Proposed Rule Amendment
OAR 340-041-0033
Toxic Substances
(1) Toxic substances may not be introduced above natural background levels in waters of the state in amounts, concentrations, or combinations that may be harmful, may chemically change to harmful forms in the environment, or may accumulate in sediments or bioaccumulate in aquatic life or wildlife to levels that adversely affect public health, safety, or welfare or aquatic life, wildlife, or other designated beneficial uses.
(2) Levels of toxic substances in waters of the state may not exceed the applicable criteria listed in Tables 20, 33A, and 33B. Tables 33A and 33B, adopted on May 20, 2004, update Table 20 as described in this section.
(a) Each value for criteria in Table 20 is effective until the corresponding value in Tables 33A or 33B becomes effective.
(A) Each value in Table 33A is effective on February 15, 2005, unless EPA has disapproved the value before that date. If a value is subsequently disapproved, any corresponding value in Table 20 becomes effective immediately. Values that are the same in Tables 20 and 33A remain in effect.
(B) Each value in Table 33B is effective upon EPA approval.
(b) The department will note the effective date for each value in Tables 20, 33A, and 33B as described in this section.
(3) To establish permit or other regulatory limits for toxic substances for which criteria are not included in Tables 20, 33A, or 33B, the department may use the guidance values in Table 33C, public health advisories, and other published scientific literature. The department may also require or conduct bio-assessment studies to monitor the toxicity to aquatic life of complex effluents, other suspected discharges, or chemical substances without numeric criteria.
(4) Arsenic Reduction Policy: The inorganic arsenic criterion for the protection of human health from the combined consumption of organisms and drinking water is 2.1 micrograms per liter. While this criterion is protective of human health and more stringent than the federal maximum contaminant level (MCL) for arsenic in drinking water, which is 10 micrograms per liter, it nonetheless is based on a higher risk level than the Commission has used to establish other human health criteria. This higher risk level recognizes that much of the risk is due to naturally high levels of inorganic arsenic in Oregon’s waterbodies. In order to maintain the lowest human health risk from inorganic arsenic in drinking water, the Commission has determined that it is appropriate to adopt the following policy to limit the human contribution to that risk.
(a) This rule becomes effective at such time that EPA approves the arsenic human health water quality criteria adopted by the Commission in April 2011.
(b) It is the policy of the Commission that the addition of inorganic arsenic from new or existing anthropogenic sources to waters of the state within a surface water drinking water protection area be reduced the maximum amount feasible. The requirements of this rule section [OAR 340-041-0033(4)] apply to sources that discharge to surface waters of the state with an ambient inorganic arsenic concentration equal to or lower than the applicable numeric inorganic arsenic criteria for the protection of human health.
(c) The following definitions apply to this section [OAR 340-041-0033(4)]:
(A) “Add inorganic arsenic” means to discharge a net mass of inorganic arsenic from a point source (the mass of inorganic arsenic discharged minus the mass of inorganic arsenic taken into the facility from a surface water source).
(B) A “surface water drinking water protection area,” for the purpose of this section, means an area delineated as such by DEQ under the source water assessment program of the federal Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300j-13. The areas are delineated for the purpose of protecting public or community drinking water supplies that use surface water sources. These delineations can be found at DEQ’s drinking water program website.
(C) “Potential to significantly increase inorganic arsenic concentrations in the public drinking water supply source water” means:
(i) to increase the concentration of inorganic arsenic in the receiving water for a discharge by 10 percent or more after mixing with the harmonic mean flow of the receiving water; or
(ii) as an alternative, if sufficient data are available, either the permittee or DEQ may base the determination of potential significance on a mass balance calculation to determine if the discharge will increase the concentration of inorganic arsenic in the surface water intake water of a public water system by 0.021 micrograms per liter or more.
(d) Following the effective date of this rule, applications for an individual NPDES permit or permit renewal received from industrial dischargers located in a surface water drinking water protection area and identified by DEQ as likely to add inorganic arsenic to the receiving water must include sufficient data to enable DEQ to determine whether:
(A) The discharge in fact adds inorganic arsenic; and
(B) The discharge has the potential to significantly increase inorganic arsenic concentrations in the public drinking water supply source water.
(e) Where DEQ determines that both conditions in subsection (c) of this section are true, the source must develop an inorganic arsenic reduction plan and propose all feasible measures to reduce its inorganic arsenic loading to the receiving water. The proposed plan, including proposed measures, monitoring and reporting requirements, and a schedule for those actions, will be described in the fact sheet and incorporated into the source’s NPDES permit after public comment and DEQ review and approval. In developing the plan, the source must:
(A) Identify how much it can minimize its inorganic arsenic discharge through pollution prevention measures, process changes, wastewater treatment, alternative water supply (for groundwater users) or other possible pollution prevention and/or control measures;
(B) Evaluate the costs, feasibility and environmental impacts of the potential inorganic arsenic reduction and control measures;
(C) Estimate the predicted reduction in inorganic arsenic and the reduced human health risk expected to result from the control measures;
(D) Propose specific inorganic arsenic reduction or control measures, if feasible, and an implementation schedule; and
(E) Propose monitoring and reporting requirements to document progress in plan implementation and the inorganic arsenic load reductions.
(f) For publicly owned treatment works, the arsenic reduction policy is implemented through the requirements of ORS 468B.140 (SB737, 2007 Oregon Legislature). Publicly owned treatment works in compliance with the requirements of ORS 468B.140 and any required and approved pollution prevention plan for arsenic are deemed to be in compliance with the arsenic reduction policy set forth in this rule section.
(g) In order to implement this section, DEQ will develop the following information and guidance within 120 days of the effective date of this rule and periodically update it as warranted by new information:
(A) A list of industrial sources or source categories, including industrial stormwater and sources covered by general permits, that are likely to add inorganic arsenic to surface waters of the State.
(i) For industrial sources or source categories permitted under a general permit that have been identified by DEQ as likely sources of inorganic arsenic, DEQ will evaluate options for reducing inorganic arsenic during permit renewal or evaluation of Stormwater Pollution Control Plans.
(B) Quantitation limits for monitoring inorganic arsenic concentrations.
(C) Information and guidance to assist sources in estimating, pursuant to paragraph (d) (C) of this section, the reduced human health risk expected to result from inorganic arsenic control measures based on the most current EPA risk assessment.
(h) It is the policy of the Commission that landowners engaged in agricultural or development practices on land where pesticides, fertilizers, or soil amendments containing arsenic are currently being or have previously been applied implement conservation practices to minimize the erosion and runoff of inorganic arsenic to waters of the State or to a location where such material could readily migrate into waters of the State. As a component of DEQ’s response to the Commission’s October 23, 2008 directive on toxic pollutants, DEQ, after providing an opportunity for public comment, will present to the Commission a proposal for implementing this policy in an environmentally meaningful and cost-effective manner as part of the agency wide Toxics Reduction Strategy.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 468.020, 468B.030, 468B.035 & 468B.048
Stats. Implemented: ORS 468B.030, 468B.035 & 468B.048
Hist.: DEQ 17-2003, f. & cert. ef. 12-9-03; DEQ 3-2004, f. & cert. ef. 5-28-04