A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Oregon E-Cycles Existing fee schedule Oregon historical manufacturer data |
|||||||
2 | Current Fee Schedule | |||||||
3 | Tier | Market Share | Current Fee | Average number of mfrs/tier | Average total market share/tier | |||
4 | Tier 1 | > 1% | $15,000 | 17 | 92.72% | |||
5 | Tier 2 | 0.1% ≤ 1% | $5,000 | 17 | 6.46% | |||
6 | Tier 3 | 0.01% < 0.1% | $200 | 18 | 0.75% | |||
7 | Tier 4 | < 0.01% | $40 | 111 | 0.071% | |||
8 | Average # mfrs/year = 163 '''''''''''''' | |||||||
12 | average | 0.66246465 | 0.26477774 | 0.06463657 | 0.00600738 | 0.00146058 | 0.00029427 | 0.0004179 |
14 | 92.724% | 6.464% | 0.747% | 0.071% |
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Fee Revenue and Program Admin costs | |||||||
2 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 |
![]() |
|||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
8 | ||||||||
9 | ||||||||
10 | ||||||||
11 | ||||||||
12 | ||||||||
13 | ||||||||
14 | ||||||||
15 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
17 | ||||||||
18 | ||||||||
19 | ||||||||
20 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
22 |
A | B | C | |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
Proposed fee structure |
||
2 | Tier | Market Share | Fee |
3 | Tier 1 | 5% or greater | Calculate to meeting remaining revenue need1. For each tier: |
4 | 1) Determine fee for each tier: | ||
5 | Tier 2 | 1% to < 5% | [Total market share of tier] x [remaining revenue need] = fee for tier |
6 | Tier 3 | 0.1% to < 1% | # manufacturers in tier |
7 | Tier 4 | 0.03% to < 0.1% | 2) Adjust so all fees are ≤ $35K and ≥ $200 |
8 | Tier 5 | 0.01% to < 0.03% | ● Cap any fee over $35K; distribute revenue above cap to lower tiers
in proportion to market share ● Raise any fee to $200; recalculate fees for higher tiers |
9 | Tier 6 | < 0.01% | $200 |
10 | Tier 7 | < 50 units | $40 |
11 | Notes: 1) remaining revenue need = revenue need minus expected revenue from Tiers 6 and 7 |
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
response to comment - #4 fee variability using historical market share data and proposed fee structure |
|||||||||||||||
2 |
Tier 1 # of mfrs/fee |
Tier 2 # of mfrs/fee |
Tier 3 # of mfrs/fee |
Tier 4 # of mfrs/fee |
Tier 5 # of mfrs/fee |
Tier 6 # of mfrs/fee |
Tier 7 # of mfrs/fee |
|||||||||
3 | Year | Number of mfrs | Fee | Number of Mfrs | Fee | Number of Mfrs | Fee | Number of Mfrs | Fee | Number of Mfrs | Fee | Number of Mfrs | Fee | Number of Mfrs | Fee | Total Mfr/year |
5 | 2008 | 8 | $30,917 | 14 | $9,717 | 17 | $1,327 | 7 | $211 | 7 | $200 | 1 | $200 | 107 | $40 | 161 |
6 | 2009 | 6 | $35,000 | 13 | $12,678 | 16 | $2,073 | 15 | $274 | 5 | $200 | 1 | $200 | 111 | $40 | 167 |
7 | 2010 | 8 | $35,000 | 8 | $11,937 | 19 | $1,725 | 11 | $573 | 7 | $200 | 0 | -* | 108 | $40 | 161 |
8 | 2011 | 9 | $35,000 | 5 | $12,332 | 15 | $1,841 | 8 | $284 | 12 | $200 | 2 | $200 | 117 | $40 | 168 |
9 | 2012 | 6 | $35,000 | 9 | $17,468 | 19 | $1,847 | 8 | $406 | 8 | $200 | 15 | $200 | 94 | $40 | 159 |
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
cost per unit using historical market share data and proposed fee schedule |
|||||||||||||
2 | ||||||||||||||
3 |
Average Cost per Unit - Proposed Fee Historical Oregon manufacturer data |
Average Cost/unit for proposed fee structure | ||||||||||||
4 | Year | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | Tier 4 | Tier 5 | Tier 6 | Tier 7** | Total number of units | 2012 Oregon manufacturer data and tier placements* | ||||
5 | 2008 | $0.71 | $0.71 | $0.71 | $0.71 | $2.20 | $4.00 | $2.35 | 573,121 | Average cost/ unit** | Proposed Tier | Proposed Fee | Average number of units | Total number of Units* |
6 | 2009 | $0.52 | $0.63 | $0.63 | $0.65 | $1.71 | $3.13 | $3.64 | 726,003 | $0.20 | Tier 1 | $35,000 | 176,533 | 1,059,319 |
7 | 2010 | $0.56 | $0.59 | $0.64 | $1.34 | $1.18 | -* | $3.33 | 716,245 | $0.39 | Tier 2 | $17,468 | 44,531 | 400,777 |
8 | 2011 | $0.40 | $0.41 | $0.41 | $0.41 | $1.20 | $3.23 | $3.08 | 1,002,539 | $0.39 | Tier 3 | $1,847 | 4,708 | 89,444 |
9 | 2012 | $0.20 | $0.39 | $0.39 | $0.39 | $0.66 | $2.20 | $2.00 | 1,562,016 | $0.39 | Tier 4 | $406 | 1,034 | 8,274 |
10 | * no manufacturers in Tier 6 - all in Tier 7 | $0.66 | Tier 5 | $200 | 303 | 2,424 | ||||||||
11 | ** average of those manufacturers with reported market share - excludes all those with zero MS | $2.20 | Tier 6 | $200 | 91 | 1,372 | ||||||||
12 | $2.00 | Tier 7 | $40 | 20 | 406 | |||||||||
13 | * 2012 Tiers are determined using 2011 market share data for devices sold in Oregon | |||||||||||||
14 | ** cost/unit varies with total number of units sold in Oregon for each year |
A | B | C | D | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
cost per unit existing fee schedule |
|||
2 | Average Price/unit for current fee schedule | |||
3 | Average Price/ unit | Current Tier | Current Fee | |
4 | $0.14 | Tier 1 | 15000 | $0.14 |
5 | $1.06 | Tier 2 | 5000 | $1.06 |
6 | $0.19 | Tier 3 | 200 | $0.15 |
7 | $0.29 | Tier 4 | 40 | $0.72 |
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
cost per unit two tier proposal using historical market share data |
||||||||||||||
2 |
Ave # of units High Tier |
Ave # of units Low Tier |
Average Cost/Unit High Tier |
Average Cost/Unit Low Tier |
Number of Mfrs - High Tier | Number of Mfrs - Low Tier | do not have total units yet |
Ave # of units High Tier |
Ave # of units Low Tier |
Average Cost/Unit High Tier |
Average Cost/Unit Low Tier |
Number of Mfrs - High Tier | Number of Mfrs - Low Tier | ||
3 | 2008 | 11,851 | 34 | $0.59 | $14.93 | 53 | 108 | 2008 | 11851.2 | 33.5 | 0.59065749 | 14.92537313 | 53 | 108 | |
4 | 2009 | 18,273 | 38 | $0.38 | $13.33 | 55 | 112 | 2009 | 18273 | 37.5 | 0.38307886 | 13.33333333 | 55 | 112 | |
5 | 2010 | 17,137 | 12 | $0.41 | $41.67 | 53 | 108 | 2010 | 17137 | 12 | 0.40847289 | 41.66666667 | 53 | 108 | |
6 | 2011 | 24,340 | 38 | $0.29 | $13.33 | 49 | 119 | 2011 | 24339.8 | 37.5 | 0.2875948 | 13.33333333 | 49 | 119 | |
7 | 2012 | 45,426 | 56 | $0.15 | $9.01 | 50 | 109 | 2012 | 45425.8 | 55.5 | 0.15409745 | 9.00900901 | 50 | 109 | |
11 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | ||||||||||
12 |
Ave # of units High Tier |
11851.2 | 18273 | 17137 | 24339.8 | 45425.8 | |||||||||
13 | big tier | 53 | 55 | 53 | 49 | 50 |
Ave # of units Low Tier |
33.5 | 37.5 | 12 | 37.5 | 55.5 | |||
14 | small tier | 108 | 112 | 108 | 119 | 109 |
Average Cost/Unit High Tier |
0.59065749 | 0.38307886 | 0.40847289 | 0.2875948 | 0.15409745 | |||
15 |
Average Cost/Unit Low Tier |
14.92537313 | 13.33333333 | 41.66666667 | 13.33333333 | 9.00900901 | |||||||||
16 | Number of Mfrs - High Tier | 53 | 55 | 53 | 49 | 50 | |||||||||
17 | Number of Mfrs - Low Tier | 108 | 112 | 108 | 119 | 109 | |||||||||
19 | Average number of units - proposed fee structure | ||||||||||||||
20 | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | Tier 4 | Tier 5 | Tier 6 | Tier 7 | ||||||||
21 | 2008 | 43,374 | 13,633 | 1,862 | 296 | 91 | 50 | 17 | |||||||
22 | 2009 | 67,403 | 20,132 | 3,291 | 422 | 117 | 64 | 11 | |||||||
23 | 2010 | 62,083 | 20,305 | 2,700 | 428 | 169 | -* | 12 | |||||||
24 | 2011 | 86,427 | 29,945 | 4,470 | 690 | 167 | 62 | 13 | |||||||
25 | 2012 | 176,553 | 44,531 | 4,708 | 1,034 | 303 | 91 | 20 |
A | B | C | D | E | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Year-by-Year Revenue Need Oregon E-Cycles program Oregon E-Cycles Registration Fee |
||||
2 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | |
3 | FY13* | FY14 | FY15 | FY16 | |
4 | Annual operating costs** | $360,000 | $360,000 | $360,000 | $395,000 |
6 | Repay loan and create operating balance | $55,000 | $55,000 | $60,000 | $55,000 |
7 | Add new products | $20,000 | $15,000 | $15,000 | |
8 | $415,000 | $435,000 | $435,000 | $465,000 | |
9 | $415,000 | $435,000 | $435,000 | $465,000 | |
10 | *Fiscal years run from July 1 through June 30. The FY designates the ending year, e.g. FY13 is the year ending June 30, 2013. FY13 corresponds to E-Cycles billing year 2012. | ||||
11 | ** Operating budget is held constant for FY14 & 15. Efficiencies are expected to offset cost factor increases of approximately 7%. FY16 includes allowance for a 10% cost increase over FY13. |
A | B | C | D | E | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
impacts on fee payers using 2012 data |
||||
2 | Tier | Proposed Fee | Existing fee | Number of Proposed Mfrs | Number of Mfrs in Existing Tier Schedule |
3 | 1 | $35,000 | $15,000 | 6 | 15 |
4 | 2 | $17,468 | $15,000 | 9 | |
5 | 3 | $1,847 | $5,000 | 19 | 19 |
6 | 4 | $406 | $200 | 8 | |
7 | 5 | $200 | $200 | 8 | 16 |
8 | 6 | $200 | $40 | 15 | |
9 | 7 | $40 | $40 | 94 | 109 |
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | N | Q | R | S | T | U | V | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Oregon E-Cycles Existing Fee Structure and Registration Fee Revenue
Received Number of Manufacturers/Total Market Share |
|||||||||||||||||
2 | Market Share | Fee | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
3 | Tier 1 | > 1% | $15,000 | 22 | 93.85% | 19 | 91.73% | 16 | 92.05% | 14 | 92.52% | |||||||
4 | Tier 2 | 0.1% ≤ 1% | $5,000 | 17 | 5.52% | 16 | 7.25% | 19 | 7.13% | 15 | 6.69% | |||||||
5 | Tier 3 | 0.01% < 0.1% | $200 | 14 | 0.52% | 20 | 0.98% | 18 | 0.80% | 20 | 0.75% | |||||||
6 | Tier 4 | < 0.01% | $40 | 108 | 0.11% | 112 | 0.04% | 108 | 0.02% | 119 | 0.04% | |||||||
7 | Total Manufacturers | 161 | 167 | 161 | 168 | |||||||||||||
8 | Revenue received | $388,000 | $339,000 | $339,000 | $287,000 | |||||||||||||
9 | Average/4 years | $338,338 | ||||||||||||||||
13 | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | Tier 4 | ||||||||||||||
14 | 2008 | 22 | 17 | 14 | 108 | 161 | ||||||||||||
15 | 2009 | 19 | 16 | 20 | 112 | 167 | ||||||||||||
16 | 2010 | 16 | 19 | 18 | 108 | 161 | ||||||||||||
17 | 2011 | 14 | 15 | 20 | 119 | 168 | ||||||||||||
18 | 2012 | 15 | 19 | 16 | 109 | 159 | ||||||||||||
22 | Oregon E-Cycles – Manufactures and Market Share by Tier | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
23 | Using E-Cycle data for 2008-2012 | Tier 1 | 22 | 19 | 16 | 14 | 15 | |||||||||||
24 | Existing Fee Structure | Mfrs/year | Total Market Share | |||||||||||||||
25 | Fee Tiers | Fee | ||||||||||||||||
26 | Tier 1 | $15,000 | 17 | 92.72% | Tier 2 | 17 | 16 | 19 | 15 | 19 | ||||||||
27 | Tier 2 | $5,000 | 17 | 6.46% | ||||||||||||||
28 | Tier 3 | $200 | 18 | 0.75% | ||||||||||||||
29 | Tier 4 | $40 | 111 | 0.07% | Tier 3 | 14 | 20 | 18 | 20 | 16 | ||||||||
30 | Total | 163 | ||||||||||||||||
31 | Add ranges – to show changes. What’s range on market share useful –useful? IIhaven’t seen number? Average may be OK. | |||||||||||||||||
33 | Tier 4 | 108 | 112 | 108 | 119 | 109 | ||||||||||||
34 | 161 | 167 | 161 | 168 | 159 |
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Comparison: Proposed to Existing Registration Fees | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Using E-Cycles Manufacturer Data for 2008 – 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||
3 | and $415,000 as the Revenue Need | ||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Proposed Fees1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5 | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | Tier 4 | Tier 5 | Tier 6 | Tier 7 | ||||||||||||||
6 | Year | Mfrs | Fee | Mfrs | Fee | Mfrs | Fee | Mfrs | Fee | Mfrs | Fee | Mfrs | Fee | Mfrs | Fee | Total Mfrs | |||||
7 | 2008 | 8 | $30,917 | 14 | $9,717 | 17 | $1,327 | 7 | $211 | 7 | $200 | 1 | $200 | 107 | $40 | 161 | |||||
8 | 2009 | 6 | $35,000 | 13 | $12,678 | 16 | $2,073 | 15 | $274 | 5 | $200 | 1 | $200 | 111 | $40 | 167 | |||||
9 | 2010 | 8 | $35,000 | 8 | $11,937 | 19 | $1,725 | 11 | $573 | 7 | $200 | 0 | - | 108 | $40 | 161 | |||||
10 | 2011 | 9 | $35,000 | 5 | $12,332 | 15 | $1,841 | 8 | $284 | 12 | $200 | 2 | $200 | 117 | $40 | 168 | |||||
11 | 2012 | 6 | $35,000 | 9 | $17,468 | 19 | $1,847 | 8 | $406 | 8 | $200 | 15 | $200 | 94 | $40 | 159 | |||||
12 | Existing fees | ||||||||||||||||||||
13 | All Yrs | $15,000 | $15,000 | $5,000 | $200 | $200 | $40 | $40 | |||||||||||||
14 | Proposed to existing fee changes | ||||||||||||||||||||
15 | 2012 | 6 | $20,000 | 9 | $2,468 | 19 | ($3,153) | 8 | $206 | 8 | same | 15 | $160 | 94 | same | ||||||
16 | 1The fee for each tier depends on the total market share of manufacturers in the tier, the number of manufacturers in the tier, revenue need for the year, and the amount of revenue over the $35,000 cap distributed to lower tiers. | ||||||||||||||||||||
19 | ($7,751) | ||||||||||||||||||||
20 | ($746) | ($362) | |||||||||||||||||||
22 | 80% | 56% | |||||||||||||||||||
23 | 172% |