A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Oregon E-Cycles Existing fee schedule Oregon historical manufacturer data |
|||||||
2 | Current Fee Schedule | |||||||
3 | Tier | Market Share | Current Fee | Average number of mfrs/tier | Average total market share/tier | |||
4 | Tier 1 | > 1% | $15,000 | 17 | 92.72% | |||
5 | Tier 2 | 0.1% ≤ 1% | $5,000 | 17 | 6.46% | |||
6 | Tier 3 | 0.01% < 0.1% | $200 | 18 | 0.75% | |||
7 | Tier 4 | < 0.01% | $40 | 111 | 0.071% | |||
8 | Average # mfrs/year = 163 '''''''''''''' | |||||||
12 | average | 0.66246465 | 0.26477774 | 0.06463657 | 0.00600738 | 0.00146058 | 0.00029427 | 0.0004179 |
14 | 92.724% | 6.464% | 0.747% | 0.071% |
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Fee Revenue and Program Admin costs | |||||||
2 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 |
![]() |
|||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
8 | ||||||||
9 | ||||||||
10 | ||||||||
11 | ||||||||
12 | ||||||||
13 | ||||||||
14 | ||||||||
15 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
17 | ||||||||
18 | ||||||||
19 | ||||||||
20 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
22 |
A | B | C | |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
Proposed fee structure |
||
2 | Tier | Market Share | Fee |
3 | Tier 1 | 5% or greater | Calculate to meeting remaining revenue need1. For each tier: |
4 | 1) Determine fee for each tier: | ||
5 | Tier 2 | 1% to < 5% | [Total market share of tier] x [remaining revenue need] = fee for tier |
6 | Tier 3 | 0.1% to < 1% | # manufacturers in tier |
7 | Tier 4 | 0.03% to < 0.1% | 2) Adjust so all fees are ≤ $35K and ≥ $200 |
8 | Tier 5 | 0.01% to < 0.03% | ● Cap any fee over $35K; distribute revenue above cap to lower tiers
in proportion to market share ● Raise any fee to $200; recalculate fees for higher tiers |
9 | Tier 6 | < 0.01% | $200 |
10 | Tier 7 | < 50 units | $40 |
11 | Notes: 1) remaining revenue need = revenue need minus expected revenue from Tiers 6 and 7 |
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
response to comment - #4 fee variability using historical market share data and proposed fee structure |
|||||||||||||||
2 |
Tier 1 # of mfrs/fee |
Tier 2 # of mfrs/fee |
Tier 3 # of mfrs/fee |
Tier 4 # of mfrs/fee |
Tier 5 # of mfrs/fee |
Tier 6 # of mfrs/fee |
Tier 7 # of mfrs/fee |
|||||||||
3 | Year | Number of mfrs | Fee | Number of Mfrs | Fee | Number of Mfrs | Fee | Number of Mfrs | Fee | Number of Mfrs | Fee | Number of Mfrs | Fee | Number of Mfrs | Fee | Total Mfr/year |
5 | 2008 | 8 | $30,917 | 14 | $9,717 | 17 | $1,327 | 7 | $211 | 7 | $200 | 1 | $200 | 107 | $40 | 161 |
6 | 2009 | 6 | $35,000 | 13 | $12,678 | 16 | $2,073 | 15 | $274 | 5 | $200 | 1 | $200 | 111 | $40 | 167 |
7 | 2010 | 8 | $35,000 | 8 | $11,937 | 19 | $1,725 | 11 | $573 | 7 | $200 | 0 | -* | 108 | $40 | 161 |
8 | 2011 | 9 | $35,000 | 5 | $12,332 | 15 | $1,841 | 8 | $284 | 12 | $200 | 2 | $200 | 117 | $40 | 168 |
9 | 2012 | 6 | $35,000 | 9 | $17,468 | 19 | $1,847 | 8 | $406 | 8 | $200 | 15 | $200 | 94 | $40 | 159 |
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
cost per unit using historical market share data and proposed fee schedule |
|||||||||||||
2 | ||||||||||||||
3 |
Average Cost per Unit - Proposed Fee Historical Oregon manufacturer data |
Average Cost/unit for proposed fee structure | ||||||||||||
4 | Year | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | Tier 4 | Tier 5 | Tier 6 | Tier 7** | Total number of units | 2012 Oregon manufacturer data and tier placements* | ||||
5 | 2008 | $0.71 | $0.71 | $0.71 | $0.71 | $2.20 | $4.00 | $2.35 | 573,121 | Average cost/ unit** | Proposed Tier | Proposed Fee | Average number of units | Total number of Units* |
6 | 2009 | $0.52 | $0.63 | $0.63 | $0.65 | $1.71 | $3.13 | $3.64 | 726,003 | $0.20 | Tier 1 | $35,000 | 176,533 | 1,059,319 |
7 | 2010 | $0.56 | $0.59 | $0.64 | $1.34 | $1.18 | -* | $3.33 | 716,245 | $0.39 | Tier 2 | $17,468 | 44,531 | 400,777 |
8 | 2011 | $0.40 | $0.41 | $0.41 | $0.41 | $1.20 | $3.23 | $3.08 | 1,002,539 | $0.39 | Tier 3 | $1,847 | 4,708 | 89,444 |
9 | 2012 | $0.20 | $0.39 | $0.39 | $0.39 | $0.66 | $2.20 | $2.00 | 1,562,016 | $0.39 | Tier 4 | $406 | 1,034 | 8,274 |
10 | * no manufacturers in Tier 6 - all in Tier 7 | $0.66 | Tier 5 | $200 | 303 | 2,424 | ||||||||
11 | ** average of those manufacturers with reported market share - excludes all those with zero MS | $2.20 | Tier 6 | $200 | 91 | 1,372 | ||||||||
12 | $2.00 | Tier 7 | $40 | 20 | 406 | |||||||||
13 | * 2012 Tiers are determined using 2011 market share data for devices sold in Oregon | |||||||||||||
14 | ** cost/unit varies with total number of units sold in Oregon for each year |
A | B | C | D | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
cost per unit existing fee schedule |
|||
2 | Average Price/unit for current fee schedule | |||
3 | Average Price/ unit | Current Tier | Current Fee | |
4 | $0.14 | Tier 1 | 15000 | $0.14 |
5 | $1.06 | Tier 2 | 5000 | $1.06 |
6 | $0.19 | Tier 3 | 200 | $0.15 |
7 | $0.29 | Tier 4 | 40 | $0.72 |
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
cost per unit two tier proposal using historical market share data |
||||||||||||||
2 |
Ave # of units High Tier |
Ave # of units Low Tier |
Average Cost/Unit High Tier |
Average Cost/Unit Low Tier |
Number of Mfrs - High Tier | Number of Mfrs - Low Tier | do not have total units yet |
Ave # of units High Tier |
Ave # of units Low Tier |
Average Cost/Unit High Tier |
Average Cost/Unit Low Tier |
Number of Mfrs - High Tier | Number of Mfrs - Low Tier | ||
3 | 2008 | 11,851 | 34 | $0.59 | $14.93 | 53 | 108 | 2008 | 11851.2 | 33.5 | 0.59065749 | 14.92537313 | 53 | 108 | |
4 | 2009 | 18,273 | 38 | $0.38 | $13.33 | 55 | 112 | 2009 | 18273 | 37.5 | 0.38307886 | 13.33333333 | 55 | 112 | |
5 | 2010 | 17,137 | 12 | $0.41 | $41.67 | 53 | 108 | 2010 | 17137 | 12 | 0.40847289 | 41.66666667 | 53 | 108 | |
6 | 2011 | 24,340 | 38 | $0.29 | $13.33 | 49 | 119 | 2011 | 24339.8 | 37.5 | 0.2875948 | 13.33333333 | 49 | 119 | |
7 | 2012 | 45,426 | 56 | $0.15 | $9.01 | 50 | 109 | 2012 | 45425.8 | 55.5 | 0.15409745 | 9.00900901 | 50 | 109 | |
11 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | ||||||||||
12 |
Ave # of units High Tier |
11851.2 | 18273 | 17137 | 24339.8 | 45425.8 | |||||||||
13 | big tier | 53 | 55 | 53 | 49 | 50 |
Ave # of units Low Tier |
33.5 | 37.5 | 12 | 37.5 | 55.5 | |||
14 | small tier | 108 | 112 | 108 | 119 | 109 |
Average Cost/Unit High Tier |
0.59065749 | 0.38307886 | 0.40847289 | 0.2875948 | 0.15409745 | |||
15 |
Average Cost/Unit Low Tier |
14.92537313 | 13.33333333 | 41.66666667 | 13.33333333 | 9.00900901 | |||||||||
16 | Number of Mfrs - High Tier | 53 | 55 | 53 | 49 | 50 | |||||||||
17 | Number of Mfrs - Low Tier | 108 | 112 | 108 | 119 | 109 | |||||||||
19 | Average number of units - proposed fee structure | ||||||||||||||
20 | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | Tier 4 | Tier 5 | Tier 6 | Tier 7 | ||||||||
21 | 2008 | 43,374 | 13,633 | 1,862 | 296 | 91 | 50 | 17 | |||||||
22 | 2009 | 67,403 | 20,132 | 3,291 | 422 | 117 | 64 | 11 | |||||||
23 | 2010 | 62,083 | 20,305 | 2,700 | 428 | 169 | -* | 12 | |||||||
24 | 2011 | 86,427 | 29,945 | 4,470 | 690 | 167 | 62 | 13 | |||||||
25 | 2012 | 176,553 | 44,531 | 4,708 | 1,034 | 303 | 91 | 20 |
A | B | C | D | E | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Year-by-Year Revenue Need Oregon E-Cycles program Oregon E-Cycles Registration Fee |
||||
2 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | |
3 | FY13* | FY14 | FY15 | FY16 | |
4 | Annual operating costs** | $360,000 | $360,000 | $360,000 | $395,000 |
6 | Repay loan and create operating balance | $55,000 | $55,000 | $60,000 | $50,000 |
7 | Add new products | $20,000 | $15,000 | $15,000 | |
8 | $415,000 | $435,000 | $435,000 | $465,000 | |
9 | $415,000 | $435,000 | $435,000 | $460,000 | |
10 | *Fiscal years run from July 1 through June 30. The FY designates the ending year, e.g. FY13 is the year ending June 30, 2013. FY13 corresponds to E-Cycles billing year 2012. | ||||
11 | ** Operating budget is held constant for FY14 & 15. Efficiencies are expected to offset cost factor increases of approximately 7%. FY16 includes allowance for a 10% cost increase over FY13. |
A | B | C | D | E | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
impacts on fee payers using 2012 data |
||||
2 | Tier | Proposed Fee | Existing fee | Number of Proposed Mfrs | Number of Mfrs in Existing Tier Schedule |
3 | 1 | $35,000 | $15,000 | 6 | 15 |
4 | 2 | $17,468 | $15,000 | 9 | |
5 | 3 | $1,847 | $5,000 | 19 | 19 |
6 | 4 | $406 | $200 | 8 | |
7 | 5 | $200 | $200 | 8 | 16 |
8 | 6 | $200 | $40 | 15 | |
9 | 7 | $40 | $40 | 94 | 109 |
A | B | C | D | E | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Oregon E-Cycles Registration Fee Revenue Received | ||||
2 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | |
3 | Total Manufacturers | 161 | 167 | 161 | 168 |
4 | Revenue received | $388,000 | $339,000 | $339,000 | $287,000 |
6 | Average 4 yr rec'd | $338,338 |