From: GARTENBAUM Andrea

Sent: Wed Jun 18 10:53:25 2014

To: 'Spenillo, Justin'

Subject: RE: Draft SIP submittal for LRAPA open burning

Importance: Normal

The letter and the verbiage on page two, where we say Attachment 3 includes “provisions submitted for approval”.

Is that verbiage correct? Instead, should this say “provisions submitted for approval and incorporation into the SIP”? Adoption into the SIP? Something else?

Andrea

From: Spenillo, Justin [mailto:Spenillo.Justin@epa.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 10:50 AM

To: GARTENBAUM Andrea

Subject: RE: Draft SIP submittal for LRAPA open burning

With regard to “I’m particularly interested in knowing if DEQ’s instruction/request to EPA for this type of SIP revision is correct.”…. let me know the pages this is on and I can take a look.

From: GARTENBAUM Andrea [mailto:GARTENBAUM.Andrea@deq.state.or.us]

Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 5:01 PM

To: LANIER Robbye; Spenillo, Justin

Subject: Draft SIP submittal for LRAPA open burning

Robbye and Justin,

I compiled the draft SIP submittal for LRAPA open burning rules. Before submitting it to EPA, I’d like to give you both the chance to see if this looks correct. In Adobe, view “bookmarks” for easy navigation through the document. I’m particularly interested in knowing if DEQ’s instruction/request to EPA for this type of SIP revision is correct.

Thanks,

Andrea Gartenbaum

Rules Group Lead

Operations Division

Oregon Department of Environmental Quality

503-229-5946

gartenbaum.andrea@deq.state.or.us