From: Robbye Lanier
Sent: Mon Aug 11 09:24:01 2014
To: GARTENBAUM Andrea
Subject: RE: draft SIP submittal - LRAPA
Importance: Normal
Hi Andrea-
Sorry for the delay. Did you want those in word or PDF?
Thanks-
Robbye
From: GARTENBAUM Andrea [mailto:GARTENBAUM.Andrea@deq.state.or.us]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 11:09 AM
To: Robbye Lanier
Subject: RE: draft SIP submittal - LRAPA
I’d like to clarify, we don't need clean copies from each rulemaking, we just need the latest version of all the rules (titles) that were amended.
Andrea
From: GARTENBAUM Andrea
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 1:09 PM
To: LANIER Robbye
Subject: RE: draft SIP submittal - LRAPA
Robbye,
There’s no rush, I just want to make sure this didn’t drop off your radar:
Getting clean copies of the 2008, 2010 and 2011 rules from you.
Andrea
From: Robbye Lanier [mailto:robbye@lrapa.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 11:22 AM
To: GARTENBAUM Andrea; 'Spenillo, Justin'
Subject: RE: draft SIP submittal - LRAPA
Justin-
It was Oakridge and the Eugene/Springfield LMP, I believe you are referencing.
Andrea-
I will review the rules list you sent and get clean copies of the 2008, 2010 and 2011 rules over to you, as requested. We had a mill fire in Springfield last Thursday at one of our Title V sources. It burned to the ground and there is apparent fallout over about a 20 mile area with some samples testing positive for asbestos that we are dealing with this morning. Sorry I will look at the rules as soon as I can today.
Robbye
From: GARTENBAUM Andrea [mailto:GARTENBAUM.Andrea@deq.state.or.us]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 11:11 AM
To: 'Spenillo, Justin'; Robbye Lanier
Subject: RE: draft SIP submittal - LRAPA
I didn’t plan to include LRAPA’s documentation of anything; only DEQ’s documentation because DEQ’s documentation shows that we followed all requirements for SIP rulemaking. Is this correct?
From: Spenillo, Justin [mailto:Spenillo.Justin@epa.gov]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 11:08 AM
To: GARTENBAUM Andrea; LANIER Robbye
Subject: RE: draft SIP submittal - LRAPA
Thanks Andrea.
I think it looks ok. The main differences that I noticed were the addition of the “stringency” section, and the multiple adoptions that you mention below. With those, I think there were some documentation issues with past LRAPA adoptions, but were resolved with this go around (if I remember correctly, it was the Eugene Springfield LMP in 2012/2013 – right Robbeye?) so you should have all of the proper documentation for those.
So, yes, those documents that you have provided should be fine.
Justin
From: GARTENBAUM Andrea [mailto:GARTENBAUM.Andrea@deq.state.or.us]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 3:56 PM
To: LANIER Robbye; Spenillo, Justin
Subject: draft SIP submittal - LRAPA
Hi, Before I mail the LRAPA permitting SIP submittal, I’d like both of your eyes on the draft letter and attachment cover page. This submittal is slightly different from others because we had two DEQ rulemakings (adopted at the same EQC meeting) and three LRAPA rulemakings (adopted by the LRAPA board in 2008, 2010 and 2011). Let me know if you think these are missing anything.
Andrea Gartenbaum
Rules Group Lead
Operations Division
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
503-229-5946
gartenbaum.andrea@deq.state.or.us