A | B | C | D | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Table 1 - Oregon E-Cycles Registration Fee Change EQC staff report statement of need existing fee schedule |
|||
2 | Current Fee Schedule | |||
3 | Tier | Market Share | Current Fee | Average number of mfrs/tier |
4 | Tier 1 | > 1% | $15,000 | 17 |
5 | Tier 2 | 0.1% ≤ 1% | $5,000 | 17 |
6 | Tier 3 | 0.01% < 0.1% | $200 | 18 |
7 | Tier 4 | < 0.01% | $40 | 111 |
8 | Average # mfrs/year = 163 |
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
|||||||
2 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
8 | ||||||||
9 | ||||||||
10 | ||||||||
11 | ||||||||
12 | ||||||||
13 | ||||||||
14 | ||||||||
15 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
17 | ||||||||
18 | ||||||||
19 |
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Table 3 - Oregon E-Cycles Registration Fee Change EQC staff report fee variability |
|||||||||||||||
2 |
Tier 1 # of mfrs/fee |
Tier 2 # of mfrs/fee |
Tier 3 # of mfrs/fee |
Tier 4 # of mfrs/fee |
Tier 5 # of mfrs/fee |
Tier 6 # of mfrs/fee |
Tier 7 # of mfrs/fee |
Total Mfr/year year | ||||||||
3 | 2008 | 8 | $30,917 | 14 | $9,717 | 17 | $1,327 | 7 | $211 | 7 | $200 | 1 | $200 | 107 | $40 | 161 |
4 | 2009 | 6 | $35,000 | 13 | $12,678 | 16 | $2,073 | 15 | $274 | 5 | $200 | 1 | $200 | 111 | $40 | 167 |
5 | 2010 | 8 | $35,000 | 8 | $11,937 | 19 | $1,725 | 11 | $573 | 7 | $200 | 0 | -* | 108 | $40 | 161 |
6 | 2011 | 9 | $35,000 | 5 | $12,332 | 15 | $1,841 | 8 | $284 | 12 | $200 | 2 | $200 | 117 | $40 | 168 |
7 | 2012 | 6 | $35,000 | 9 | $17,468 | 19 | $1,847 | 8 | $406 | 8 | $200 | 15 | $200 | 94 | $40 | 159 |
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Table 4 - EQC staff report - response to comments #4 unstable revenue - cost per unit | |||||||
2 | ||||||||
3 | Average Cost per Unit | |||||||
4 | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | Tier 4 | Tier 5 | Tier 6 | Tier 7** | |
5 | 2008 | $0.71 | $0.71 | $0.71 | $0.71 | $2.20 | $4.00 | $2.35 |
6 | 2009 | $0.52 | $0.63 | $0.63 | $0.65 | $1.71 | $3.13 | $3.64 |
7 | 2010 | $0.56 | $0.59 | $0.64 | $1.34 | $1.18 | -* | $3.33 |
8 | 2011 | $0.40 | $0.41 | $0.41 | $0.41 | $1.20 | $3.23 | $3.08 |
9 | 2012 | $0.20 | $0.39 | $0.39 | $0.39 | $0.66 | $2.20 | $2.00 |
10 | * no manufacturers in Tier 6 - all in Tier 7 | |||||||
11 | ** average of those manufacturers with reported market share - excludes all those with zero MS |
A | B | C | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Table Y – Proposed fee structure and method of calculation | ||
2 | Tier | Market Share | Fee |
3 | Tier 1 | 5% or greater | Steps to calculate: |
4 | 1) sum market share for each tier | ||
5 | Tier 2 | 1% to < 5% | 2) multiply market share of tier by remaining revenue need1 |
6 | Tier 3 | 0.1% to < 1% | 3) divide revenue share of each tier by # of manufacturers in that tier |
7 | Tier 4 | 0.03% to < 0.1% | 4) distribute fees in excess of 35K cap proportional to market share of lower tiers |
8 | Tier 5 | 0.01% to < 0.03% | 5) no fee above 35K or below $200 |
9 | Tier 6 | < 0.01% | $200 |
10 | Tier 7 | < 50 units | $40 |
11 | Notes: 1) remaining revenue need = revenue need minus expected revenue from Tiers 6 and 7 |