| A | B | C | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 - 2008 Fish Consumption Rate Project - Meetings in Review | ||
| 3 | Meeting Date | Location | Workshop 1 (Portland): Background and Scope |
| 4 | 3/13/2007 | Portland | What Trying to Achieve and How |
| 6 | Water Quality Standards: What are They, What Are They Not and Why are They Important? | ||
| 8 | Who do Water Quality Standards Affect and How? | ||
| 10 | 2004 Toxics Criteria Triennial Review | ||
| 12 | Number of Attendees Sorted by Category | Where are We Today Regarding FCR? | |
| 13 | EQC | 1 | |
| 14 | Industry Reps | 6 | Scope and Overview of the Workshops |
| 15 | Tribal Member / Representative | 23 | How to Participate in This Effort |
| 16 | Municipal / Regional Government | 8 | |
| 17 | Environmental Group | 9 | |
| 18 | State Government | 13 | |
| 19 | Federal Government | 5 | |
| 20 | Facilitation Team | 3 | |
| 21 | Public Health | 1 | |
| 22 | Commerical/Recreational Fishing | 4 | |
| 23 | Media | 1 | |
| 24 | TOTALS | 74 | |
| 43 | Meeting Date | Location | Workshop 1 (Coos Bay): Background and Scope |
| 44 | 3/14/2007 | Coos Bay | What Trying to Achieve and How |
| 46 | Water Quality Standards: What are They, What Are They Not and Why are They Important? | ||
| 48 | Who do Water Quality Standards Affect and How? | ||
| 50 | 2004 Toxics Criteria Triennial Review | ||
| 52 | Number of Attendees Sorted by Category | Where are We Today Regarding FCR? | |
| 53 | EQC | 1 | |
| 54 | Industry Reps | 2 | Scope and Overview of the Workshops |
| 55 | Tribal Member / Representative | 8 | How to Participate in This Effort |
| 56 | Municipal / Regional Government | 1 | |
| 57 | Environmental Group | ||
| 58 | State Government | 2 | |
| 59 | Federal Government | 2 | |
| 60 | Facilitation Team | 2 | |
| 61 | Public Health | ||
| 62 | Commercial/Recreational Fishing | 1 | |
| 63 | Media | ||
| 64 | TOTALS | 19 | |
| 84 | Meeting Date | Location | Workshop 2: Review of Water Quality Standards and Fish Consumption Data |
| 85 | 5/16/2007 | Lincoln City | |
| 86 | Review of 1st Workshop – Background and Scope | ||
| 88 | What are the Policy Questions that Need to be Answered | ||
| 89 | to Support a Fish Consumption Rate? | ||
| 91 | How do Oregon’s Water Quality Standards Compare to other | ||
| 92 | Number of Attendees Sorted by Category | State and Tribal Water Quality Standards? | |
| 93 | EQC | ||
| 94 | Industry Reps | 4 | What is EPA’s Human Health Methodology for Choosing a Fish Consumption Rate? |
| 95 | Tribal Member / Representative | 22 | Role of the Human Health Focus Group - Overview |
| 96 | Municipal / Regional Government | 5 | |
| 97 | Environmental Group | 4 | Columbia River InterTribal Fish Commission's Fish Consumption Study Review |
| 98 | State Government | 4 | |
| 99 | Federal Government | 7 | How EPA's Current Fish Consumption Rate Applies to Marine/Freshwater/Estuarine Fish Species |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | Facilitation Team | 2 | |
| 101 | Public Health | 0 | Review of Fish Consumption Surveys |
| 102 | Commercial/Recreational Fishing | 1 | Opportunity for Testimony |
| 103 | Media | 1 | |
| 104 | TOTALS | 50 | |
| 119 | Meeting Date | Location | Workshop 3: Fish Consumption Rate and Human Health |
| 120 | 7/17/2007 | Portland | |
| 121 | Summary of Workshop 2 | ||
| 123 | Clarification of the FCR Process, Roles and Products of this Project | ||
| 125 | Human Health Focus Group Presentations: How is Risk Assessed? What Role does Risk Play | ||
| 126 | in Setting OR Criteria? What Risks are Posed by Consuming More than 17.5 grams/day? | ||
| 128 | Number of Attendees Sorted by Category | Public Input on Preliminary / Proposed Range of Rates that May be Considered | |
| 129 | EQC | 1 | |
| 130 | Industry Reps | 6 | Opportunity for Personal Testimony and/or Comments on Fish Consumption and Human Health Risks |
| 131 | Tribal Member / Representative | 11 | Wrap Up and Next Steps in the Process |
| 132 | Municipal / Regional Government | 4 | |
| 133 | Environmental Group | 4 | |
| 134 | State Government | 7 | |
| 135 | Federal Government | 6 | |
| 136 | Facilitation Team | 3 | |
| 137 | Public Health | 3 | |
| 138 | Commercial/Recreational Fishing | 0 | |
| 139 | Media | 0 | |
| 140 | TOTALS | 45 | |
| 145 | NOTE: October 2007 EQC Meeting/Work Session replaced the fall public workshop | ||
| 158 | Meeting Date | Location | Workshop 4: Fish Consumption Rate Options |
| 159 | 4/2/2008 | Pendleton | |
| 160 | Update on the Fish Consumption Rate Project | ||
| 162 | Presentation of the Human Health Focus Group's (HHFG) Report | ||
| 164 | DEQ's Fish Consumption Rate Options | ||
| 166 | Proposed Options for the Three Governments to Consider | ||
| 167 | Number of Attendees Sorted by Category | ||
| 168 | EQC | 1 | What is the Most Important Principle for Deciding which FCR Number is Appropriate - and Why? |
| 169 | Industry Reps | 5 | What Percentage of Fish Consumers Should Be Protected / Should Salmon be Included? |
| 170 | Tribal Member / Representative | 30 | Small and Large Group Discussions |
| 171 | Municipal / Regional Government | 5 | Opportunity for Testimony About the Fish Consumption Rate Options |
| 172 | Environmental Group | 2 | |
| 173 | State Government | 11 | Wrap up / Next Steps in the Process |
| 174 | Federal Government | 4 | |
| 175 | Facilitation Team | 3 | |
| 176 | Public Health | 4 | |
| 177 | Commercial/Recreational Fishing | 0 | |
| 178 | Media | 0 | |
| 179 | Other | 1 | |
| 180 | TOTALS | 66 | |
| 185 | Meeting Date | Location | Workshop 5: Reducing Toxics in Our Environment |
| 186 | 6/4/2008 | Portland | |
| 187 | Where (and How) Have We Been Successful with Toxic Reduction? | ||
| 188 | Addressing the Need for 'Out of the Box' Solutions | ||
| 190 | Presentations of Successes: | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 191 | National (Great Lakes), | ||
| 192 | Pacific Northwest/Regional (WA & Columbia River Basin) and | ||
| 193 | Oregon (Hood River, EWEB, Toyota/Portland) | ||
| 194 | Number of Attendees Sorted by Category | ||
| 195 | EQC | 1 | Where Else Can We Be Successful in Oregon? How? |
| 196 | Industry Reps | 7 | Proposal for Integrated Program from ACWA & Small/Large Group Discussions |
| 197 | Tribal Member / Representative | 6 | Panel: What do Policy Makers Think About These Ideas? What Can They Do? |
| 198 | Municipal / Regional Government | 9 | |
| 199 | Environmental Group | 7 | Wrap Up and Next Steps in the Process |
| 200 | State Government | 10 | |
| 201 | Federal Government | 13 | Opportunity for Public Testimony |
| 202 | Public Health | 6 | |
| 203 | Commercial/Recreational Fishing | 0 | |
| 204 | Media | 0 | |
| 205 | Facilitation Team | 3 | |
| 206 | Other | 3 | |
| 207 | TOTALS | 65 | |
| 210 | Meeting Date | Location | Workshop 6: Fiscal Impacts and Implementation Strategies of a Revised Fish Consumption Rate |
| 211 | 6/27/2008 | Portland | |
| 212 | Overview of the Fiscal Impacts and Implementation Advisory Committee's Work | ||
| 214 | Fiscal Analyses of the Cost of Compliance: Three Views | ||
| 215 | SAIC, Inc, NWPPA, & ACWA | ||
| 216 | FIIAC Members: Responses and Thoughts about Costs and Analyses | ||
| 218 | What are the Potential Benefits of A Raised FCR? | ||
| 219 | Number of Attendees Sorted by Category | ||
| 220 | EQC | What are the Implementation Approaches? Matrix Review | |
| 221 | Industry Reps | 7 | FIIACs Initial Proposed Implementation Strategy |
| 222 | Tribal Member / Representative | 6 | What's Next for the Fish Consumption Rate Project? |
| 223 | Municipal / Regional Government | 2 | |
| 224 | Environmental Group | 2 | Opportunity for Personal/Public Testimony About Fish Consumption Rate, |
| 225 | Other | 1 | Fiscal Impacts and Implementation Ideas |
| 226 | State Government | 5 | |
| 227 | Federal Government | 6 | |
| 228 | Facilitation Team | 3 | |
| 229 | Public Health | 2 | |
| 230 | Commercial/Recreational Fishing | ||
| 231 | Media | ||
| 232 | TOTALS | 34 | |
| 234 | NOTE: August 2008 EQC meeting replacing the July Public Information Workshop | ||