From: Vrooman Gary L

Sent: Fri Mar 30 11:15:24 2012

To: PICKERELL Loretta; PERRY Marylou

Subject: RE: JUSTICE-#3288901-v5-e-waste_fee_rules_draft (2)

Importance: Normal

These look ok to me.

Gary L. Vrooman

Assistant Attorney General

Oregon Department of Justice

Natural Resources Section

971.673.1880

From: PICKERELL Loretta [mailto:PICKERELL.Loretta@deq.state.or.us]

Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 9:42 AM

To: PICKERELL Loretta; PERRY Marylou; Vrooman Gary L

Subject: RE: JUSTICE-#3288901-v5-e-waste_fee_rules_draft (2)

Attached are a couple additional edits –in highlights – except the Total Registration Fee title, which doesn’t show as highlighted.

Loretta

From: PICKERELL Loretta

Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 9:24 AM

To: PERRY Marylou; 'Vrooman Gary L'

Subject: RE: JUSTICE-#3288901-v5-e-waste_fee_rules_draft (2)

Mary Lou –

I had a couple other changes – will send in a minute. I’ll include a suggested alternative to “based on” – that doesn’t work well.

Have been working at home -- planning to head in later.

Loretta

From: PERRY Marylou

Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 9:19 AM

To: PICKERELL Loretta; 'Vrooman Gary L'

Subject: RE: JUSTICE-#3288901-v5-e-waste_fee_rules_draft (2)

Thanks -

I now have comments from both of you.

Two things –

1)Added titles to the sections are for clarity – we can use the suggested changes from you both.

2) The “as provided” language is being phased out by DEQ. I suggest we leave it as is with the “based on” language and revisit this text item during the comment period.

I can send Maggie the edited version from Gary – or do we need more edits?

Mary Lou

From: PICKERELL Loretta

Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 9:07

To: 'Vrooman Gary L'; PERRY Marylou

Subject: RE: JUSTICE-#3288901-v5-e-waste_fee_rules_draft (2)

Thanks, Gary.

From: Vrooman Gary L [mailto:Gary.L.Vrooman@doj.state.or.us]

Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 8:18 AM

To: PICKERELL Loretta; PERRY Marylou

Subject: RE: JUSTICE-#3288901-v5-e-waste_fee_rules_draft (2)

A few minor edits and some responses to comments on the attached.

Gary L. Vrooman

Assistant Attorney General

Oregon Department of Justice

Natural Resources Section

971.673.1880

From: PICKERELL Loretta [mailto:PICKERELL.Loretta@deq.state.or.us]

Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 12:57 AM

To: PERRY Marylou; VROOMAN Gary L

Subject: RE: JUSTICE-#3288901-v5-e-waste_fee_rules_draft (2)

Gary and Mary Lou-

It’s late –attached are my suggestions, comments, questions. I’ll review this again when not so tired tomorrow, but wanted you to see my initial comments.

Mary Lou – do we need to use titles for each section? Does it make rules clearer? Have suggested changes if we keep them.

Gary, you’ll see a few comments from me, but particularly need your review of the addition to Revenue Need (2)(b).

Have noted a couple places in 2012 registration fees section where the edits changed the meaning – I noted changes needed.

Thanks,

Loretta

From: PERRY Marylou

Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 4:15 PM

To: PICKERELL Loretta; VROOMAN Gary L

Subject: FW: JUSTICE-#3288901-v5-e-waste_fee_rules_draft (2)

Loretta and Gary –

I worked with Maggie to make these changes – many are changes to naming and numbering conventions. Some are language changes – and we moved the overview to its own section at the beginning of 340-098-150. Please review and accept (or not accept) these changes.

Mary Lou

From: VANDEHEY Maggie

Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 16:05

To: PERRY Marylou

Subject: JUSTICE-#3288901-v5-e-waste_fee_rules_draft (2)

*****CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*****

This e-mail may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee or it appears from the context or otherwise that you have received this e-mail in error, please advise me immediately by reply e-mail, keep the contents confidential, and immediately delete the message and any attachments from your system.

************************************