A B C D E F G H I
1 survey name Columbia Intertribal Fish Comission 1994. A fish consumpson survey of the Umatilla Nez Perce, Yakama, and Warm Springs Tribes of the Columbia River Basin ref critfc 2007 ref EPA 1994-1996, 1998. USDA continuing surveyof Food Intakes by Individuals, August 2002 ref Toy et al 1996. A fish consumption survey of the Tulalp and Squaxin Isalnd Tribes of the Puget Sound Region Suquamish Tribe 2000 Fish Consumption survey of the suquamish Indian Tribe of the Port Madison Indian Reservation , Puget Sound Region
2 Type fo ssurvey conducted tribal seafood consumption       national nutritional status   tribal seafood consumption tribal seafood consumption
3 Type of survey interview questionnaire and dietary recall       dietary recall   interview questionnaire interview questionnaire
4 description random from Indian Health Service of enrolled members on or near reservation       stratified random; low income; no ethnic or Indian specific interviews   Randomly selected tribal members Randomly selected tribal members
5 Cost $300,000              
6 population inteviewed 744 called; 125 per tribe/       21000   150 Tulalip; 120 Suquaxin Island  
7 population represented yakama 3872; nez perce 1446; umatilla 818; warm springs 1531       281 million   2 tribes = 14 Puget Sound Tribes;Tulalip 1398;Squaxin Island 500 831
8 percent response 70%       76%      
9 number of children 204   0 to 6   2000 1996 add 4000 1998   69 31
10 age of children 0 to 6 years       0 to 10; add 3 year old girls 1998   0-6 0-6
11 number of adults 513       15000   190 92
12 adult age >18       >18      
13 males 222       10439      
14 females 278   278   10168      
15 paid participants $40 per person              
16 results weighted yes              
17 source of fish 88% Columbia River       many      
18 cooked or uncooked cooked?uncooked       converted to uncooked      
19 number of inteview days recall       2 non consectuve days      
20 combined interviews         average of 2 days pg 2-7 aug 2002    
21 range of response chose lower end of range              
22 outliers eliminated 1 child and 4 adults too high           statisical (3 st deviations) none excluded
23 consumers/non consumers both; minimal difference at 90/95/99% because most were consumers       both;if 1 day 0 use 2nd day as average;both days 0=non-consumer     no non consumers
24 inteview season november low fish consumer              
25 anadromous salmon and steelhead listed together       NOAA catch rates for marine/estuarine/FW      
26 finfish         salmon 0.06% FW; 3.02%est;96.92% marine      
27 shellfish                
28 resident                
29 adult ave consume & non 58.7       6.5   Squaxin 72.8; Tulalip 72l7 213.8
30 adult 90% consumer & non 105       17.5   Squaxin 201.6; Tulalip 192.3 489
31 adult 99% consumer & non 389              
32 child average con&non 19.6   26.7          
33 chlld 90% con & non     64.8          
34 child 99% con& non     81          
35 adult ave consumer only 63.2   162          
36 adult 90% consumer only                
37 adult 99% consumer only                
38 child ave consumer only                
39 child 90% consumer only         156.3      
40 child 99% consumer only                
41 female 90% consumer only         165.5      
42 age range 58% 18-39;31% 40-59: 9.9% 60              
43 reported as g/day       g/kg/day      
44 elders     94          
45 elder ages     55-92          
46 elder average     65.1          
47 elder 90th%     97.2          
48 elder 95%     170.1          
49 elder 99th %     486          
50 elder range     0-972          

Sheet1