the netting basis and PSEL.
(98) "Pollutant-specific emissions unit" means an emissions unit considered separately with respect to each regulated air pollutant.
(99) "Potential to emit" or "PTE" means the lesser of:
(a) The capacity of a stationary source; or
(b) The maximum allowable emissions taking into consideration any physical or operational limitation, including air pollution control equipment and restrictions on hours of operation or on the type or amount of material combusted, stored, or processed, if the limitation is enforceable by the Administrator.
(c) This definition does not alter or affect the use of this term for any other purposes under the Act or the term "capacity factor" as used in Title IV of the Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder. Secondary emissions are not considered in determining the potential to emit.
(100) "Predictive emission monitoring system (PEMS)" means a system that uses process and other parameters as inputs to a computer program or other data reduction system to produce values in terms of the applicable emission limitation or standard.
(101) "Process Upset" means a failure or malfunction of a production process or system to operate in a normal and usual manner.
(102) "Proposed permit" means the version of an Oregon Title V Operating Permit that the Department or a Regional Agency proposes to issue and forwards to the Administrator for review in compliance with OAR 340-218-0230.
(103) "Reference method" means any method of sampling and analyzing for an air pollutant as specified in 40 CFR Part 52, 60, 61 or 63.
(104) "Regional Agency" means Lane Regional Air Protection Agency.
(105) "Regulated air pollutant" or "Regulated Pollutant":
(a) Except as provided in subsections (b) and(c) of this section, means:
(A) Nitrogen oxides or any VOCs;
(B) Any pollutant for which a national ambient air quality standard has been promulgated, including any precursors to such pollutants;
(C) Any pollutant that is subject to any standard promulgated under section 111 of the Act;
(D) Any Class I or II substance subject to a standard promulgated under or established by Title VI of the Act;
(E) Any pollutant listed under OAR 340-244-0040 or 340-244-0230; and
(F) Greenhouse Gases.
(b) As used in OAR 340 division 220, regulated pollutant means particulates, volatile organic compounds, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur dioxide.
(c) As used in OAR 340 division 224, regulated pollutant does not include any pollutant listed in divisions 244 and 246, unless the pollutant is listed in OAR 340 division 200 Table 2 (significant emission rates).
(106) "Renewal" means the process by which a permit is reissued at the end of its term.
(107) "Responsible official" means one of the following:
(a) For a corporation: a president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy or decision-making functions for the corporation, or a duly authorized representative of such person if the representative is responsible for the overall operation of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities applying for or subject to a permit and either:
(A) The facilities employ more than 250 persons or have gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding $25 million (in second quarter 1980 dollars); or
(B) The delegation of authority to such representative is approved in advance by the Department or Lane Regional Air Protection Agency.
(b) For a partnership or sole proprietorship: a general partner or the proprietor, respectively;
(c) For a municipality, State, Federal, or other public agency: either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. For the purposes of this division, a principal executive officer of a Federal agency includes the chief executive officer having responsibility for the overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency(e.g., a Regional Administrator of the EPA); or
(d) For affected sources:
(A) The designated representative in so far as actions, standards, requirements, or prohibitions under Title IV of the Act or the regulations promulgated there under are concerned; and
(B) The designated representative for any other purposes under the Oregon Title V Operating Permit program.
(108) "Secondary Emissions" means emissions that are a result of the construction and/or operation of a source or modification, but that do not come from the source itself. Secondary emissions must be specific, well defined, quantifiable, and impact the same general area as the source associated with the secondary emissions. Secondary emissions may include, but are not limited to:
(a) Emissions from ships and trains coming to or from a facility;
(b) Emissions from off-site support facilities that would be constructed or would otherwise increase emissions as a result of the construction or modification of a source.
(109) "Section 111" means section 111 of the FCAA which includes Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources (NSPS).
(110) "Section 111(d)" means subsection 111(d) of the FCAA which requires states to submit to the EPA plans that establish standards of performance for existing sources and provides for implementing and enforcing such standards.
(111) "Section 112" means section 112 of the FCAA which contains regulations for Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP).
(112) "Section 112(b)" means subsection 112(b) of the FCAA which includes the list of hazardous air pollutants to be regulated.
(113) "Section 112(d)" means subsection 112(d) of the FCAA which directs the EPA to establish emission standards for sources of hazardous air pollutants. This section also defines the criteria to be used by the EPA when establishing the emission standards.
(114) "Section 112(e)" means subsection 112(e) of the FCAA which directs the EPA to establish and promulgate emissions standards for categories and subcategories of sources that emit hazardous air pollutants.
(115) "Section 112(r)(7)" means subsection 112(r)(7) of the FCAA which requires the EPA to promulgate regulations for the prevention of accidental releases and requires owners or operators to prepare risk management plans.
(116) "Section 114(a)(3)" means subsection 114(a)(3) of the FCAA which requires enhanced monitoring and submission of compliance certifications for major sources.
(117) "Section 129" means section 129 of the FCAA which requires the EPA to establish emission standards and other requirements for solid waste incineration units.
(118) "Section 129(e)" means subsection 129(e) of the FCAA which requires solid waste incineration units to obtain Oregon Title V Operating Permits.
(119) "Section 182(f)" means subsection 182(f) of the FCAA which requires states to include plan provisions in the State Implementation Plan for NOx in ozone nonattainment areas.
(120) "Section 182(f)(1)" means subsection 182(f)(1) of the FCAA which requires states to apply those plan provisions developed for major VOC sources and major NOx sources in ozone nonattainment areas.
(121) "Section 183(e)" means subsection 183(e) of the FCAA which requires the EPA to study and develop regulations for the control of certain VOC sources under federal ozone measures.
(122) "Section 183(f)" means subsection 182(f) of the FCAA which requires the EPA to develop regulations pertaining to tank vessels under federal ozone measures.
(123) "Section 184" means section 184 of the FCAA which contains regulations for the control of interstate ozone air pollution.
(124) "Section 302" means section 302 of the FCAA which contains definitions for general and administrative purposes in the Act.
(125) "Section 302(j)" means subsection 302(j) of the FCAA which contains definitions of "major stationary source" and "major emitting facility."
(126) "Section 328" means section 328 of the FCAA which contains regulations for air pollution from outer continental shelf activities.
(127) "Section 408(a)" means subsection 408(a) of the FCAA which contains regulations for the Title IV permit program.
(128) "Section 502(b)(10) change" means a change which contravenes an express permit term but is not a change that:
(a) Would violate applicable requirements;
(b) Would contravene federally enforceable permit terms and conditions that are monitoring, recordkeeping, reporting, or compliance certification requirements; or
(c) Is a Title I modification.
(129) "Section 504(b)" means subsection 504(b) of the FCAA which states that the EPA can prescribe by rule procedures and methods for determining compliance and for monitoring.
(130) "Section 504(e)" means subsection 504(e) of the FCAA which contains regulations for permit requirements for temporary sources.
(131) "Significant Air Quality Impact" means an additional ambient air quality concentration equal to or greater than in the concentrations listed in Table 1. The threshold concentrations listed in Table 1 are used for comparison against the ambient air quality standard and do not apply for protecting PSD Class I increments or air quality related values (including visibility). For sources of VOC or NOx, a major source or major modification has a significant impact if it is located within the Ozone Precursor Distance defined in OAR 340-225-0020.
(132) "Significant Emission Rate" or "SER," except as provided in subsections (a) through(c) of this section, means an emission rate equal to or greater than the rates specified in Table 2.
(a) For the Medford-Ashland Air Quality Maintenance Area, the Significant Emission Rate for PM10 is defined in Table 3.
(b) For regulated air pollutants not listed in Table 2 or 3, the significant emission rate is zero unless the Department determines the rate that constitutes a significant emission rate.
(c) Any new source or modification with an emissions increase less than the rates specified in Table 2 or 3 associated with a new source or modification which would construct within 10 kilometers of a Class I area, and would have an impact on such area equal to or greater than 1 ug/m3 (24 hour average) is emitting at a significant emission rate. This provision does not apply to greenhouse gas emissions.
(133) "Significant Impairment" occurs when the Department determines that visibility impairment interferes with the management, protection, preservation, or enjoyment of the visual experience within a Class I area. The Department will make this determination on a case-by-case basis after considering the recommendations of the Federal Land Manager and the geographic extent, intensity, duration, frequency, and time of visibility impairment. These factors will be considered along with visitor use of the Class I areas, and the frequency and occurrence of natural conditions that reduce visibility.
(134) “Small scale local energy project” means:
(a) A system, mechanism or series of mechanisms located primarily in Oregon that directly or indirectly uses or enables the use of, by the owner or operator, renewable resources including, but not limited to, solar, wind, geothermal, biomass, waste heat or water resources to produce energy, including heat, electricity and substitute fuels, to meet a local community or regional energy need in this state;
(b) A system, mechanism or series of mechanisms located primarily in Oregon or providing substantial benefits to Oregon that directly or indirectly conserves energy or enables the conservation of energy by the owner or operator, including energy used in transportation;
(c) A recycling project;
(d) An alternative fuel project;
(e) An improvement that increases the production or efficiency, or extends the operating life, of a system, mechanism, series of mechanisms or project otherwise described in this section of this rule, including but not limited to restarting a dormant project;
(f) A system, mechanism or series of mechanisms installed in a facility or portions of a facility that directly or indirectly reduces the amount of energy needed for the construction and operation of the facility and that meets the sustainable building practices standard established by the State Department of Energy by rule; or
(g) A project described in subsections (a) to (f) of this section, whether or not the existing project was originally financed under ORS 470, together with any refinancing necessary to remove prior liens or encumbrances against the existing project.
(h) A project described in subsections (a) to (g) of this section that conserves energy or produces energy by generation or by processing or collection of a renewable resource.
(135) "Source" means any building, structure, facility, installation or combination thereof that emits or is capable of emitting air contaminants to the atmosphere, is located on one or more contiguous or adjacent properties and is owned or operated by the same person or by persons under common control. The term includes all pollutant emitting activities that belong to a single major industrial group (i.e., that have the same two-digit code) as described in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, (U.S. Office of Management and Budget, 1987) or that support the major industrial group.
(136) "Source category":
(a) Except as provided in subsection(b) of this section, means all the pollutant emitting activities that belong to the same industrial grouping(i.e., that have the same two-digit code) as described in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, (U.S. Office of Management and Budget, 1987).
(b) As used in OAR 340 division 220, Oregon Title V Operating Permit Fees, means a group of major sources that the Department determines are using similar raw materials and have equivalent process controls and pollution control equipment.
(137) "Source Test" means the average of at least three test runs conducted in accordance with the Department's Source Sampling Manual.
(138) "Startup" and "shutdown" means that time during which an air contaminant source or emission-control equipment is brought into normal operation or normal operation is terminated, respectively.
(139) "State Implementation Plan" or "SIP" means the State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan as adopted by the Commission under OAR 340-200-0040 and approved by EPA.
(140) "Stationary source" means any building, structure, facility, or installation at a source that emits or may emit any regulated air pollutant.
(141) "Substantial Underpayment" means the lesser of ten percent (10%) of the total interim emission fee for the major source or five hundred dollars.
(142) "Synthetic minor source" means a source that would be classified as a major source under OAR 340-200-0020, but for limits on its potential to emit air pollutants contained in a permit issued by the Department under OAR 340 division 216 or 218.
(143) "Title I modification" means one of the following modifications pursuant to Title I of the FCAA:
(a) A major modification subject to OAR 340-224-0050, Requirements for Sources in Nonattainment Areas;
(b) A major modification subject to OAR 340-224-0060, Requirements for Sources in Maintenance Areas;
(c) A major modification subject to OAR 340-224-0070, Prevention of Significant Deterioration Requirements for Sources in Attainment or Unclassified Areas;
(d) A modification that is subject to a New Source Performance Standard under Section 111 of the FCAA; or
(e) A modification under Section 112 of the FCAA.
(144) "Total Reduced Sulfur" or "TRS" means the sum of the sulfur compounds hydrogen sulfide, methyl mercaptan, dimethyl sulfide, dimethyl disulfide, and any other organic sulfides present expressed as hydrogen sulfide(H2S).
(145) "Typically Achievable Control Technology" or "TACT" means the emission limit established on a case-by-case basis for a criteria pollutant from a particular emissions unit in accordance with OAR 340-226-0130. For existing sources, the emission limit established will be typical of the emission level achieved by emissions units similar in type and size. For new and modified sources, the emission limit established will be typical of the emission level achieved by well controlled new or modified emissions units similar in type and size that were recently installed. TACT determinations will be based on information known to the Department while considering pollution prevention, impacts on other environmental media, energy impacts, capital and operating costs, cost effectiveness, and the age and remaining economic life of existing emission control equipment. The Department may consider emission control technologies typically applied to other types of emissions units where such technologies could be readily applied to the emissions unit. If an emission limitation is not feasible, a design, equipment, work practice, operational standard, or combination thereof, may be required.
(146) "Unassigned Emissions" means the amount of emissions that are in excess of the PSEL but less than the Netting Basis.
(147)"Unavoidable" or "could not be avoided" means events that are not caused entirely or in part by poor or inadequate design, operation, maintenance, or any other preventable condition in either process or control equipment.
(148) "Upset" or "Breakdown" means any failure or malfunction of any pollution control equipment or operating equipment that may cause excess emissions.
(149) "Visibility Impairment" means any humanly perceptible change in visual range, contrast or coloration from that which existed under natural conditions. Natural conditions include fog, clouds, windblown dust, rain, sand, naturally ignited wildfires, and natural aerosols.
(150) "Volatile Organic Compounds" or "VOC" means any compound of carbon, excluding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides or carbonates, and ammonium carbonate, that participates in atmospheric photochemical reactions.
(a) This includes any such organic compound except the following, which have been determined to have negligible photochemical reactivity in the formation of tropospheric ozone: methane; ethane; methylene chloride(dichloromethane); dimethyl carbonate, propylene carbonate, 1,1,1-trichloroethane(methyl chloroform); 1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane(CFC-113); trichlorofluoromethane(CFC-11); dichlorodifluoromethane(CFC-12); chlorodifluoromethane(HCFC-22); trifluoromethane(HFC-23); 1,2-dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane (CFC-114); chloropentafluoroethane(CFC-115); 1,1,1-trifluoro 2,2-dichloroethane(HCFC-123); 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane(HFC-134a); 1,1-dichloro 1-fluoroethane(HCFC-141b); 1-chloro 1,1-difluoroethane(HCFC-142b); 2-chloro-1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane(HCFC-124); pentafluoroethane(HFC-125); 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane(HFC-134); 1,1,1-trifluoroethane(HFC-143a); 1,1-difluoroethane (HFC-152a); parachlorobenzotrifluoride(PCBTF); cyclic, branched, or linear completely methylated siloxanes; acetone; perchloroethylene(tetrachloroethylene); 3,3-dichloro-1,1,1,2,2-pentafluoropropane(HCFC-225ca); 1,3-dichloro-1,1,2,2,3-pentafluoropropane (HCFC-225cb); 1,1,1,2,3,4,4,5,5,5-decafluoropentane HFC 43-10mee); difluoromethane(HFC-32); ethylfluoride(HFC-161); 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoropropane(HFC-236fa); 1,1,2,2,3-pentafluoropropane(HFC-245ca); 1,1,2,3,3-pentafluoropropane(HFC-245ea); 1,1,1,2,3-pentafluoropropane(HFC-245eb); 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane(HFC-245fa); 1,1,1,2,3,3-hexafluoropropane(HFC-236ea); 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane(HFC-365mfc); chlorofluoromethane (HCFC-31); 1 chloro-1-fluoroethane(HCFC-151a); 1,2-dichloro-1,1,2-trifluoroethane(HCFC-123a); 1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4-nonafluoro-4-methoxy-butane(C4F9OCH3 or HFE-7100); 2-(difluoromethoxymethyl)-1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane((CF3)2CFCF2OCH3); 1-ethoxy-1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,4-nonafluorobutane(C4F9OC2H5 or HFE-7200); 2-(ethoxydifluoromethyl)-1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane ((CF3)2CFCF2OC2H5); methyl acetate; 1,1,1,2,2,3,3-heptafluoro-3-methoxy-propane(n-C3F7OCH3, HFE-7000); 3-ethoxy-1,1,1,2,3, 4,4,5,5,6,6,6-dodecafluoro-2-(trifluoromethyl) hexane(HFE-7500); 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane(HFC 227ea); methyl formate (HCOOCH3); (1) 1,1,1,2,2,3,4,5,5,5-decafluoro-3-methoxy-4-trifluoromethyl-pentane(HFE-7300); and perfluorocarbon compounds that fall into these classes:
(A) Cyclic, branched, or linear, completely fluorinated alkanes;
(B) Cyclic, branched, or linear, completely fluorinated ethers with no unsaturations;
(C) Cyclic, branched, or linear, completely fluorinated tertiary amines with no unsaturations; and
(D) Sulfur containing perfluorocarbons with no unsaturations and with sulfur bonds only to carbon and fluorine.
(b) For purposes of determining compliance with emissions limits, VOC will be measured by an applicable reference method in accordance with the Department's Source Sampling Manual, January, 1992. Where such a method also measures compounds with negligible photochemical reactivity, these negligibly-reactive compounds may be excluded as VOC if the amount of such compounds is accurately quantified, and the Department approves the exclusion.
(c) The Department may require an owner or operator to provide monitoring or testing methods and results demonstrating, to the Department's satisfaction, the amount of negligibly-reactive compounds in the source's emissions.
(d) The following compound(s) are VOC for purposes of all recordkeeping, emissions reporting, photochemical dispersion modeling and inventory requirements which apply to VOC and must be uniquely identified in emission reports, but are not VOC for purposes of VOC emissions limitations or VOC content requirements: t-butyl acetate.
(151) "Year" means any consecutive 12 month period of time.
NOTE: This rule is included in the State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan as adopted by the EQC under OAR 340-200-0040.
[ED. NOTE: The tables referenced in this rule are not included in the rule text. Click here for a PDF copy of the tables.]
[Publications: Publications referenced are available from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A.025
Hist.: [DEQ 15-1978, f. & ef. 10-13-78; DEQ 4-1993, f. & cert. ef. 3-10-93]; [DEQ 47, f. 8-31-72, ef. 9-15-72; DEQ 63, f. 12-20-73, ef. 1-11-74; DEQ 107, f. & ef. 1-6-76; Renumbered from 340-020-0033.04; DEQ 25-1981, f. & ef. 9-8-81; DEQ 5-1983, f. & ef. 4-18-83; DEQ 18-1984, f. & ef. 10-16-84; DEQ 8-1988, f. & cert. ef. 5-19-88 (and corrected 5-31-88); DEQ 14-1989, f. & cert. ef. 6-26-89; DEQ 42-1990, f. 12-13-90, cert. ef. 1-2-91; DEQ 2-1992, f. & cert. ef. 1-30-92; DEQ 7-1992, f. & cert. ef. 3-30-92; DEQ 27-1992, f. & cert. ef. 11-12-92; DEQ 4-1993, f. & cert. ef. 3-10-93; DEQ 12-1993, f. & cert. ef. 9-24-93, Renumbered from 340-020-0145, 340-020-0225, 340-020-0305, 340-020-0355, 340-020-0460 & 340-020-0520; DEQ 19-1993, f. & cert. ef. 11-4-93; DEQ 20-1993(Temp), f. & cert. ef. 11-4-93; DEQ 13-1994, f. & cert. ef. 5-19-94; DEQ 21-1994, f. & cert. ef. 10-14-94; DEQ 24-1994, f. & cert. ef. 10-28-94; DEQ 10-1995, f. & cert. ef. 5-1-95; DEQ 12-1995, f. & cert. ef. 5-23-95; DEQ 22-1995, f. & cert. ef. 10-6-95; DEQ 19-1996, f. & cert. ef. 9-24-96; DEQ 22-1996, f. & cert. ef. 10-22-96; DEQ 9-1997, f. & cert. ef. 5-9-97; DEQ 14-1998, f. & cert. ef. 9-14-98; DEQ 16-1998, f. & cert. ef. 9-23-98; DEQ 21-1998, f. & cert. ef. 10-14-98; DEQ 1-1999, f. & cert. ef. 1-25-99; DEQ 6-1999, f. & cert. ef. 5-21-99]; DEQ 14-1999, f. & cert. ef. 10-14-99, Renumbered from 340-020-0205, 340-028-0110; DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01; DEQ 2-2005, f. & cert. ef. 2-10-05; DEQ 2-2006, f. & cert. ef. 3-14-06; DEQ 6-2007(Temp), f. & cert. ef. 8-17-07 thru 2-12-08; DEQ 8-2007, f. & cert. ef. 11-8-07; DEQ 10-2008, f. & cert .ef. 8-25-08
340-200-0025
Abbreviations and Acronyms
(1) "ACDP" means Air Contaminant Discharge Permit.
(2) "ACT" means Federal Clean Air Act.
(3) "AE" means Actual Emissions.
(4) "AICPA" means Association of Independent Certified Public Accountants.
(5) "AQCR" means Air Quality Control Region.
(6) "AQMA" means Air Quality Maintenance Area.
(7) "ASME" means American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
(8) "ASTM" means American Society for Testing & Materials.
(9) "ATETP" means Automotive Technician Emission Training Program.
(10) "AWD" means all wheel drive.
(11) "BACT" means Best Available Control Technology.
(12) "BLS" means black liquor solids.
(13) "CAA" means Clean Air Act
(14) "CAR" means control area responsible party.
(15) "CBD" means central business district.
(16) "CCTMP" means Central City Transportation Management Plan.
(17) "CEM" means continuous emissions monitoring.
(18) "CEMS" means continuous emission monitoring system.
(19) "CERCLA" means Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act.
(20) "CFRMS" means continuous flow rate monitoring system.
(21) "CFR" means Code of Federal Regulations.
(22) "CMS" means continuous monitoring system.
(23) "CO" means carbon monoxide.
(24) “CO2e” means carbon dioxide equivalent.
(25) "COMS" means continuous opacity monitoring system.
(26) "CPMS" means continuous parameter monitoring system.
(27) "DEQ" means Department of Environmental Quality.
(28) "DOD" means Department of Defense.
(29) "EA" means environmental assessment.
(30) "ECO" means employee commute options.
(31) "EEAF" means emissions estimate adjustment factor.
(32) "EF" means emission factor.
(33) "EGR" means exhaust gas re-circulation.
(34) "EIS" means Environmental Impact Statement
(35) "EPA" means Environmental Protection Agency.
(36) "EQC" means Environmental Quality Commission.
(37) "ESP" means electrostatic precipitator.
(38) "FCAA" means Federal Clean Air Act.
(39) "FHWA" means Federal Highway Administration.
(40) "FONSI" means finding of no significant impact.
(41) "FTA" means Federal Transit Administration.
(42) "GFA" means gross floor area.
(43) “GHG” means greenhouse gases.
(44) "GLA" means gross leasable area.
(45) "GPM" means grams per mile.
(46) "gr/dscf" means grains per dry standard cubic foot.
(47) "GTBA" means grade tertiary butyl alcohol.
(48) "GVWR" means gross vehicle weight rating.
(49) "HAP" means hazardous air pollutant.
(50) "HEPA" means high efficiency particulate air.
(51) "HMIWI" means hospital medical infectious waste incinerator.
(52) "I/M" means inspection and maintenance program.
(53) "IG" means inspection grade.
(54) "IRS" means Internal Revenue Service.
(55) "ISECP" means indirect source emission control program.
(56) "ISTEA" means Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act.
(57) "LAER" means Lowest Achievable Emission Rate.
(58) "LDT2" means light duty truck 2.
(59) "LIDAR" means laser radar; light detection and ranging.
(60) "LPG" means liquefied petroleum gas.
(61) "LRAPA" means Lane Regional Air Protection Agency.
(62) "LUCS" means Land Use Compatibility Statement.
(63) "MACT" means Maximum Achievable Control Technology.
(64) "MPO" means Metropolitan Planning Organization.
(65) "MTBE" means methyl tertiary butyl ether.
(66) "MWC" means municipal waste combustor.
(67) "NAAQS" means National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
(68) "NEPA" means National Environmental Policy Act.
(69) "NESHAP" means National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants.
(70) "NIOSH" means National Institute of Occupational Safety & Health.
(71) "NOx" means nitrogen oxides.
(72) "NSPS" means New Source Performance Standards.
(73) "NSR" means New Source Review.
(74) "NSSC" means neutral sulfite semi-chemical.
(75) "O3" means ozone.
(76) "OAR" means Oregon Administrative Rules.
(77) "ODOT" means Oregon Department of Transportation.
(78) "ORS" means Oregon Revised Statutes.
(79) "OSAC" means orifice spark advance control.
(80) "OSHA" means Occupational Safety & Health Administration.
(81) "PCDE" means pollution control device collection efficiency.
(82) "PEMS" means predictive emission monitoring system.
(83) "PM" means particulate matter.
(84) "PM10" means particulate matter less than 10 microns.
(85) “PM2.5” means particulate matter less than 2.5 microns.
(86) "POTW" means Publicly Owned Treatment Works.
(87) "POV" means privately owned vehicle.
(88) "PSD" means Prevention of Significant Deterioration.
(89) "PSEL" means Plant Site Emission Limit.
(90) "QIP" means quality improvement plan.
(91) "RACT" means Reasonably Available Control Technology.
(92) "RVCOG" means Rogue Valley Council of Governments.
(93) "RWOC" means running weighted oxygen content.
(94) "SKATS" means Salem-Kaiser Area Transportation Study.
(95) "scf" means standard cubic feet.
(96) "SCS" means speed control switch.
(97) "SD" means standard deviation.
(98) "SIP" means State Implementation Plan.
(99) "SO2" means sulfur dioxide.
(100) "SOCMI" means synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industry.
(101) "SOS" means Secretary of State.
(102) "TAC" means thermostatic air cleaner.
(103) "TACT" means Typically Achievable Control Technology.
(104) "TCM" means transportation control measures.
(105) "TCS" means throttle control solenoid.
(106) "TIP" means Transportation Improvement Program.
(107) "TRS" means total reduced sulfur.
(108) "TSP" means total suspended particulate matter.
(109) "UGA" means urban growth area.
(110) "UGB" means urban growth boundary.
(1911) "US DOT" means United States Department of Transportation.
(112) "UST" means underground storage tanks.
(113) "UTM" means universal transverse mercator.
(114) "VIN" means vehicle identification number.
(115) "VMT" means vehicle miles traveled.
(116) "VOC" means volatile organic compounds.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A
Hist.: DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01; DEQ 3-2007, f. & cert. ef. 4-12-07; DEQ 8-2007, f. & cert. ef. 11-8-07
340-200-0040
State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan
(1) This implementation plan, consisting of Volumes 2 and 3 of the State of Oregon Air Quality Control Program, contains control strategies, rules and standards prepared by the Department of Environmental Quality and is adopted as the state implementation plan (SIP) of the State of Oregon pursuant to the federal Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.A 7401 to 7671q.
(2) Except as provided in section (3), revisions to the SIP will be made pursuant to the Commission’s rulemaking procedures in division 11 of this chapter and any other requirements contained in the SIP and will be submitted to the United States Environmental Protection Agency for approval. The State Implementation Plan was last modified by the Commission on April 21, 2011.
(3) Notwithstanding any other requirement contained in the SIP, the Department may:
(a) Submit to the Environmental Protection Agency any permit condition implementing a rule that is part of the federally-approved SIP as a source-specific SIP revision after the Department has complied with the public hearings provisions of 40 CFR 51.102 (July 1, 2002); and
(b) Approve the standards submitted by a regional authority if the regional authority adopts verbatim any standard that the Commission has adopted, and submit the standards to EPA for approval as a SIP revision.
NOTE: Revisions to the State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan become federally enforceable upon approval by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. If any provision of the federally approved Implementation Plan conflicts with any provision adopted by the Commission, the Department shall enforce the more stringent provision.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A.035
Hist.: DEQ 35, f. 2-3-72, ef. 2-15-72; DEQ 54, f. 6-21-73, ef. 7-1-73; DEQ 19-1979, f. & ef. 6-25-79; DEQ 21-1979, f. & ef. 7-2-79; DEQ 22-1980, f. & ef. 9-26-80; DEQ 11-1981, f. & ef. 3-26-81; DEQ 14-1982, f. & ef. 7-21-82; DEQ 21-1982, f. & ef. 10-27-82; DEQ 1-1983, f. & ef. 1-21-83; DEQ 6-1983, f. & ef. 4-18-83; DEQ 18-1984, f. & ef. 10-16-84; DEQ 25-1984, f. & ef. 11-27-84; DEQ 3-1985, f. & ef. 2-1-85; DEQ 12-1985, f. & ef. 9-30-85; DEQ 5-1986, f. & ef. 2-21-86; DEQ 10-1986, f. & ef. 5-9-86; DEQ 20-1986, f. & ef. 11-7-86; DEQ 21-1986, f. & ef. 11-7-86; DEQ 4-1987, f. & ef. 3-2-87; DEQ 5-1987, f. & ef. 3-2-87; DEQ 8-1987, f. & ef. 4-23-87; DEQ 21-1987, f. & ef. 12-16-87; DEQ 31-1988, f. 12-20-88, cert. ef. 12-23-88; DEQ 2-1991, f. & cert. ef. 2-14-91; DEQ 19-1991, f. & cert. ef. 11-13-91; DEQ 20-1991, f. & cert. ef. 11-13-91; DEQ 21-1991, f. & cert. ef. 11-13-91; DEQ 22-1991, f. & cert. ef. 11-13-91; DEQ 23-1991, f. & cert. ef. 11-13-91; DEQ 24-1991, f. & cert. ef. 11-13-91; DEQ 25-1991, f. & cert. ef. 11-13-91; DEQ 1-1992, f. & cert. ef. 2-4-92; DEQ 3-1992, f. & cert. ef. 2-4-92; DEQ 7-1992, f. & cert. ef. 3-30-92; DEQ 19-1992, f. & cert. ef. 8-11-92; DEQ 20-1992, f. & cert. ef. 8-11-92; DEQ 25-1992, f. 10-30-92, cert. ef. 11-1-92; DEQ 26-1992, f. & cert. ef. 11-2-92; DEQ 27-1992, f. & cert. ef. 11-12-92; DEQ 4-1993, f. & cert. ef. 3-10-93; DEQ 8-1993, f. & cert. ef. 5-11-93; DEQ 12-1993, f. & cert. ef. 9-24-93; DEQ 15-1993, f. & cert. ef. 11-4-93; DEQ 16-1993, f. & cert. ef. 11-4-93; DEQ 17-1993, f. & cert. ef. 11-4-93; DEQ 19-1993, f. & cert. ef. 11-4-93; DEQ 1-1994, f. & cert. ef. 1-3-94; DEQ 5-1994, f. & cert. ef. 3-21-94; DEQ 14-1994, f. & cert. ef. 5-31-94; DEQ 15-1994, f. 6-8-94, cert. ef. 7-1-94; DEQ 25-1994, f. & cert. ef. 11-2-94; DEQ 9-1995, f. & cert. ef. 5-1-95; DEQ 10-1995, f. & cert. ef. 5-1-95; DEQ 14-1995, f. & cert. ef. 5-25-95; DEQ 17-1995, f. & cert. ef. 7-12-95; DEQ 19-1995, f. & cert. ef. 9-1-95; DEQ 20-1995 (Temp), f. & cert. ef. 9-14-95; DEQ 8-1996(Temp), f. & cert. ef. 6-3-96; DEQ 15-1996, f. & cert. ef. 8-14-96; DEQ 19-1996, f. & cert. ef. 9-24-96; DEQ 22-1996, f. & cert. ef. 10-22-96; DEQ 23-1996, f. & cert. ef. 11-4-96; DEQ 24-1996, f. & cert. ef. 11-26-96; DEQ 10-1998, f. & cert. ef. 6-22-98; DEQ 15-1998, f. & cert. ef. 9-23-98; DEQ 16-1998, f. & cert. ef. 9-23-98; DEQ 17-1998, f. & cert. ef. 9-23-98; DEQ 20-1998, f. & cert. ef. 10-12-98; DEQ 21-1998, f. & cert. ef. 10-12-98; DEQ 1-1999, f. & cert. ef. 1-25-99; DEQ 5-1999, f. & cert. ef. 3-25-99; DEQ 6-1999, f. & cert. ef. 5-21-99; DEQ 10-1999, f. & cert. ef. 7-1-99; DEQ 14-1999, f. & cert. ef. 10-14-99, Renumbered from 340-020-0047; DEQ 15-1999, f. & cert. ef. 10-22-99; DEQ 2-2000, f. 2-17-00, cert. ef. 6-1-01; DEQ 6-2000, f. & cert. ef. 5-22-00; DEQ 8-2000, f. & cert. ef. 6-6-00; DEQ 13-2000, f. & cert. ef. 7-28-00; DEQ 16-2000, f. & cert. ef. 10-25-00; DEQ 17-2000, f. & cert. ef. 10-25-00; DEQ 20-2000 f. & cert. ef. 12-15-00; DEQ 21-2000, f. & cert. ef. 12-15-00; DEQ 2-2001, f. & cert. ef. 2-5-01; DEQ 4-2001, f. & cert. ef. 3-27-01; DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01; DEQ 15-2001, f. & cert. ef. 12-26-01; DEQ 16-2001, f. & cert. ef. 12-26-01; DEQ 17-2001, f. & cert. ef. 12-28-01; DEQ 4-2002, f. & cert. ef. 3-14-02; DEQ 5-2002, f. & cert. ef. 5-3-02; DEQ 11-2002, f. & cert. ef. 10-8-02; DEQ 5-2003, f. & cert. ef. 2-6-03; DEQ 14-2003, f. & cert. ef. 10-24-03; DEQ 19-2003, f. & cert. ef. 12-12-03; DEQ 1-2004, f. & cert. ef. 4-14-04; DEQ 10-2004, f. & cert. ef. 12-15-04; DEQ 1-2005, f. & cert. ef. 1-4-05; DEQ 2-2005, f. & cert. ef. 2-10-05; DEQ 4-2005, f. 5-13-05, cert. ef. 6-1-05; DEQ 7-2005, f. & cert. ef. 7-12-05; DEQ 9-2005, f. & cert. ef. 9-9-05; DEQ 2-2006, f. & cert. ef. 3-14-06; DEQ 4-2006, f. 3-29-06, cert. ef. 3-31-06; DEQ 3-2007, f. & cert. ef. 4-12-07; DEQ 4-2007, f. & cert. ef. 6-28-07; DEQ 8-2007, f. & cert. ef. 11-8-07; DEQ 5-2008, f. & cert. ef. 3-20-08; DEQ 11-2008, f. & cert. ef. 8-29-08; DEQ 12-2008, f. & cert. ef. 9-17-08; DEQ 14-2008, f. & cert. ef. 11-10-08; DEQ 15-2008, f. & cert. ef 12-31-08; DEQ 3-2009, f. & cert. ef. 6-30-09; DEQ 8-2009, f. & cert. ef. 12-16-09; DEQ 2-2010, f. & cert. ef. 3-5-10; DEQ 5-2010, f. & cert. ef. 5-21-10; DEQ 14-2010, f. & cert. ef. 12-10-10
TABLE 1 OAR 340-200-0020 SIGNIFICANT AIR QUALITY IMPACT
|
|
Table 2 OAR 340-200-0020 SIGNIFICANT EMISSION RATES | |
Pollutant | Emission Rate |
Greenhouse Gases (CO2e) | 75,000 tons/year |
Carbon Monoxide | 100 tons/year |
Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) | 40 tons/year |
Particulate Matter | 25 tons/year |
PM10 | 15 tons/year |
Direct PM2.5 | 10 tons/year |
PM2.5 precursors (SO2 or NOx) | 40 tons/year |
Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) | 40 tons/year |
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) | 40 tons/year |
Ozone precursors (VOC or NOx) | 40 tons/year |
Lead | 0.6 ton/year |
Fluorides | 3 tons/year |
Sulfuric Acid Mist | 7 tons/year |
Hydrogen Sulfide | 10 tons/year |
Total Reduced Sulfur (including hydrogen sulfide) | 10 tons/year |
Reduced sulfur compounds (including hydrogen sulfide) | 10 tons/year |
Municipal waste combustor organics (measured as total tetra- through octa- chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans) | 0.0000035 ton/year |
Municipal waste combustor metals (measured as particulate matter) | 15 tons/year |
Municipal waste combustor acid gases (measured as sulfur dioxide and hydrogen chloride) | 40 tons/year |
Municipal solid waste landfill emissions (measured as nonmethane organic compounds) | 50 tons/year |
Table 3 OAR 340-200-0020 SIGNIFICANT EMISSION RATES FOR THE MEDFORD-ASHLAND AIR QUALITY MAINTENANCE AREA | ||
Air Contaminant | Emission Rate | |
| Annual | Day |
PM10 | (5.0 tons) | (50.0 lbs.) |
TABLE 4 OAR 340-200-0020(31) De Minimis Emission Levels | |
Pollutant | De minimis (tons/year, except as noted) |
Greenhouse Gases (CO2e) | 2,756 |
CO | 1 |
NOx | 1 |
SO2 | 1 |
VOC | 1 |
PM | 1 |
PM10 (except Medford AQMA) | 1 |
PM10/PM2.5 (Medford AQMA) | 0.5 [5.0 lbs/day] |
Direct PM2.5 | 1 |
Lead | 0.1 |
Fluorides | 0.3 |
Sulfuric Acid Mist | 0.7 |
Hydrogen Sulfide | 1 |
Total Reduced Sulfur (including hydrogen sulfide) | 1 |
Reduced Sulfur | 1 |
Municipal waste combustor organics (Dioxin and furans) | 0.0000005 |
Municipal waste combustor metals | 1 |
Municipal waste combustor acid gases | 1 |
Municipal solid waste landfill gases | 1 |
Single HAP | 1 |
Combined HAP (aggregate) | 1 |
TABLE 5 OAR 340-200-0020(56) Generic PSELs | |
Pollutant | Generic PSEL (tons/year, except as noted) |
GreenhouseGases (CO2e) | 74,000 |
CO | 99 |
NOx | 39 |
SO2 | 39 |
VOC | 39 |
PM | 24 |
PM10 (except Medford AQMA) | 14 |
PM10/PM2.5 (Medford AQMA) | 4.5 [49 lbs/day] |
Direct PM2.5 | 9 |
Lead | 0.5 |
Fluorides | 2 |
Sulfuric Acid Mist | 6 |
Hydrogen Sulfide | 9 |
Total Reduced Sulfur (including hydrogen sulfide) | 9 |
Reduced Sulfur | 9 |
Municipal waste combustor organics (Dioxin and furans) | 0.0000030 |
Municipal waste combustor metals | 14 |
Municipal waste combustor acid gases | 39 |
Municipal solid waste landfill gases | 49 |
Single HAP | 9 |
Combined HAPs (aggregate) | 24 |
DIVISION 202
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS AND PSD
INCREMENTS
340-202-0010
Definitions
The definitions in OAR 340-200-0020 and this rule apply to this division. If the same term is defined in this rule and OAR 340-200-0020, the definition in this rule applies to this division.
( 1) "Ambient Air" means that portion of the atmosphere external to buildings, to which the general public has access.
(2) "Ambient Air Monitoring Site Criteria" means the general probe siting specifications as set forth in Appendix E of 40 CFR 58.
(3) "Approved Method" means an analytical method for measuring air contaminant concentrations described or referenced in 40 CFR 50 and Appendices. These methods are approved by the Department of Environmental Quality.
(4) "Baseline Concentration" means:
(a) Except as provided in subsection (c), the ambient concentration level for sulfur dioxide and PM10 that existed in an area during the calendar year 1978. Actual emission increases or decreases occurring before January 1, 1978 must be included in the baseline calculation, except that actual emission increases from any source or modification on which construction commenced after January 6, 1975 must not be included in the baseline calculation;
(b) The ambient concentration level for nitrogen oxides that existed in an area during the calendar year 1988.
(c) For the area of northeastern Oregon within the boundaries of the Umatilla, Wallowa-Whitman, Ochoco, and Malheur National Forests, the ambient concentration level for PM10 that existed during the calendar year 1993. The Department allows the use of a prior time period if the Department determines that it is more representative of normal emissions.
(d) For PM10 in the Medford-Ashland AQMA: the ambient PM10 concentration levels that existed during the year that EPA redesignates the AQMA to attainment for PM10.
(e) The ambient concentration level for PM2.5 that existed in an area during the calendar year 2007.
(f) If no ambient air quality data is available in an area, the baseline concentration may be estimated using modeling based on actual emissions for the years specified in subsections (a) through (e) of this section.
(5) "Indian Governing Body" means the governing body of any tribe, band, or group of Indians subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and recognized by the United States as possessing power of self-government.
(6) "Indian Reservation" means any federally recognized reservation established by Treaty, Agreement, Executive Order, or Act of Congress.
(7) "Oregon Standard Method" means any method of sampling and analyzing for an air contaminant approved by the Department. Oregon standard methods are kept on file by the Department.
(8) "PPM" means parts per million by volume. It is a dimensionless unit of measurement for gases that expresses the ratio of the volume of one component gas to the volume of the entire sample mixture of gases.
[NOTE: This rule is included in the State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan as adopted by the Environmental Quality Commission under OAR 340-200-0040.]
[Publications: The publications referenced in this rule are available from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468A
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A.025
Hist.: DEQ 37, f. 2-15-72, ef. 3-1-72; DEQ 18-1979, f. & ef. 6-22-79; DEQ 25-1981, f. & ef. 9-8-81; DEQ 8-1988, f. & cert. ef. 5-19-88 (corrected 9-30-88); DEQ 4-1993, f. & cert. ef. 3-10-93; DEQ 19-1993, f. & cert. ef. 11-4-93; Renumbered from 340-031-0105; DEQ 17-1995, f. & cert. ef. 7-12-95; DEQ 14-1999, f. & cert. ef. 10-14-99, Renumbered from 340-031-0005; DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01
Ambient Air Quality Standards
340-202-0060
Suspended Particulate Matter
Concentrations of the fraction of suspended particulate that is equal to or less than ten microns in aerodynamic diameter in ambient air as measured by an approved method must not exceed:
(1) 150 micrograms of PM10 per cubic meter of air as a 24-hour average concentration for any calendar day. This standard is attained when the expected number of days per calendar year with a 24-hour average concentration above 150 micrograms per cubic meter as determined in accordance with Appendix K of 40 CFR 50 is equal to or less than one at any site.
Concentrations of the fraction of suspended particulate that is equal to or less than 2.5 microns in aerodynamic diameter in ambient air as measured by an approved method must not exceed:
(2) 35 micrograms of PM2.5 per cubic meter of air as a 3-year average of annual 98th percentile 24-hour average values recorded at each monitoring site. This standard is attained when the 3-year average of annual 98th percentile 24-hour average concentrations is equal to or less than 35 micrograms per cubic meter as determined in accordance with Appendix N of 40 CFR 50.
(3) 15 micrograms of PM2.5 per cubic meter of air as a 3-year average of the annual arithmetic mean. This standard is attained when the annual arithmetic mean concentration is equal to or less than 15 micrograms per cubic meter as determined in accordance with Appendix N of 40 CFR 50.
[NOTE: This rule is included in the State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan as adopted by the Environmental Quality Commission under OAR 340-200-0040.]
[Publications: The publication(s) referenced in this rule is available from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468 & ORS 468A
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A.025
Hist.: DEQ 37, f. 2-15-72, ef. 3-1-72; DEQ 8-1988, f. & cert. ef. 5-19-88 (corrected 9-30-88); DEQ 24-1991, f. & cert. ef. 11-13-91; DEQ 4-1993, f. & cert. ef. 3-10-93; DEQ 14-1999, f. & cert. ef. 10-14-99, Renumbered from 340-031-0015; DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01
Prevention of Significant Deterioration Increments
340-202-0210
Ambient Air Increments
(1) This rule defines significant deterioration. In areas designated as Class I, II or III, emissions from new or modified sources must be limited such that increases in pollutant concentration over the baseline concentration must be limited to those set out in Table 1.
|
|
(2) For any period other than an annual period, the applicable maximum allowable increase may be exceeded during one such period per year at any one location.
[NOTE: This rule is included in the State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan as adopted by the Environmental Quality Commission under OAR 340-200-0040.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468 & ORS 468A
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A.025
Hist.: DEQ 18-1979, f. & ef. 6-22-79; DEQ 8-1988, f. & cert. ef. 5-19-88 (corrected 9-30-88); DEQ 7-1992, f. & cert. ef. 3-30-92; DEQ 17-1995, f. & cert. ef. 7-12-95; DEQ 14-1999, f. & cert. ef. 10-14-99, Renumbered from 340-031-0110; DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01
DIVISION 215
GREENHOUSE GAS REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
340-215-0050
Greenhouse Gas Reporting Fees
(1) Any person required to register and report under OAR 340-215-0030(1)(a) must submit greenhouse gas reporting fees to the Department as specified in OAR 340-220-0050(4). The fees must be received by the Department within 30 days after the Department mails the fee invoice.
(2) Any person required to register and report under OAR 340-215-0030(1)(b)–(c) must submit greenhouse gas reporting fees to the Department as specified in OAR Chapter 340, Division 216, Table 2, Part 3. The fees must be received by the Department within 30 days after the Department mails the fee invoice.
Stat. Auth.: 468A.050
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468 & 468A
Hist.: DEQ 9-2009(Temp), f. 12-24-09, cert. ef. 1-1-10 thru 6-30-10
DIVISION 216
AIR CONTAMINANT DISCHARGE PERMITS
340-216-0020
Applicability
This division applies to all sources referred to in Table 1. This division also applies to Oregon Title V Operating Permit program sources when an ACDP is required by OAR 340-218-0020 or 340-224-0010. Sources referred to in Table 1 are subject to fees as set forth in Table 2.
(1) No person may construct, install, establish, develop or operate any air contaminant source which is referred to in Table 1 without first obtaining an Air Contaminant Discharge Permit (ACDP) from the Department or Regional Authority, unless otherwise deferred from the requirement to obtain an ACDP in subsection (1)(c) or (d) of this rule. No person may continue to operate an air contaminant source if the ACDP expires, or is terminated or revoked; except as provided in OAR 340-216-0082.
(a) For portable sources, a single permit may be issued for operating at any area of the state if the permit includes the requirements from both the Department and Regional Authorities.
(b) The Department or Regional Authority where the portable source's Corporate offices are located will be responsible for issuing the permit. If the corporate office of a portable source is located outside of the state, the Department will be responsible for issuing the permit.
(c) An air contaminant source required to obtain an ACDP or ACDP Attachment pursuant to a NESHAP or NSPS adopted by the Commission by rule is not required to submit an application for an ACDP or ACDP Attachment until four months after the effective date of the Commission’s adoption of the NESHAP or NSPS, and is not required to obtain an ACDP or ACDP Attachment until six months after the Commission’s adoption of the NESHAP or NSPS. In addition, the Department may defer the requirement to submit an application for, or to obtain an ACDP or ACDP Attachment, or both, for up to an additional twelve months.
(d) Gasoline dispensing facilities are not required to submit an application for an ACDP or ACDP Attachment until May 1, 2010 or obtain an ACDP or ACDP attachment until June 1, 2010. The Department may defer the requirement to submit an application for, or to obtain an ACDP or ACDP Attachment, or both, for up to an additional six months.
(e) Deferrals of Oregon permitting requirements do not relieve an air contaminant source from the responsibility of complying with federal NESHAP or NSPS requirements.
(2) No person may construct, install, establish, or develop any source that will be subject to the Oregon Title V Operating Permit program without first obtaining an ACDP from the Department or Regional Authority.
(3) No person may modify any source that has been issued an ACDP without first complying with the requirements of OAR 340-210-0205 through 340-210-0250.
(4) No person may modify any source required to have an ACDP such that the source becomes subject to the Oregon Title V Operating Permit program without complying with the requirements of OAR 340-210-0205 through 340-210-0250.
(5) No person may increase emissions above the PSEL by more than the de minimis levels specified in OAR 340-200-0020 without first applying for and obtaining a modified ACDP.
(6) Subject to the requirements in this Division, the Lane Regional Air Protection Agency is designated by the Commission as the permitting agency to implement the Air Contaminant Discharge Permit program within its area of jurisdiction. The Regional Agency's program is subject to Department oversight. The requirements and procedures contained in this Division pertaining to the Air Contaminant Discharge Permit program shall be used by the Regional Agency to implement its permitting program until the Regional Agency adopts superseding rules which are at least as restrictive as state rules.
NOTE: This rule is included in the State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan as adopted by the EQC under OAR 340-211-0040.
[ED. NOTE: The tables referenced in this rule are not included in the rule text. Click here for a PDF copy of the tables.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A
Hist.: DEQ 47, f. 8-31-72, ef. 9-15-72; DEQ 63, f. 12-20-73, ef. 1-11-74; DEQ 107, f. & ef. 1-6-76; Renumbered from 340-020-0033; DEQ 125, f. & ef. 12-16-76; DEQ 20-1979, f. & ef. 6-29-79; DEQ 23-1980, f. & ef. 9-26-80; DEQ 13-1981, f. 5-6-81, ef. 7-1-81; DEQ 11-1983, f. & ef. 5-31-83; DEQ 3-1986, f. & ef. 2-12-86; DEQ 12-1987, f. & ef. 6-15-87; DEQ 27-1991, f. & cert. ef. 11-29-91; DEQ 4-1993, f. & cert. ef. 3-10-93; DEQ 12-1993, f. & cert. ef. 9-24-93, Renumbered from 340-020-0155; DEQ 19-1993, f. & cert. ef. 11-4-93; DEQ 22-1994, f. & cert. ef. 10-4-94; DEQ 22-1995, f. & cert. ef. 10-6-95; DEQ 19-1996, f. & cert. ef. 9-24-96; DEQ 22-1996, f. & cert. ef. 10-22-96; DEQ 14-1999, f. & cert. ef. 10-14-99, Renumbered from 340-028-1720; DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01; DEQ 4-2002, f. & cert. ef. 3-14-02; DEQ 7-2007, f. & cert. ef. 10-18-07; DEQ 8-2007, f. & cert. ef. 11-8-07; DEQ 15-2008, f. & cert. ef 12-31-08; DEQ 8-2009, f. & cert. ef. 12-16-09; DEQ 9-2009(Temp), f. 12-24-09, cert. ef. 1-1-10 thru 6-30-10; Administrative correction 7-27-10; DEQ 10-2010(Temp), f. 8-31-10, cert. ef. 9-1-10 thru 2-28-11
340-216-0025
Types of Permits
(1) Construction ACDP:
(a) A Construction ACDP may be used for approval of Type 3 changes specified in OAR 340-210-0220 at a source subject to the ACDP permit requirements in this division.
(b) A Construction ACDP is required for Type 3 changes specified in OAR 340-210-0225 at sources subject to the Oregon Title V Operating Permit requirements.
(2) General ACDP. A General ACDP is for a category of sources for which individual permits are unnecessary in order to protect the environment. An owner or operator of a source may be assigned to a General ACDP if the Department has issued a General ACDP for the source category:
(a) The source meets the qualifications specified in the General ACDP;
(b) The Department determines that the source has not had ongoing, reoccurring, or serious compliance problems; and
(c) The Department determines that a General ACDP would appropriately regulate the source.
(3) Short Term Activity ACDP. A Short Term Activity ACDP is a letter permit that authorizes the activity and includes any conditions placed upon the method or methods of operation of the activity. The Department may issue a Short Term Activity ACDP for unexpected or emergency activities, operations, or emissions.
(4) Basic ACDP. A Basic ACDP is a permit that authorizes the regulated source to operate in conformance with the rules contained in OAR 340 divisions 200 to 268.
(a) Owners and operators of sources and activities listed in Table 1, Part A of OAR 340-216-0020 must at a minimum obtain a Basic ACDP.
(b) Any owner or operator of a source required to obtain a Basic ACDP may obtain either a Simple or Standard ACDP.
(5) Simple ACDP. A Simple ACDP is a permit that contains:
(a) All relevant applicable requirements for source operation, including general ACDP conditions for incorporating generally applicable requirements;
(b) Generic PSELs for all pollutants emitted at more than the deminimis level in accordance with OAR 340 division 222;
(c) Testing, monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements sufficient to determine compliance with the PSEL and other emission limits and standards, as necessary; and
(d) A permit duration not to exceed 5 years.
(6) Standard ACDP:
(a) A Standard ACDP is a permit that contains:
(A) All applicable requirements, including general ACDP conditions for incorporating generally applicable requirements;
(B) Source specific PSELs or Generic PSELs, whichever are applicable, as specified in OAR 340 division 222;
(C) Testing, monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements sufficient to determine compliance with the PSEL and other emission limits and standards, as necessary; and
(D) A permit duration not to exceed 5 years.
(b) All owners and operators of sources and activities listed in Table 1, Part C of OAR 340-216-0020 must obtain a Standard ACDP.
(c) Owners or operators of sources and activities listed in Table 1, Part B of OAR 340-216-0020 which do not qualify for a General ACDP or Simple ACDP must obtain a Standard ACDP.
(d) Any owner or operator of a source not required to obtain a Standard ACDP may obtain a Standard ACDP.
NOTE: This rule is included in the State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan as adopted by the EQC under OAR 340-211-0040.
[ED. NOTE: The tables referenced in this rule are not included in the rule text. Click here for a PDF copy of the tables.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468 & ORS 468A
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468.020 & ORS 468A.025
Hist.: DEQ 47, f. 8-31-72, ef. 9-15-72; DEQ 63, f. 12-20-73, ef. 1-11-74; DEQ 107, f. & ef. 1-6-76; Renumbered from 340-020-0033; DEQ 125, f. & ef. 12-16-76; DEQ 20-1979, f. & ef. 6-29-79; DEQ 23-1980, f. & ef. 9-26-80; DEQ 13-1981, f. 5-6-81, ef. 7-1-81; DEQ 11-1983, f. & ef. 5-31-83; DEQ 3-1986, f. & ef. 2-12-86; DEQ 12-1987, f. & ef. 6-15-87; DEQ 27-1991, f. & cert. ef. 11-29-91; DEQ 4-1993, f. & cert. ef. 3-10-93; DEQ 12-1993, f. & cert. ef. 9-24-93; Renumbered from 340-020-0155; DEQ 19-1993, f. & cert. ef. 11-4-93; DEQ 22-1994, f. & cert. ef. 10-4-94; DEQ 22-1995, f. & cert. ef. 10-6-95; DEQ 19-1996, f. & cert. ef. 9-24-96; DEQ 22-1996, f. & cert. ef. 10-22-96; DEQ14-1999, f. & cert. ef. 10-14-99, Renumbered from 340-028-1720; DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01; DEQ 4-2002, f. & cert. ef. 3-14-02
340-216-0040
Application Requirements
(1) New Permits. Except for Short Term Activity ACDPs, any person required to obtain a new ACDP must provide the following general information, as applicable, using forms provided by the Department in addition to any other information required for a specific permit type:
(a) Identifying information, including the name of the company, the mailing address, the facility address, and the nature of business (Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code);
(b) The name and phone number of a local person responsible for compliance with the permit;
(c) The name of a person authorized to receive requests for data and information;
(d) A description of the production processes and related flow chart;
(e) A plot plan showing the location and height of air contaminant sources. The plot plan must also indicate the nearest residential or commercial property;
(f) The type and quantity of fuels used;
(g) An estimate of the amount and type of each air contaminant emitted by the source in terms of hourly, daily, or monthly and yearly rates, showing calculation procedures;
(h) Any information on pollution prevention measures and cross-media impacts the applicant wants the Department to consider in determining applicable control requirements and evaluating compliance methods;
(i) Estimated efficiency of air pollution control equipment under present or anticipated operating conditions;
(j) Where the operation or maintenance of air pollution control equipment and emission reduction processes can be adjusted or varied from the highest reasonable efficiency and effectiveness, information necessary for the Department to establish operational and maintenance requirements in accordance with OAR 340-226-0120(1) and (2);
(k) A Land Use Compatibility Statement signed by a local (city or county) planner either approving or disapproving construction or modification of the source, if required by the local planning agency; and
(l) Any other information requested by the Department.
(2) Renewal Permits. Except for Short Term Activity ACDPs, any person required to renew an existing permit must submit the information identified in section (1) using forms provided by the Department, unless there are no significant changes to the permit. If there are significant changes, the applicant must provided the information identified in section (1) only for those changes. Where there are no significant changes to the permit , the applicant may use a streamlined permit renewal application process by providing the following information:
(a) Identifying information, including the name of the company, the mailing address, the facility address, and the nature of business (Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code) using a form provided by the Department; and
(b) A marked up copy of the previous permit indicating minor changes along with an explanation for each requested change.
(3) Permit Modifications. For Simple and Standard ACDP modifications, the applicant must provided the information in section (1) relevant to the requested changes to the permit and a list of any new requirements applicable to those changes.
(4) Any owner or operator who fails to submit any relevant facts or who has submitted incorrect information in a permit application must, upon becoming aware of such failure or incorrect submittal, promptly submit such supplementary facts or corrected information.
(5) The department must receive the application at least 60 days before a permit or modified permit is needed.
(6) The application must be completed in full and signed by the applicant or the applicant's legally authorized representative.
(7) Two copies of the application are required, unless otherwise requested by the Department. At least one of the copies must be a paper copy, but the others may be in any other format, including electronic copies, upon approval by the Department.
(8) A copy of NSR permit applications and supplemental information must also be submitted directly to the EPA.
(9) The name of the applicant must be the legal name of the facility or the owner's agent or the lessee responsible for the operation and maintenance of the facility. The legal name must be registered with the Secretary of State Corporations Division.
(10) All applications must include the appropriate fees as specified in Table 2 of OAR 340-216-0020.
(11) Applications that are obviously incomplete, unsigned, improperly signed, or lacking the required exhibits or fees will be rejected by the Department and returned to the applicant for completion.
(12) Within 15 days after receiving the application, the Department will preliminarily review the application to determine the adequacy of the information submitted:
(a) If the Department determines that additional information is needed, the Department will promptly ask the applicant for the needed information. The application will not be considered complete for processing until the requested information is received. The application will be considered withdrawn if the applicant fails to submit the requested information within 90 days of the request;
(b) If, in the opinion of the Department, additional measures are necessary to gather facts regarding the application, the Department will notify the applicant that such measures will be instituted along with the timetable and procedures to be followed. The application will not be considered complete for processing until the necessary additional fact-finding measures are completed. When the information in the application is deemed adequate for processing, the Department will so notify the applicant .
(13) If at any time while processing the application, the Department determines that additional information is needed, the Department will promptly ask the applicant for the needed information. The application will not be considered complete for processing until the requested information is received. The application will be considered withdrawn if the applicant fails to submit the requested information within 90 days of the request.
(14) If, upon review of an application, the Department determines that a permit is not required, the Department will so notify the applicant in writing. Such notification is a final action by the Department on the application.
[NOTE: This rule is included in the State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan as adopted by the EQC under OAR 340-200-0040.]
[ED. NOTE: The tables referenced in this rule are not included in the rule text. Click here for a PDF copy of the tables.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468 & ORS 468A
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468 & ORS 468A
Hist.: DEQ 42, f. 4-5-72, ef. 4-15-72; DEQ 47, f. 8-31-72, ef. 9-15-72; DEQ 63, f. 12-20-73, ef. 1-11-74; DEQ 107, f. & ef. 1-6-76; Renumbered from 340-020-0033; DEQ 20-1979, f. & ef. 6-29-79; DEQ 13-1988, f. & cert. ef. 6-17-88; DEQ 4-1993, f. & cert. ef. 3-10-93; DEQ 12-1993, f. & cert. ef. 9-24-93; Renumbered from 340-020-0175; DEQ 19-1993, f. & cert. ef. 11-4-93; DEQ 14-1999, f. & cert. ef. 10-14-99, Renumbered from 340-028-1770; DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01, Renumbered from 340-014-0020 & 340-014-0030
340-216-0052
Construction ACDP
(1) Purpose. A Construction ACDP is a permit for approval of Type 3 construction or modification changes as specified in OAR 340-210-0220. The Construction ACDP includes requirements for the construction or modification of stationary sources or air pollution control equipment and does not by itself provide authorization to operate the new construction or modification. A new or modified Standard ACDP or Oregon Title V Operating Permit is required before operation of the new construction or modification. A Construction ACDP may be used for the following situations:
(a) For complex construction or modification projects that require an extended period of time to construct, the Construction ACDP may provide construction approval faster than issuance of a Standard ACDP or modified Standard ACDP because the operating requirements would not need to be included in the permit.
(b) For Oregon Title V Operating Permit sources, the Construction ACDP may include the requirements of OAR 340-218-0050 and follow the external review procedures in 340-218-0210 and 340-218-0230 so that the requirements may later be incorporated into the Oregon Title V Operating Permit by an administrative amendment. If the applicant elects to incorporate the Construction ACDP by administrative amendment, all of the application submittal, permit content, and permit issuance requirements of OAR 340 division 218 must be met for the Construction ACDP
(2) Application requirements. Any person requesting a Construction ACDP must:
(a) Submit an application in accordance with OAR 340-216-0040 and provide the information specified in 340-216-0040(1) as it relates to the proposed new construction or modification; and
(b) Provide a list of any applicable requirements related to the new construction or modification.
(3) Fees. Applicants for a Construction ACDP must pay the fees set forth in Table 2 of OAR 340-216-0020.
(4) Permit content. A Construction ACDP must include at least the following:
(a) A requirement that construction must commence within 18 months after the permit is issued;
(b) A requirement to construct in accordance with approved plans;
(c) A requirement to comply with all applicable requirements;
(d) Emission limits for affected stationary sources;
(e) Performance standards for affected stationary sources and air pollution control equipment;
(f) Performance test requirements;
(g) Monitoring requirements, if specialized equipment is required (e.g., continuous monitoring systems);
(h) Notification and reporting requirements (construction status reports, startup dates, source test plans, CEMS performance specification testing plans, etc.);
(i) General ACDP conditions for incorporating generally applicable requirements;
(j) A requirement to modify the operating permit before commencing operation of the new construction or modification;
(k) A permit expiration date of no more than 5 years; and
(l) Oregon Title V Permit requirements as specified in OAR 340-218-0050, if the applicant requests the external review procedures in OAR 340-218-0210 and 340-218-0230.
(5) Permit issuance procedures:
(a) A Construction ACDP requires public notice in accordance with OAR 340 division 209 for Category III permit actions.
(b) For sources subject to the Oregon Title V Operating Permit program, the applicant may ask for the external review procedures in OAR 340-218-0210 and 340-218-0230 in addition to the requirements of OAR 340 division 209 to allow the Construction ACDP to be incorporated into the Oregon Title V Operating Permit later by an administrative amendment provided the requirements of (1)(b) are met.
(c) Issuance of a modified Construction ACDP requires one of the following, as applicable:
(A) Non-technical modifications and non-NSR Basic and Simple technical modifications require public notice in accordance with OAR 340 division 209 for Category I permit actions.
(B) Non-NSR/PSD Moderate and Complex technical modifications require public notice in accordance with OAR 340 division 209 for Category II permit actions.
[ED. NOTE: The tables referenced in this rule are not included in the rule text. Click here for a PDF copy of the tables.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A
Hist.: DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01
340-216-0054
Short Term Activity ACDPs
(1) Application requirements. Any person requesting a Short Term Activity ACDP must apply in writing, fully describing the emergency and the proposed activities, operations, and emissions. The application must include the fees specified in section (2) of this rule.
(2) Fees. Applicants for a Short Term Activity ACDP must pay the fees set forth in Table 2 of 340-216-0020.
(3) Permit content.
(a) This permit includes conditions that ensure adequate protection of property and preservation of public health, welfare, and resources.
(b) A Short Term Activity ACDP does not include a PSEL for any air contaminants discharged as a result of the permitted activity.
(c) A Short Term Activity ACDP automatically terminates 60 days from the date of issuance and may not be renewed.
(d) A Short Term Activity ACDPs will be properly conditioned to ensure adequate protection of property and preservation of public health, welfare and resources.
(4) Permit issuance procedures. A Short Term Activity ACDP requires public notice in accordance with OAR 340 division 209 for Category I permit actions.
[ED. NOTE: The tables referenced in this rule are not included in the rule text. Click here for a PDF copy of the tables.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A
Hist.: DEQ 42, f. 4-5-72, ef. 4-15-72; DEQ 4-1993, f. & cert. ef. 3-10-93; DEQ 22-1996, f. & cert. ef. 10-22-96; DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01, Renumbered from 340-014-0050
340-216-0056
Basic ACDPs
(1) Application requirements. Any person requesting a Basic ACDP must submit an application in accordance with OAR 340-216-0040 and provide the information specified in OAR 340-216-0040(1).
(2) Fees. Applicants for a new Basic ACDP must pay the fees set forth in Table 2 of 340-216-0020.
(3) Permit content:
(a) A Basic ACDP contains only the most significant and relevant rules applicable to the source;
(b) A Basic ACDP does not contain a PSEL;
(c) A Basic ACDP requires a simplified annual report be submitted to the Department; and
(d) A Basic ACDP may be issued for a period not to exceed ten years.
(4) Permit issuance procedures. A Basic ACDP requires public notice in accordance with OAR 340 division 209 for Category I permit actions.
[ED. NOTE: The tables referenced in this rule are not included in the rule text. Click here for a PDF copy of the tables.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A
Hist.: DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01; DEQ 8-2007, f. & cert. ef. 11-8-07
340-216-0060
General Air Contaminant Discharge Permits
(1) Applicability.
(a) The Department may issue a General ACDP under the following circumstances:
(A) There are several sources that involve the same or substantially similar types of operations;
(B) All requirements applicable to the covered operations can be contained in a General ACDP;
(C) The emission limitations, monitoring, recordkeeping, reporting and other enforceable conditions are the same for all operations covered by the General ACDP; and
(D) The pollutants emitted are of the same type for all covered operations.
(b) Permit content. Each General ACDP must include the following:
(A) All relevant requirements for the operations covered by the General ACDP;
(B) Generic PSELs for all pollutants emitted at more than the deminimis level in accordance with OAR 340, division 222;
(C) Testing, monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements necessary to ensure compliance with the PSEL and other applicable emissions limits and standards; and
(D) A permit expiration date not to exceed 10 years from the date of issuance.
(c) Permit issuance procedures: A new General ACDP requires public notice and opportunity for comment in accordance with OAR 340 division 209 for Category III permit actions. A reissued General ACDP or a modification to a General ACDP requires public notice and opportunity for comment in accordance with OAR 340 division 209 for Category II permit actions. All General ACDPs are on file and available for review at the Department's headquarters.
(2) Source assignment:
(a) Application requirements. Any person requesting that a source be assigned to a General ACDP must submit a written application in accordance with OAR 340-216-0040 that includes the information in OAR 340-216-0040(1), specifies the General ACDP source category, and shows that the source qualifies for the General ACDP.
(b) Fees. Applicants must pay the fees set forth in Table 2 of OAR 340-216-0020. The fee class for each General ACDP is as follows:
(A) Hard chrome platers -- Fee Class Three;
(B) Decorative chrome platers -- Fee Class Two;
(C) Halogenated solvent degreasers -- batch cold -- Fee Class Two;
(D) Halogenated solvent degreasers -- batch vapor and in-line -- Fee Class Two;
(E) Halogenated solvent degreasers -- batch cold, batch vapor, and in-line -- Fee Class Two;
(F) Perchloroethylene dry cleaners -- Fee Class Six;
(G) Asphalt plants -- Fee Class Three;
(H) Rock crushers -- Fee Class Two;
(I) Ready-mix concrete -- Fee Class One;
(J) Sawmills, planing mills, millwork, plywood manufacturing and veneer drying -- Fee Class Three;
(K) Boilers -- Fee Class Two;
(L) Crematories -- Fee Class Two;
(M) Grain elevators -- Fee Class One;
(N) Prepared feeds, flour, and cereal -- Fee Class One;
(O) Seed cleaning -- Fee Class One;
(P) Coffee roasters -- Fee Class One;
(Q) Bulk gasoline plants -- Fee Class One;
(R) Electric power generators -- Fee Class Two;
(S) Clay ceramics -- Fee Class One;
(T) Hospital sterilizers -- Fee Class Four;
(U) Secondary nonferrous metals -- Fee Class One;
(V) Gasoline dispensing facilities -- stage I -- Fee Class Five;
(W) Gasoline dispensing facilities -- stage II -- Fee Class Four;
(X) Wood preserving -- Fee Class Four;
(Y) Metal fabrication and finishing -- with two or more of the following operations -- Fee Class Two;
(i) Dry abrasive blasting performed in a vented enclosure or of objects greater than 8 feet (2.4 meters) in any one dimension that uses materials that contain MFHAP or has the potential to emit MFHAP;
(ii) Spray-applied painting operation using MFHAP containing paints;
(iii) Welding operation that uses materials that contain MFHAP or has the potential to emit MFHAP and uses 2,000 pounds or more per year of MFHAP containing welding wire and rod (calculated on a rolling 12-month basis);
(Z) Metal fabrication and finishing -- with only one of the operations listed in subparagraphs (2)(b)(Y)(i) through (iii) of this rule-- Fee Class One:
(AA) Metal fabrication and finishing -- with none of the operations listed in subparagraphs (2)(b)(Y)(i) through (iii) of this rule -- Fee Class Four;
(BB) Plating and polishing -- Fee Class One;
(CC) Surface coating operations -- Fee Class One;
(DD) Paint stripping -- Fee Class One;
(EE) Aluminum, copper, and nonferrous foundries -- Fee Class Two;
(FF) Paints and allied products manufacturing -- Fee Class Two;
(GG) Any General ACDP not listed above -- Fee Class One.
(c) Source assignment procedures:
(A) Assignment of a source to a General ACDP is a Category I permit action and is subject to the Category I public notice requirements in accordance with OAR 340, division 209.
(B) A person is not a permittee under the General ACDP until the Department assigns the General ACDP to the person.
(C) Assignments to General ACDPs and attachment(s) terminate when the General ACDP or attachment expires or is modified, terminated or revoked.
(D) Once a source has been assigned to a General ACDP, if the assigned General ACDP does not cover all requirements applicable to the source, the other applicable requirements must be covered by assignment to one or more General ACDP Attachments in accordance with OAR 340-216-0062, otherwise the source must obtain a Simple or Standard ACDP.
(E) A source requesting to be assigned to a General ACDP Attachment, in accordance with OAR 340-216-0062, for a source category in a higher annual fee class than the General ACDP the source is currently assigned to, must be reassigned to the General ACDP for the source category in the higher annual fee class.
(3) Department Initiated Modification. If the Department determines that the conditions have changed such that a General ACDP for a category needs to be modified, the Department may issue a new General ACDP for that category and assign all existing General ACDP permit holders to the new General ACDP.
(4) Rescission. In addition to OAR 340-216-0082 (Termination or Revocation of an ACDP), the Department may rescind an individual source's assignment to a General ACDP if the source no longer meets the requirements of this rule or the conditions of the permit, including, but not limited to a source having an ongoing, reoccurring or serious compliance problem. Upon rescinding a source's assignment to a General ACDP the Department will place the source on a Simple or Standard ACDP. The Department may also revoke a General ACDP or attachment or both if conditions, standards or rules have changed so the permit or attachment no longer meets the requirements of this rule.
NOTE: This rule is included in the State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan as adopted by the EQC under OAR 340-200-0040.
[ED. NOTE: The tables referenced in this rule are not included in the rule text. Click here for a PDF copy of the tables.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468 & 468A
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468.020 & 468A.025
Hist.: DEQ 14-1998, f. & cert. ef. 9-14-98; DEQ 14-1999, f. & cert. ef. 10-14-99, Renumbered from 340-028-1725; DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01; DEQ 10-2001, f. & cert. ef. 8-30-01; DEQ 4-2002, f. & cert. ef. 3-14-02; DEQ 2-2006, f. & cert. ef. 3-14-06; DEQ 8-2007, f. & cert. ef. 11-8-07; DEQ 15-2008, f. & cert. ef 12-31-08; DEQ 8-2009, f. & cert. ef. 12-16-09
340-216-0064
Simple ACDP
(1) Applicability.
(a) Sources and activities listed in Table 1, Part B of OAR 340-216-0020 that do not qualify for a General ACDP and are not required to obtain a Standard ACDP must, at a minimum, obtain a Simple ACDP.
(b) Any source required to obtain a Simple ACDP may obtain a Standard ACDP.
(c) The Department may determine that a source is ineligible for a Simple ACDP and must obtain a Standard ACDP based upon, but not limited to, the following considerations:
(A) The nature, extent, and toxicity of the source's emissions;
(B) The complexity of the source and the rules applicable to that source;
(C) The complexity of the emission controls and potential threat to human health and the environment if the emission controls fail;
(D) The location of the source; and
(E) The compliance history of the source.
(2) Application Requirements. Any person requesting a new, modified, or renewed Simple ACDP must submit an application in accordance with OAR 340-216-0040.
(3) Fees. Applicants for a new or modified Simple ACDP must pay the fees set forth in Table 2 of 340-216-0020. Annual fees for Simple ACDPs will be assessed based on the following:
(a) Low Fee -- A Source may qualify for the Low Fee if:
(A) the source is, or will be, permitted under only one of the following categories from OAR 340-216-0020 Table 1, Part B (category 25. Electric Power Generation, may be included with any category listed below):
(i) Category 7. Asphalt felt and coatings;
(ii) Category 13. Boilers and other fuel burning equipment;
(iii) Category 33. Galvanizing & Pipe coating;
(iv) Category 39. Gray iron and steel foundries, malleable iron foundries, steel investment foundries, steel foundries 100 or more tons/yr. metal charged (not elsewhere identified);
(v) Category 40. Gypsum products;
(vi) Category 45. Liquid Storage Tanks subject to OAR division 232;
(vii) Category 56. Non-Ferrous Metal Foundries 100 or more tons/yr. of metal charged;
(viii) Category 57. Organic or Inorganic Industrial Chemical Manufacturing;
(ix) Category 62. Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning;
(x) Category 73. Secondary Smelting and/or Refining of Ferrous and Non-Ferrous Metals; or
(xi) Category 85. All Other Sources not listed in Table 1 which would have actual emissions, if the source were to operate uncontrolled, of 5 or more tons a year of direct PM2.5 or PM10 if located in a PM2.5 or PM10 non-attainment or maintenance area, or 10 or more tons of any single criteria pollutant in any part of the state; and
(B) The actual emissions from the 12 months immediately preceding the invoice date, and future projected emissions are less than 5 tons/yr. PM10 in a PM10 nonattainment or maintenance area, and less than 10 tons/yr. for each criteria pollutant; and
(C) The source is not considered an air quality problem or nuisance source by the Department.
(b) High Fee -- Any source required to have a Simple ACDP (OAR 340-216-0020 Table 1 Part B) that does not qualify for the Low Fee will be assessed the High Fee.
(c) If the Department determines that a source was invoiced for the Low Annual Fee but does not meet the Low Fee criteria outlined above, the source will be required to pay the difference between the Low and High Fees, plus applicable late fees in accordance with OAR 340-216-0020 Table 2. Late fees start upon issuance of the initial invoice. In this case, the Department will issue a new invoice specifying applicable fees.
(4) Permit Content.
(a) All relevant applicable requirements for source operation, including general ACDP conditions for incorporating generally applicable requirements;
(b) Generic PSELs for all pollutants emitted at more than the deminimis level in accordance with OAR 340 division 222;
(c) Testing, monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements sufficient to determine compliance with the PSEL and other emission limits and standards, as necessary; and
(d) A permit duration not to exceed 5 years
(5) Permit issuance procedures:
(a) Issuance of a new or renewed Simple ACDP requires public notice in accordance with OAR 340 division 209 for Category II permit actions.
(b) Issuance of a modification to a Simple ACDP requires one of the following procedures, as applicable:
(A) Non-technical and non-NSR/PSD Basic and Simple technical modifications require public notice in accordance with OAR 340, division 209 for Category I permit actions; or
(B) Issuance of non-NSR/PSD Moderate and Complex technical modifications require public notice in accordance with OAR 340 division 209 for Category II permit actions.
[ED. NOTE: The tables referenced in this rule are not included in the rule text. Click here for a PDF copy of the tables.]
340-216-0066
Standard ACDPs
(1) Application requirements. Any person requesting a new, modified, or renewed Standard ACDP must submit an application in accordance with OAR 340-216-0040 and include the following additional information as applicable:
(a) For new or modified Standard ACDPs that are not subject to NSR (OAR 340 division 224) but have emissions increases above the significant emissions rate, the application must include an analysis of the air quality and visibility (federal major sources only) impact of the source or modification, including meteorological and topographical data, specific details of models used, and other information necessary to estimate air quality impacts.
(b) For new or modified Standard ACDPs that are subject to NSR (OAR 340 division 224), the application must include the following additional information as applicable:
(A) A detailed description of the air pollution control equipment and emission reductions processes which are planned for the source or modification, and any other information necessary to determine that BACT or LAER technology, whichever is applicable, would be applied;
(B) An analysis of the air quality and visibility (federal major sources only) impact of the source or modification, including meteorological and topographical data, specific details of models used, and other information necessary to estimate air quality impacts; and
(C) An analysis of the air quality and visibility (federal major sources only) impacts, and the nature and extent of all commercial, residential, industrial, and other source emission growth, which has occurred since January 1, 1978, in the area the source or modification would affect.
(2) Fees. Applicants for a Standard ACDP must pay the fees set forth in Table 2 of 340-216-0020.
(3) Permit content. A Standard ACDP is a permit that contains:
(a) all applicable requirements, including general ACDP conditions for incorporating generally applicable requirements;
(b) Source specific PSELs or Generic PSELs, whichever are applicable, as specified in OAR 340, division 222;
(c) Testing, monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements sufficient to determine compliance with the PSEL and other emission limits and standards, as necessary; and
(d) A permit duration not to exceed 5 years.
(4) Permit issuance procedures.
(a) Issuance of a new or renewed Standard ACDP requires public notice as follows:
(A) For non-NSR permit actions, issuance of a new or renewed Standard ACDP requires public notice in accordance with OAR 340 division 209 for Category III permit actions for any increase in allowed emissions, or Category II permit actions if no emissions increase is allowed.
(B) For NSR permit actions, issuance of a new Standard ACDP requires public notice in accordance with OAR 340 division 209 for Category IV permit actions.
(b) Issuance of a modified Standard ACDP requires one of the following, as applicable:
(A) Non-technical modifications and non-NSR Basic and Simple technical modifications require public notice in accordance with OAR 340 division 209 for Category I permit actions.
(B) Non-NSR/PSD Moderate and Complex technical modifications require public notice in accordance with OAR 340 division 209 for Category II permit actions if no increase in allowed emissions, or Category III permit actions if an increase in emissions is allowed.
(C) NSR/PSD modifications require public notice in accordance with OAR 340 division 209 for Category IV permit actions.
[ED. NOTE: The tables referenced in this rule are not included in the rule text. Click here for a PDF copy of the tables.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A
Hist.: DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01; DEQ 4-2002, f. & cert. ef. 3-14-02
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A
Hist.: DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01; DEQ 4-2002, f. & cert. ef. 3-14-02
340-216-0070
Permitting Multiple Sources at a Single Adjacent or Contiguous Site
A single or contiguous site containing activities or processes that are covered by more than one General ACDP, or a source that contains processes or activities listed in more than one Part of Table 1, Part A to Part C, OAR 340-216-0020 may obtain a Standard ACDP.
[NOTE: This rule is included in the State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan as adopted by the EQC under OAR 340-200-0040.]
[ED. NOTE: The tables referenced in this rule are not included in the rule text. Click here for a PDF copy of the tables.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468 & ORS 468A
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468 & ORS 468A
Hist.: DEQ 47, f. 8-31-72, ef. 9-15-72; DEQ 63, f. 12-20-73, ef. 1-11-74; DEQ 107, f. & ef. 1-6-76; Renumbered from 340-020-0003; DEQ 4-1993, f. & cert. ef. 3-10-93; DEQ 12-1993, f. & cert. ef. 9-24-93; Renumbered from 340-020-0160; DEQ 19-1993, f. & cert. ef. 11-4-93; DEQ 14-1999, f. & cert. ef. 10-14-99, Renumbered from 340-028-1730; DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01
340-216-0090
Sources Subject to ACDPs and Fees
All air contaminant discharge sources listed in Table 1 OAR 340-216-0020 must obtain a permit from the Department and are subject to fees as set forth in Table 2 OAR 340-216-0020.
[NOTE: This rule is included in the State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan as adopted by the EQC under OAR 340-200-0040.]
[ED. NOTE: The tables referenced in this rule are not included in the rule text. Click here for a PDF copy of the tables.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020 & ORS 468A.040
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468.065
Hist.: DEQ 47, f. 8-31-72, ef. 9-15-72; DEQ 63, f. 12-20-73, ef. 1-11-74; DEQ 107, f. & ef. 1-6-76; Renumbered from 340-020-0033.12; DEQ 125, f. & ef. 12-16-76; DEQ 20-1979, f. & ef. 6-29-79; DEQ 11-1983, f. & ef. 5-31-83; DEQ 6-1986, f. & ef. 3-26-86; DEQ 12-1987, f. & ef. 6-15-87; DEQ 17-1990, f. & cert. ef. 5-25-90; DEQ 27-1991, f. & cert. ef. 11-29-91; DEQ 4-1993, f. & cert. ef. 3-10-93; DEQ 12-1993, f. & cert. ef. 9-24-93; Renumbered from 340-020-0165; DEQ 19-1993, f. & cert. ef. 11-4-93; DEQ 20-1993(Temp), f. & cert. ef. 11-4-93; DEQ 13-1994, f. & cert. ef. 5-19-94; DEQ 21-1994, f. & cert. ef. 10-14-94; DEQ 22-1994. f. & cert. ef. 10-14-94; DEQ 22-1995, f. & cert. ef. 10-6-95; DEQ 18-1997, f. 8-27-97, cert. ef. 10-1-97; DEQ 7-1998, f. & cert. ef. 5-5-98; DEQ 12-1998, f. & cert. ef. 6-30-98; DEQ 14-1998, f. & cert. ef. 9-14-98; DEQ 10-1999, f. & cert. ef. 7-1-99; DEQ 14-1999, f. & cert. ef. 10-14-99, Renumbered from 340-028-1750; DEQ 8-2000, f. & cert. ef. 6-6-00; DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01
DIVISION 216
OAR 340-216-0020
AIR CONTAMINANT DISCHARGE PERMITS
Table 1
Part A: Activities and Sources
The following commercial and industrial sources must obtain a Basic ACDP under the procedures set forth in 340-216-0056 unless the source is required to obtain a different form of ACDP by Part B or C hereof: (Production and emission parameters are based on the latest consecutive 12 month period, or future projected operation, whichever is higher. Emission cutoffs are based on actual emissions.)
1. ** Autobody Repair or Painting Shops painting more than 25 automobiles in a year.
2. Concrete Manufacturing including Redimix and CTB more than 5,000 but less than 25,000 cubic yards per year output.
3. Crematory and Pathological Waste Incinerators with less than 20 tons/yr. material input.
4. Natural gas and propane fired boilers (with or without #2 diesel oil back-up****) of 10 or more MMBTU but less than 30 MMBTU/hr heat input constructed after June 9, 1989.
5. Prepared feeds for animals and fowl and associated grain elevators more than 1,000 tons/yr. but less than 10,000 tons per year throughput.
6. Rock, Concrete or Asphalt Crushing both portable and stationary more than 5,000 tons/yr. but less than 25,000 tons/yr. crushed.
7. Surface coating operations whose actual or expected usage of coating materials is greater than 250 gallons per month, excluding sources that exclusively use non-VOC and non-HAP containing coatings (e.g. powder coating operations).
Part B Activities and Sources
The following commercial and industrial sources must obtain either:
• a General ACDP, if one is available for the source classification and the source qualifies for a General ACDP under the procedures set forth in 340-216-0060;
• a Simple ACDP under the procedures set forth in 340-216-0064; or
• a Standard ACDP under the procedures set forth in 340-216-0066 if the source fits one of the criteria of Part C hereof.
1. Aerospace or Aerospace Parts Manufacturing
2. Aluminum, Copper, and Other Nonferrous Foundries subject to an Area Source NESHAP
3. Aluminum Production - Primary
4. Ammonia Manufacturing
5. Animal Rendering and Animal Reduction Facilities
6. Asphalt Blowing Plants
7. Asphalt Felts or Coating
8. Asphaltic Concrete Paving Plants both stationary and portable
9. Bakeries, Commercial over 10 tons of VOC emissions per year
10. Battery Separator Manufacturing
11. Battery Manufacturing and Re-manufacturing
12. Beet Sugar Manufacturing
13. Boilers and other Fuel Burning Equipment over 10 MMBTU/hr. heat input, except exclusively Natural Gas and Propane fired units (with or without #2 diesel backup) under 30 MMBTU/hr. heat input
14. Building paper and Buildingboard Mills
15. Calcium Carbide Manufacturing
16. *** Can or Drum Coating
17. Cement Manufacturing
18. * Cereal Preparations and Associated Grain Elevators 10,000 or more tons/yr. throughput
19. Charcoal Manufacturing
20. Chlorine and Alkalies Manufacturing
21. Chrome Plating
22. Clay Ceramics Manufacturing subject to an Area Source NESHAP
23. Coffee Roasting (roasting 30 or more tons per year)
24. Concrete Manufacturing including Redimix and CTB 25,000 or more cubic yards per year output
25. Crematory and Pathological Waste Incinerators 20 or more tons/yr. material input
26. Degreasers (halogenated solvents subject to a NESHAP)
27. Electrical Power Generation from combustion, excluding units used exclusively as emergency generators and units less than 500 kW
28. Commercial Ethylene Oxide Sterilization, excluding facilities using less than 1 ton of ethylene oxide within all consecutive 12-month periods after December 6, 1996
29. Ferroalloy Production Facilities subject to an Area Source NESHAP
30. *** Flatwood Coating regulated by Division 232
31. *** Flexographic or Rotogravure Printing subject to RACT
32. * Flour, Blended and/or Prepared and Associated Grain Elevators 10,000 or more tons/yr. throughput
33. Galvanizing and Pipe Coating (except galvanizing operations that use less than 100 tons of zinc/yr.)
34. Gasoline Bulk Plants, Bulk Terminals, and Pipeline Facilities
35. Gasoline dispensing facilities, excluding gasoline dispensing facilities with monthly throughput of less than 10,000 gallons of gasoline per month
36. Glass and Glass Container Manufacturing
37. * Grain Elevators used for intermediate storage 10,000 or more tons/yr. throughput
38. Grain terminal elevators
39. Gray iron and steel foundries, malleable iron foundries, steel investment foundries, steel foundries 100 or more tons/yr. metal charged (not elsewhere identified)
40. Gypsum Products Manufacturing
41. Hardboard Manufacturing (including fiberboard)
42. Hospital sterilization operations subject to an Area Source NESHAP.
43. Incinerators with two or more ton per day capacity
44. Lime Manufacturing
45. *** Liquid Storage Tanks subject to OAR Division 232
46. Magnetic Tape Manufacturing
47. Manufactured and Mobile Home Manufacturing
48. Marine Vessel Petroleum Loading and Unloading
49. Metal Fabrication and Finishing Operations subject to an Area Source NESHAP, excluding facilities that meet all the following:
a. Do not perform any of the operations listed in OAR 340-216-0060(2)(b)(Y)(i) and (iii);
b. Do not perform shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) using metal fabrication and finishing hazardous air pollutant (MFHAP) containing wire or rod; and
c. Use less than 100 pounds of MFHAP containing welding wire and rod per year
50. Millwork (including kitchen cabinets and structural wood members) 25,000 or more bd. ft./maximum 8 hr. input
51. Molded Container
52. Motor Coach Manufacturing
53. Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Surface Coating Operations subject to an Area Source NESHAP, excluding motor vehicle surface coating operations painting less than 10 vehicles per year or using less than 20 gallons of coating per year and motor vehicle surface coating operations registered pursuant to OAR 340-210-0100(2)
54. Natural Gas and Oil Production and Processing and associated fuel burning equipment
55. Nitric Acid Manufacturing
56. Non-Ferrous Metal Foundries 100 or more tons/yr. of metal charged
57. Organic or Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing and Distribution with ½ or more tons per year emissions of any one criteria pollutant (sources in this category with less than ½ ton/yr. of each criteria pollutant are not required to have an ACDP)
58. Paint and Allied Products Manufacturing subject to an Area Source NESHAP
59. Paint Stripping and Miscellaneous Surface Coating Operations subject to an Area Source NESHAP
60. *** Paper or other Substrate Coating
61. Particleboard Manufacturing (including strandboard, flakeboard, and waferboard)
62. Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Operations subject to an Area Source NESHAP, excluding perchloroethylene dry cleaning operations registered pursuant to OAR 340-210-0100(2)
63. Pesticide Manufacturing 5,000 or more tons/yr. annual production
64. Petroleum Refining and Re-refining of Lubricating Oils and Greases including Asphalt Production by Distillation and the reprocessing of oils and/or solvents for fuels
65. Plating and Polishing Operations subject to an Area Source NESHAP
66. Plywood Manufacturing and/or Veneer Drying
67. Prepared Feeds Manufacturing for animals and fowl and associated grain elevators 10,000 or more tons per year throughput
68. Primary Smelting and/or Refining of Ferrous and Non-Ferrous Metals
69. Pulp, Paper and Paperboard Mills
70. Rock, Concrete or Asphalt Crushing both portable and stationary 25,000 or more tons/yr. crushed
71. Sawmills and/or Planing Mills 25,000 or more bd. ft./maximum 8 hr. finished product
72. Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing subject to an Area Source NESHAP
73. Secondary Smelting and/or Refining of Ferrous and Non-Ferrous Metals
74. * Seed Cleaning and Associated Grain Elevators 5,000 or more tons/yr. throughput
75. Sewage Treatment Facilities employing internal combustion for digester gasses
76. Soil Remediation Facilities stationary or portable
77. Steel Works, Rolling and Finishing Mills
78. *** Surface Coating in Manufacturing subject to RACT
79. Surface Coating Operations with actual emissions of VOCs before add on controls of 10 or more tons/yr.
80. Synthetic Resin Manufacturing
81. Tire Manufacturing
82. Wood Furniture and Fixtures 25,000 or more bd. ft./maximum 8 hr. input
83. Wood Preserving (excluding waterborne)
84. All Other Sources not listed herein that the Department determines an air quality concern exists or one which would emit significant malodorous emissions
85. All Other Sources not listed herein which would have actual emissions, if the source were to operate uncontrolled, of 5 or more tons a year of direct PM2.5 or PM10 if located in a PM2.5 or PM10 non-attainment or maintenance area, or 10 or more tons of any single criteria pollutant in any part of the state
Part C: Activities and Sources
The following sources must obtain a Standard ACDP under the procedures set forth in 340-
216-0066:
1. Incinerators for PCBs and / or other hazardous wastes
2. All Sources that the Department determines have emissions that constitute a nuisance
3. All Sources electing to maintain the source’s baseline emission rate, or netting basis
4. All Sources subject to a RACT, BACT, LAER, NESHAP adopted in OAR 340-244-0220, NSPS, State MACT, or other significant Air Quality regulation(s), except:
a. Source categories for which a General ACDP has been issued.
b. Sources with less than 10 tons/yr. actual emissions that are subject to RACT, NSPS or a NESHAP adopted in OAR 340-244-0220 which qualify for a Simple ACDP.
c. Sources registered pursuant to OAR 340-210-0100(2).
d. Electrical power generation units used exclusively as emergency generators and units less than 500 kW.
e. Gasoline dispensing facilities, provided the gasoline dispensing facility has monthly throughput of less than 10,000 gallons of gasoline per month
f. Motor vehicle surface coating operations painting less than 10 vehicles per year or using less than 20 gallons of coating per year.
g. Commercial ethylene oxide sterilization operations using less than 1 ton of ethylene oxide within all consecutive 12-month periods after December 6, 1996.
h. Metal fabrication and finishing operations that meet all the following:
A. Do not perform any of the operations listed in OAR 340-216-0060(2)(b)(Y)(i) and (iii);
B. Do not perform shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) using metal fabrication and finishing hazardous air pollutant (MFHAP) containing wire or rod; and
C. Use less than 100 pounds of MFHAP containing welding wire and rod per year
5. All sources having the potential to emit more than 100,000 tons CO2e of GHG emissions in a year.
6. All Sources having the Potential to Emit more than 100 tons of any regulated air contaminant in a year, other than GHGs and HAPs
7. All Sources having the Potential to Emit more than 10 tons of a single hazardous air pollutant in a year
8. All Sources having the Potential to Emit more than 25 tons of all hazardous air pollutants combined in a year
Notes:
* Applies only to Special Control Areas
** Portland AQMA only
*** Portland AQMA, Medford-Ashland AQMA or Salem SKATS only
**** “back-up” means less than 10,000 gallons of fuel per year
Table 2
Part 1. Initial Permitting Application Fees: (in addition to first annual fee)
a. Short Term Activity ACDP | $3,000.00 |
b. Basic ACDP | $120.00 |
c. Assignment to General ACDP | $1,200.00* |
d. Simple ACDP | $6,000.00 |
e. Construction ACDP | $9,600.00 |
f. Standard ACDP | $12,000.00 |
g. Standard ACDP (PSD/NSR) | $42,000.00 |
*DEQ may waive the assignment fee for an existing source requesting to be assigned to a General ACDP because the source is subject to a newly adopted area source NESHAP as long as the existing source requests assignment within 90 days of notification by DEQ.
Part 2. Annual Fees: (Due date 12/1* for 1/1 to 12/31 of the following year)
a. Short Term Activity ACDP |
| $NA |
b. Basic ACDP |
| $360.00 |
c. General ACDP | (A) Fee Class One | $720.00 |
(B) Fee Class Two | $1,296.00 | |
(C) Fee Class Three | $1,872.00 | |
(D) Fee Class Four | $360.00 | |
(E) Fee Class Five | $120.00 | |
(F) Fee Class Six | $240.00 | |
d. Simple ACDP | (A) Low Fee | $1,920.00 |
(B) High Fee | $3,840.00 | |
e. Standard ACDP | $7,680.00 |
*The payment due date for dry cleaners or gasoline dispensing facilities may be extended by the Department until March 1st.
Part 3. Specific Activity Fees:
a. Non-Technical Permit Modification (1) | $360.00 |
b. Non-PSD/NSR Basic Technical Permit Modification (2) | $360.00 |
c. Non-PSD/NSR Simple Technical Permit Modification(3) | $1,200.00 |
d. Non-PSD/NSR Moderate Technical Permit Modification (4) | $6,000.00 |
e. Non-PSD/NSR Complex Technical Permit Modification (5) | $12,000.00 |
f. PSD/NSR Modification | $42,000.00 |
g. Modeling Review (outside PSD/NSR) | $6,000.00 |
h. Public Hearing at Source's Request | $2,400.00 |
i. State MACT Determination | $6,000.00 |
j. Compliance Order Monitoring (6) | $120.00/month |
k. Greenhouse Gas Reporting, as required by OAR 340-215- | 15% of the applicable annual fee in Part 2 |
• Part 4. Late Fees:
a. 8-30 days late 5%
b. 31-60 days late 10%
c. 61 or more days late 20%
1. Non-Technical modifications include, but are not limited to name changes, change of ownership and similar administrative changes. For gasoline dispensing facilities, a portion of these fees will be used to cover the fees required for changes of ownership in OAR 340-150-0052(4).
2. Basic Technical Modifications include, but are not limited to corrections of emission factors in compliance methods, changing source test dates for extenuating circumstances, and similar changes.
3. Simple Technical Modifications include, but are not limited to, incorporating a PSEL compliance method from a review report into an ACDP, modifying a compliance method to use different emission factors or process parameter, changing source test dates for extenuating circumstances, changing reporting frequency, incorporating NSPS and NESHAP requirements that do not require judgment, and similar changes.
4. Moderate Technical Modifications include, but are not limited to incorporating a relatively simple new compliance method into a permit, adding a relatively simple compliance method or monitoring for an emission point or control device not previously addressed in a permit, revising monitoring and reporting requirements other than dates and frequency, adding a new applicable requirement into a permit due to a change in process or change in rules and that does not require judgment by the Department, incorporating NSPS and NESHAP requirements that do not require judgment, and similar changes.
5. Complex Technical Modifications include, but are not limited to incorporating a relatively complex new compliance method into a permit, adding a relatively complex compliance method or monitoring for an emission point or control devise not previously addressed in a permit, adding a relatively complex new applicable requirement into a permit due to a change in process or change in rules and that requires judgment by the Department, and similar changes.
6. This is a one time fee payable when a Compliance Order is established in a Permit or a Department Order containing a compliance schedule becomes a Final Order of the Department and is based on the number of months the Department will have to oversee the Order.
DIVISION 222
STATIONARY SOURCE PLANT SITE EMISSION LIMITS
340-222-0042
Short Term PSEL
(1) For sources located in areas with established short term SER (OAR 340-200-0020 Table 3), PSELs are required on a short term basis for those pollutants that have a short term SER. The short term averaging period is daily, unless emissions cannot be monitored on a daily basis. The averaging period for short term PSELs can never be greater than monthly.
(a) For existing sources, the initial short term PSEL will be set as:
(A) the lesser of the short term capacity or the current permit's short term PSEL, if each is greater than or equal to the short term SER; or
(B) the generic PSEL, if either the short term capacity or the current short term PSEL is less than the short term SER.
(b) For new sources, the initial short term PSEL will be zero.
(2) If an applicant wants a short term PSEL at a rate greater than the initial short term PSEL, the applicant must:
(a) Demonstrate that the requested increase over the initial short term PSEL is less than the significant emission rate (Note: In this case new sources would get a generic PSEL); or
(b) For increases equal to or greater than the SER over the initial short term PSEL:
(A) Obtain offsets and demonstrate a net air quality benefit in accordance with OAR 340-225-0090;
(B) Obtain an allocation from an available growth allowance in accordance with the applicable maintenance plan; or
(C) For carbon monoxide, demonstrate that the source or modification will not cause or contribute to an air quality impact equal to or greater than 0.5 mg/m3 (8 hour average) and 2 mg/m3 (1 hour average).
(D) For federal major sources, demonstrate compliance with air quality related values (AQRV) protection in accordance with OAR 340-225-0070.
(3) Once the short term PSEL is increased pursuant to section (2) of this rule, the increased level becomes the initial short term PSEL for future evaluations.
[ED. NOTE: The Table(s) referenced in this rule is not printed in the OAR Compilation. Copies are available from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A
Hist.: DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01
340-222-0045
Unassigned Emissions
(1) Purpose. The purpose of unassigned emissions is to track and manage the difference in the quantity of emissions between the netting basis and what the source could emit based on the facility's current physical and operational design.
(2) Establishing unassigned emissions.
(a) Unassigned emissions equal the netting basis minus the source's current PTE, minus any banked emission reduction credits. Unassigned emissions are zero if this result is negative.
(b) Unused capacity created after the effective date of this rule due to reduced potential to emit that is not banked or expired emission reduction credits (OAR 340-268-0030), increase unassigned emissions on a ton for ton basis.
(3) Maximum unassigned emissions.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, unassigned emissions will be reduced to not more than the SER (OAR 340-200-0020 Table 2) on July 1, 2007 and at each permit renewal following this date.
(b) The netting basis is reduced by the amount that unassigned emissions are reduced.
(c) In an AQMA where the EPA requires an attainment demonstration based on dispersion modeling, unassigned emissions are not subject to reduction under this rule.
(4) Using unassigned emissions.
(a) Unassigned emissions may be used for internal netting to allow an emission increase at the existing source in accordance with the permit.
(b) Unassigned emissions may not be banked or transferred to another source.
(c) Emissions that are removed from the netting basis are unavailable for netting in any future permit actions.
(5) Upon renewal, modification or other reopening of a permit after July 1, 2002 the unassigned emissions will be established with an expiration date of July 1, 2007 for all unassigned emissions in excess of the SER. Each time the permit is renewed after July 1, 2007 the unassigned emissions will be established again and reduced upon the following permit renewal to no more than the SER for each pollutant in OAR 340-200-0020 Table 2.
[NOTE: This rule is included in the State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan as adopted by the EQC under OAR 340-200-0040.]
[ED. NOTE: The Table(s) referenced in this rule is not printed in the OAR Compilation. Copies are available from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020 & ORS 468A.310
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468 & ORS 468A
Hist.: DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01
DIVISION 224
MAJOR NEW SOURCE REVIEW
340-224-0010
Applicability and General Prohibitions
(1) Within designated nonattainment and maintenance areas, this division applies to owners and operators of proposed major sources and major modifications for the regulated pollutant(s) for which the area is designated nonattainment or maintenance.
(2) Within attainment and unclassifiable areas, this division applies to owners and operators of proposed federal major sources and major modifications at federal major sources for the regulated pollutant(s) for which the area is designated attainment or unclassified.
(3) Owners and operators of sources that do not meet the applicability criteria of sections (1) or (2) of this rule are subject to other Department rules, including Highest and Best Practicable Treatment and Control Required (OAR 340-226-0100 through 340-226-0140), Notice of Construction and Approval of Plans (340-210-0205 through 340-210-0250), ACDPs (OAR 340 division 216), Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Contaminants (OAR 340 division 244), and Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources (OAR 340 division 238).
(4) No owner or operator of a source that meets the applicability criteria of sections (1) or (2) of this rule may begin construction without having received an air contaminant discharge permit (ACDP) from the Department and having satisfied the requirements of this division.
(5) Beginning May 1, 2011, the pollutant GHGs is subject to regulation if:
(a) The source is a new federal major source for a regulated pollutant that is not GHGs, and also emits, will emit or will have the potential to emit 75,000 tons per year CO2e or more; or
(b) The source is or becomes a federal major source subject to OAR 340-224-0070 as a result of a major modification for a regulated pollutant that is not GHGs, and will have an emissions increase of 75,000 tons per year CO2e or more over the netting basis.
(6) Beginning July 1, 2011, in addition to the provisions in section (5) of this rule, the pollutant GHGs shall also be subject to regulation at:
(a) A new federal major source; or
(b) A source that is or becomes a federal major source when such source undertakes a major modification.
(7) Subject to the requirements in this division, the Lane Regional Air Protection Agency is designated by the Commission as the permitting agency to implement the Oregon Major New Source Review program within its area of jurisdiction. The Regional Agency's program is subject to Department oversight. The requirements and procedures contained in this division pertaining to the Major New Source Review program shall be used by the Regional Agency to implement its permitting program until the Regional Agency adopts superseding rules which are at least as restrictive as state rules.
[NOTE: This rule is included in the State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan as adopted by the EQC under OAR 340-200-0040.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A.025
Hist.: DEQ 25-1981, f. & ef. 9-8-81; DEQ 4-1993, f. & cert. ef. 3-10-93; DEQ 12-1993, f. & cert. ef. 9-24-93; Renumbered from 340-020-0220; DEQ 19-1993, f. & cert. ef. 11-4-93; DEQ 26-1996, f. & cert. ef. 11-26-96; DEQ 14-1999, f. & cert. ef. 10-14-99, Renumbered from 340-028-1900; DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01; DEQ 1-2004, f.& cert. ef. 4-14-04
340-224-0050
Requirements for Sources in Nonattainment Areas
Within a designated nonattainment area, proposed major sources and major modifications of a nonattainment pollutant, including VOC or NOx in a designated ozone nonattainment area or SO2 or NOx in a designated PM2.5 nonattainment area, must meet the requirements listed below:
(1) Lowest Achievable Emission Rate (LAER). The owner or operator must apply LAER for each nonattainment pollutant or precursor(s) emitted at or above the significant emission rate (SER). LAER applies separately to the nonattainment pollutant or precursor(s) if emitted at or above a SER over the netting basis.
(a) For a major modification, the requirement for LAER applies to the following:
(A) Each emissions unit that emits the nonattainment pollutant or precursor(s) and is not included in the most recent netting basis established for that pollutant; and
(B) Each emissions unit that emits the nonattainment pollutant or precursor (s) and is included in the most recent netting basis but has been modified and the modification resulted in an increase in actual emissions above the portion of the most recent netting basis attributable to the emissions unit or the nonattainment pollutant or precursor(s).
(b) For phased construction projects, the LAER determination must be reviewed at the latest reasonable time before commencing construction of each independent phase.
(c) When determining LAER for a change that was made at a source before the current NSR application, the Department will consider technical feasibility of retrofitting required controls provided:
(A) The change was made in compliance with NSR requirements in effect when the change was made, and
(B) No limit will be relaxed that was previously relied on to avoid NSR.
(d) Modifications to individual emissions units that increase the potential to emit less than 10 percent of the SER are exempt from this section unless:
(A) They are not constructed yet;
(B) They are part of a discrete, identifiable, larger project that was constructed within the previous 5 years and is equal to or greater than 10 percent of the SER; or
(C) They were constructed without, or in violation of, the Department's approval.
(2) Offsets and Net Air Quality Benefit. The owner or operator must obtain offsets and demonstrate that a net air quality benefit will be achieved as specified in OAR 340-225-0090.
(3) Additional Requirements:
(a) The owner or operator of a source that emits or has the potential to emit 100 tons per year or more of any regulated pollutant subject to this division must evaluate alternative sites, sizes, production processes, and environmental control techniques for the proposed source or modification and demonstrate that benefits of the proposed source or modification will significantly outweigh the environmental and social costs imposed as a result of its location, construction or modification.
(b) The owner or operator of a source that emits or has the potential to emit 100 tons per year or more of any regulated pollutant subject to this division must demonstrate that all major sources owned or operated by such person (or by an entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with such person) in the state are in compliance, or are on a schedule for compliance, with all applicable emission limitations and standards under the Act.
(c) The owner or operator of a federal major source must meet the visibility impact requirements in OAR 340-225-0070.
NOTE: This rule is included in the State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan as adopted by the EQC under OAR 340-200-0040.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A.025
Hist.: DEQ 25-1981, f. & ef. 9-8-81; DEQ 5-1983, f. & ef. 4-18-83; DEQ 27-1992, f. & cert. ef. 11-12-92; DEQ 4-1993, f. & cert. ef. 3-10-93; DEQ 12-1993, f. & cert. ef. 9-24-93, Renumbered from 340-020-0240; DEQ 19-1993, f. & cert. ef. 11-4-93; DEQ 10-1995, f. & cert. ef. 5-1-95; DEQ 22-1995, f. & cert. ef. 10-6-95; DEQ 26-1996, f. & cert. ef. 11-26-96; DEQ 16-1998, f. & cert. ef. 9-23-98; DEQ 1-1999, f. & cert. ef.1-25-99; DEQ 14-1999, f. & cert. ef. 10-14-99, Renumbered from 340-028-1930; DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01; DEQ 1-2004, f. & cert. ef. 4-14-04; DEQ 3-2007, f. & cert. ef. 4-12-07
340-224-0060
Requirements for Sources in Maintenance Areas
Within a designated maintenance area, proposed major sources and major modifications of a maintenance pollutant, including VOC or NOx in a designated ozone maintenance area or SO2 or NOx in a designated PM2.5 maintenance area, must meet the requirements listed below:
(1) Best Available Control Technology (BACT). Except as provided in section (5) and (6) of this rule, the owner or operator must apply BACT for each maintenance pollutant or precursor(s) emitted at or above a significant emission rate (SER). BACT applies separately to the maintenance pollutant or precursor(s) if emitted at or above a SER over the netting basis.
(a) For a major modification, the requirement for BACT applies to the following:
(A) Each emissions unit that emits the maintenance pollutant or precursor(s) and is not included in the most recent netting basis established for that pollutant; and
(B) Each emissions unit that emits the maintenance pollutant or precursor (s) and is included in the most recent netting basis but has been modified and the modification resulted in an increase in actual emissions above the portion of the most recent netting basis attributable to the emissions unit or the maintenance pollutant or precursor(s). (b) For phased construction projects, the BACT determination must be reviewed at the latest reasonable time before commencement of construction of each independent phase.
(c) When determining BACT for a change that was made at a source before the current NSR application, the technical and economic feasibility of retrofitting required controls may be considered, provided:
(A) The change was made in compliance with NSR requirements in effect when the change was made; and
(B) No limit is being relaxed that was previously relied on to avoid NSR.
(d) Modifications to individual emissions units that increase the potential to emit less than 10 percent of the significant emission rate are exempt from this section unless:
(A) They are not constructed yet;
(B) They are part of a discrete, identifiable larger project that was constructed within the previous 5 years and that is equal to or greater than 10 percent of the significant emission rate; or
(C) They were constructed without, or in violation of, the Department's approval.
(2) Air Quality Protection:
(a) Offsets and Net Air Quality Benefit. Except as provided in subsections (b), (c), (d) and (e) of this section, the owner or operator must obtain offsets and demonstrate that a net air quality benefit will be achieved in the area as specified in OAR 340-225-0090.
(b) Growth Allowance. The requirements of this section may be met in whole or in part in an ozone or carbon monoxide maintenance area with an allocation by the Department from a growth allowance, if available, in accordance with the applicable maintenance plan in the SIP adopted by the Commission and approved by EPA. An allocation from a growth allowance used to meet the requirements of this section is not subject to OAR 340-225-0090. Procedures for allocating the growth allowances for the Oregon portion of the Portland-Vancouver Interstate Maintenance Area for Ozone and the Portland Maintenance Area for Carbon Monoxide are contained in 340-242-0430 and 340-242-0440.
(c) In a carbon monoxide maintenance area, a proposed carbon monoxide major source or major modification is exempt from subsections (a) and (b) of this section if the owner or operator can demonstrate that the source or modification will not cause or contribute to an air quality impact equal to or greater than 0.5 mg/m3 (8 hour average) and 2 mg/m3 (1-hour average). The demonstration must comply with the requirements of OAR 340-225-0045.
(d) In a PM10 maintenance area, a proposed PM10 major source or major modification is exempt from subsection (a) of this section if the owner or operator can demonstrate, pursuant to the requirements of OAR 340-225-0045, that the source or modification will not cause or contribute to an air quality impact in excess of:
(A) 120 ug/m3 (24-hour average) or 40 ug/m3 (annual average) in the Grants Pass PM10 maintenance area;
(B) 140 ug/m3 (24-hour average) or 47 ug/m3 (annual average) in the Klamath Falls PM10 maintenance area; or
(C) 140 ug/m3 (24-hour average) or 45 ug/m3 (annual average) in the Lakeview PM10 maintenance area. In addition, a single source impact is limited to an increase of 5 ug/m3 (24-hour average) in the Lakeview PM10 maintenance area.
(e) Proposed major sources and major modifications located in or that impact the Salem Ozone Maintenance Area are exempt from OAR 340-225-0090 and section (2)(a) of this rule for VOC and NOx emissions with respect to ozone formation in the Salem Ozone Maintenance Area.
(3) The owner or operator of a source subject to this rule must provide an air quality analysis in accordance with OAR 340-225-0050(1) and (2), and 340-225-0060.
(4) Additional Requirements for Federal Major Sources: The owner or operator of a federal major source subject to this rule must provide an analysis of the air quality impacts for the proposed source or modification in accordance with OAR 340-225-0050(3) and 340-225-0070. In addition to the provisions of this section, provisions of section 340-224-0070 also apply to federal major sources.
(5) Contingency Plan Requirements. If the contingency plan in an applicable maintenance plan is implemented due to a violation of an ambient air quality standard, this section applies in addition to other requirements of this rule until the Commission adopts a revised maintenance plan and EPA approves it as a SIP revision.
(a) The requirement for BACT in section (1) of this rule is replaced by the requirement for LAER contained in OAR 340-224-0050(1).
(b) An allocation from a growth allowance may not be used to meet the requirement for offsets in section (2) of this rule.
(c) The exemption provided in subsection (2)(c) and (2)(d) of this rule for major sources or major modifications within a carbon monoxide or PM10 maintenance area no longer applies.
(6) Medford-Ashland AQMA: Proposed major sources and major modifications that would emit PM10 within the Medford-Ashland AQMA must meet the LAER emission control technology requirements in OAR 340-224-0050.
(7) Pending Redesignation Requests. This rule does not apply to a proposed major source or major modification for which a complete application to construct was submitted to the Department before the maintenance area was redesignated from nonattainment to attainment by EPA. Such a source is subject to OAR 340-224-0050.
NOTE: This rule is included in the State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan as adopted by the EQC under OAR 340-200-0040.
[Publications: Publications referenced are available from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A.025
Hist.: DEQ 26-1996, f. & cert. ef. 11-26-96; DEQ 15-1998, f. & cert. ef. 9-23-98; DEQ 1-1999, f. & cert. ef. 1-25-99; DEQ 14-1999, f. & cert. ef. 10-14-99, Renumbered from 340-028-1935; DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01; DEQ 11-2002, f. & cert. ef. 10-8-02; DEQ 1-2005, f. & cert. ef. 1-4-05; DEQ 9-2005, f. & cert. ef. 9-9-05; DEQ 3-2007, f. & cert. ef. 4-12-07
340-224-0070
Prevention of Significant Deterioration Requirements for Sources in Attainment or Unclassified Areas
Within a designated attainment or unclassified area, proposed federal major sources and major modifications at federal major sources for the pollutant(s) for which the area is designated attainment or unclassified, must meet the requirements listed below:
(1) Best Available Control Technology (BACT). The owner or operator must apply BACT for each pollutant or precursor(s) emitted at or above a significant emission rate (SER). BACT applies separately to the pollutant or precursor(s) if emitted at or above a SER over the netting basis. In the Medford-Ashland AQMA, the owner or operator of any proposed new federal major PM10 source, or proposed major modification of a federal major PM10 source must comply with the LAER emission control technology requirement in 340-224-0050(1), and is exempt from the BACT provision of this section.
(a) For a major modification, the requirement for BACT applies to the following:
(A) Each emissions unit that emits the pollutant or precursor(s) and is not included in the most recent netting basis established for that pollutant; and
(B) Each emissions unit that emits the pollutant or precursor (s) and is included in the most recent netting basis but has been modified and the modification resulted in an increase in actual emissions above the portion of the most recent netting basis attributable to the emissions unit or the nonattainment pollutant or precursor(s).
(b) For phased construction projects, the BACT determination must be reviewed at the latest reasonable time before commencement of construction of each independent phase.
(c) When determining BACT for a change that was made at a source before the current NSR application, any additional cost of retrofitting required controls may be considered provided:
(A) The change was made in compliance with NSR requirements in effect at the time the change was made, and
(B) No limit is being relaxed that was previously relied on to avoid NSR.
(d) Modifications to individual emissions units that increase the potential to emit less than 10 percent of the significant emission rate are exempt from this section unless:
(A) They are not constructed yet;
(B) They are part of a discrete, identifiable larger project that was constructed within the previous 5 years and that is equal to or greater than 10 percent of the significant emission rate; or
(C) They were constructed without, or in violation of, the Department's approval.
(2) Air Quality Analysis: The owner or operator of a source subject to this rule must provide an analysis of the air quality impacts of each pollutant for which emissions will exceed the netting basis by the SER or more due to the proposed source or modification in accordance with OAR 340-225-0050 through 340-225-0070.
(a) For increases of direct PM2.5 or PM2.5 precursors equal to or greater than the significant emission rate, the owner or operator must provide an analysis of PM2.5 air quality impacts based on all increases of direct PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursors.
(b)The owner or operator of any source subject to this rule that significantly impacts air quality in a designated nonattainment or maintenance area must meet the requirements of net air quality benefit in 340-225-0090.
(3) Air Quality Monitoring: The owner or operator of a source subject to this rule must conduct ambient air quality monitoring in accordance with the requirements in OAR 340-225-0050.
(4) The owner or operator of a source subject to this rule and significantly impacting a PM10 maintenance area (significant air quality impact is defined in OAR 340-200-0020), must comply with the requirements of 340-224-0060(2).
[NOTE: This rule is included in the State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan as adopted by the EQC under OAR 340-200-0040]
[Publications: Publications referenced are available from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A.025
Hist.: DEQ 25-1981, f. & ef. 9-8-81; DEQ 5-1983, f. & ef. 4-18-83; DEQ 18-1984, f. & ef. 10-16-84; DEQ 14-1985, f. & ef. 10-16-85; DEQ 5-1986, f. & ef. 2-21-86; DEQ 8-1988, f. & cert. ef. 5-19-88 (and corrected 5-31-88); DEQ 27-1992, f. & cert. ef. 11-12-92; Section (8) Renumbered from 340-020-0241; DEQ 4-1993, f. & cert. ef. 3-10-93; DEQ 12-1993, f. & cert. ef. 9-24-93; Renumbered from 340-020-0245; DEQ 19-1993, f. & cert. ef. 11-4-93; DEQ 26-1996, f. & cert. ef. 11-26-96; DEQ 16-1998, f. & cert. ef. 9-23-98; DEQ 1-1999, f. & cert. ef. 1-25-99; DEQ 14-1999, f. & cert. ef. 10-14-99, Renumbered from 340-028-1940; DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01; DEQ 11-2002, f. & cert. ef. 10-8-02; DEQ 1-2004, f.& cert. ef. 4-14-04; DEQ 1-2005, f. & cert. ef. 1-4-05
DIVISION 225
AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS
340-225-0020
Definitions
The definitions in OAR 340-200-0020 and this rule apply to this division. If the same term is defined in this rule and 340-200-0020, the definition in this rule applies to this division.
(1) "Allowable Emissions" means the emissions rate of a stationary source calculated using the maximum rated capacity of the source (unless the source is subject to federally enforceable limits which restrict the operating rate, or hours of operation, or both) and the most stringent of the following:
(a) The applicable standards as set forth in 40 CFR Parts 60, 61 and 63;
(b) The applicable State Implementation Plan emissions limitation, including those with a future compliance date; or
(c) The emissions rate specified as a federally enforceable permit condition.
(2) "Background Light Extinction" means the reference levels (Mm-1) shown in the estimates of natural conditions as referenced in the FLAG to be representative of the PSD Class I or Class II area being evaluated.
(3) "Baseline Concentration" means:
(a) Except as provided in subsection (c), the ambient concentration level for sulfur dioxide and PM10 that existed in an area during the calendar year 1978. Actual emission increases or decreases occurring before January 1, 1978 must be included in the baseline calculation, except that actual emission increases from any source or modification on which construction commenced after January 6, 1975 must not be included in the baseline calculation;
(b) The ambient concentration level for nitrogen oxides that existed in an area during the calendar year 1988.
(c) For the area of northeastern Oregon within the boundaries of the Umatilla, Wallowa-Whitman, Ochoco, and Malheur National Forests, the ambient concentration level for PM10 that existed during the calendar year 1993. The Department may allow the source to use an earlier time period if the Department determines that it is more representative of normal emissions.
(d) For PM10 in the Medford-Ashland AQMA: the ambient PM10 concentration levels that existed during the year that EPA redesignates the AQMA to attainment for PM10.
(e) The ambient concentration level for PM2.5 that existed in an area during the calendar year 2007.
(f) If no ambient air quality data is available in an area, the baseline concentration may be estimated using modeling based on actual emissions for the years specified in subsections (a) through (e) of this section.
(4) "Competing PSD Increment Consuming Source Impacts" means the total modeled concentration above the modeled Baseline Concentration resulting from increased emissions of all other sources since the baseline concentration year that are within the Range of Influence of the source in question. Allowable Emissions may be used as a conservative estimate, in lieu of Actual Emissions, in this analysis.
(5) "Competing NAAQS Source Impacts" means total modeled concentration resulting from allowable emissions of all other sources that are within the Range of Influence of the source in question.
(6) "FLAG" refers to the Federal Land Managers' Air Quality Related Values Work Group Phase I Report - REVISED. See 75 Federal Register 66125, October 27, 2010.
(7) "General Background Concentration" means impacts from natural sources and unidentified sources that were not explicitly modeled. The Department may determine this as site-specific ambient monitoring or representative ambient monitoring from another location.
(8) "Predicted Maintenance Area Concentration" means the future year ambient concentration predicted by the Department in the applicable maintenance plan as follows:
(a) The future year (2015) concentrations for the Grants Pass UGB are 89 μg/m3 (24-hour average) and 21 μg/m3 (annual average).
(b) The future year (2015) concentrations for the Klamath Falls UGB are 114 μg/m3 (24-hour average) and 25 μg/m3 (annual average).
(c) The future year (2025) concentrations for the Lakeview UGB are 126 μg/m3 (24-hour average) and 27 μg/m3 (annual average).
(9) "Nitrogen Deposition" means the sum of anion and cation nitrogen deposition expressed in terms of the mass of total elemental nitrogen being deposited. As an example, Nitrogen Deposition for NH4NO3 is 0.3500 times the weight of NH4NO3 being deposited.
(10) "Ozone Precursor Distance" means the distance in kilometers from the nearest boundary of a designated ozone nonattainment or maintenance area within which a major new or modified source of VOC or NOx is considered to significantly affect that designated area. The determination of significance is made by either the formula method or the demonstration method.
(a) The Formula Method.
(A) For sources with complete permit applications submitted before January 1, 2003: D = 30 km
(B) For sources with complete permit applications submitted on or after January 1, 2003: D = (Q/40) x 30 km
(C) D is the Ozone Precursor Distance in kilometers. The value for D is 100 kilometers when D is calculated to exceed 100 kilometers. Q is the larger of the NOx or VOC emissions increase from the source being evaluated in tons/year, and is quantified relative to the netting basis.
(D) If a source is located at a distance less than D from the designated area, the source is considered to have a significant effect on the designated area. If the source is located at a distance equal to or greater than D, it is not considered to have a significant effect.
(b) The Demonstration Method. An applicant may demonstrate to the Department that the source or proposed source would not significantly impact a nonattainment area or maintenance area. This demonstration may be based on an analysis of major topographic features, dispersion modeling, meteorological conditions, or other factors. If the Department determines that the source or proposed source would not significantly impact the nonattainment area or maintenance area under high ozone conditions, the Ozone Precursor Distance is zero kilometers.
(11) "Ozone Precursor Offsets" means the emission reductions required to offset emission increases from a major new or modified source located inside the designated nonattainment or maintenance area or within the Ozone Precursor Distance. Emission reductions must come from within the designated area or from within the Ozone Precursor Distance of the offsetting source as described in OAR 340-225-0090. The offsets determination is made by either the formula method or the demonstration method.
(a) The Formula Method.
(A) Required offsets (RO) for new or modified sources are determined as follows:
(i) For sources with complete permit applications submitted before January 1, 2003: RO = SQ
(ii) For sources with complete permit applications submitted on or after January 1, 2003: RO = (SQ minus (40/30 * SD))
(B) Contributing sources may provide offsets (PO) calculated as follows: PO = CQ minus (40/30 * CD)
(C) Multiple sources may contribute to the required offsets of a new source. For the formula method to be satisfied, total provided offsets (PO) must equal or exceed the required offset (RO).
(D) Definitions of factors used in paragraphs (A) (B) and (C) of this subsection:
(i) RO is the required offset of NOx or VOC in tons per year as a result of the source emissions increase. If RO is calculated to be negative, RO is set to zero;
(ii) SQ is the source emissions increase of NOx or VOC in tons per year above the netting basis;
(iii) SD is the source distance in kilometers to the nonattainment or maintenance area. SD is zero for sources located within the nonattainment or maintenance area.
(iv) PO is the provided offset from a contributing source and must be equal to or greater than zero;
(v) CQ is the contributing emissions reduction in tons per year quantified relative to contemporaneous pre-reduction actual emissions (OAR 340-268-0030(1)(b)).
(vi) CD is the contributing source distance in kilometers to the nonattainment or maintenance area. For a contributing source located within the nonattainment or maintenance area, CD equals zero.
(b) The Demonstration Method. An applicant may demonstrate to the Department using dispersion modeling or other analyses the level and location of offsets that would be sufficient to provide actual reductions in concentrations of VOC or NOx in the designated area during high ozone conditions. The modeled reductions of ambient VOC or NOx concentrations resulting from the emissions offset must be demonstrated over a greater area and over a greater period of time within the designated area as compared to the modeled ambient VOC or NOx concentrations resulting from the emissions increase from the source subject to this rule. If the Department determines that the demonstration is acceptable, then the Department will approve the offsets proposed by the applicant. The demonstration method does not apply to sources located inside an ozone nonattainment area.
(12) "Range of Influence (ROI)" means:
(a) For PSD Class II and Class III areas, the Range of Influence of a competing source (in kilometers) is defined by:
(A) ROI (km) = Q (tons/year) / K (tons/year km).
(B) Definition of factors used in paragraph (A) of this subsection:
(i) ROI is the distance a source has an effect on an area and is compared to the distance from a potential competing source to the Significant Impact Area of a proposed new source. Maximum ROI is 50 km, however the Department may request that sources at a distance greater than 50 km be included in a competing source analysis.
(ii) Q is the emission rate of the potential competing source in tons per year.
(iii) K (tons/year km) is a pollutant specific constant as defined in the table below:
Constant K for Range of Influence Calculation | |||||
Pollutant | PM2.5/PM10 | SOx | NOx | CO | Lead |
K | 5 | 5 | 5 | 40 | 0.15 |
(b) For PSD Class I areas, the Range of Influence of a competing source includes emissions from all sources that occur within the modeling domain of the source being evaluated. The Department determines the modeling domain on a case-by-case basis.
(13) "Source Impact Area" means a circular area with a radius extending from the source to the largest distance to where predicted impacts from the source or modification equal or exceed the Class II Significant Air Quality Impact levels set out in Table 1 of OAR 340 division 200. This definition only applies to PSD Class II areas and is not intended to limit the distance for PSD Class I modeling.
(14) "Sulfur Deposition" means the sum of anion and cation sulfur deposition expressed in terms of the total mass of elemental sulfur being deposited. As an example, sulfur deposition for (NH4)2SO4 is 0.2427 times the weight of (NH4)2SO4 being deposited.
[ED. NOTE: The tables referenced in this rule are not included in the rule text. Click here for a PDF copy of the tables.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A
Hist.: DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01; DEQ 11-2002, f. & cert. ef. 10-8-02; DEQ 12-2002(Temp), f. & cert. ef. 10-8-02 thru 4-6-03; Administrative correction 11-10-03; DEQ 1-2004, f.& cert. ef. 4-14-04; DEQ 1-2005, f. & cert. ef. 1-4-05; DEQ 9-2005, f. & cert. ef. 9-9-05
340-225-0030
Procedural Requirements
Information Required. In addition to the requirements defined in OAR 340-216-0040, the owner or operator of a source (where required by divisions 222 or 224) must submit all information necessary to perform any analysis or make any determination required under these rules. Such information must include, but is not limited to:
(1) Emissions data for all existing and proposed emission points from the source or modification. This data must represent maximum emissions for the averaging times by pollutant consistent with the ambient air quality standards in division 202.
(2) Stack parameter data (height above ground, exit diameter, exit velocity, and exit temperature data for all existing and proposed emission points from the source or modification;
(3) An analysis of the air quality and visibility impact of the source or modification, including meteorological and topographical data, specific details of models used, and other information necessary to estimate air quality impacts; and
(4) An analysis of the air quality and visibility impacts, and the nature and extent of all commercial, residential, industrial, and other source emission growth, that has occurred since January 1, 1978, in the area the source or modification would significantly affect.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A
Hist.: DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01
340-225-0045
Requirements for Analysis in Maintenance Areas
Modeling: For determining compliance with the limits established in OAR 340-224-0060(2)(c) and (2)(d), NAAQS, and PSD Increments, the following methods must be used:
(1) For each maintenance pollutant and its precursors, a single source impact analysis is sufficient to show compliance with standards, PSD increments, and limits if modeled impacts from emission increases equal to or greater than a significant emission rate above the netting basis due to the proposed source or modification being evaluated are less than the Class II Significant Air Quality Impact Levels specified in OAR 340-200-0020, Table 1.
(2) If the requirement in section (1) of this rule is not satisfied, the owner or operator of a proposed source or modification being evaluated must perform competing source modeling as follows:
(a) For demonstrating compliance with the maintenance area limits established in OAR 340-224-0060(2)(c) and (2)(d), the owner or operator of a proposed source or modification must show that modeled impacts from the proposed increased emissions plus Competing Source Impacts, plus predicted maintenance area concentration are less than the limits for all averaging times.
(b) For demonstrating compliance with the NAAQS, the owner or operator of a proposed source or modification must show that the total modeled impacts plus total Competing NAAQS Source Impacts plus General Background Concentrations are less than the NAAQS for all averaging
(c) For demonstrating compliance with the PSD Increments (as defined in OAR 340-202-0210, Table 1), the owner or operator of a proposed source or modification must show that modeled impacts from the proposed increased emissions (above the baseline concentration) plus competing PSD Increment Consuming Source Impacts (above the baseline concentration) are less than the PSD increments for all averaging times.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A, 468A.025 & 468A.035
Hist.: DEQ 11-2002, f. & cert. ef. 10-8-02; DEQ 1-2005, f. & cert. ef. 1-4-05
340-225-0050
Requirements for Analysis in PSD Class II and Class III Areas
Modeling: For determining compliance with the NAAQS and PSD Increments in PSD Class II and Class III areas, the following methods must be used:
(1) For each pollutant and its precursors, a single source impact analysis is sufficient to show compliance with standards and PSD increments if modeled impacts from emission increases equal to or greater than a significant emission rate above the netting basis due to the proposed source or modification being evaluated are less than the Class II Significant Air Quality Impact Levels specified in OAR 340-200-0020, Table 1.
(2) If the requirement in section (1) of this rule is not satisfied, the owner or operator of a proposed source or modification being evaluated must perform competing source modeling as follows:
(a) For demonstrating compliance with the PSD Increments (as defined in OAR 340-202-0210, Table 1), the owner or operator of a proposed source or modification must show that modeled impacts from the proposed increased emissions (above the modeled Baseline Concentration) plus Competing PSD Increment Consuming Source Impacts (above the modeled Baseline Concentration) are less than the PSD increments for all averaging times.
(b) For demonstrating compliance with the NAAQS, the owner or operator of a proposed source must show that the total modeled impacts plus total Competing NAAQS Source Impacts plus General Background Concentrations are less than the NAAQS for all averaging times.
(3) Additional Impact Modeling:
(a) When referred to this rule by divisions 222 or 224, the owner or operator of a source must provide an analysis of the impairment to visibility, soils and vegetation that would occur as a result of the source or modification, and general commercial, residential, industrial and other growth associated with the source or modification. As a part of this analysis, deposition modeling analysis is required for sources emitting heavy metals above the significant emission rates as defined in OAR 340-200-0020, Table 2. Concentration and deposition modeling may also be required for sources emitting other compounds on a case-by-case basis;
(b) The owner or operator must provide an analysis of the air quality concentration projected for the area as a result of general commercial, residential, industrial and other growth associated with the source or modification.
(4) Air Quality Monitoring:
(a)(A) When referred to this rule by division 224, the owner or operator of a source must submit with the application an analysis of ambient air quality in the area impacted by the proposed project. This analysis, which is subject to the Department's approval, must be conducted for each pollutant potentially emitted at a significant emission rate by the proposed source or modification. The analysis must include continuous air quality monitoring data for any pollutant that may be emitted by the source or modification, except for volatile organic compounds. The data must relate to the year preceding receipt of the complete application and must have been gathered over the same time period. The Department may allow the owner or operator to demonstrate that data gathered over some other time period would be adequate to determine that the source or modification would not cause or contribute to a violation of an ambient air quality standard or any applicable pollutant increment. Pursuant to the requirements of these rules, the owner or operator must submit for the Department's approval, a preconstruction air quality monitoring plan. This plan must be submitted in writing at least 60 days prior to the planned beginning of monitoring and approved in writing by the Department before monitoring begins.
(B) Required air quality monitoring must be conducted in accordance with 40 CFR 58 Appendix B, "Quality Assurance Requirements for Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Air Monitoring" (July 1, 2000) and with other methods on file with the Department.
(C) The Department may exempt the owner or operator of a proposed source or modification from preconstruction monitoring for a specific pollutant if the owner or operator demonstrates that the air quality impact from the emissions increase would be less than the amounts listed below or that modeled competing source concentration (plus General Background Concentration) of the pollutant within the Source Impact Area are less than the following significant monitoring concentrations:
(i) Carbon monoxide; 575 ug/m3, 8 hour average;
(ii) Nitrogen dioxide; 14 ug/m3, annual average;
(iii) PM10; 10 ug/m3, 24 hour average;
(iv) PM2.5; 4 ug/m3, 24-hour average;
(v) Sulfur dioxide; 13 ug/m3, 24 hour average;
(vi) Ozone; Any net increase of 100 tons/year or more of VOCs from a source or modification subject to PSD requires an ambient impact analysis, including the gathering of ambient air quality data. However, requirement for ambient air monitoring may be exempted if existing representative monitoring data shows maximum ozone concentrations are less than 50% of the ozone NAAQS based on a full season of monitoring;
(vii) Lead; 0.1 ug/m3, 24 hour average;
(viii) Fluorides; 0.25 ug/m3, 24 hour average;
(ix) Total reduced sulfur; 10 ug/m3, 1 hour average;
(x) Hydrogen sulfide; 0.04 ug/m3, 1 hour average;
(xi) Reduced sulfur compounds; 10 ug/m3, 1 hour average.
(D) The Department may allow the owner or operator of a source (where required by divisions 222 or 224) to substitute post construction monitoring for the requirements of (4)(a)(A) for a specific pollutant if the owner or operator demonstrates that the air quality impact from the emissions increase would not cause or contribute to an exceedance of any air quality standard. This analysis must meet the requirements of 340-225-0050(2)(b) and must use representative or conservative General Background Concentration data.
(E) When PM10 preconstruction monitoring is required by this section, at least four months of data must be collected, including the season(s) the Department judges to have the highest PM10 levels. PM10 must be measured in accordance with 40 CFR part 50, Appendix J (July 1, 1999). In some cases, a full year of data will be required.
(b) After construction has been completed, the Department may require ambient air quality monitoring as a permit condition to establish the effect of emissions, other than volatile organic compounds, on the air quality of any area that such emissions could affect.
[ED. NOTE: The tables referenced in this rule are not included in the rule text. Click here for a PDF copy of the tables.]
[Publications: Publications referenced are available from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A
Hist.: DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01; DEQ 11-2002, f. & cert. ef. 10-8-02; DEQ 1-2004, f.& cert. ef. 4-14-04
340-225-0060
Requirements for Demonstrating Compliance with Standards and Increments in PSD Class I Areas
For determining compliance with standards and increments in PSD Class I areas, the following methods must be used:
(1) Before January 1, 2003, the owner or operator of a source (where required by divisions 222 or 224) must model impacts and demonstrate compliance with standards and increments on all PSD Class I areas that may be affected by the source or modification.
(2) On or after January 1, 2003, the owner or operator of a source (where required by divisions 222 or 224) must meet the following requirements:
(a) For each pollutant and its precursors, a single source impact analysis will be sufficient to show compliance with increments if modeled impacts from emission increases equal to or greater than a significant emission rate above the netting basis due to the proposed source or modification being evaluated are demonstrated to be less than the Class I impact levels specified in OAR 340-200-0020, Table 1.
(b) If the requirement in subsection (a) of this section is not satisfied, the owner or operator must also show that the increased source impacts (above Baseline Concentration) plus Competing PSD Increment Consuming Source Impacts are less than the PSD increments for all averaging times.
(c) For each pollutant and its precursors, a single source impact analysis will be sufficient to show compliance with standards if modeled impacts from emission increases equal to or greater than a significant emission rate above the netting basis due to the proposed source or modification being evaluated are demonstrated to be less than the Class II impact levels specified in OAR 340-200-0020, Table 1.
(d) If the requirement of subsection (2)(a) of this section is not satisfied, and background monitoring data for each PSD Class I area shows that the NAAQS is more controlling than the PSD increment then the source must also demonstrate compliance with the NAAQS by showing that their total modeled impacts plus total modeled Competing NAAQS Source Impacts plus General Background Concentrations are less than the NAAQS for all averaging times.
[ED. NOTE: The tables referenced in this rule are not included in the rule text. Click here for a PDF copy of the tables.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A
Hist.: DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01; DEQ 11-2002, f. & cert. ef. 10-8-02
340-225-0090
Requirements for Demonstrating a Net Air Quality Benefit
Demonstrations of net air quality benefit for offsets must include the following:
(1) Ozone areas (VOC and NOx emissions). For sources capable of impacting a designated ozone nonattainment or maintenance area;
(a) Offsets for VOC and NOx are required if the source will be located within the designated area or within the Ozone Precursor Distance.
(b) The amount and location of offsets must be determined in accordance with this subsection:
(A) For new or modified sources locating within a designated nonattainment area, the offset ratio is 1.1:1. These offsets must come from within either the same designated nonattainment area as the new or modified source or another ozone nonattainment area (with equal or higher nonattainment classification) that contributes to a violation of the NAAQS in the same designated nonattainment area as the new or modified source.
(B) For new or modified sources locating within a designated maintenance area, the offset ratio is 1.1:1. These offsets may come from within either the designated area or the ozone precursor distance.
(C) For new or modified sources locating outside the designated area, but within the ozone precursor distance, the offset ratio is 1:1. These offsets may come from within either the designated area or the ozone precursor distance.
(D) Offsets from outside the designated area but within the Ozone Precursor Distance must be from sources affecting the designated area in a comparable manner to the proposed emissions increase. Methods for determining offsets are described in the Ozone Precursor Offsets definition (OAR 340-225-0020(11)).
(c) In lieu of obtaining offsets, the owner or operator may obtain an allocation at the rate of 1:1 from a growth allowance, if available, in an applicable maintenance plan.
(d) Sources within or affecting the Medford Ozone Maintenance Area are exempt from the requirement for NOx offsets relating to ozone formation.
(e) Sources within or affecting the Salem Ozone Maintenance Area are exempt from the requirement for VOC and NOx offsets relating to ozone formation.
(2) Non-Ozone areas (PM2.5, PM10, SO2, CO, NOx, and Lead emissions):
(a) For a source locating within a designated nonattainment area, the owner or operator must comply with paragraphs (A) through (E) of this subsection:
(A) Obtain offsets from within the same designated nonattainment area for the nonattainment pollutant(s);
(B) Except as provided in paragraph (C) of this subsection, provide a minimum of 1:1 offsets for each nonattainment pollutant and precursor with emission increases over the Netting Basis;
(C) For PM2.5; inter-pollutant offsets are allowed as follows:
(i) 1 ton of direct PM2.5 may be used to offset 40 tons of SO2;
(ii) 1 ton of direct PM2.5 may be used to offset 100 tons of NOx;
(iii) 40 tons of SO2 may be used to offset 1 ton of direct PM2.5;
(iv) 100 tons of NOx may be used to offset 1 ton of direct PM2.5.
(D) Provide a net air quality benefit within the designated nonattainment area. "Net Air Quality Benefit" means:
(i) Offsets obtained result in a reduction in concentration at a majority of the modeled receptors and the emission increases from the proposed source or modification will result in less than a significant impact level increase at all modeled receptors; or
(ii) For a small scale local energy project and any infrastructure related to that project located in the same area, a reduction of the nonattainment pollutant emissions equal to the ratio specified in this subsection, provided that the proposed major source or major modification would not cause or contribute to a violation of the national ambient air quality standard or otherwise pose a material threat to compliance with air quality standards in the nonattainment area.
(E) Provide offsets sufficient to demonstrate reasonable further progress toward achieving the NAAQS.
(b) For a source locating outside a designated nonattainment area but causing a significant air quality impact on the area, the owner or operator must provide offsets sufficient to reduce the modeled impacts below the significant air quality impact level (OAR 340-200-0020) at all receptors within the designated nonattainment area. These offsets may come from within or outside the designated nonattainment area.
(c) For a source locating inside or causing a significant air quality impact on a designated maintenance area, the owner or operator must either provide offsets sufficient to reduce modeled impacts below the significant air quality impact level (OAR 340-200-0020) at all receptors within the designated maintenance area or obtain an allocation from an available growth allowance as allowed by an applicable maintenance plan. These offsets may come from within or outside the designated maintenance area.
(A) Medford-Ashland AQMA: Proposed new major PM10 sources or major PM10 modifications locating within the AQMA that are required to provide emission offsets under OAR 340-224-0060(2)(a) must provide reductions in PM10 emissions equal to 1.2 times the emissions increase over the netting basis from the new or modified source, and must provide a net air quality benefit within the AQMA. "Net Air Quality Benefit" means:
(i) A reduction in concentration at a majority of the modeled receptors and less than a significant impact level increase at all modeled receptors; or
(ii) For a small scale local energy project and any infrastructure related to that project located in the same area, a reduction of the maintenance pollutant emissions equal to the ratio specified in this paragraph, provided that the proposed major source or major modification would not cause or contribute to a violation of the national ambient air quality standard or otherwise pose a material threat to compliance with air quality standards in the maintenance area.
(B) Medford-Ashland AQMA: Proposed new major PM10 sources or major PM10 modifications located outside the Medford-Ashland AQMA that cause a significant air quality impact on the AQMA must provide reductions in PM10 emissions sufficient to reduce modeled impacts below the significant air quality impact level (OAR 340-200-0020) at all receptors within the AQMA.
(3) Except as provided in paragraph (2)(a)(C) of this rule, the emission reductions used as offsets must be of the same type of pollutant as the emissions from the new source or modification. Sources of PM10 must be offset with particulate in the same size range.
(4) The emission reductions used as offsets must be contemporaneous, that is, the reductions must take effect before the time of startup but not more than two years before the submittal of a complete permit application for the new source or modification. This time limitation may be extended through banking, as provided for in OAR 340 division 268, Emission Reduction Credit Banking. In the case of replacement facilities, the Department may allow simultaneous operation of the old and new facilities during the startup period of the new facility, if net emissions are not increased during that time period. Any emission reductions must be federally enforceable at the time of the issuance of the permit.
(5) Offsets required under this rule must meet the requirements of Emissions Reduction Credits in OAR 340 division 268.
(6) Emission reductions used as offsets must be equivalent in terms of short term, seasonal, and yearly time periods to mitigate the effects of the proposed emissions.
NOTE: This rule is included in the State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan as adopted by the EQC under OAR 340-200-0040.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A.025
Hist.: DEQ 25-1981, f. & ef. 9-8-81; DEQ 5-1983, f. & ef. 4-18-83; DEQ 8-1988, f. & cert. ef. 5-19-88 (and corrected 5-31-88); DEQ 22-1989, f. & cert. ef. 9-26-89; DEQ 27-1992, f. & cert. ef. 11-12-92; DEQ 4-1993, f. & cert. ef. 3-10-93; DEQ 12-1993, f. & cert. ef. 9-24-93, Renumbered from 340-020-0260; DEQ 19-1993, f. & cert. ef. 11-4-93; DEQ 4-1995, f. & cert. ef. 2-17-95; DEQ 26-1996, f. & cert. ef. 11-26-96; DEQ 14-1999, f. & cert. ef. 10-14-99, Renumbered from 340-028-1970; DEQ 14-1999, f. & cert. ef. 10-14-99, Renumbered from 340-030-0111; DEQ 6-2001, f. 6-18-01, cert. ef. 7-1-01, Renumbered from 340-224-0090 & 340-240-0260; DEQ 11-2002, f. & cert. ef. 10-8-02; DEQ 12-2002(Temp), f. & cert. ef. 10-8-02 thru 4-6-03; Administrative correction 11-10-03; DEQ 1-2004, f. & cert. ef. 4-14-04; DEQ 1-2005, f. & cert. ef. 1-4-05; DEQ 3-2007, f. & cert. ef. 4-12-07
| |||||
| |
| |
DIVISION 228
REQUIREMENTS FOR FUEL BURNING EQUIPMENT AND FUEL SULFUR CONTENT
Federal Acid Rain Program
340-228-0300
Federal Regulations Adopted by Reference
(1) 40 CFR Parts 72, 75, and 76 (July 2, 2010) are by this reference adopted and incorporated herein, for purposes of implementing an acid rain program that meets the requirements of title IV of the Clean Air Act. The term "permitting authority" means the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality and the term "Administrator" shall mean the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
(2) If the provisions or requirements of 40 CFR Part 72 conflict with or are not included in OAR 340 divisions 218 or 220, the Part 72 provisions and requirements shall apply and take precedence.
[Publications: Publications referenced are available from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020 & 468.310(2)
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468A.025
Hist.: DEQ 32-1994, f. & cert. ef. 12-22-94; DEQ 14-1999, f. & cert. ef. 10-14-99, Renumbered from 340-022-0075; DEQ 22-2000, f. & cert. ef. 12-18-00; DEQ 13-2006, f. & cert. ef. 12-22-06
DIVISION 246
OREGON STATE AIR TOXICS PROGRAM
340-246-0230
Safety Net Source Air Toxics Emissions Reduction Measures in Permit
(1) Public Participation. The Department will hold public informational meetings to discuss proposed air toxics emissions reduction measures. After the informational meetings, the Department will provide at least 40-days notice before holding a public hearing to collect official comments on the proposed air toxics emissions reduction measures.
(2) Permit or Permit Modification After considering public comments, the Department will propose air toxics emissions reduction measures to be placed in the source's permit, according to the reopening process for Oregon Title V permits in OAR 340-218-0200 or Oregon Title V Permit issuance in 340-218-0120 or Department Initiated Permit Modifications in 340-216-0084 or Air Contaminant Discharge Permit issuance in 340-216-0020, Table I, Part B, line 74.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.035, 468A.010(1), 468A.015
Stats. Implemented:
Hist.: DEQ 15-2003, f. & cert. ef. 11-3-03
Attachment 4
Public Notice and Adoption Documents
• Public notice in the Secretary of State’s Oregon Bulletin November 1, 2010
• Certificate and Order for Filing Permanent Administrative Rules, filed April 29, 2011
Attachment 5
Compilation of Public Comments and Department’s Response
• Presiding Officer’s Report for Rulemaking Hearings dated November 19, 2010
• Summary of Public Comment and Agency Response dated February 28, 2011
State of Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality Memorandum
Presiding Officer's Report
Date: November 19, 2010
To: Environmental Quality Commission
From: Jill Inahara
Subject: Presiding Officer's Report for Rulemaking Hearings Title of Proposal: New Source Review, Particulate Matter and Greenhouse Gas Permitting Requirements and Other Permitting Rule Updates
Hearing 1:
Date and Time: November 16, 2010, 6:00 p.m.
Location: Department of Environmental Quality Medford Office, 221 Stewart Avenue, Suite 201, Medford
The Department prepared the room for the public hearing for a 6:00 p.m. start time. Seven people attended but did not wish to present an oral comment. An overview of the rulemaking package was presented by Jill Inahara with a question and answer session. Presiding Officer Tom Peterson closed the hearing at 7:00 p.m.
Hearing 2:
Date and Time: November 17, 2010, 6:00 p.m.
Location: Department of Environmental Quality Bend Office, 475 NE Bellevue, Suite 110 Bend, OR
The Department prepared the room for the public hearing for a 6:00 p.m. start time. No one attended. Presiding Officer Mark Fisher closed the hearing at 6:30 p.m.
Hearing 3:
Date and Time: November 18, 2010, 6:00 p.m.
Location: Department of Environmental Quality Headquarters Office, 811 SW 6th Avenue, Portland
The Department prepared the room for the public hearing for a 6:00 p.m. start time. Seven people attended but did not wish to present an oral comment. An overview of the rulemaking package was presented by Jill Inahara with a question and answer session. Presiding Officer George Davis closed the hearing at 7:30 p.m.
Hearing 4:
Date and Time: November 19, 2010, 1:00 p.m.
Location: Department of Environmental Quality Salem Office, 750 Front Street, Suite 120, Salem
The Department prepared the room for the public hearing for a 1:00 p.m. start time. Seven people attended but did not wish to present an oral comment. An overview of the rulemaking package was presented by Jill Inahara with a question and answer session. Presiding Officer Gary Andes closed the hearing at 2:00 p.m.
Summary of public comment and agency response
Title of rulemaking: New source review, particulate matter and greenhouse gas permitting requirements and other permitting rule updates
Prepared by: Jill Inahara and Mark Fisher Date: Feb. 28, 2011
1.1.1.A.(1) Comment period | DEQ opened the first public comment period Oct. 15, 2010, and closed it Nov. 24, 2010. Nineteen organizations submitted written comments on the proposed rules. DEQ held the following public hearings:
1) Nov. 16, 2010, 6 p.m. DEQ - Medford Regional Office 221 Stewart Avenue, Suite 201, Medford Seven people attended and none testified
2) Nov. 17, 2010, 6 p.m. DEQ - Bend Regional Office 475 NE Bellevue Drive, Suite 110, Bend None attended.
3) Nov. 18, 2010, 6 p.m. DEQ - Headquarters Office, room EQC-A 811 SW 6th Avenue, Portland Seven people attended and none testified.
4) Nov. 19, 2010, 1 p.m. DEQ - Salem Regional Office 750 Front St NE, #120 Seven people attended and none testified.
Based on the comments received, DEQ decided to reopen the comment period to allow for additional comment on the different proposed options. DEQ held a second comment period Dec. 9, 2010, through Jan. 14, 2011. Fourteen organizations, some of which commented previously, submitted written comments on the revisions to the proposed rules.
|
1.1.1.A.(2) Organization of comments and responses | Summaries of individual comments and DEQ’s responses are provided below. DEQ responses are shown in italics. Comments are summarized in categories. The persons who provided comments are referenced by number. A list of commenters and their reference numbers follows the summary of comments and responses.
|
1.1.1.A.(3) Acronyms used in this document | ACDP = Air Contaminant Discharge Permit BACT = Best Available Control Technology DEQ = Oregon Department of Environmental Quality EPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency EQC = Oregon Environmental Quality Commission NAA = nonattainment area NAAQS = National Ambient Air Quality Standards NOx = nitrogen oxides NSR = New Source Review PAL = Plantwide Applicability Limit PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter PSD = Prevention of Significant Deterioration PSEL = Plant Site Emission Limit PTE = potential to emit SILs = significant impact levels SMC = significant monitoring concentration SO2 = sulfur dioxide tpy = tons per year VOC = volatile organic compounds |
Summary of comments and DEQ responses | |
1. Actual emissions definition | Under the definition of "Actual Emissions", paragraph 0020(3)(b) should be amended to read " ....but was permitted or approved to construct and operate .... " to be consistent with the previous paragraph 0020(3)(a)(C). (7)
Response: The change was made to the proposed rule as suggested.
|
2. Actual emissions and PTE establishment | DEQ should ensure that its rule would allow using the most appropriate formula (as prescribed by EPA), or continuous emissions monitors to establish actual emissions and PTE. (12)
Response: The rule allows for the use of both of these methods to calculate actual emissions and potential to emit.
Actual emissions are the foundation for the baseline emission rate in most cases, which in turn establishes the netting basis and the Plant Site Emission Limit (PSEL or potential to emit). DEQ rules state that PSELs may be changed when errors are found or better data is available for calculating PSELs. To determine compliance with the PSELs, the rule states that one or more of the following methods may be acceptable: • Continuous emissions monitors; • Material balance calculations; • Emissions calculations using approved emission factors and process information; • Alternative production or process limits; and • Other methods approved by the Department.
DEQ is currently updating guidance on how emissions should be calculated to ensure that the best data available is used. No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment. |
3a. Actual emissions as PTE used to net out of PSD | DEQ clarifies that a source that has a PSEL set based on PTE cannot use the resulting netting basis to net out of PSD for changes that increase emissions elsewhere at the plant. This is a necessary part of DEQ’s proposal to give sources that were “permitted but not yet operating during the baseline period” an “actual emissions” amount equal to its PTE. That proposal is under protective and difficult to implement. To the extent that DEQ moves forward that program, however, this exclusion is absolutely essential to preventing sources from illegally expanding emissions from existing sources. (12)
Response: The commenter is correct that the proposed rule would allow DEQ to reduce the netting basis - if it is based on PTE - to the highest actual emissions in the 10 years after the end of the baseline period or after permit issuance. This applies to sources that were permitted during the baseline period but did not begin operation and for sources that will go through New Source Review/Prevention of Significant Deterioration after this rule adoption. In addition, it will restrict a source’s ability to do a netting action until the baseline is reset based on actual emissions.
For sources that were permitted or approved to construct and operate but had not yet begun normal operation during the baseline period, existing rules use the PTE as their actual emissions. This provision has been in place since the Oregon program was initially approved by EPA and has not been difficult to implement. The provision ensures that permit applicants evaluate the air quality impacts of the maximum level of emissions that the new or modified source is capable of emitting. DEQ agrees with the commenter that reducing the netting basis before it may be used in netting is more protective and is therefore proposing the reduction in netting basis from PTE to actual emission.
| 3b. Actual emissions as PTE used to net out of PSD | Under DEQ’s proposal to reduce PTE to actual emissions for sources that were permitted but not operating in the baseline period, if a source makes a physical or operational change, it must ask for its “actual emissions” to be reset before it makes the change. This is essentially an up to 10-year look back period for actual emissions for a source “permitted but not yet operating.” This policy seems to insure that any facility making a physical or operational change would have at least 10 years of history to look back to in determining whether the change would significantly increase emissions. (12)
Response: The 10-year look back period is to establish actual emissions for a previously approved increase to PTE, not to determine if a previous increase triggers NSR/PSD. The reset is to reduce the netting basis already approved in an earlier modification before a source makes any future physical modifications. This reduction in netting basis will enable DEQ to initially permit a facility using a protective assumption that it could emit at its capacity, but ensure that only the emission level actually achieved during the first years of operation can be used to net a future increase out of NSR/PSD. This change aligns the netting basis closer to actual emissions. No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| 3c. Actual emissions as PTE used to net out of PSD | For example, under DEQ’s formulation, a source that has a 2000 – 2010 baseline (either a reset PTE or actual emissions) that decides to make a physical or operational change in 2030 could be exempt from permitting and control requirements if they remained under that 2000 – 2010 baseline, even if they had not actually emitted that much for many years, and even if a large number of smaller sources (and cars, residential emissions, etc.) increased the burden of the pollutant in the air shed. (12)
Response: Assuming that the reduction in emissions since the baseline period was voluntary, NSR/PSD would not be triggered for that source in the commenter’s example. One of the benefits of a fixed baseline period is that it creates an incentive for sources to make early voluntary reductions. With a floating baseline period used in other states, sources have an incentive to delay voluntary reductions until just before planned increases. If the decrease in actual emissions was due to the adoption of emission standards, the netting basis would be reduced by the amount of reduction required by rule. If the reduction was due to the shutdown of an emission unit, the unassigned emission rule (OAR 340-222-0045) would reduce the netting basis if it is greater than a source’s PTE. If a large number of smaller sources increased the burden of the pollutant in the air shed and the area becomes a nonattainment area, DEQ will create an attainment plan that will require air quality controls. No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| 3d. Actual emissions as PTE used to net out of PSD | ||||||||||||||||||
We do not support the proposed language that would require resetting of actual emissions if the source did not achieve its full emissions capacity within 10 years after commencing construction. This approach is bad public policy in that it encourages sources to emit at their maximum permitted level in order to preserve baseline. This also creates serious issues for sources that take a long time to complete construction as they will not have necessarily reached normal operations in enough time to establish a reasonable baseline emission rate. (9)
Response: DEQ is aware that this change may be a disincentive for sources to voluntarily implement early reductions. Therefore, the proposed rules have been revised for sources that voluntarily implement pollution prevention practices or operational, maintenance and work practice requirements in accordance with OAR 340-226-0110 and 0120. Emissions reductions required to reduce PTE to actual emissions will not include reductions achieved through these mechanisms. This provision will continue the program’s incentive for voluntary early reductions and remove the disincentive for maintaining maximum emissions to preserve baseline. In addition, the ten-year reset period may be extended to 15 years upon demonstration that construction is still underway or normal operation has not been achieved. Further, only the netting basis will be reduced, so only future modifications will be affected. The PSEL will not be reduced, so a source will still be able to utilize the full capacity of a unit that went through PSD without triggering PSD again.
| 4. Aggregate insignificant emissions | OAR 340-200-0020(7)(h): The revision to the definition of "Aggregate insignificant emissions" adding a threshold for greenhouse gases needs to include language indicating that the 1,000 short tons value is measured as CO2 equivalent (CO2e). (7)
Response: The change was made to the proposed rule as suggested. Upon further consideration, DEQ has concluded that the aggregate insignificant emissions threshold for greenhouse gases should be the same as the GHG reporting threshold of 2,500 metric tons/year or 2,756 short tons/year.
| 5. PM2.5 baseline emission rate and netting basis
| A source should have the option of either taking the PM2.5 proportionate share of its PM10 netting basis or the actual PM2.5 emissions from the baseline period. (1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17)
We would prefer that the baseline values for new pollutants (PM2.5 & GHG) be set in proportion to pollutants that have already gone through the PSD process. (20) We support setting a netting basis for PM2.5 based on the PM2.5 fraction of the PM10 netting basis with two caveats: 1) DEQ will increase the PM2.5 netting basis by up to 5 tons/yr to allow for sources that made changes in reliance on their PM10 netting basis, 2) sources utilizing existing capacity present in the baseline period can use existing equipment to set the PSEL. (1, 3, 13, 23)
Sources should not be allowed to choose between existing netting basis or highest actual emissions in the last 10 years for determining a netting basis for PM2.5. We recommend adoption of a 24-month period, as required by the federal program before NSR Reform. In no event should sources be allowed to reach back to higher pollution output before the baseline concentration year. All the same problems arise with this static baseline, but an added layer of complexity arises from the 5 ton per year “true-up.” (12) If a facility shuts down one of two production lines because of the recent economic downturn, it should not be able to restart it five or ten years later without trigging PSD. (12)
Response: The commenters above provide differing views about the flexibility that a source should have to choose a baseline period and whether a source should be allowed a one-time 5 ton true-up. DEQ is concerned that allowing each source to select the most advantageous baseline period weakens the program and could arguably make Oregon’s program less stringent than the federal program, which is strictly prohibited.
DEQ is proposing to provide only one option. The PM2.5 netting basis and PSEL will be set based on the PM2.5 fraction of the PM10 netting basis and PSEL. Since there is so much overlap between these two pollutants, this ensures that the introduction of the new pollutant (PM2.5) doesn’t trigger any new requirements if a source is not making any physical modifications or production increases. In addition, it takes into account whether the source has gone through NSR/PSD for PM10. These numbers could diverge in the future as changes are made to the plant, so that either or both pollutants could trigger NSR/PSD or a PSEL modeling analysis.
Although it does add complexity, DEQ proposes that permit writers be allowed to make a one time true-up of up to 5 tons in the PM2.5 netting basis if needed to account for the difference in the significant emission rate for PM10 and PM2.5. This will avoid retroactively making a source subject to NSR/PSD for PM2.5. This is needed because the SER for PM2.5 is 5 tons lower than the SER for PM10, so without the true-up, a modification that was approved under the PM10 rules could be retroactively in violation of the PM2.5 rules. This one time true-up is only for previously approved modifications that increased PM10 emissions before PM2.5 became a regulated pollutant. All future modifications will continue to be examined for NSR/PSD applicability.
The PM2.5 PSEL is proposed to be the PM2.5 fraction of the PM10 PSEL. Since PSELs are based on existing equipment, sources will be able to use existing capacity in setting their PM2.5 PSEL if the PM10 PSEL allows the use of existing capacity. For some facilities, the PSEL is set at less than capacity so it does not allow for the use of full existing capacity. In these instances, the source could request an increase to full capacity in accordance with the PSEL rule. An increase in emissions due to utilizing existing capacity would not be subject to NSR/PSD, but may require an ambient air quality analysis that includes modeling. In the example cited above regarding shut down of a production line, restarting that production line would not trigger PSD through Oregon’s or EPA’s program. In both programs, the use of existing capacity without a physical modification would not trigger PSD, so in this respect, the programs are identical.
| 6. Greenhouse gas baseline emission rate | We suggest that the Department revise its proposed regulations to allow dual options for how a source calculates its GHG baseline emission rate: either calculating baseline GHG emissions using production parameter or through the use of the actual GHG emissions from the baseline period. (1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 23)
If DEQ continues to let sources choose the baseline year from 2000-2010, it should add the sentence “The Department may allow the use of a prior time period upon a determination that it is more representative of normal source operation” in relation to GHGs. (1, 3, 6, 13, 23)
We also recommend that the rules be revised to clarify that if a source has gone through PSD for one combustion pollutant, it can set its GHG netting basis based on the production rates used in that PSD analysis. (1, 2, 4, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 23)
We agree with the baseline emission rate for GHGs as being the actual annual emission rate during any consecutive 12 month period between 2000 and 2010. We also support the clarifications that actual emissions are calculated for those sources or portions of sources that have been permitted, but did not commence normal operation, during the baseline period. (9)
Sources should not be allowed to choose between existing netting basis or highest actual emissions in the last 10 years for determining a netting basis for GHG. DEQ should adopt a baseline emission rate definition that captures the existing actual air quality of an area and travels, with the rest of us, across time. We recommend adoption of a 24-month period as required by the federal program before NSR Reform. In no event should sources be allowed to reach back to higher pollution output before the baseline concentration year. (12)
Response: The commenters above provide differing views about the flexibility that a source should have to choose a greenhouse gas baseline period.
In the revised proposed definition of baseline period, the period for GHGs is a consecutive 12-month period between 2000 and 2010, so the baseline emission rate for GHGs will be the actual emissions in that highest 12-month period during those years. Sources will not be given a choice of either the most recent 10 years or the original 1977-1978 baseline period. DEQ is concerned that allowing each source to select the most advantageous baseline period weakens the program and could arguably make Oregon’s program less stringent than the federal program, which is strictly prohibited.
DEQ is proposing the most recent ten years as the baseline period for GHG because GHG is a completely new regulated pollutant. Determining actual emissions as of 1977-1978 could be problematic, especially since GHG emissions from processes are not necessarily tied to GHG emissions from combustion sources that are already included in permits. A more current baseline period for GHG will also align GHGs more closely with the federal program in the initial years of implementation. In addition, DEQ recognizes that there have been considerable economic swings recently that could affect a source’s actual emissions so DEQ is proposing a 10 year look-back period to establish the baseline period. See the response in comment 52 “State NSR/PSD program vs. federal program.”
| ||||||||||||||||||
7. Potential to emit used to establish baseline emission rate or NSR/PSD PSEL | The PSEL should be used to establish a baseline emission rate. The PSEL would change when new air permits are issued and would be a more realistic emission rate for the semiconductor industry than the PTE. It could be ten to twenty years before a semiconductor facility is fully built out. (11)
We believe that the current rules should continue to be used to establish the baseline emission rate and PSELs, for new and modified sources, based on the source's PTE. (2, 10) We request that the Department confirm in its response to comments that in light of the proposed revisions to the definition of "actual emissions," the GHG baseline emission rate attributable to equipment will equal the potential to emit of that equipment where that equipment has been approved for construction prior to December 31, 2010 but has not yet begun normal operations by January 1, 2011. (9)
The use of PTE during the baseline period, or at initial construction, to set netting basis and PSEL overstates emissions, making it less likely that a source would later trigger NSR/PSD even when making a modification that would significantly increase actual pollution. A policy which bases determinations of significant emissions increases on actual emissions preceding the physical change, would avoid this problem. (12)
As DEQ is aware, the Clean Air Act PSD program intended to grandfather existing sources and slowly phase in technology designed to reduce emissions over time as capital improvements were made to aging facilities. By pairing an evaluation of available control technology, and potential capital expenditures on control technology, with a major capital project, Congress intended to avoid a bottleneck of facilities needing to install major equipment, and reasonably phase in controls. Effective implementation of the PSD program, with its dual goals of maintaining clean air and allowing for economic expansion, requires that emissions calculations be revisited on a regular basis (e.g., before a modification causing a significant increase in actual emissions). (12)
Response: The commenters above provide differing views about setting the baseline emission rate for sources that are permitted but not yet operating during the baseline period.
For sources that are permitted to construct and operate during the baseline period but that do not begin normal operations until after the baseline period, DEQ proposes to initially set the baseline emission rate equal to PTE. DEQ confirms that this also applies to the GHG baseline emission rate, which will initially equal the potential to emit of equipment that has been approved for construction prior to December 31, 2010 but has not yet begun normal operations by January 1, 2011. The initial netting basis for existing sources is the baseline emission rate. For new sources that go through NSR/PSD, DEQ proposes to continue setting the netting basis equal to the PTE because that ensures that the maximum air quality impact of the new source or modification is evaluated during permitting. If a new source does not go through NSR/PSD, then the netting basis is zero.
Past experience has shown that most sources never operate and emit at their PTE. Therefore, for sources that have baseline emission rates equal to the PTE, DEQ proposes to require that the “actual” emissions be reset from the PTE to the highest actual emissions ten or more years after the end of the baseline period for GHG sources. See the response in comment 3 “Actual emissions as PTE used to net out of PSD.”
DEQ proposes that the same provision will be applied to new sources that have gone through NSR/PSD. The netting basis will be reset from PTE to the highest actual emissions during the 10 years after NSR/PSD permit issuance. An additional 5 years may be granted if it is demonstrated that a source had not achieved normal operations within the 10 year period.
This change will remove emissions from the netting basis that will likely never be emitted. It will not prevent the source from operating at the full capacity because the PSEL will not be reduced. However, it will prevent the source from using the “extra” potential emissions for netting a future modification out of NSR/PSD.
| 8. Baseline emission rate definition - corrections | The language in the old definition of baseline emission rate already establishes a list of the only reasons a baseline can be changed, so the text about freezing adds confusion. The second concern has to do with the use of term “the Department” in the discussion of how changes are made to the baseline rate. We are concerned that specifying that “the Department determines” could be relied on by a source in an enforcement action to argue that the baseline cannot be recalculated based on, for example, a material mistake or inaccurate statements by a source, unless it was the Department that made the determination that there was a mistake or inaccurate statements. (7)
Response: DEQ has proposed changes to the definition of baseline emission rate to clarify when it can be changed. The original reason for freezing the baseline emission rate was to prevent sources from asking for changes based on the discovery of “new” production information that is difficult to verify 30 years after the fact. Therefore, changes have been proposed that only allow the production basis to be changed upon discovery of a material mistake or an inaccurate statement. The word “Department” has also been removed from the definition to allow others to discover a material mistake.
| 9. Greenhouse gas PSELs greater than netting basis | We request DEQ clarify that that GHG PSD does not apply for sources that seek to establish a GHG PSEL that is greater than the significant emission rate over the netting basis as a result of utilizing capacity that existed in the baseline year. (15)
Response: Section (d) of the definition of major modification in OAR 340-200-0020 clearly states that increases in hours of operation or production rates that would cause emission increases above the levels allowed in a permit and would not involve a physical change or change in method of operation in the source are not major modifications. Once the baseline emission rate is established, the PSEL may be increased to utilize the full capacity in accordance with the PSEL rule, OAR 340-222-041(3)(b). Since there is no ambient air quality standard or PSD increment for GHG, then there would be no requirement for an air quality analysis to approve an increase in the GHG PSEL.
| 10. Greenhouse gas baseline emission rate establishment | ||||||||||||||||||
We request that the rules be revised so that the GHG baseline is established as part of the first permitting action for which an application is submitted after March 1, 2011. (1, 2, 4, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17)
Response: Because this rulemaking package will be considered by the EQC in April instead of February, as previously planned, and because new or modified major sources of GHGs alone will not be required to get permits until July 1, DEQ proposes to change the date when PM2.5 and GHGs will be added to permits. Permits that are on public notice before July 1, 2011 but not issued yet will not be changed to include PM2.5 and GHGs. Any other permits that are on public notice after July 1, 2011 must include PM2.5 and GHGs. The proposed rules have been changed to reflect this change in procedure.
| 11. Baseline period | We understand that the Department is considering allowing the discharger to choose a year between 2000 and 2010. We see no reason not to choose this approach so long as the source commits to the year and does not change it once the year is elected. We would favor one that provides the greatest flexibility to all permittees. (5)
Response: Sources will be able to make a one-time choice of a consecutive 12-month period between the years 2000 and 2010 for the baseline period for greenhouse gases. The baseline period for PM2.5 will be 1977 or 1978, the same as the other NSR/PSD pollutants even though a baseline emission rate will not be established for PM2.5. Instead, the netting basis for PM2.5 will be established based on the PM2.5 fraction of the PM10 netting basis (if one exists). Using this approach, there is no need to establish a baseline emission rate for PM2.5.
| 12. Baseline period for PM2.5 precursors | The baseline period for PM2.5 precursors should be consistent with the baseline period for PM2.5. Otherwise, sources will be routinely forced into PSEL review, PSD or nonattainment NSR for PM2.5 precursors even though PM2.5 does not trigger the same review. (1, 2, 4, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17)
Response: PM2.5 precursors (SO2 and NOx) are already regulated criteria pollutants under the NSR/PSD program. Since the initial PM2.5 netting basis is the PM2.5 fraction of the PM10 netting basis, PM2.5, PM10, SO2, and NOx will all have the same baseline period for most sources. If a source has triggered NSR/PSD for one pollutant and not the others, the netting basis will be based on different production rates for different pollutants, which is consistent with how the program is currently implemented. Introducing different baseline years for precursors would be administratively impractical. No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| 13. Baseline period tied to baseline concentration year | We are concerned that DEQ’s proposal fails to adequately match the baseline period and baseline concentrations. If individual emissions levels are not set from the same date range as the monitoring data, then DEQ’s rules will not ensure compliance with the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) or PSD increment. If DEQ decides to implement the PM2.5 PSD program through the PSEL program, DEQ should mandate that the baseline emission rate be set for the same period for which DEQ has monitoring data, or at the very least implement stringent guidelines that direct the limited instances when a different baseline period may be chosen. (12)
Response: DEQ believes that it is not feasible to link the baseline period and the baseline concentration year. Instead, DEQ determines the actual emissions of sources during the baseline concentration year at the time that a PSD increment analysis is conducted. The baseline period for emissions is the year that DEQ starts counting emissions increases and decreases from a source toward applicability of the NSR/PSD program. It is a fixed period for each pollutant, regardless of the source’s location.
The baseline concentration year is the year that DEQ starts counting emissions increases and decreases in an area for assessing consumption of the PSD increment, and it varies by pollutant and area of the state. Default baseline concentration years for assessing degradation of air quality are based on when DEQ initially made the determination that areas of the state were in attainment or nonattainment with an ambient air quality standard. Baseline concentration years have also been established for specific areas that were not in attainment with a standard but subsequently were re-designated to attainment.
Because the baseline concentration years are different for different pollutants and the baseline periods do not correspond to the baseline concentration years, DEQ does not rely on the baseline emission rates associated with a baseline period to assess the impacts of emission increases in an area. The analysis is case-by-case depending on the source and the range of influence of its emissions. If the emission increases from a new or modified source cause an impact greater than the significant impact level for a pollutant, then the emission increases since the baseline concentration year from other nearby sources must be evaluated along with the emissions from the new or modified source to determine whether a PSD increment could potentially be exceeded. Only the emission increases (and decreases) since the baseline concentration year must be evaluated, but in many cases, the total allowable emissions of the sources is used to evaluate the impacts as a conservative analysis. The inventory of emission increases since the baseline period may be evaluated in more detail if the initial conservative analysis indicates that the PSD increment could potentially be exceeded.
In this rulemaking DEQ proposes 2007 as the baseline concentration year for PM2.5 because 2007 is the middle year of the 3 years (2006 through 2008) when ambient monitoring was conducted to determine whether areas of the state are in attainment or nonattainment with the standards. DEQ does not propose establishing a baseline concentration year for GHG because there is no ambient air quality standard for GHG.
The baseline concentration year is not used in determining whether a NAAQS could potentially be exceeded. For the NAAQS analysis, the emissions from the proposed new or modified source along with other source emissions in the nearby area are modeled and the impacts are added to the background concentration to determine whether a NAAQS could potentially be exceeded. No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| ||||||||||||||||||
14. Federal major source definition | OAR 340-200-0020(54): The revision to the definition of "Federal Major Source" is not consistent with the EPA requirements as set forth in the "Tailoring Rule." Essentially, there is a two-part test in order to determine a Federal Major Source with respect to GHGs. First, GHGs must be a regulated air pollutant, that is the source must have the potential to emit 100,000 tpy or more on a CO2 equivalent (CO2e) basis. Then the source must also have the potential to emit 100 or 250 tpy or more of an individual GHG on a mass basis. (1, 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14, 17, 23)
Response: The change was made to the proposed rule as suggested.
| 15. Federal major source, major source and major modification definitions regarding fugitive emissions | We request that DEQ revise the definition of “major source” to exclude fugitive emissions from consideration except in relation to sources in one of the designated source categories. EPA’s Tailoring Rule is clear that fugitive GHG emissions need only be considered in determining PSD and Title V applicability for sources within one of the designated source categories. Nonetheless, although DEQ has stated that it intends to be no more stringent than that Tailoring Rule requires, it is proposing that fugitive GHG emissions must be included for all sources when determining PSD or Title V applicability. (1, 2, 4, 9, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 23)
Response: Fugitive emissions have always been included in determining whether a source is a major source in Oregon in accordance with OAR 340-224-0100: “Fugitive emissions are included in the calculation of emission rates of all air contaminants. Fugitive emissions are subject to the same control requirements and analyses required for emissions from identifiable stacks or vents.”
In Oregon, fugitive emissions means emissions of any air contaminant which escape to the atmosphere from any point or area that is not identifiable as a stack, vent, duct, or equivalent opening. In the federal program, fugitive emissions means those emissions which could not reasonably pass through a stack, chimney, vent, or other functionally equivalent opening. If DEQ were to change the way fugitive emissions are handled, then the definition would also need to be changed. The proposed revisions to the definitions of federal major source and major source ensure that they are consistent with OAR 340-224-0100. This is a clarification of the rules and is not a change in implementation or policy. Including fugitive emissions in the calculation of all emission rates is also more protective of the environment. No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| 16. Greenhouse gas definition | DEQ should revise the proposed definition of “greenhouse gas” to exclude CO2 emissions from biomass effective upon the date that EPA authorizes the removal of biomass GHG emissions from PSD consideration. EPA has promised to finalize its decision in 2011 on whether biomass related CO2 emissions must be counted in determining PSD applicability. If EPA concludes that the CO2 emissions from biomass should not be counted, then, consistent with Oregon’s policy of promoting responsible utilization of biomass, the Oregon rules should automatically implement the EPA position. (1, 2, 4, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 23)
As [former] Governor Kulongoski has repeatedly stated, biomass is key to Oregon's economic future as well as to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. DEQ should adopt rules that ensure that as soon as possible, the regulations will reflect the preference for the burning of renewable biomass as opposed to non-renewable fossil fuel. (16)
Response: On 01/12/2011, EPA announced its plan to defer, for three years, greenhouse gas permitting requirements for carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from biomass-fired and other biogenic sources. By July 2011, EPA plans to complete a rulemaking to implement this deferral. During the three-year period, the EPA plans to seek input on critical scientific issues from its partners within the federal government and from outside scientists who have relevant expertise. Before the end of the three-year period, the agency intends to issue a second rulemaking that determines how these emissions should be treated or counted under GHG permitting requirements.
EPA will also plan to issue guidance shortly that will provide a basis that state or local permitting authorities may use to conclude that the use of biomass as fuel is the best available control technology for GHG emissions until the agency can complete an action on the three-year deferral in July.
DEQ has proposed a change to the definitions of “greenhouse gases” to exempt CO2 derived from biomass from PSD and Title V permitting during the three-year EPA deferral period.
| 17. Sequestering of carbon based emissions | ||||||||||||||||||
Many company owners will be faced with higher fees and administrative costs, without realizing the benefit of forest ownership that sequesters CO2 and GHG emissions. Starting in 2011 many forest owners in New Zealand have the options of receiving "carbon credits" and using these credits as offsets or selling them and receiving income for the sequestering of carbon based emissions. The current ODEQ and EPA policies do not take these issues into account for parties that own CO2 sequestering assets. (8)
Response: As noted in the comment, EPA did not address CO2 sequestering in the greenhouse gas tailoring rule. Because offsets are not required under the PSD program, the PSD program does not create a market for carbon credits and it is not necessary for DEQ to address CO2 sequestering in this rulemaking. If EPA establishes a requirement for carbon credits in a future rulemaking, DEQ will assess the need for state rules at that time. No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| 18. Major modification definition | In Oregon, to qualify as a major modification, a change must result in "an increase in the PSEL" over the significant emission rate over the netting basis. The focus of the determination must be on whether actual emissions increase, not whether the permit limit changes. (12)
Response: The use of the PSEL to define whether a facility’s changes qualify as a major modification is the basis of Oregon’s NSR/PSD program. EPA evaluated and initially approved the DEQ NSR program in 1982 and more recently in 2003 as being equivalent or more stringent than EPA’s regulations on a program basis.
When determining whether NSR/PSD is triggered, DEQ requires sources to use projected potential emissions from the modification rather than projected actual emissions, as required by EPA. DEQ’s approach is more stringent because sources would trigger NSR/PSD earlier since potential emissions are higher than actual emissions.
Changes to the definition of major modification are proposed to clarify that the trigger for NSR/PSD is a “PSEL that exceeds the netting basis by an amount that is equal to or greater than the significant emission rate.” The current definition of major modification says that there must be a PSEL “increase” over the netting basis. This change is proposed to clarify past practice in implementing the NSR/PSD program. In some cases the PSEL could even decrease from the permitted value and NSR/PSD would still be triggered if the resultant PSEL is more than the netting basis by a SER. See the response to comment 25 “Netting basis definition.”
| 19. Major modification definition allows automatic netting | A problem with Oregon's program is that it requires a "major modification" to result in an increase in permitted (not actual) emissions that is equivalent to an increase over the SER on a plant-wide basis. Instead of focusing on the pollution increase from the new emissions unit, Oregon's program determines whether an emissions increase is significant by reference to the entire facility. In this way, Oregon's program features "automatic netting" based on a permit limit from the 1970s, or in the case of one of the proposed rules, from the more recent baseline period. Thus, so long as the source had a PSEL in excess of emissions projected from the source after a physical or operational change, and never banked those emissions, no PSD permit is required. (12)
Response: Oregon’s NSR/PSD program does look at increases over the netting basis for the whole facility rather than individual emissions units. However, sources must accumulate ALL increases and decreases from ALL emissions units in determining whether NSR/PSD is triggered. This approach eliminates the ability of sources to disaggregate changes at a facility that are involved in a project (possible under the federal program) in order to avoid NSR/PSD. If NSR/PSD is triggered, sources are required to apply retrofit Best Available Control Technology to all the emissions units that contributed to the increase, not just the current project.
In 2001, Oregon’s PSEL and NSR rules were changed to reduce the concern described by the commenter as “automatic netting.” When a source shuts down an emissions unit, those emissions can potentially make the netting basis higher than the source’s current PTE. Unassigned emissions are the difference between the netting basis and what a source could emit based on its current physical and operational design. The PSEL rules were changed to limit unassigned emissions, and to establish the process for reducing unassigned emissions and the netting basis. Unassigned emissions that are removed from the netting basis cannot be used in future netting actions, nor can they be sold or banked.
The proposal to reset actual emissions and netting basis described in response to comment 3 will further reduce the opportunity for “automatic netting.” No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| 20. Major modification definition – before PSD program established | What is particularly confusing is how a source could legally qualify for the definition of “major modification” that requires that sources have “obtained all permits to construct and operate after the applicable baseline period but have not undergone New Source Review?” If a source was permitted during the baseline period and had not begun normal operation, it should only get PTE if it “commenced” construction during the baseline period. (12)
Response: DEQ and EPA anticipated the possibility that a source that was permitted to construct would not begin construction immediately as provided for in OAR 340-224-0030 (2)(a): Approval to construct becomes invalid if construction is not commenced within 18 months after the Department issues such approval, if construction is discontinued for a period of 18 months or more, or if construction is not completed within 18 months of the scheduled time. The Department may extend the 18-month period for good cause.
A PSD permit is valid if the above criteria are met. Otherwise, the PSD permit would be terminated and a new permit would be required if construction were not commenced within the allowed time period. No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| ||||||||||||||||||
21. Major modification definition – revised language | Under the definition of “Major Modification”, we found the new language in subparagraph (d) confusing. Based on the new language in the definition of “actual emissions” we understand that Oregon wants to allow a source to either reset the netting basis or exclude a portion of the netting basis when determining whether a new proposed change would be a major modification. We recommend that this provision more clearly spell out how a major modification would be determined when the netting basis hasn’t been reset (i.e., how you exclude a portion of the netting basis). (7)
Response: Changes have been made to this portion of the proposed definition of major modification to clarify the intent. For existing greenhouse gas sources and sources that add new equipment that are permitted at their potential to emit, the netting basis and the PSEL from these equipment will need to be tracked separately from the existing netting basis and PSEL of existing equipment.
| 22. Major source definition | OAR 340-200-0020(70): The revision to the definition of "Major Source" has the same problem as the revised definition of "Federal Major Source" in that it doesn't correctly reflect the two-part test for GHGs. In addition, the 100,000 tpy threshold needs to include language specifying that it is measured as CO2 equivalent (CO2e). (1, 2, 4, 7, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17)
Response: The change was made to the proposed rule as suggested.
| 23. Major source definition to include emission decreases | We request that DEQ revise the proposed revisions to the definition of “major source” to allow the inclusion of emissions decreases. Given Oregon’s unique means of applying the term “major source” including future increases and excluding future decreases in emissions would force sources that were making net reductions to be considered major sources and be subject to requirements such as nonattainment new source review. (1, 2, 4, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 23)
Response: DEQ agrees that emission decreases should be in the calculation of potential to emit of a source. The change will also be made to the definition of federal major source.
| 24. Netting basis definition allows thirty-year "lookback" period | ||||||||||||||||||
Another problem with Oregon's PSEL approach is that the PSEL is not based on projected or actual emissions during a time-frame that is contemporaneous with the physical or operational change in question, but during the "baseline period." The baseline emission rate is then adjusted as rules change and future permitting decisions are made. The adjusted baseline is referred to as the “netting basis.” The resultant "netting basis" in many cases may not reflect actual emissions at any time that is reasonably contemporaneous with the physical or operational change in question. In fact, the "netting basis" reflects a thirty-year "lookback" period, in clear contravention of the federal regulatory floor. Thus, the PSELs are unenforceable on a practical level. (12)
Response: DEQ does agree that the netting basis may or may not reflect actual emissions that are contemporaneous with the physical or operational change in question. However, this does not mean the federal program is more stringent than the Oregon program. While modifications at individual facilities may be evaluated differently under the federal and Oregon programs, EPA has determined that the programs are equivalent overall. PSELs and netting basis provide a simple and enforceable mechanism for evaluating whether sources are subject to NSR/PSD as a result of physical changes or changes in the method of operation.
At the time of a physical or operational change, actual emissions may be more or less than the netting basis. This is because the PSEL could have been increased to allow utilization of existing capacity, and the source may be operating at higher capacity than in the baseline period or the emissions may have decreased due to voluntary reductions. If the contemporaneous actual emissions are greater than the netting basis, this component of the Oregon NSR/PSD test is a more stringent test than the federal. If the contemporaneous actual emissions are less than the netting basis, this component of the Oregon NSR/PSD test may be less stringent than the federal. In both cases, however, using the PTE after the physical change in the NSR/PSD test makes the Oregon test more likely to trigger NSR/PSD than if the projected actual emissions were used as in the federal test.
DEQ does not agree that PSELs are unenforceable. Each permit includes compliance monitoring in accordance with OAR 340-222-0080. This monitoring meets the federal requirement to be practically enforceable because it can be determined on at least a monthly basis. If a source violates the PSEL, DEQ is able to take direct enforcement action against the source.
| 25. Netting basis definition | DEQ recently released an interpretation of “netting basis” in regards to PGE’s Boardman plant. This interpretation stated that decreases required by rule would take effect on the netting basis upon adoption by the agency. PGE had announced plans to build an entirely new generating facility at the Boardman site. Without this new DEQ interpretation of netting basis, PGE could have constructed that new facility without ever subjecting it to PSD review because their actual emissions were massively below their allowable emissions. PGE would not have had to increase their PSEL to allow operation of the new facility, and therefore would not trigger PSD review.
As commenters pointed out in response to DEQ’s proposed permit for PGE Boardman, which advanced this new interpretation, the interpretation would lead to absurd results, potentially subjecting facilities to PSD review for projects that decreased emissions. (12)
Response: A combination of existing rules together require that the netting basis be reduced at the time an emission standard is adopted, whereas the PSEL is reduced at the time a source is required to comply with the new emission standard. In response to the situation noted in the comment, DEQ developed an internal management directive to clarify how these rules work together. If the netting basis is not reduced at the time the rule requiring a reduction is adopted, the source could reduce emissions prior to the compliance date (in this case, up to 7 years later) and use the emission reductions to avoid PSD for other projects. This would result in a source using a rule-required reduction in netting, which is not allowed under Oregon’s federally approved State Implementation Plan.
The commenter mentioned that facilities could be subject to PSD review for projects that decreased emissions, which is correct. The two part test for whether a major modification is triggered is a physical change or a change in the method of operation and a PSEL that results in an increase over the netting basis by more than the significant emission rate. A source’s projected PSEL from the major modification could actually decrease from its current PSEL and still trigger NSR/PSD. This is because a source’s PSEL can be higher than the netting basis due to the use of existing capacity as long as it has not made a physical change or a change in the method of operation at the facility. The PSEL can also be higher than the netting basis because of previously approved increases due to physical modifications that did not trigger NSR/PSD. If the source then makes a physical change or change in the method of operation, the new PSEL can be lower than the existing PSEL but over the netting basis by more than a significant emission rate. Increases in the PSEL from the use of existing capacity must be tracked separately from increases due to physical modifications.
Example:
In the example above, NSR/PSD was not triggered in 2000 because the increase in PSEL over the netting basis for new equipment (20 tpy) was not over the SER. The change in 2009 did trigger NSR/PSD since the increase in the PSEL over the netting basis for new equipment (45 tpy) was greater than the SER even though the PSEL decreased from 150 tpy to 145 tpy. This clarification was made in the definition of major modification (see the response in comment 18 “major modification definition”).
| 26. Ozone precursor definition | OAR 340-200-0020(84): The new definition of "Ozone Precursor" should include language regarding the measurement methods similar to the language in the definition of "PM10" when used in context of emissions especially to distinguish between ambient NO2 and NOx emissions. (7)
Response: The change was made to the proposed rule as suggested.
| 27. Conditional test method citation | OAR 340-200-0020(95)(b): We assume ODEQ removed the conditional test method (CTM) citation because CTMs are no longer being developed. We recommend that other test method (OTM) 027 for PM2.5 and PM10, that has superceded CTM 040, be cited here. As with the current definitions of "PM" and "PM10," this definition needs to reference the appropriate EPA or ODEQ emissions measurement method in order to distinguish ambient PM2.5 from PM2.5 emissions. (7)
Response: EPA reference test methods for PM10 and PM2.5 (Methods 201A and 202 - Methods for Measurement of Filterable PM10 and PM2.5 and Measurement of Condensable PM Emissions from Stationary Sources) were promulgated on December 1, 2010 and became effective on January 1, 2011. These revised EPA methods have replaced Other Test Method (OTM) 27 and 28 and have been added to the proposed definitions of PM10 and PM2.5.
| ||||||||||||||||||
28. Regulated air pollutant definition | OAR 340-200-0020(103)(a)(B): It isn't clear that the provision in the definition of "Regulated air pollutant" or "Regulated Pollutant" that references the national ambient air quality standards (103)(a)(B) includes any precursors to such pollutants. This should be clarified in the text. (7)
Response: The change was made to the proposed rule as suggested.
| 28. Volatile organic compounds definition | OAR 340-200-0020(148)(d): Note that paragraph (d) in the definition of “Volatile Organic Compounds” appears to be missing the last line. The EPA definition of the term in 40 CFR5l.100 includes a few more words and the identification of the actual compound subject to the provision. (7)
Response: The correction was made to the proposed rule as suggested.
| 29. Significant impact levels | OAR 340-200, new Table 1: The new Table 1 SIGNIFICANT AIR QUALITY IMPACT includes Class III impact levels for SO2 that are higher than the Class II impact levels established by EPA. Oregon will need to submit a demonstration that such higher levels will still ensure protection of the NAAQS in Class III areas.
Also new Table 1 specifies Significant Air Quality Impact values for PM2.5 of 0.2 ug/m3 (annual arithmetic mean) and 1.0 ug/m3 (24-hour average) respectively. These differ from the corresponding Class II and III areas PM2.5 SILs of 0.3 ug/m3 (annual arithmetic mean) and 1.2 ug/m3 (24-hour average) established by EPA. Please clarify why these values are different. (7)
We believe that DEQ should establish PM2.5 SILs consistent with the federal SILs. (1, 2, 4, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17)
Response: The Class III SO2 SILs will be changed to match EPA’s Class II SO2 SILs. DEQ’s Class II and Class III SILs for PM2.5 adopted in the August 2010 temporary rules are lower than EPA’s values to be consistent with the lower SIL levels adopted in the early 1990’s for PM10 due to significant air quality problems in the Medford area. Upon reconsideration, DEQ proposes to adopt EPA’s PM2.5 SILs for all areas. The change was made to the proposed rule as suggested.
| 30. Error in Table 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
OAR 340-202-0210, Table 1: There is a typo in Table 1. For Class I areas, the PM10 increments should be 4 and 8 ug/m3 respectively for the annual arithmetic mean and 24-hour maximum respectively. (1, 2, 4, 11, 13, 14, 17)
Response: The changes were made to the proposed rule as suggested.
| 31. Greenhouse gas in CO2e | OAR 340-216-0020, Table 1 Part C (No.5): It must be clear that the 100,000 tons of GHG here is in terms of CO2 equivalent (CO2e), not mass emissions. See comments on OAR 340-200 above regarding GHG emission thresholds. (1)
Response: The change was made to the proposed rule as suggested.
| 32. PM2.5 significant emission rate in Medford | We suggest that DEQ clarify the significant emission rates applicable for PM2.5 in Medford. The rates identified are for PM10/PM2.5 without any indication as to whether that is direct PM2.5, precursors or some combination of the two. Due to the different regulation of PM2.5, we do not believe that the Medford significant emission rates should include PM2.5 at all. (1, 3, 13, 23)
Response: The change was made to the proposed rule as suggested.
| 33. Reporting requirement | OAR 340-218-0040(2) requires that Title V applicants supplement their applications during the time period where the application is being evaluated and acted on. This is very different from the apparently open ended requirement being proposed for ACDP sources. Because of the potentially far reaching impacts of this regulation, and the lack of discussion about it prior to proposal, we strongly urge the Department to withdraw the provision. If DEQ retains the provision, we request that similar language from the Title V rules be added so that it is clear that this requirement applies while the permit application is under review. (1, 2, 4, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17)
Response: The added language for Air Contaminant Discharge Permit applications comes directly from the Title V permit application requirements in OAR 340-218-0040(2): Duty to supplement or correct application. Any applicant who fails to submit any relevant facts or who has submitted incorrect information in a permit application must, upon becoming aware of such failure or incorrect submittal, promptly submit such supplementary facts or corrected information. In addition, an applicant must provide additional information as necessary to address any requirements that become applicable to the source after the date it filed a complete application but prior to release of a draft permit.
The duty to supplement or correct information extends beyond the period in which the application is being considered and acted upon. If it were limited to the evaluation period, an applicant could conceal certain facts and upon permit issuance could argue that is was relieved of the obligation to supplement or correct. Or an applicant could make a critical mistake and omit information that would have required the source to comply with a significant requirement and yet not be obligated to later raise the issue to DEQ. Based on concerns raised by the EPA in its priority sector review, this language was added to the ACDP application requirements. No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| ||||||||||||||||||
34. Greenhouse gas PSD applicability prior to July 1, 2011 | OAR 340-224-0010(5): This new applicability provision for GHGs needs to include language indicating that the 75,000 tpy value is measured as CO2 equivalent (CO2e). (7) We request that the Department revise its GHG PSD applicability provisions proposed for inclusion in OAR 340-224-0010(5). We believe that what was intended was to require new Federal Major Sources that also have a GHG PTE of 75,000 tons/year to have to undergo PSD for GHGs. Likewise, we believe that existing Federal Major Sources that have a significant emissions increase of a non-GHG regulated air pollutant and a GHG emissions increase of 75,000 tons/year or more over the netting basis would be subject to PSD for GHGs. As proposed, the underlined elements are missing from the rule resulting in the Oregon proposed rule being far more stringent than the federal rules. (1, 2, 4, 9, 11, 13, 14, 17)
Response: The change was made to the proposed rule as suggested.
| 35. Greenhouse gas PSD applicability after July 1, 2011 | OAR 340-224-0010(6): This new applicability provision for GHGs needs to include language indicating that the 100,000 tpy value is measured as CO2 equivalent (CO2e) and that a new stationary source or an existing stationary source is subject to regulation when it emits, will emit, or has the potential to emit 100,000 tpy or more. (7) We request that the Department revise its GHG PSD applicability provisions proposed for inclusion in OAR 340-224-0010(6). We believe that what was intended was to require existing Federal Major Sources to undergo PSD for GHGs only if they request a GHG emissions increase of 75,000 tons/year or more over the GHG netting basis. As proposed, the rule requires the source to be regulated even if the ultimate GHG PSEL requested does not exceed the netting basis by an SER or more. We suggest that the rule be changed to remove this possibility. (1, 2, 4, 9, 11, 13, 14, 17)
Response: The changes were made to the proposed rule as suggested.
| 36. Additional requirements for sources in nonattainment areas | OAR 340-224-0050(3): The additional requirements for sources in nonattainment areas are only required to apply to sources that are major for the nonattainment pollutant. Since GHGs are not criteria pollutants and never will be nonattainment pollutants, these provisions need not apply to GHGs. However, if ODEQ does include GHGs here, it needs to include language indicating that the 100,000 tpy value is measured as CO2 equivalent (CO2e). (7)
Response: Greenhouse gases were removed from this section as suggested.
| 37. OAR 340-224-0060(1) | ||||||||||||||||||
For consistency and accuracy, the text in 0060(1) should be amended to read " ... must apply BACT for each maintenance pollutant or precursor(s) emitted at or above a SER. " (7)
Response: The change was made to the proposed rule as suggested.
| 38. BACT for PM2.5 precursors | We request that the Department revise its regulations to clarify that sources triggering BACT for a PM2.5 precursor (e.g. NOx out of a boiler) do not necessarily trigger BACT for direct PM2.5 coming out of an unrelated emission unit (e.g., a planer). Due to Oregon’s program being so different from the federal program in this regard, it is necessary to clarify that triggering BACT for a PM2.5 precursor would not then trigger BACT for all direct PM2.5 emission units, and vice versa. (1, 3, 13, 23)
Response: DEQ agrees that BACT does not apply to direct PM2.5 or PM2.5 precursors if they are not emitted at a SER over the netting basis. The change was made to the proposed rule as suggested.
| 39. BACT applicability
| DEQ’s rules currently state that equipment installed after the baseline period must undergo BACT. However, we believe that this regulation should be revised to recognize that equipment authorized to be installed in the baseline period should not be subject to BACT when it is constructed. That would place equipment installed without authorization during the baseline period in a better position than equipment permitted, but not yet installed, during the baseline period. (9)
Response: DEQ agrees that if the emissions unit was included in the netting basis because it was permitted during the baseline period, then retroactive BACT would only apply to the emissions unit if it is modified and there is an increase in emissions. A change was already proposed that addressed this issue but an additional change was made for further clarification.
| 40. OAR 340-224-0070(2)(a) | To be consistent with paragraph 0070(2), paragraph 0070(2)(a) should be amended to read "For increases of PM2.5 precursors equal to or greater than the precursor significant emission rate, .... ". (7)
Response: The change was made to the proposed rule as suggested.
| ||||||||||||||||||
41. OAR 340-224-0070(5) | It is not clear why this new provision for sources impacting PM2.5 nonattainment areas is necessary. It appears to duplicate the requirement of 340-224-0070(2)(b). Since 340-224-0050(2) refers to 340-225-0090 both 0070(2)(b) and this new 0070(5) appear to require the same thing. (7)
Response: OAR 340-224-0070(5) was deleted from the proposed rule as suggested.
| 42. PM2.5 Precursor Air Quality Analysis
| In OAR 340-224-0070(2)(a), DEQ proposes to require that where a federal major source or a major modification at a federal major source results in an increase of PM2.5 precursors of an SER or more, the source must provide an analysis of PM2.5 impacts. However, there is no basis for an individual source to model indirect PM2.5 emissions. Therefore, the rule should be revised to state that the source must provide an analysis of direct PM2.5 air quality impacts. (1, 2, 4, 11, 13, 14, 17)
Response: As EPA stated in the preamble to the final rule Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) for Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 Micrometers (PM2.5) – Increments, Significant Impact Levels (SILs) and Significant Monitoring Concentration (SMC): “The impacts of PM2.5 precursors on ambient concentrations of PM2.5 cannot be determined from the dispersion models that EPA has currently approved for modeling individual PSD sources. Such models are not designed to consider chemical transformations that occur in the atmosphere after the precursor emissions have been released from the source. Consideration of these transformations is necessary to be able to add precursor impacts into the total modeled ambient PM2.5 concentrations for comparison to the SILs for PM2.5. The technical tools needed to complete a comprehensive analysis of all emissions that contribute to ambient concentrations of PM2.5 are only in the developmental stage; nevertheless, we believe that it would be inappropriate to restrict the regulatory language in such a way that future regulatory amendments would be required to enable the inclusion of precursor impacts in the PM2.5 analysis as the necessary technical tools become available. Estimating techniques are being developed that will be able to be applied to the PM2.5 analysis in the near future, which could not be required if the regulatory language precluded them. We acknowledge the concerns that have been expressed by some commenters about the shortcomings of not considering the impacts of PM2.5 precursors under the PM2.5 air quality analyses. Accordingly, we believe that the new provision for applying the SILs for PM2.5 to the required analyses for the NAAQS and increments should not be self-limiting by specifying the use of only direct PM2.5 emissions. Instead, the new provision contained in this final rule provides that the test will be based on whether “the emissions increase … would cause … air quality impacts less than [the PM2.5 SILs].” See new 40 CFR 51.166(k)(2) and 52.21(k)(2). We believe that it would be more effective to rely on interim policy and guidance as appropriate to help determine the best methods available to make the required assessment of source impacts on ambient PM2.5 resulting from any emissions.” No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| 43. Baseline concentration definition
| The clarification to the definition of "baseline concentration" is consistent with EPA's definition and the definition in section 169 of the Act. When submitting this regulation as a SIP revision, Oregon must demonstrate that the regulation is consistent with previous interpretations so it cannot be construed to be a relaxation. The old language could be interpreted to mean that all emission increases from new sources and modifications occurring after January 6, 1975 but before January 1, 1978 consume increment, while the new language could be interpreted to mean that only emission increases from major new sources and major modifications consume increment. (7)
Response: The proposed rule language for the definition of “baseline concentration” states: “Actual emission increases or decreases occurring before January 1, 1978 must be included in the baseline calculation, except that actual emission increases from any major source or major modification on which construction commenced after January 6, 1975 must not be included in the baseline calculation;”
The word “major” was added to this definition in division 225 to make it consistent with the definition in division 202. Upon further consideration, DEQ has concluded that “major” should not be added to source and modification in the definition of baseline concentration. When an air quality impact analysis is required under division 225, all permitted sources, not just “major” sources, are included in the modeling analysis, not in the baseline calculation (or background concentration). DEQ will change the proposed definition of baseline concentration in division 202 to be consistent with the definition in division 225.
| 44. AQRV analysis guidance | ||||||||||||||||||
A key impact of the regulation of PM2.5 will be the increased need to evaluate AQRVs. Therefore, as part of this GHG/PM2.5 rulemaking, we encourage the Department to update the date reference for the definition of “FLAG” in OAR 340-225-0020(6) to reference the new version published in the October 27, 2010 Federal Register. 75 Fed. Reg. 66125 (Oct. 27, 2010). (1, 2, 4, 11, 13, 14, 17)
Response: The change was made to the proposed rule as suggested.
| 45. PM2.5 precursor offsetting
| We urge the Department to clarify what is required under its rules in terms of PM2.5 precursor offsetting. It very difficult to understand what is required in terms of precursor offsetting and what is allowed/required in the event of inter-pollutant trading. (1, 2, 4, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17)
Response: The proposed rule has been clarified as suggested. EPA has determined that the relative efficacy of emissions reductions varies across pollutants and that a ton of direct PM2.5 is generally more effective than a ton of precursor emissions in reducing overall PM2.5 concentrations. Therefore, the EPA preferred trading ratios for PM2.5 and its precursors (NOx and SO2) are included in the proposed rules.
| 46. Small-scale local energy projects | Even with the conditions provided in this paragraph, it may be too broad an assertion to state that a small-scale local energy project and associated infrastructure provides a net air quality benefit without conducting air quality dispersion modeling to confirm this. We are not aware of similar provisions in the SIPs of other states. Therefore, before Region 10 can consider this for inclusion in the Oregon SIP, we will need to consult with EPA Headquarters and other Regions. (7)
Response: The proposed rules change how small scale local energy projects are evaluated under Oregon’s rules based on recent changes to Oregon’s statutes resulting from House Bill 2952. EPA requires states to have minor source construction approval programs, in addition to the major source program described above, but gives states flexibility in how to do this. Oregon’s existing minor source construction approval program in effect applies major source NSR/PSD requirements to any source with emissions over the Significant Emission Rate. This is above and beyond what is required by the federal rules. HB 2952 revised how minor source construction approval works for small scale local energy projects in Oregon providing DEQ with greater flexibility on how to implement the program. The changes in the proposed rule still meet EPA’s general requirement to have a construction approval program for minor sources and is still protective of the environment. No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| 47. Proposed option 1 | Option 1 fails to link PSELs to the baseline concentration in the air shed and therefore will not meet the PSEL program’s goal of ensuring compliance with NAAQS and PSD increment. DEQ provides little guidance on how the “fraction” will be established. There is no indication that DEQ will require further testing of the source to ensure that the fraction remains the same, potentially allowing massive increases in PM2.5 emissions and the resulting specific health effects. (12)
Response: DEQ is proposing to implement a variation of Option 1. The netting basis and PSEL for PM2.5 will be the fraction of the PM10 netting basis and PSEL. Since there is so much overlap between these two pollutants, this ensures that the introduction of the new pollutant (PM2.5) doesn’t trigger any new requirements if a plant is not making any modifications or production increases. The GHG baseline will be set based on the highest actual emissions in a 12-consecutive month period during the years 2000-2010.
DEQ does not agree that the PSEL program will not ensure compliance with the NAAQS or the PSD increment. See the response in comment 13 “Baseline period tied to baseline concentration year.” See the responses in comments 54 and 55 regarding “Compliance with the NAAQS” and “Compliance with the PSD increment.”
DEQ will be providing guidance to permit writers on how the PM2.5 fraction of PM10 will normally be established. Source test data at the facility is the most reliable way to determine the PM2.5 fraction of PM10 emissions. The guidance will also include information on the cases when source tests will normally be required, along with the frequency to verify the PM2.5 fraction. Smaller sources of PM2.5 (less than 5 tons/year for each piece of equipment) will not normally be required to test because of the lower amount of emissions and limited resources. In this case, industry specific data available from trade associations or EPA’s AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, will normally be used to estimate PM2.5 emissions. AP-42 has been published since 1972 as the primary compilation of EPA's emission factor information. It contains emission factors and process information for more than 200 air pollution source categories. A source category is a specific industry sector or group of similar emitting sources. The emission factors have been developed and compiled from source test data, material balance studies, and engineering estimates.
The PM2.5 fraction of PM10 depends on the type of source. For natural gas combustion, 100% of PM10 is PM2.5. If data is not available on the PM2.5 fraction of PM10 and sources do not want to incur the expense of source testing, the most conservative estimate is to assume PM10, or even PM, is all PM2.5. This approach will be easiest for sources but will also cause increases at the source to trigger NSR/PSD earlier since the significant emission rate for PM2.5 is 10 tons/year (PM10 SER = 15 tons/year and PM SER = 25 tons/year). Once the source chooses to assume PM2.5 = PM10, that choice cannot be changed in the future, even if more accurate data is available. No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| ||||||||||||||||||
48. Proposed option 2 | Option 2 would subject facilities to PSD for any increase over current PSEL and could lead to massive increases in actual pollution. By setting PSELs at PTE for ALL sources constructed after 1978, Option 2 would allow massive increases in actual emissions in the air shed and allow for violation of the NAAQS or PSD increment with impunity. Even more so than Option 1, Option 2 would wholly disconnect the PSEL program from the programs it is supposed to support, making the PSEL nothing more than a bureaucratic and accounting exercise in futility. (12)
Response: The commenter is correct in stating that Option 2 would disconnect greenhouse gas emissions from actual emissions today. DEQ is not recommending Option 2 for adoption. Changes have been made to the proposed rules to incorporate a modified version of Option 1 (see the response in comment 48 “Proposed Option 1”).
| 49. Proposed option 3 | Option 3 is better because it ties the baseline period to when DEQ actually has monitoring data, ensuring that the PSEL program actually meets its goal of ensuring compliance with the NAAQS and PSD increment. If adopted, DEQ should outline very specific requirements for when DEQ will diverge from the baseline period for setting baseline emission rates. (12)
Response: DEQ is not recommending Option 3 for adoption because it would create a different baseline for PM2.5 and PM10. Since the two pollutants are so closely related, adoption of this option would create significant implementation issues. In addition, DEQ does not believe it is necessary to align the baseline year with the baseline concentration year to ensure compliance with the increment. See the responses in comment 54 “Compliance with the NAAQS” and comment 55 “Compliance with the PSD increment.” Changes have been made to the proposed rules to incorporate a modified version of Option 1 (see the response in comment 48 “Proposed Option 1”).
| 50. Proposed option 4 | Option 4 is best. The PSEL program has failed to live up to what Oregonians expect and DEQ should move away from it. Option 4 is a good first step down that road. (12)
Response: After consulting with EPA about the strengths and weaknesses of the federal program and considering implementation issues, DEQ is not recommending adoption of Option 4 (see the response in comment 52 to “State NSR/PSD program vs. federal program). Changes have been made to the proposed rules to incorporate a modified version of Option 1 (see the response in comment 48 “Proposed Option 1”).
| 51. State NSR/PSD program vs. federal program
| ||||||||||||||||||
In the PM2.5/GHG regulatory proposal, the Department has indicated that it is considering adopting the federal PSD rules for greenhouse gases rather than keeping GHG regulation consistent with the regulation of other regulated air pollutants. We believe that this would be bad for Oregon and therefore encourage the Department to adopt regulations that treat GHGs consistent with how other regulated air pollutants are treated for the following reasons: • The Oregon program has always had incentives under the PSEL program to reduce emissions and to operate equipment in as low-emitting a manner as possible. This excludes changes from PSD when these changed can be accommodated under the PSEL. • The Oregon program provides flexibility to expand production operations. • The Oregon program provides simplicity in determining NSR/PSD applicability, unlike the federal program where sources must rely on consultants to assist with their applicability determinations due to the complexity of the rules. This will be especially important if the rules affect smaller businesses in the future. (1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 23) The commenters would prefer the adoption of the Federal Netting Method for GHG emissions because it does not place the facility at a competitve disadvantage when compared to other plants in other parts of the country. Any amendments to the DEQ program should bring the DEQ program closer to EPA’s Regulations. (6, 10, 12)
Response: The commenters provide differing views on whether to use the Oregon or federal netting approach for GHG.
Basic DEQ and EPA NSR/PSD Program Differences DEQ’s NSR/PSD rules differ from EPA’s regulations in a number of fundamental ways. • The DEQ program has lower major source thresholds, so smaller new sources and changes to smaller existing sources are subject to review. • The DEQ program utilizes a plant-wide cap approach to defining major modification rather than a contemporaneous net emissions increase approach as does EPA’s rules. The effect of this plant-wide cap approach is that some changes which would be subject to review under EPA’s rules are not subject under DEQ’s rules and vice versa. • DEQ accumulates all emissions increases and decreases from physical changes or changes in the method of operation since the baseline year or last major source permit, whichever is more recent, rather than just during a “contemporaneous” time period. This aspect of DEQ’s program creates an incentive for sources to voluntarily reduce emissions in order to avoid triggering NSR/PSD. • The PSEL rules have provisions that require the PSEL and netting basis to be reduced if emission reductions at the sources occur and make the caps excessively high. • The PSEL also eliminates the possibility of a gradual increase of emissions over time by piecemeal projects not triggering NSR/PSD. Under the federal rules, an increase or decrease in actual emissions is contemporaneous. • Changes which would result in increased emissions, but would not be considered modifications under EPA’s rules, are reviewed for compliance with standards and increments under DEQ’s PSEL program.
EPA evaluated and initially approved the DEQ NSR program in 1982 as being equivalent or more stringent than EPA’s regulations on a program basis and more recently in 2003.
Continued Implementation of Oregon NSR/PSD Program After carefully considering all comments, DEQ has decided to recommend using the Oregon NSR/PSD program for both PM2.5 and greenhouse gases. Based on conversations with EPA Region 10, there are definite advantages of the Oregon program over the federal program, including simplicity in determining applicability of the program as noted by some commenters. The following list contains elements of the federal NSR/PSD program that make it potentially less stringent and more complicated than Oregon’s program: • The ability to subtract from projected future actual emissions any increase due to demand growth • The ability to subtract from projected future actual emissions anything a source was capable of accommodating before the change that is unrelated to the change • The ability to disaggregate changes at a facility that are involved in a project • The question of whether emissions increases from debottlenecking should be included in the modification • The fact that fugitive emissions are not included in emissions increase for all source categories • Potential exemptions for routine repair and replacement • The ability to pursue the netting credits approach, which involves a 5-year contemporaneous period that is plant wide • The ability to pick different baseline years for each pollutant involved in a change. • The unenforceability of the projected actual emissions in the test of whether a major modification has occurred
In an area where the Oregon program may seem less stringent than the federal program, setting actual emissions at a source’s potential to emit, DEQ is proposing a change to the existing rules. See the response in comment 18 “major modification definition.” Oregon’s NSR/PSD program was used as one of the models to support the development of the Plantwide Applicability Limit option in the federal NSR/PSD rules. DEQ feels that the benefits of Oregon’s NSR/PSD program far outweigh any advantages of the federal program. Changes will be made to incorporate greenhouse gases into Oregon’s NSR/PSD program.
| 52. Guidance on Federal PSD Program | Oregon’s PSEL program, like other DEQ innovative programs, is unique under the Clean Air Act. While this may be a source of pride for DEQ, it makes implementing the program difficult because, when faced by difficult questions about the program and how it operates, DEQ consistently makes ad hoc or irrational decisions without fully anticipating all of the potential consequences. Comparatively, the federal program is implemented by most other states and by EPA and therefore has a wealth of interpretive guidance on the implementation of the program. Implementation of the federal program would therefore save DEQ time and money and would reduce the number of ad hoc decisions DEQ has to make and revise. (12)
Response: As stated in response to comment 52 to “State NSR/PSD program vs. federal program” above, DEQ is proposing to continue to use the Oregon approach to netting in the NSR/PSD program for PM2.5 and greenhouse gases. Even though there is guidance on implementation of many aspects of the federal program, the program has similar complexity to the Oregon program and requires similar time and resources to implement. While implementation issues in the Oregon program often arise with regard to specific permitting actions, DEQ does not make ad hoc decisions regarding permitting issues. Decisions are made based on a legal review of the rules, DEQ guidance and past practices. No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| 53. Compliance with the NAAQS | The PSEL program is intended to ensure compliance with the NAAQS and PSD increment. Both of these programs are based on actual emissions within the air shed. The only way that the PSEL can actually ensure compliance with these programs is if the baseline emission rates are set based on actual monitoring data from the baseline period. DEQ’s proposed options 1 and 2 do not connect the baseline emissions rate to the baseline period and these proposed options would therefore not ensure compliance with the NAAQS or PSD increment. (12)
Response: The PSEL program provides the basis for assuring compliance with emission standards, and the NSR/PSD program ensures that major new and modified sources do not cause violations of ambient standards and PSD increments. However, the PSEL is only one element of an overall regulatory system that ensures compliance with the NAAQS.
The CAA requires all areas of the country to meet or strive to comply with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards set by EPA. The Clean Air Act established two types of NAAQS. Primary standards set limits to protect public health, including the health of "sensitive" populations such as asthmatics, children, and the elderly. Secondary standards set limits to protect public welfare, including protection against visibility impairment, damage to animals, crops, vegetation, and buildings. State and local governments monitor the ambient air to determine whether the levels of pollution comply with the NAAQS. A region that does not meet the standard is considered a nonattainment area. Once the EPA designates nonattainment areas, the state works with businesses, local governments, and the public to reduce the emissions from sources contributing to the nonattainment status of the area.
One of the key programs designed to help achieve compliance with the NAAQS is the New Source Review (NSR) program, a preconstruction review process for new and modified stationary sources. The NSR program has two parts: the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program for attainment or "clean" areas typically requires new or modified sources to install state-of-the-art pollution controls to ensure that the ambient air quality will not degrade. The non-attainment area NSR program is designed to ensure that any new industrial growth in a non-attainment area will comply with stringent emission limitations (by requiring the most protective pollution controls and emission offsets), with the goal of improving air quality overall to meet the NAAQS. The NSR program requires companies to obtain permits for new construction or major modifications that substantially increase a facility's emissions.
However, regulating major new and modified sources is not sufficient to ensure compliance with the NAAQS. States must submit a plan to EPA detailing steps necessary to achieve and maintain the NAAQS. This plan is referred to as the State Implementation Plan or SIP. SIPs must include an inventory of emissions, enforceable emission limitations, related control measures, and schedules and time-tables for compliance that are necessary for the area to meet the Clean Air Act standards and opportunities for public input. Air monitoring is conducted to measure whether standards are being met.
If a state has nonattainment areas within its borders, the state must develop and submit an attainment plan to EPA detailing steps necessary to achieve the standard. Generally, the attainment plan includes modeling to demonstrate that the measures selected by the state will reduce emissions enough for the area to meet the standard. In addition, the Clean Air Act requires major sources of air pollution to meet stricter emission control requirements in nonattainment areas than are required in areas that meet federal health standards. For example, new sources of air pollution in nonattainment areas must meet stricter permitting requirements. States may ask EPA to redesignate an area back into attainment if: • the area has monitored attainment of the air quality standard; • EPA has determined that the improvement in air quality is due to permanent and enforceable reductions in emissions; • the state has submitted, and EPA has approved, a maintenance plan for the area; and, • the area has met all other applicable Clean Air Act requirements.
Nonattainment areas that later are designated to attainment are considered maintenance areas. The steps to maintain air quality are defined in a maintenance plan. Unless demonstrated to be no longer necessary, the control measures used to improve air quality will remain in place and additional measures could be needed. The maintenance plan must demonstrate continued compliance, considering projected growth, for a period of ten years. If outdoor air monitors record a violation of the standard, the maintenance plan includes a commitment to determine appropriate measures to address the cause of the violation.
Oregon hasn’t always met the National Ambient Air Quality Standards and initially had several communities designated by the EPA as non-attainment areas for ozone, carbon monoxide and particulate. DEQ developed attainment plans for these areas which included more stringent controls, such as limits on emissions of solvents and particulate matter limits on wood particle dryers and hardboard press vents. The more stringent controls on industrial emissions resulted in reductions to the PSEL and netting basis. In this sense, the PSELs help achieve compliance with the NAAQS even though they are not used to demonstrate compliance with the NAAQS. With these and other control strategies, all of the nonattainment areas under DEQ's jurisdiction were redesignated as maintenance areas in the 1990s and have remained in compliance ever since.
The PM10 control strategies in the maintenance plans were so effective that when EPA developed the first PM2.5 ambient air quality standards, there were no PM2.5 nonattainment areas in the state. Only later when EPA reduced the PM2.5 NAAQS, two areas in the state were designated as nonattainment areas. An additional area in the state is violating the standard based on recent monitoring data, but it has not officially been designated as a nonattainment area yet.
Based on the fact that the only NAAQS violations in the state are for a pollutant for which EPA recently lowered the NAAQS, DEQ’s air quality program has been very successful in protecting air quality in the state. No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| 54. Compliance with the PSD increment | DEQ’s implementation of the PSELs fails to ensure compliance with the NAAQS and PSD increment (12)
Response: The PSEL program provides the basis for assuring compliance with ambient standards and PSD increments but is not the actual method used to evaluate increment consumption. A PSD increment is the maximum concentration increase that is allowed to occur above a baseline concentration for a specific pollutant in permitting a new or modified source. The baseline concentration is defined for each pollutant and, in general, is equal to the ambient concentration existing during the baseline concentration year. PSD increments prevent the air quality in clean areas from deteriorating to the level set by the NAAQS. Significant deterioration is said to occur when the amount of new pollution would exceed the applicable PSD increment. It is important to note, however, that the air quality cannot deteriorate beyond the applicable NAAQS level, even if not all of the PSD increment is consumed.
General Approach to Increment Analyses The EPA and the States have generally used an emissions inventory and modeling approach to identify the degree to which an increment has been consumed or will be consumed by major source construction. Ambient monitoring has not been used to establish baseline concentrations or to evaluate increment consumption because ambient measurements reflect emissions from all sources, including those that should be excluded from the measurements.
EPA has not necessarily required the identification of a specific baseline concentration but rather has focused on measuring the change in concentration from the legally established baseline date to the time of the analysis. For example, in the preamble to the 1978 PSD regulation, EPA stated the following: The regulations promulgated today no longer suggest that the baseline concentration be formally established. The Administrator feels that increment consumption can be best tracked by tallying changes in emissions levels of sources contributing to the baseline concentration and increases in emissions due to new sources. Data to establish baseline air quality in an absolute sense would be needed only if increment consumption were to be tracked using ambient measurements. Thus, to implement the air quality increment approach, the reviewing authority needs to verify that all changes from baseline emissions rates (decreases or increases as appropriate) in conjunction with the increased emissions associated with approved new source construction will not violate an applicable increment * * *.
Class I, II, and III Areas and Increment. The PSD requirements provide for a system of area classifications which affords States an opportunity to establish air quality goals that are consistent with local land use goals. There are three area classifications. Each classification differs in terms of the amount of growth it will permit before significant air quality deterioration would be deemed to occur. Class I areas have the smallest increments and thus allow only a small degree of air quality deterioration. Class II areas can accommodate normal well-managed industrial growth. Class III areas have the largest increments and thereby provide for a larger amount of development than either Class I or Class II areas.
Increment Consumption and Expansion The amount of PSD increment that has been consumed in a PSD area is determined from the emissions increases and decreases which have occurred from sources since the applicable baseline date. It is useful to note, however, that in order to determine the amount of PSD increment consumed (or the amount of available increment); no determination of the baseline concentration needs to be made. Instead, increment consumption calculations must reflect only the ambient pollutant concentration change attributable to increment-affecting emissions.
Emissions increases that consume a portion of the applicable increment are, in general, all those not accounted for in the baseline concentration and specifically include actual emissions increases at any stationary source, area source, or mobile source occurring after the baseline concentration year. The amount of available increment may be added to, or "expanded," through the reduction of actual emissions from any source after the baseline concentration year.
Oregon’s Approach to Increment Analyses Sources that trigger Prevention of Significant Deterioration for PM2.5 must model air quality impacts from emissions increases due to the project that are above emissions in 2007, the baseline concentration year, regardless of the year of their baseline emission period. This is also true for NOx, since the baseline concentration year (1988) does not correspond to the baseline emission year (1977-1978). These modeled ambient concentrations will be compared to the maximum allowable increases (PSD increments) to identify the degree to which an increment has been consumed or will be consumed by major source construction. Because the baseline year for emissions different from the baseline concentration year, sources that trigger NSR/PSD must establish actual emissions in 2007 for modeling to show compliance with the PSD increment. This is also done for competing source modeling because a source's individual impact is significant. Therefore, it is not imperative that the baseline emissions year be the same as the baseline concentration year, because modeled emissions are always actual emissions in the baseline concentration year. No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| ||||||||||||||||||
55. PSEL program fails to meet goals | The PSEL program has failed to meet DEQ’s own goals as stated below: 1) assuring reasonable further progress towards attainment of ambient standards; 2) assuring compliance with ambient standards and PSD increments; 3) administering the emissions trading program; and 4) tracking PSD increment consumption.
The PSEL program is only concerned with a specific source’s “allowable” emissions, while both the NAAQS and PSD increments are tied directly to “actual” emissions because they are concerned with “actual” concentrations of pollutants in the air shed. From the start, then, the administration of the PSEL program is disconnected with goals it is intended to achieve. For instance, a facility that only runs two 8-hour shifts, but has the potential to run three 8-hour shifts, even the source never has and never intends to, could increase actual emissions from their two shifts by 50%, which would be up to their “allowable emissions,” without triggering the PSD program under Oregon’s current rules. Conversely, assuming this increase in actual emissions was over the significant emission rate, the federal program would be triggered and the source would be required to meet the requirements of the PSD program. This highlights how the Oregon PSEL program is inconsistent with the federal program. (12)
Response: The PSEL program has not failed to meet DEQ’s goals. See the responses in comment 54 “Compliance with the NAAQS,” comment 55 “Compliance with the PSD increment” and comment 24 “Netting basis definition allows thirty-year "lookback" period”.
Regarding the example mentioned above, if a source was only operating two shifts during the baseline period, the baseline emission would be established on two shifts. Subsequently, if the source wanted to increase to three shifts, they would have to request an increase in their PSEL. If that increase was more than the SER, it would require an air quality impact analysis under the PSEL rule (OAR 340-222-0041). The source would be required to prove that the increase in emissions would not violate any air quality standards and if it did, the increase would not be allowed. The increase would not be subject to PSD because there is no physical modification; the source is merely using existing capacity. Under the federal program, this type of change in operation would also not be subject to PSD because there is no physical change. The federal program would not even require an air quality impact analysis for the actual increase in emissions. In this regard, Oregon’s PSEL program goes beyond the federal program in protecting the environment. No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| 56. Continued operation of high-emitting, old sources | The PSEL program encourages the continued operation of old, dirty sources when they would otherwise be replaced with new, cleaner sources. The current PSEL program places too much concern on “creep” instead of focusing on the larger problem of “slippage” with old, dirty sources in the region. Slippage is where a source has slowly deteriorated to the point where it can no longer function at what was its original design capacity. Old sources whose retrofits would trigger the federal PSD program, instead simply have their life extended and keep polluting indefinitely because the PSEL program lets these inefficient sources run forever, so long as their allowable emissions do not increase. By allowing these older, inefficient, and dirty sources to operate, in essence, indefinitely, the PSEL program undermines incentives that the facility has to replace older sources with newer, cleaner, more efficient sources.
DEQ has indicated that their main concern is not with slippage, but is instead with “creep” which is overblown. Creep is the process by which a source could systematically increase their potential emissions without triggering the federal PSD program. Under the federal program, only emission increases within ten years are considered. A source could then increase emissions, so long as the increase is below the significant emission rate, every ten years without triggering the federal PSD program.
The PSEL program also subsidizes current facilities to the detriment of facilities that may want to move into Oregon. Because the PSEL program allows current facilities to operate almost indefinitely without meeting the strictest requirements of the Clean Air Act, these facilities have a competitive advantage over any facilities that wish to be located in Oregon in the same industry that would have to meet these, sometimes costly, requirements. In this light, the PSEL program can be seen, not only as undermining the goals of the Clean Air Act, but also stifling business opportunities in Oregon. (12)
Response: DEQ believes that "slippage" is as likely or more likely to occur under the federal program than under Oregon's approach to netting. Under the federal program, sources can avoid triggering NSR/PSD by delaying emission reductions until just before an increase is needed. In the scenario described in the comment, a high-polluting older source would likely be closed at the same time that its replacement is permitted so that the reduction from closing the older source could be used to net the replacement out of NSR. For example, a high emitting boiler could be closed in a netting action to permit a lower-emitting new boiler without triggering NSR/PSD. The same outcome could be achieved under the Oregon program, but the source would be able to voluntarily reduce the emissions from the older source earlier without losing the ability to use the reduction in netting.
Under either the federal or Oregon approach to netting, NSR/PSD is only triggered if a physical change or change in the method of operation results in a net significant emission rate increase. If a source is modified because its capacity has slowly deteriorated over time, but the modification does not increase emissions by more than a significant emission rate above the netting basis, it would not trigger NSR/PSD. Depending on whether the source has increased or decreased emissions since the baseline period, the netting basis under the Oregon program could be higher or lower than under the federal program. No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| 57. PSELs are unenforceable | We are worried about the unenforceable nature of the PSELs. As applied to PM2.5, the unenforceable nature of these regulations is highlighted by DEQ’s attempt to estimate the level of PM2.5 at sources in relation to the source’s PM10 levels. However, without adequate monitoring and reporting requirements, sources are able to avoid the permitting requirements needed to protect the health of Oregon residents from the specific harms caused by PM2.5. (12)
Response: Once established, compliance with the PM2.5 PSEL will be determined by a compliance method involving monitoring of emissions, production or other parameters. Like other PSELs, the PM2.5 PSELs will meet EPA's requirements for practical enforceability because the limits are set on a rolling 12-month period and the compliance determination is done every month. Even though the PSEL is an annual limit, the monitoring is monthly and in many cases hourly when CEMS are available. If a source violates the PSEL, DEQ is able to take direct enforcement action against the source. No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| 58. Minimum requirements and program stringency | ||||||||||||||||||
The proposed amendments go beyond what is required to “update state regulations for fine particulate pollution and greenhouse gases in order to align them with new federal regulations” and will affect the stringency of the program. Allowing this to continue increases the costs and complexity of the program, without any defined benefits. (10)
Response: The proposed regulations are necessary to update state regulations for fine particulate pollution and greenhouse gases. The area where the rules are being tightened is in resetting PTE to actual emissions for sources that were permitted but not operating in the baseline period and for sources that will go through NSR/PSD in the future. This change is proposed to better align this aspect of Oregon's program with the federal program. See the response in comment 3 “Actual emissions as PTE used to net out of PSD.” No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| 59. Regulation of greenhouse gases | The designation on Greenhouse Gases and Global Warming is based on flawed scientific research and conclusions. This legislation and/or rulemaking will do nothing but to significantly raise costs to business and thereby to the consumer, and create more bureaucracy and inefficiency with the DEQ, all because of fear and false research. I call upon the DEQ to cease all further efforts supporting and establishing Greenhouse Gas and Global Warming regulation, rulings and enforcement. (22)
In the age of problems I would say this is a real lot of government contrived silliness. (21)
Response: Based on the best peer-reviewed science, EPA found in 2009 that manmade greenhouse gas emissions threaten the health and welfare of the American people. EPA is not alone in reaching that conclusion. The National Academy of Sciences has stated that there is a strong, credible body of evidence, based on multiple lines of research, documenting that the climate is changing and that the changes are caused in large part by human activities. Eighteen of America’s leading scientific societies have written that multiple lines of evidence show humans are changing the climate, that contrary assertions are inconsistent with an objective assessment of the vast body of peer-reviewed science, and that ongoing climate change will have broad impacts on society, including the global economy and the environment.
Oregon cannot disregard the strong scientific evidence showing that humans are contributing to the rapid increase of global temperatures. In addition, although new reporting and permitting requirements and fees create costs to businesses, the effects of climate change have serious implications for the economy and environment. For example, Oregon snow packs are shrinking and unseasonably warm temperatures are leading to rapid spring melts depleting Oregon’s supply of summer water for agriculture.
However, even if greenhouse gas emissions did not contribute to global warming, DEQ would still be required by federal law to establish a GHG permitting program. Under the federal Clean Air Act, no major new or modified source of GHG may be constructed in the United States without a PSD permit. If DEQ does not establish a GHG permitting program, these sources could not be built in Oregon, which would cause a severe economic impact on the state. No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| 60. Greenhouse gas reporting and fees | Currently forest products company owners that own manufacturing or conversion facilities along with timberland and forestland that sequesters CO2 gases and emissions are being held to an increasing pile of fees (i.e., annual GHG reporting fees and related annual paperwork). The adoption of an ODEQ policy and regulation that places the GHG manufacturing emissions in Title V and ACDP permits as part of PSEL is headed to a place that can be summed up as "taxation and regulation without representation". (8)
The DEQ’s reporting threshold for greenhouse gases should be increased to match the EPA’s threshold. There is no reasonable explanation for the DEQ to continue to diverge from the EPA. Allowing this to continue increases the cost and complexity of the program, without any defined benefits. (10)
Response: This rulemaking does not address greenhouse gas reporting. However, in earlier rulemakings, the EQC adopted a greenhouse gas reporting requirement that is more comprehensive than the federal requirement. DEQ proposed and EQC adopted an emissions threshold of 2,500 metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent in Oregon’s greenhouse gas reporting rules, as compared to 25,000 metric tons for the federal reporting program. The lower reporting threshold will allow Oregon to develop a better scientific basis for tracking and addressing greenhouse gas emissions. Because this rulemaking does not address greenhouse gas reporting, no change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| 61. PM2.5 to PM10 ratio | Establishing a ratio between PM2.5 and PM10 emissions should not be done through testing only. Sources should have the option of using the ratio based upon the Particle Size Category by AP-42 section. If a modeling analysis is required for an area, having PM2.5 default to PM10 will result in compounding conservative worst case conditions. (10)
Response: DEQ prefers source test data at the facility as the most reliable way to determine the PM2.5 fraction of PM10 emissions. Where source testing is not required or possible, industry specific data available from trade associations or EPA’s AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, can be used to estimate PM2.5 emissions. See the response in comment 48 “Proposed Option 1” for more information.
DEQ agrees that modeling PM10 as a surrogate for PM2.5 is a conservative approach in most cases. Since PM2.5 emissions must include secondary formation, PM2.5 modeled impacts could actually be greater than PM10 modeled impacts. However, some sources may choose to use this conservative approach to avoid the cost of testing to differentiate between PM2.5 and PM10. No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| ||||||||||||||||||
62. Total particulate matter instead of PM2.5 | Instead of trying to enforce new lower standards for the most difficult, expensive and inaccurate testing of PM2.5, DEQ should be looking at standards for total particulate matter based on testing with an allowance for use of existing tables of site developed ratios to establish particle size gradation. They should also recognize that geography plays a large role in air pollution problems and efforts should be made to reduce pollution at those specific times when the air shed becomes stagnant. (10)
Response: Since EPA adopted national ambient air quality standards for PM2.5, DEQ does not have a choice on whether to implement a permitting program for PM2.5. If DEQ does not adopt these rules, Oregon will lose federal approval to implement the program and could face sanctions. EPA has developed tables with particle size gradation for some but not all sources. Geography is taken into account in developing air quality attainment plans for areas that violate NAAQS.
DEQ calls periodic air pollution advisories during the winter due to stagnant air. During these times, pollutants trapped near the surface can steadily increase in concentration toward unhealthful levels due to inadequate air mixing. These pollutants are mainly generated from wood smoke from residential heating, open burning, industry and other sources. People in affected counties are asked to curtail or limit open burning and the use of uncertified woodstoves. DEQ urges people who have alternative heating options not to burn in woodstoves or fireplaces. People are also asked to limit driving and vehicle idling and businesses are asked to allow employees to telecommute. During an air quality emergency, industries could also be required to curtail operations. No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
| 63. PM2.5 source test method | Another issue that I am quite concerned about is assuming that PM10 emissions are PM2.5 emissions and vice versa. With respect to the issue of PM2.5, it appears that permanent rule making is under way and definite without allowing source test methods to develop so that industry sources can quantify existing PM2.5 emissions from sources at their respective facilities. This is a potentially catastrophic mistake, and to date, no acceptable test method exists that allows a wood products source that is saturated to test and measure PM2.5 emissions from a wet scrubber or wet-ESP control device that is currently controlling emissions from their manufacturing facility. How can we regulate effectively without effective means and technology to measure PM2.5 emissions from wood products sources? (8)
Response: Sources will be required to estimate PM2.5 emissions in their permit renewal or modification applications. They will be required to use the best information available to make this estimate. For natural gas combustion, 100% of the PM10 will be PM2.5. In other cases, a fraction of the PM10 will be PM2.5 and it will be the responsibility of the source to determine this fraction, either from source test data or literature data of similar sources. See the response in comment 48 “Proposed Option 1” for additional information.
On December 1, 2010, EPA revised two test methods for measuring particulate matter emissions from stationary sources. One of the revised methods, called Method 201A, will provide the capability to measure the mass of filterable PM2.5. The second revised method, called Method 202, will make a more accurate measurement of condensable particulate matter. Condensable particulate matter forms from condensing gases or vapors. It is a common component of both PM10 (particulate matter equal to or less than 10 micrometers in diameter) and PM2.5. The revised EPA methods have replaced Other Test Methods 27 and 28 and will be added to the definitions of PM10 and PM2.5.
DEQ recognizes that EPA Method 201A cannot be used in a saturated gas stream. DEQ will continue to work with EPA and other interested parties on finding a better method to test this type of source.
| 64. Litigation opt-out
| We recommend that the Department include within its rules a provision stating that if the federal GHG PSD rules are vacated or stayed by the courts or Congress, then the Oregon rules will cease to be in effect. (1, 2, 4, 11, 3, 14, 15, 17)
Response: At this time, the outcome of any lawsuits regarding greenhouse gases is unknown. DEQ does not know if greenhouse gas permitting rules will be vacated or modified. Until the time EPA changes the federal rules, DEQ is required to implement greenhouse gas rules in order to receive approval of the State Implementation Plan and ensure withdrawal of the Federal Implementation Plan. If federal rules change, EQC can consider revising Oregon's rules at that time either through a temporary or regular rulemaking. No change to the rule is proposed in response to this comment.
|
List of people submitting comments (by commenter number) | |||
Number | Name | Organization | Receive date |
1 | John Ledger | AOI | 11/24/10 |
2 | Lee Weber | ATI Wah Chang/ ATI Albany Operations | 11/24/10 |
3 | Russell Strader | Boise Cascade, LLC | 11/24/10 |
4 | Russell Burns | Boise Paper | 11/24/10 |
5 | Lee Fortier | Dry Creek Landfill | 11/24/10 |
6 | Alicia Little | Dyno Nobel Inc. | 11/24/10 |
7 | Scott Hedges | Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 | 11/24/10 |
8 | James DeHoog | Environmental Technical Services | 11/24/10 |
9 | Scott Stewart | Intel | 11/24/10 |
10 | Thomas Gruszczenski | Knife River Materials | 11/24/10 |
11 | Mari Chesser | Microchip Technology Inc. | 11/24/10 |
12 | John Krallman, Kenny Key | Northwest Environmental Defense Fund | 11/24/10 |
13 | Kathryn VanNatta | Northwest Pulp and Paper Association | 11/24/10 |
14 | Holly Sears | Oregon Refuse & Recycling Association | 11/24/10 |
15 | Ray Hendricks | PGE | 11/24/10 |
16 | Lisa Becherer | Roseburg Forest Products | 11/24/10 |
17 | Scott Conant | SP Newsprint Co., LLC | 11/24/10 |
18 | Martha Moore | TW Environmental, Inc. | 11/24/10 |
19 | Dale Wonn | Weyerhaeuser NR Company | 11/24/10 |
11 | Mari Chesser | Microchip Technology Inc. | 12/13/10 |
20 | Thane Jennings | Hermiston Power, LLC, Calpine Corp. | 12/17/10 |
2 | Lee Weber | ATI Wah Chang/ ATI Albany Operations | 12/22/10 |
6 | Alicia Little | Dyno Nobel Inc. | 12/22/10 |
10 | Thomas Gruszczenski | Knife River Materials | 12/23/10 |
21 | Mitchel Karp | RSG Forest Products | 12/30/10 |
22 | Mitch Jorgensen | Molalla Redi-Mix & Rock Products, Inc. | 12/30/10 |
1 | John Ledger | AOI | 01/14/11 |
3 | Russell Strader | Boise Cascade, LLC | 01/14/11 |
7 | Scott Hedges | Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 | 01/14/11 |
9 | Scott Stewart | Intel | 01/14/11 |
12 | Aubrey Baldwin | Northwest Environmental Defense Fund | 01/14/11 |
13 | Kathryn VanNatta | Northwest Pulp and Paper Association | 01/14/11 |
15 | Ray Hendricks | PGE | 01/14/11 |
23 | Lincoln Cannon | Oregon Forest Industries Council | 01/14/11 |
Attachment 6
Cover Letter for 2008 Title V Program Update Submittal
October 17, 2008
Richard Albright, Director
Office of Air, Waste and Toxics
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
RE: Title V Program Update Submittal
Dear Mr. Albright:
This submittal is to update Oregon’s Title V Program with rules adopted October 17, 2007. Attachments including a cover memo to the Environmental Quality Commission, redline version of the rule, public notice, and Secretary of State filing have been forwarded to Doug Hardesty. This submittal implements Item IV, Operating Permit program Updates, of the Title V Implementation Agreement between Oregon and EPA.
The staff contacts for this submittal are Sarah Armitage, Air Quality Planning, at 503-229-5186, and Shelley Matthews, SIP Coordinator, at (503) 229-6457.
Sincerely,
Joni Hammond,
Acting Deputy Director
cc w/attachments: Doug Hardesty, EPA, Region 10
cc w/o attachments: Shelley Matthews, DEQ AQ SIP Coordinator
Andrew Ginsburg, DEQ AQ Administrator
Paul Koprowski, EPA Oregon Operations office
Attachments:
Attachment 1: Staff Report, Agenda Item D of the October 17-18, 2007 EQC Meeting
Attachment 2: Provisions Submitted for Approval
Attachment 3: Public Notice and Adoption Documents
- Public notice in the Secretary of State’s Oregon Bulletin April 01, 2007
- Certificate and Order for Filing Permanent Administrative Rules, filed November 08, 2007.
Attachment 4: Compilation of Public Comments and Department’s Response
- Presiding Officer’s Report for Rulemaking Hearings dated May 01, 2007