From: FULLER Brian

Sent: Wed May 30 16:33:12 2012

To: RM.CT; RHOADES Cathie

Subject: FW: Converson Technology exception language

Importance: Normal

Attachments: CTRulemaking120604Div96DraftAmendmentsConvTechNewRules.docx;

We should be prepared to discuss this on the 4^th. Do we need to spend some time on this during tomorrow’s meeting?

Thanks

From: Mary Sue [mailto:duckyrecycler@verizon.net]

Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 4:07 PM

To: FULLER Brian

Cc: 'Chris Ulum'; 'Matt Stern'; duckyrecycler@verizon.net; info@agriplasinc.com

Subject: Converson Technology exception language

I would like to see the attached exception language added to the Division 96 Conversion Technology Rules. Please be prepared to discuss this and many other questions that I have on your rule language. I notice that you have dropped any air quality risks, but I think the water quality risks should be eliminated too if the applicant has a department issued discharge permit. Also, the fire and explosion risk is unnecessary if the state fire marshall approves the building permit that would be necessary for nearly any expansion. In general, I think the permit language is way too onerous for businesses that want to expand to Oregon in this economic climate. I do not see that the risk to solid waste warrants such detailed permits and reporting.

Mary Sue Gilliland

Vice President Operations and Business Development

Agri-Plas, Inc.

503-390-2381