Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (exprod6mx206.postini.com [64.18.1.106]) by pop.hevanet.com (8.11.6p3/8.11.6p3) with SMTP id oAONh1V04660 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:43:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from source ([159.121.9.230]) by exprod6mx206.postini.com ([64.18.5.10]) with SMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:43:01 CST X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,250,1288569600"; d="scan'208,217";a="2084831" Received: from deqmail1.deq.state.or.us ([159.121.9.6]) by deqx5.deq.state.or.us with ESMTP; 24 Nov 2010 23:43:01 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB8C31.549BFE5A" Subject: FW: New Source Review, Particulate Matter and Greenhouse Gas Permitting Requirements and Other Permitting Rule Updates Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:43:01 -0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: New Source Review, Particulate Matter and Greenhouse Gas Permitting Requirements and Other Permitting Rule Updates Thread-Index: AcuMLX8vmtZ0kJoUQ/OjQ7c5gjKnkQAA6tVw From: "AQFeb2011Rules" To: Cc: "MATTHEWS Shelley" X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0 X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 ) X-pstn-settings: 5 (2.0000:2.0000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 X-pstn-addresses: from [2297/94] X-UIDL: AM!#!'~J!!:5a"!l#2!! Status: RO This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB8C31.549BFE5A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is the last one in this box, "AQFeb2011Rules" for now. I'll log in & forward any others after 5pm. =20 From: Martha Moore [mailto:martha@tw-enviro.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 3:16 PM To: AQFeb2011Rules Subject: New Source Review, Particulate Matter and Greenhouse Gas Permitting Requirements and Other Permitting Rule Updates =20 Dear DEQ Staff and Concerned Participants: =20 I am submitting a comment on the issue of whether DEQ should use the same New Source Review (NSR)/Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) process for the greenhouse gas pollutants as currently used for all other pollutants in Oregon, or should adopt the federal NSR/PSD methods. I strongly urge the continued use of the Oregon NSR/PSD methods for all pollutants regulated in the future, and particularly for the greenhouse gas pollutants. =20 I have worked assisting businesses in numerous states with air permitting over the past 20 years. I have particularly worked with many small and family-owned businesses over that same time period. Although many of the small businesses I have worked with have not been subject to NSR/PSD, I believe that will change in the future as the thresholds that trigger NSR/PSD permitting are lowered (this intent seems fairly clear in the preamble to the federal Tailoring Rules for Greenhouse Gases). The Oregon NSR/PSD regulations are in some ways more stringent than the federal regulations and in some ways more lenient. The Oregon program does provide an incentive for businesses to reduce emissions and not continue the operation of outdated equipment simply to maintain an emissions base. However, the true hallmark of the Oregon program from my perspective is that the program is more comprehensible, less convoluted, and more predictable than the federal program. As these programs begin to affect smaller businesses, the adverse effects will be reduced if the regulations are comprehensible and predictable. =20 I strongly urge the continued use of the Oregon approach to NSR/PSD, and if possible, some outreach to smaller businesses likely to be affected by these regulations in the future. Most of the potentially affected smaller businesses are completely unaware that this major regulatory program may affect them. =20 Thank you for the opportunity to comment. =20 Martha Moore, P.E. =20 TW Environmental, Inc. P.O. Box 14373 Portland, OR 97293-0373 =20 503-235-9194 martha@tw-enviro.com =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB8C31.549BFE5A Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This is the last one = in this box, “AQFeb2011Rules” for now. I’ll log in & = forward any others after 5pm.

 

From:= Martha = Moore [mailto:martha@tw-enviro.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 3:16 PM
To: AQFeb2011Rules
Subject: New Source Review, Particulate Matter and Greenhouse Gas Permitting Requirements and Other Permitting Rule = Updates

 

Dear DEQ Staff and Concerned = Participants:

 

I am submitting a comment on the issue of whether = DEQ should use the same New Source Review (NSR)/Prevention of Significant = Deterioration (PSD) process for the greenhouse gas pollutants as currently used for = all other pollutants in Oregon, or should adopt the federal NSR/PSD methods.  = I strongly urge the continued use of the Oregon NSR/PSD methods for all pollutants regulated in the future, and particularly for the greenhouse = gas pollutants.

 

I have worked assisting businesses in numerous = states with air permitting over the past 20 years.  I have particularly worked = with many small and family-owned businesses over that same time period.  Although many of the small businesses I have worked with have not been = subject to NSR/PSD, I believe that will change in the future as the thresholds = that trigger NSR/PSD permitting are lowered (this intent seems fairly clear = in the preamble to the federal Tailoring Rules for Greenhouse Gases).  The = Oregon NSR/PSD regulations are in some ways more stringent than the federal regulations and in some ways more lenient.  The Oregon program does provide an incentive for businesses to reduce emissions and not continue = the operation of outdated equipment simply to maintain an emissions base. = However, the true hallmark of the Oregon program from my perspective is that the = program is more comprehensible, less convoluted, and more predictable than the = federal program.    As these programs begin to affect smaller businesses, the adverse effects will be reduced if the regulations are comprehensible and predictable.

 

I strongly urge the continued use of the Oregon = approach to NSR/PSD, and if possible, some outreach to smaller businesses likely to = be affected by these regulations in the future.  Most of the = potentially affected smaller businesses are completely unaware that this major = regulatory program may affect them.

 

Thank you for the opportunity to = comment.

 

Martha Moore, P.E.

 

TW Environmental, Inc.

P.O. Box 14373

Portland, OR  97293-0373

 

503-235-9194

martha@tw-enviro.com

 

------_=_NextPart_001_01CB8C31.549BFE5A--